Hi folks,

Can someone show me the law itself or an example of how it works from a real world perspective?

I'm talking about the law where a guy pays child support even though it's not his own child. I was reading old threads on the other sub and found this one:

https://old.reddit.com/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen/comments/cqz4jn/fat_ugly_skank_hoe_overjoyed_that_she_can_hop/ex0sxp0/

If you watch that video in that post, they say the guy is not the father and the woman goes crazy with joy.

What's confusing to me is that in that situation, a guy would still have to pay child support? I figured if any situation warranted no child support it would be that one. I also figured there would be special cases, like if the woman gets a new husband, the old one stops paying.

So maybe I'm just looking for more info on this topic and how it causes women to become WAATGM.

I mean, why can't we vote for politicians that don't support this type of thing? Why can't someone run for office on a platform of "We want to stop letting certain types of women get married under certain situations?"

Like for example, at the border right now they are DNA testing the kids to make sure they're crossing with their actual parents. Why can't we have that for marriage? Why can't a politician run on that platform or at least implement it?

Eh I guess I'm sort of ranting. It's hard to imagine such a child support law exists to the degree that I hear about.

Hopefully this is close enough to the topic of WAATGM. I know it's a little off but the other sub it would have seemed even farther off topic since those are usually profile pictures.