Why does the system want us to act a certain way?

Reddit View
February 21, 2020
125 upvotes

The more I swallow this pill, the more I wonder why the system is created like this.

Men (especially Gen Z) are getting more and more feminine, anxious bitches who find their pimples or their unicorn more important rather than adopting the masculine, independent behaviors of their grandfathers focused on real success.

Women are getting more and more power but always remain unsatisfied because the world will be eventually full of beta bitches.

Why is this shift happening? imo it looks like that in the last 40 years this world that ALWAYS has been ruled by men is changing into this soft, yet depressed, victimized, egocentric society.


Post Information
Title Why does the system want us to act a certain way?
Author itzdjengo
Upvotes 125
Comments 88
Date 21 February 2020 09:33 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit askTRP
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/338176
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/f7i380/why_does_the_system_want_us_to_act_a_certain_way/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
betaunicorn
Comments

[โ€“]1Red_Pill_Brotherhood259 points260 points 2 (23 children) | Copy

Feminized, mentally castrated men are easier to control and thus lead into debt, global economic competition and growth as well as consumerism.

Subverting the image of masculine, strong men(negative portrayal of men in the media, pop culture/music, TV ads, Hollywood, in the workplace with affirmative action, etc) in favor of female empowerment is because many women still somehow think they are getting the short end of the stick.

Also, it's been proven that women influence the vast majority of purchases(cars, homes, household items, etc etc) so things are going to lean towards supporting the feminine and women.

There is a belief that masculinity is "toxic" and bad while women are innocent victims. They shame you for your own masculinity.

The solution is to first see the system(unplugging), then to pursue entrepreneurship, freedom and travel.

[โ€“]burn-all-bridges75 points76 points  (10 children) | Copy

I just spent $5 hoping that someone, anyone, will be lucky enough to focus on this guys brilliant comment.

This shit right here ๐Ÿ™Œ๐Ÿป

Guys...read that shit over and over until you're on fucking fire with the desire to create memories and experiences to tell your grandkids or just anyone.

**Unplug *Pursue Entrepreneurship *Pursue Freedom **PursueTravel.

Always make yourself better. Always learn. Always grow.

Learn from your mistakes. Sometimes you win, sometimes you learn.

If you motherfuckers want help, ask for it. I want you guys to fucking LIVE.

God bless u/Red_Pill_Brotherhood

[โ€“]1Red_Pill_Brotherhood13 points14 points  (2 children) | Copy

Cheers, brother. Yep- pursue ultimate freedom and purpose.

[โ€“]RPNorvell[M] 6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

+1, buddy.

[โ€“]1Red_Pill_Brotherhood2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Cheers. Glad I could offer some insight.

[โ€“]Yesicomeback4 points5 points  (5 children) | Copy

How do u unplug?

[โ€“]burn-all-bridges19 points20 points  (3 children) | Copy

I'm going to come back to this! Message me if you want to chat with me personally. I'm going into a concert. I'll talk to you later for sure if you message me, and most likely if you reply.

Unplugging at its basic level is taking the red pill and seeing the world for what is. Not blaming the cards you're dealt, and playing your hand like it's the hand you wanted.

Talk soon! You're brave for asking, I got you.

[โ€“]Yesicomeback0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Will wait for ur reply

[โ€“]ScarletWhiteEmerald0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Does the !remindme bot work in this sub? Leaving a reply here so I remember to come see your advice on unplugging

[โ€“]isitmorphingtime0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I think many would benefit and be interested in hearing some ways people unplug

I know I would be, I encourage you to make a public post but obvs it's your life and time, do as you please

[โ€“]leew3605 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

The easy answer is just to read TRP's sidebar.

The hard answer is to learn psychology and economics. If you're in college and it offers Microeconomics 101 or "Money and Banking" courses they'd be a very good starting point.

[โ€“]volvostupidshit3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yes. This is the least that we can do for the people who sacrificed themselves for our freedom. Use it to live your life. Responsibly.

[โ€“]itzdjengo[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is the answer I was looking for. It makes me frustrated, but on the other side we can see this as an opportunity to stand out from the crowd.

The Red Pill may seem big, but I've come to a realization how scarce we actually are. And how powerful a level of awareness COULD be.

I appreciate your reply

[โ€“]deville0514 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy

this system is designed not for intelligence but for hardwork and subservience. religion makes sex taboo and govt makes ganja taboo. because if you get sex openly, you wouldnt go to work and work hard to one day be somebody to get that sex. if you smoke too much, you dont wanna work cuz you realise that its a waste of time.
so first they make you feel like you are not man enough and then they show you that a good looking, fit rich man gets all the girls. now watch that and feel like shit, sulk with some booze and get back to being the slave you are

[โ€“]Gawernator2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Isnโ€™t it all group think

[โ€“]VisiblePlan3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

this deserves a point right here, nailed it spot on.

[โ€“]babybopp2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

A good way to understand this consumerism is how commercials on home improvement are all done by and for women these days.

[โ€“]Yesicomeback1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

How do you "unplug" ?

[โ€“]cracksniffer6665 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Take the red pill. Jk, idk I got unplugged by the henious nature of women and reality. To each his own.

[โ€“]itzdjengo[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

The one and only way to unplug is to really see things for what they are. For me it took me 2 years, and I still am having trouble with understanding.

Read, write, lift, take action. We can't make you unplug, we can speak real facts over and over but it still won't make you unplug. You have to go out and experience it yourself while being conscious of the theory.

[โ€“]HillaryLostTheEC2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Women are just insanely easy to control lol when they are told they're victims of the system constantly and universities play into this and give them women only scholarships and are being fed propaganda that they should pursue STEM careers. Women are not logical enough for STEM careers and I wouldn't be surprised if they're being "pushed" through. Don't get me started on the power the metoo movement has given them.

[โ€“]bendali_light4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well , actually they are logical enough for STEM careers , what maybe you meant is that they are not innovative as much as men , maybe. I've seen some really smart women doing really well academically. But I do agree that when it gets about relationships they are all acting emotional.

[โ€“][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy

[removed]

[โ€“]Rkingpin33 points34 points  (1 child) | Copy

The agenda is to keep people pampered and comfortable and enslaved to debt so they lack the time and mental energy to ask lifes big questions

[โ€“]_-resonance-_5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Brooooooo... ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

[โ€“]kellykebab19 points20 points  (2 children) | Copy

The simplest explanation, in my opinion, is that we are living in a resource abundant period of history, relative to total population. There is just more to go around, per capita. Meanwhile, the total population is also exploding. This means that not only are there more total humans in absolute terms who do not have to be high producers (i.e. "masculine"), but that this share of humans is becoming a larger percentage of the total population. Because they can.

There is just less environmental and survival pressure on humans, particularly in the Western world, which allows for more non-adaptive mutations to proliferate. And because more of these under-adapted humans exist and because the Western world developed a liberal, open model of society, our culture now accomodates these types of people by necessity. Just consider what the alternative would be.

I'm not a scientist or any kind of authority, by the way. I read a little bit on this topic and think about it. So this answer is somewhat speculative. But I think it's a lot more explanatory and a lot simpler (see Occam's razor) than the other explanations in this thread. Many noteworthy human developments can be easily explained by biological and existential pressures. Culture usually follows biology.

Edit: I should mention that our Western world is probably not selecting for zero "adaptive" qualities. Perhaps cooperation and some kind of high level technical or information-processing abilities are being selected for more frequently than in previous generations. (Big emphasis on that "perhaps." I'm not, by any means, an expert on this subject.)

However, it seems to me that traditionally masculine traits like fortitude and aggression would be less selected for currently than in previous generations. Probably still sexually selected, because women tend to like those qualities, but very likely (again, imho) much less frequently naturally selected for than in the past. The vast majority of people in the West lead very safe, very coddled lives and have little chance of dying before reproducing. Hence, the proliferation of non-masculine mutations.

[โ€“]_-resonance-_2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Holy crap, well said, to say the least.

[โ€“]kellykebab0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Thanks. The most recent book I have read that informed this comment is The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution. (In honesty, I am still roughly halfway through.)

The relevant takeaway that I've pulled from the book to this discussion is the play between population levels and resources and how this can potentially influence the rate of mutations. The particular relationship between these variables (and those mutations) will also directly impact culture. A society will look very different, for example, when the population is high, but resources are thinly distributed than when the population is just beginning to grow in response to widespread resource availability.

As I said in the previous comment, our present society appears to be both high population and high per capita resource abundance. According to history, this generally positive arrangement cannot last indefinitely. One or the other typically has to give.

It is an interesting topic, to be sure.

[โ€“]2redhawkes53 points54 points  (2 children) | Copy

Control, it's easier to control feminized mental midget than masculine man, hence all the shitting on everything that's masculine.

Read on effects of testosterone and you'll get it. Globohomo fags are terrified of man with 'fuck that noize' attitude, hence all that MSM narrative/programming. Quarantining TRP is another example. Their motto is 'feels over realz' whick is perfect way to manipulate bloopsters into brainless consumers.

[โ€“]laserdicks5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yup. Slave mentality is an old trick. As old as humanity itself. Gotta break em before you can yoke em!

[โ€“]burn-all-bridges8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

Feels over realz haha. I love that

[โ€“]Endorsed ContributorFereallyRed29 points30 points  (2 children) | Copy

Nothing has changed. Strong men want weak men under their control.

[โ€“]Nofapislit18 points19 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yep, yes, and yessir. Private educated, Ivy League, high iq, attractive, rich, with alpha fathers. They exist and have existed in all times. Power is passed down unless you have the balls to take it yourself.

[โ€“]wtfdoiaskfor10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

This right here^. The gilded comment sounds nice but isn't as succint and true as this.

[โ€“]mortalcoil120 points21 points  (3 children) | Copy

Do some research on John B. Calhoun's rat studies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_B._Calhoun

"In the early 1960s, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) acquired property in a rural area outside Poolesville, Maryland. The facility that was built on this property housed several research projects, including those headed by Calhoun. It was here that his most famous experiment, the mouse universe, was created.[1] In July 1968, four pairs of mice were introduced into the habitat. The habitat was a 9-foot (2.7 m) square metal pen with 4.5-foot-high (1.4 m) sides. Each side had four groups of four vertical, wire mesh "tunnels." The "tunnels" gave access to nesting boxes, food hoppers, and water dispensers. There was no shortage of food or water or nesting material. There were no predators. The only adversity was the limit on space.

John Calhoun meeting Pope Paul VI on 27 September 1973 Initially, the population grew rapidly, doubling every 55 days. The population reached 620 by day 315, after which the population growth dropped markedly, doubling only every 145 days. The last surviving birth was on day 600, bringing the total population to a mere 2200 mice, even though the experiment setup allowed for as many as 3840 mice in terms of nesting space. This period between day 315 and day 600 saw a breakdown in social structure and in normal social behavior. Among the aberrations in behavior were the following: expulsion of young before weaning was complete, wounding of young, increase in homosexual behavior, inability of dominant males to maintain the defense of their territory and females, aggressive behavior of females, passivity of non-dominant males with increased attacks on each other which were not defended against.[2]

After day 600, the social breakdown continued and the population declined toward extinction. During this period females ceased to reproduce. Their male counterparts withdrew completely, never engaging in courtship or fighting and only engaging in tasks that were essential to their health. They ate, drank, slept, and groomed themselves โ€“ all solitary pursuits. Sleek, healthy coats and an absence of scars characterized these males. They were dubbed "the beautiful ones." Breeding never resumed and behavior patterns were permanently changed.

The conclusions drawn from this experiment were that when all available space is taken and all social roles filled, competition and the stresses experienced by the individuals will result in a total breakdown in complex social behaviors, ultimately resulting in the demise of the population."

We are "The beautiful ones."

and Japan has the same issue on steroids.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/how-mouse-utopias-1960s-led-grim-predictions-humans-180954423/

"At the peak population, most mice spent every living second in the company of hundreds of other mice. They gathered in the main squares, waiting to be fed and occasionally attacking each other. Few females carried pregnancies to term, and the ones that did seemed to simply forget about their babies. They'd move half their litter away from danger and forget the rest. Sometimes they'd drop and abandon a baby while they were carrying it.

The few secluded spaces housed a population Calhoun called, "the beautiful ones." Generally guarded by one male, the femalesโ€”and few malesโ€”inside the space didn't breed or fight or do anything but eat and groom and sleep. When the population started declining the beautiful ones were spared from violence and death, but had completely lost touch with social behaviors, including having sex or caring for their young."

[โ€“]_-resonance-_8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

What. In. The. Fuck......

[โ€“]fragpistol6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

While that study was shocking, his follow up studies paint a less bleak picture. When the experiment was set up again, but the mice were given other things to take up their time such as spaces for mice to play, the population was able to tolerate a much larger number of mice before any societal stress was observed, which makes sense. Give people only the option of food and sex, and Im sure society will fall apart in no time, however when people have things to preoccupy them; work, discovery, philosophy, then society is able to handle far more stress.

[โ€“]estrogenmilk3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

that's some fucked up Noah's ark shit

[โ€“]SavorThePill7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

Since some amazing answers that I won't attempt to match have already been given, I've got a response out of left-field:

They want people to build the pyramids all over again. Shackle the mind, and you may do with the body as you wish...they'll bend to your will of their own accord once you've programmed the little robots well enough.

The Pharaohs saw to it that each slave who worked on the pyramids was given a gallon of beer a day (true story). Keep people content just enough, even while you subjugate them, and they'll keep doing what you want.

Or maybe there's no plot or scheme. Perhaps we see a world simply in chaos and imagine that a grand design is behind it all--that some semblance of order presides over the growing catastrophe. Maybe that lens is just our way of seeing the world as we wish to see it.

[โ€“]wont_tell_i_refuse_14 points15 points  (9 children) | Copy

More of it has to do with human nature than most of us right-wing conspiracy theorists are willing to admit. Itโ€™s more interesting to assume Bob Iger is personally gearing up some conspiracy against American men than to acknowledge the simple truth that people always take the easy way out.

Why chase poon when you can coom? Why chase a career when you can vote for socialism and take the other guyโ€™s dough?

Also, immigration destroyed the nation and postmodernism destroyed the family unit.

[โ€“]Ravenanom1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy

How does immigration destroy the nation?

[โ€“]wont_tell_i_refuse_0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy

A nation is just an ethnicity. Multi ethnic nation is a contradiction in terms.

[โ€“][deleted]  (3 children) | Copy

[deleted]

[โ€“]wont_tell_i_refuse_1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

I have a Masterโ€™s degree in the topic. Shoot your shot.

[โ€“][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy

[deleted]

[โ€“]wont_tell_i_refuse_1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Do you honestly think nationalism was ever multiethnic? Then why did the French kings standardize the French language if they werenโ€™t purposefully trying to create a โ€œFrenchโ€ identity?

[โ€“]Ravenanom0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

We're a globalised society right now. The idea of nationalism, which it literally was/is, is being replaced by the idea of globalism.

[โ€“]TheBadGoy0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Ahem...Weimar Germany. That is all...

[โ€“]wtfdoiaskfor1-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

More of it has to do with human nature

100% this. It's not some global scale conspiracy to weaken men (I don't think any man can pull this off). It's just that people will always tend towards cozy / eazy stuff rather than facing reality and if nobody pushes you to be a man, you'll never be a man.

Couple that with the destroyed family and fatherless children and you have our world

Poeple are taking advantage of the situation - they didn't create it

[โ€“]WiterS22 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

There are two parts:

1-The old system created by beta males, for the benefit of beta males, supported by laws and religion. The majority of beta males have a stake on you being plugged.

2-After the fall of the soviet union, socialists realized that the worker class had more interest in buying a new car than in revolting against the rich, so they moved the class fight to females revolting against males, gay revolting against heterosexuals, and all class of minorities revolting against majorities.

That's why they took control of feminist discourse, mixed it with LGBT, and authoritarianly pursue and censor dissidents. They don't really care about feminism, but about controlling public discourse, and public perception of majority consensus.

The extreme left took power of universities, mass media, government funds and the largest charity foundations, so it is well financed.

Main sources of funding are government grants, George Soros (Open Society), Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Ford Foundation, Arcus Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, IPPF. They all have public annual budgets detailing the billions spent on genre ideology.

Those billions are against TRP, not because TRP is uncomfortable to women, but because it is an independent thought process.

They are far left, so they accuse any dissident of being far right.

[โ€“]SatansLawya2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

As to why the system wants us to act this way: I can only assume that having a large number of men being submissive strengthens the position of "real" men (I.e. = the system, if you will). And that's kind of natural. We always did and I don't see this going away, only the tools are changing.

As to why the shift is happening: I absolutely and one-hundred percent believe that the rise of pornography is responsible. Now I don't have anything against it - but before you disregard the idea, think about this: A man has this immutable drive to mate. Now back in the days of our grandfather's, the only way to kill the urge was either masturbate to fantasy or going out cold approaching. Now consider cultural background a bit - back then, most people where more religious than today, so playing with yourself was considered sinful. Now I don't believe that this alone stopped a masturbation epidemic. But the attitude towards it was different.

Even not taking this cultural background in consideration, think about the media present back then. There was no overabundance of erotica, weather it was porn or Instagram thots, as the Massmedia was just starting out - it had a different purpose back then.

And now think about a guy born in today's age - let's say 2000. He is now 20, and grew up in a world where basically everything is sexualized - even new phones are "sexy" (yeah ok, its status, but the point is having this overabundance of things to potentially make you sexy is different from the past, where a house you built or bought was sexy.) And this guy has the same primal drive his grandfather had, but one thing is different: he doesn't need to rely on fantasy anymore. He has the opportunity to "mate" with more potential women than his ancestors combined in the course of a week, because his brain actually can't differentiate between an actual person or pornography (now I don't mean that people can't differentiate between sex and porn, but that the "drive" to procreate is satisfied with masturbating to porn. The brain doesn't care where it comes from). And what does that do to the boy? He gets hooked. Because it's fucking easy and scratches the itch. And what does that lead to? Being (too) satisfied, because the only drive a man has is now gone. Not wanting to grab life by the balls and do shit. No vigor. Low energy. Basically being beta.

Of course there are many other factors that play a role today. And also, if you watch porn and it does not have this effect on you: great! But that doesn't mean that millions react the same way. I know plenty of guys beating it at least daily, and most of them look the same: Weak.

Clarification: no I don't advertise for nofap or whatever. There is enough research showing changes in the brain with pornography viewing habits. Scaling it up to a generation and you land pretty close to where we are now.

But if anyone is interested, try abstinence from pron and masturbating, just as a self-discipline practice. For some it's harder than you think. But redpoll was always about bettering yourself, and if this teaches you a valuable lesson about self-discipline, do it.

[โ€“]itzdjengo[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

I agree with everything you've mentioned here. I'm a '00 baby myself. I also have seen alot of (young) men my age were raised by a single mom.

The impact of being raised by a single mom is huge. I am experiencing it myself, I had to practice and learn every step to masculinity myself. Most young adults are not aware of that, and continue to adopt the feminine behaviors their mothers had.

The more I think about it, the more I realize how fucked up that shit is. Am really curious how this (my) generation turns out to be in 10 years.

[โ€“]SatansLawya1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Yes, being raised by a single mother will definitely impact your whole perception of masculinity. But then again, here you are, learning the ropes. And that's a core principle: you decided to change the things you can change. It's important to value your own decisions, and not pointing fingers to external factors. That doesn't mean they don't exist, but means you for yourself and no strangers on the net, your mother, a drunk dad, school or whoever else is responsible for your actions.

You may have been dealt a hand that's bad in comparison (now I don't know you or your upbringings - maybe it wasn't bad after all), but coming to the point where you realize that those cards actually hold no value over your future decisions is a hard concept to grasp for new redpillers. That's where most fail. They never stop pointing fingers.

External factors are just that: external. How you personally handle those is another game on its own - some just give up for the simplicity of it and succumb to being yes-men. And it's fine if someone chooses to, we're not here to babysit.

I'm curious about it too. But thinking about that actually has no value, because we can't change the whole world. We can change our personal world, and should as long as we breathe.

[โ€“]itzdjengo[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Facts. I appreciate your reply

[โ€“]omega_dawg933 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

in the biggest picture, if you're honest and know true female nature, men are simply disposable tools to them... and they want you to stay that way.

in the meantime, they're having a feminism rally and want you to know that they can handle 100% of their affairs on their own and wouldn't mind having all men transported permanently to planet mars. "WE DON'T NEED MEN!"

then, when the crowds disperse, the undesirable types keep yelling, "toxic masculinity," while the other 90% respond to male advances, want dates, WANT MARRIAGE, and want kids with strong, dominant, MASCULINE men. yes, masculinity is toxic but somehow feels very good when they're in the presence of it, esp. when the guy shows genuine interest in her and esp. when he's grabbing her ass, tits, etc. and pulling her hair during sex.

iow, it's a gigantic shit test.

they don't like old school men's behavior (like the old dominant men of the past), but they actually do... they just want him to tone-down his voice and to dress better. when i grew-up in the 70's, the men on tv were archie bunker, james evans (good times), ward cleaver (leave it to beaver) and george jefferson, etc. then, there was fonzie, and a few others. today, men on tv are goofy, stupid guys that can't do anything without a woman's guidance and direction... with an underlying message that sex is rationed-out based on his behavior and compliance.

women don't want a push-over or a man that's totally under her thumb. the switch-over happened with al bundy. lol.

advice: hear what women say but don't listen to it... and NEVER follow their advice on anything except raising children and $$$ (but only if she's a licensed accountant).

[โ€“]jm516 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

Empires need to keep expanding. When expansion stops being cost effective, the empire starts to decline.

<soft, yet depressed, victimized, egocentric society.

That describes the last years of the Roman Empire.

[โ€“]RedPillAlphaBigCock2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I donโ€™t believe in any system .in 2020 itโ€™s simply good times creating week men because they choose comfort and shit food and poor sleep and stress and then women loose respect for them and women hate week men . And all SJWism is simply because life is too comfortable and people donโ€™t persue love and their passions and missions

[โ€“][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy

[removed]

[โ€“]MVWeiss2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yep

[โ€“]rangat424 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

Alpha men must be demonized to implement socialism. Alpha men dont want socialism. Only women and beta men want socialism. Women and beta men want to steal the resources from alpha men because evolutionarily the alphas tended to have all the resources. A society full of strong alpha males rejects socialism and prevents toxic feminism from getting out of control. Its a battle between alphas (individualism) and women+betas (socialism).

[โ€“]xX_bullitt_Xx2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Nailed it. I was mildly politically interested before I swallowed the pill, now I'm much more involved. Globalism is literally intended to take from alpha men and give to women and their betas.

[โ€“]ezpzcoconut1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

The short answer is that modern society has made men soft with its luxuries and technology. Western society doesnt require 'strong' men anymore. The modern age is perfectly suited for high IQ nerds to gain power and wealth.

[โ€“]throwawaycunt19971 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Everyone wants to be God but not everyone can be God. So... in order to get away with being the top of the food chain without being charged with murder, the least you can do is gaslight and castrate the competition into slavery. I mean, 2 birds with 1 stone, right?

Itโ€™s all about cold-blooded competition, and domestication.

[โ€“]Endorsed Contributorleftajar3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

Western civilization is being subverted deliberately by globalist bankers. This is happening very slowly and gradually, because the population is still strong enough to throw off the shackles if they actually recognized the threat.

Same reason they're pushing gun control. There's a very dark and dystopian future planned for us, and they don't want us getting any ideas.

[โ€“]MVWeiss0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Yup

[โ€“]chillindude9111 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Not sure how to answer the question but Gen Z as an overall trend is more โ€œconservative,โ€ hardworking, and pragmatic than past generations. Gen Z has the most in common with the World War I generation.

But yeah mainstream media and all that portraying masculinity in a negative light needs to stop.

[โ€“]SavorThePill3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

I read that one too somewhere, but I haven't seen the truth of it yet.

[โ€“]lilrobinzz10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

My generation is obsessed with tik a thot and insta thot and snap a thot

[โ€“]catsdontsmile2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Leftists (feminism was integrated in the left aswell) are ruining society. Look at their track record. Everything they touch turns into shit. And they basically own colleges and most artists (biggest influencers). So there you go indoctrination and followers.

[โ€“]babybopp0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah... Not u.

[โ€“]Nergaal0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Aggressive males are a risk. They are more likely to take risks when they don't like the system. Look at the Islamic world, how likely are they to defend the religion if anybody goes against the system. And how messy the Arab spring ended up being. Insurrections like that are essentially impossible in the feminized West.

[โ€“]TheBadGoy0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Society always reflects the image of its masters. Who do you think of when you visualize physically weak, materialistic, neurotic and slightly effeminate men? Think really hard.

[โ€“]BlueMyLoad690 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

A Matrix full of Neos would collapse. Canโ€™t have too many of those flying around.

[โ€“]RelucBeam0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

These continuous circlejerk threads lol

[โ€“]send_it_for_the_boys0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Watch don mazzettis video about dad bods it actually holds truth

[โ€“][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Because of fucking feminism. Feminism is killing us males. Males are confined, trapped, depressed, and suicidal because of fucking feminism. We are not allowed to express ourselves for fear of civil/legal retaliation from PC's SJWs. The fuck

[โ€“]groundedair0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

depressed, victimized, egocentric society

Fully explained in The Power of Now by Eckhart Tolle.

[โ€“]BlueIowa0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Yea but the past doesnt matter so?

[โ€“]anxiousdweller0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

then that system was made by people who want you to act that way..

[โ€“]eeeehshure-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy

Nothing is going on, there is no system. The world simply doesn't need a lot of strong men anymore, and these are the natural consequences. When you'll start having sex, you will stop caring about these things. So have some sex.

[โ€“]burn-all-bridges3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

There are two things in this world. Wonderful, visceral, sexy sex.... and death ... horrible boring death.

I'm gonna go off and have some sex with these girls before I die.

If you guys wanna join, that's cool. But don't look at me in the eye...It puts me off.

[โ€“]SavorThePill1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

+1 for that reference, favorite line in the movie (except for Thurman's material lmao)

[โ€“]Domebeers-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

imagine not knowing about the KBG plot to bring down america

[โ€“]Merica911-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

First off; side bar.

Second off, the top 500 richest people in the world are all man. So.. You can act how ever you want. The Alphas in this world will not bend into beta attributes. That's part of what makes them alpha.

[โ€“]maljo24-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy

Violent crime has dropped in half in the last 25 years. Bingo.

[โ€“]xX_bullitt_Xx0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I seriously doubt this is accurate.

[โ€“]blasterkid1-3 points-2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Ok boomer

[โ€“]itzdjengo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I aint a boomer. I'm a 19 year old talking about how weak his generation is, and is going to be.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

ยฉ TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter