Separating the sexes in church

Reddit View
August 28, 2019

How can anyone take a religion seriously that doesn't separate the sexes in service? Such a religion is obviously cucked. If you attend such a religion with your family, you are promoting degenerate values to your family. Traditional Christianity did separate the sexes.

The only uncucked religions that I know of are Islam, Orthodox Judaism, and traditional Anabaptism. I can't understand why an uncucked Christian would attend any service other than a traditional Anabaptist service.

Post Information
Title Separating the sexes in church
Author fschmidt
Upvotes 6
Comments 16
Date 28 August 2019 08:18 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit askRPC
Original Link
Similar Posts

[–]OsmiumZulu4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

Surely such strong statements have equally strong biblical foundations. Would you be so kind as to provide the scriptural case for separating the sexes in church since it is so clear that any church that doesn’t follow the practice is cucked inside out?


[–]fschmidt[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

I already responded to this saying that there is no direct scriptural commandment on this, and common sense is needed. But I certainly can make a scriptural case using logic. The Old Testament is full of commandments like don't trim the edge your your beard, no tattoos, don't eat a kid boiled in its mother's milk, etc. What is the point of these commandments? The point is that these were practices of evil anti-God cultures. One shouldn't copy the practices of evil cultures because then you will be cucked and you will become like them. Exactly the reasoning applies to the mixing of the sexes. When the West was good, it generally kept the sexes apart, especially in church. As the West became evil, it mixed the sexes, especially in church. By copying evil depraved modern western culture, you are cucked and you will become like them.

[–]Red-Curious1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

no direct scriptural commandment on this ... scriptural case using logic

This comes down to the knowledge hierarchy:

  • Philosophy is the lowest level. It attempts to answer questions and solve problems through the application of logic and reason. It answers the question: What SHOULD be true?

  • Science is the mid-range. It attempts to answer questions and solve problems through observation and experimentation. It answers the question: What is OBSERVABLY true?

  • Theology is the highest tier. It attempts to discern truth through the study and application of spiritual revelation from God (i.e. predominantly Scripture). It answers the question: What is ACTUALLY true?

Theology doesn't answer every question, and not every unanswered theological question can be tested through science. As such, logical thinking certainly has its place - and a very, very wide open place at that.

But we must always be cautious to recognize that philosophical thinking - even with Scripture as our inspiration - is still just philosophy. It is not to be given Scriptural weight or authority.

You have some good points to make, but if they aren't backed by Scripture, they're nothing more than human wisdom - which, while valuable, is never something we should build our lives around.

[–]redwall923 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Do Paul's writing command woman to remain quiet in the church or to stay out when man is present?

[–]Rifleshoot3 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy

That’s one way to do it, sure. But biblically, I don’t know of any scripture hat would point to it being sinful. Did Christ start any of His sermons off by telling everyone to split off into the separate sexes? Of course not. Don’t confuse personal preference with divine mandate.

[–]fschmidt[S] -1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy

If scripture had to cover every possible sin then it would be so big that it would fill a library. Scripture focuses on the common sins of the time it was written. In the past, people weren't so degenerate as to mix sexes in service, so that just wasn't an issue.

Imagine a church that told people that they shouldn't breath. They would argue that there is no scriptural mandate to breath, so there is nothing wrong with their teaching. What would you think of such a church?

[–]Rifleshoot3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy

I believe the onus is on you to prove that this is somehow wrong. I’ve seen nothing to suggest that it is and like I said, Christ Himself never bothered with the idea, so why should we?

[–]fschmidt[S] -1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy

I don't have to prove anything, I am just trying to understand uncucked Christians (if any are here). Jesus didn't say anything about most liberal degeneracies, so common sense is required. Women dressing like sluts. Trans-sexuals. Open borders. Etc.

So to repeat my question, if you are an uncucked Christian who opposes liberal degeneracy regardless of whether such degeneracy is explicitly prohibited in scripture, how can you tolerate a church that mixes the sexes?

[–]Rifleshoot1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

I don’t see mixing the sexes as degeneracy. There’s nothing to suggest that it is.

[–]fschmidt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

All of history suggests that it is degeneracy. All successful traditional religions in history seperated the sexes. Since Christianity stopped separating the sexes, Christian countries have become liberal cesspools.

I have visited many religious services including churches and synagogues. And I have noticed that the one thing that perfectly correlates with traditional conservative values is separating the sexes in service.

[–]CarelessBowler50 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

To be fair, Islam isn't as "uncucked' as you might think:

[–]fschmidt[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

That isn't about Islam. It is about a nominally Muslim country, in the same sense that American is a nominally Christian country. So that is meaningless. If you want to judge Islam, go visit a mosque. I attend mosque regularly as a non-Muslim because that is the only good religion where I live. (No traditional Anabaptists, and Judaism is evil.)

[–]NoFaithInThisSub 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy

I can't understand why an uncucked Christian would attend any service other than a traditional Anabaptist service.

Because even they do not have the "Book of Acts" miracles taking place, the lack of power, and lack of current teaching.

[–]fschmidt[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

What they [traditional Anabaptists] have, unlike other Christians, is a future. They maintain their traditions, form stable families, enforce morals, etc.

Q. What is the difference between a modern Christian and an atheist?

A. The atheist doesn't violate the third commandment.

[–]AyePincheGringo0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

What absolute horse shit

[–]fschmidt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Pinche pendejo, the Catholic Church did this in Latin countries until quite recently when they became degenerate cesspools.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter