RP truths get upvoted and BP comments get downvoted in an outside subreddit

Reddit View
September 11, 2015
146 upvotes

So I stumbled across a current post in the nyc subreddit (link) titled: "There 39 percent more women ages 22 to 29 with college degrees in Manhattan than men in the same bracket".

The link brings you to article titled: "Why College-Educated Women Can't Find Love".

The top comment:

Men have no problem dating down, but women do.

Some selected comments:

Despite this being a claim that is supported by research, it has been posted to SRS for some reason. I guess acknowledging reality is sexist.

Mid-30s guy here. I can't get a date with a woman my age to save my life, but I can go to a bar by myself and get approached by much younger women if I stand still for more than a few minutes.

you are doing apps wrong. if you are chatting together for a "few days" you are taking shit too slow. You should have a day set to meet at the end of the first day

Even better, a whiny BP commenter calling out TRP has the most downvotes:

This reeks of red piller bullshit. Who the fuck are these people they interviewed? Do they actually think what they are doing will result in anything quantifiable and real that benefits their lives, jesus. That said I am so sick of the hook up culture in NYC. Trying to find something real with someone here is fucking impossible. You date for a month or two, have a great time and the dump your ass for some ostensibly better option that is out there somewhere. The paradox of choice is real, effects women WAY more than men, and is fucking stupid.

EDIT: Added link


Post Information
Title RP truths get upvoted and BP comments get downvoted in an outside subreddit
Author Casanova-Quinn
Upvotes 146
Comments 74
Date 11 September 2015 03:04 PM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/36304
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/3kjsug/rp_truths_get_upvoted_and_bp_comments_get/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
the red pill
Comments

[–]abdada116 points117 points  (34 children) | Copy

NYC is pussy paradise but LTR hell.

All my ugliest friends in NYC get more pussy than my hottest friends in Chicago.

[–][deleted] 50 points51 points  (9 children) | Copy

Worth it to not live in NYC

[–]abdada20 points21 points  (8 children) | Copy

I fly to NYC round trip for $40 total some weekends. HotelTonight app gets me a decent dig for $75. Why live there?

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (6 children) | Copy

Yeah..wouldn't want to spend more than a weekend at a time in that shit hole called NYC. Like a giant roach motel. But I will admit the bitches are bad there. I live in Orange County and can pull women here where you must be in the top 20 for any play. And that play will most likely land you a "thick" chick. The top white girls in LA area will laugh at any man not making 150 per year and driving a new Tesla.

But when I take my California game to NYC....it's like being Eddie Murphy in "Coming to America". "The Royal Balls are washed Sire."

[–]Lagasuarus 19 points19 points [recovered] | Copy

The royal penis is clean your highness

[–]GhostOfAladdin 10 points10 points [recovered] | Copy

Sounds superficial as make-up.

[–][deleted] 39 points40 points  (0 children) | Copy

LA and OC is. Always take a girl to the beach if you are in California. Why? Because her makeup doesn't stand a chance and you get to see the real her.

[–]Endorsed Contributorseattleron2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Damn, that easy? What is it about NYC that makes it so easy?

[–][deleted] 19 points20 points  (0 children) | Copy

  1. Single women outnumber single men

  2. Women have the most degrees and are looking for men with the same. So, if you have a degree and good job, you are already ahead of the curve. And most men with degrees are already married before exiting college.

  3. Nearly half of NYC population has not been married.

  4. Dense population. Meaning, in LA you can walk past 1 girl in a mile but in NYC you will walk by dozens.

  5. Desperate ass women that though getting a degree and "focusing on their career" would make them happy and are now scrambling to find a BB in a city full of asshole guys that will play like they are BB and then fuck and chuck.

[–]Smooovies0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Honest question: What part of the city do you hit up for going out? I've been around mid-town, but only to a couple of college type bars. Also, how efficient is uber in the city? You probably don't need it with the subway.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock39 points40 points  (10 children) | Copy

It's a concrete jungle, no nature whatsoever. Grey, dull, and boring. People scattered, rushing like rats racing to their desk jobs. Advertisements everywhere. Pollution. To top it off, I don't enjoy the club atmosphere and I loathe shopping.

[–]abdada13 points14 points  (8 children) | Copy

I go there for income. I have zero interest in women in societies where they outnumber men.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

Are there many endorsed from Canada? We only really have 4 major cities, would be nice to hear their take on them

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

I'm not endorsed but I love Vancouver. Not only because I am a Canucks fan but every one is so laid back/semi hippied out. You get that metropolitan/night life/educated population combined with Canadian manners and kindness.

Only thing that shocked me was all the junkies. Fucking clouds of them.

[–]TRPShill0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

Can you clarify on that second sentence? That situation heavily skews the market in your favor for pumping n dumping.

[–]abdada4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

I'm not into pumping and dumping. Never suited me because adding up the time invested for most guys I prefer to spend my time more efficiently.

NYC is a money machine. I go for 1-3 day consults and make 300% more than I make in other major cities. Can't imagine spending that time chasing skirt when I can return home wealthier.

[–]TRPShill3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Thanks. What do you do consulting in man?

[–]fortifiedoranges1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Where are you going where the women are hotter than the ones in the fashion district? Or is it a secret?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Couldn't have said it better myself. When I was a kid I spent a few years hopping trains and hitch hiking around North America. The places I was most eager to go(LA and NYC) were fucking disgusting when I got there. You can see the air in LA, at least you could back then. New York was cramped, polluted, and the people all ass holes who didn't make eye contact with each other. Also they were absurdly expensive.

[–]KingoftheAssholes3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy

Same with miami. Even in my bluepill days longest relationship only lasted 3 months

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy

Miami is complete shit for LTRs. Women in Miami are extremely fickle and more materialistic than NYC.

They rather stay home then go out with a decent middle-class man.

[–]KingoftheAssholes10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yep. But on the brightside winter and spring brings a fresh crop of ONS and 1 week plates. Winter is coming.

[–]everythingisthrown3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

LA is just hell. Shit's hard mode man.

[–]razorwan2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

NYC has gorgeous women indeed, but it's like enjoying candy if you're really craving it. You won't ever get a full meal out of whores like that. Better to just stay away from it entirely than be part of the ego-feeding machine.

[–]TheSliceman7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

Something not always mentioned in this sub is how similar casual sex is to junk food.

In my world, 10 plates is just a massive waste of time and energy.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy

I've commented elsewhere how shitty the dating scene is in Chicago. It, of course, was down voted into oblivion.

[–]abdada11 points12 points  (4 children) | Copy

I prefer Chicago girls because I find a lot of conservative ones who only take the Metra in for work and then quickly skidaddle. Most of my LTRs have been Chicago born and bred but tend to live in the surrounding burbs.

If she lives in the city, she's plate material.

[–]AEther_Flux3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

My current LTR is from a Chicago suburb. I have a lot of fun with her. We are currently in Jacksonville to boot, wonderful place!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Solid clarification. The city white girls tend to be try hards to an extent. The first gens downtown are solid usually.

[–]Junkname720 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I've found that girls from the west suburbs tend to be freaks. no idea why. I'm from a northern suburb, and all of the girls I grew up with... high maintenance bitches that, while they look good, are looking for husbands ASAP... they all live in River North.

Also too many fatsos here. at least in new york, they try to look good.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorCopperFox3c56 points57 points  (5 children) | Copy

There have been a few threads about the recent news articles on the lack of college-educated men in major cities in the U.S. ... feminists reaping what they sow, I guess. Perhaps if feminists gave a shit about equality they'd do something about the disparity in male-female undergrads in college (nearly 60% are females now). But of course, modern-day feminism is really just about maintaining female privilege.

Always interesting to see RP truth coming out of the woodwork in other places though ... if you wanna face reality, you can't deny the truth.

[–]1whatsazipper13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy

If anything, they continue to double down on policies that push men out of college and jobs.

If you're a successful male, however, that means they've helped you eliminate competition.

[–]Freddy_Fedora10 points11 points  (2 children) | Copy

In my opinion it's because universities are turning into feminist havens (feels before reals) and platforms for their agenda.

Out of my 3 courses im doing this year all are run by feminist women. (Fat or 35 yo new mothers) and their units reek of it.

Graphic design project. Read a book from a list (all love novels) and recreate a book cover based on its meaning - reeks of pintrest love bullshit.

Product design project. Create a device that connects loved ones together. Based off a project another feminist did who was approved a 2 mil grant.

The reason men aren't getting degrees is because they know it's all bullshit now, they rather go into the real world and do something which will be actually effective instead of waste 4 years listening to feminists spout bull shit and feel goods wothout any marketable skills at the end of the day.

I do want to be a product designer and I need the paper, but this uni is makong me WORSE at my chosen career.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorCopperFox3c13 points14 points  (1 child) | Copy

I'm a PhD computer scientist, although I work more in industry not academia. One piece of advice I can give you is to be unapologetically Red Pill in your approach to these projects and academic endeavors, but never use the terminology. They will respect you for it, but won't know why.

I've personally seen it happen over and over. Even the most feminist-minded women respond to strength and leadership in men, though they don't overtly admit it.

[–]Freddy_Fedora2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yea computer science and engineering hasn't been taken over by the feminists (yet) my bro did computer science and he is killing it.

I get mixed results with going my own way. Sometimes it gets me the best mark in the class other times it's just "not within guidelines". At this point I'm just getting through it and making my tutors feel bad.

[–]trpfieldreport74 points75 points  (5 children) | Copy

RP truths get upvoted and BP comments get downvoted in an outside subreddit

This is most of Reddit.

They gladly upvote "Red Pill" content (read: common sense), but god help you if you label it or use "Red Pill" language.

[–]iLLprincipLeS37 points38 points  (1 child) | Copy

In the evolved scheme of things men’s reproductive best interest involves sacrifices. When a man commits to parental investment with a woman he takes on sunk cost risks. The time he spends investing himself committed to one woman and the children they produce comes at the cost of reproductive opportunities with other women. Women’s sexual strategy necessitates he compromise or abandon his biological imperative. Naturally, both men and women have adapted ways to circumvent monogamy to optimize their sexual strategies (infidelity, short-term breeding schema), but the basic equation is the same; if a man is invested in one woman it limits him from seeking other (potentially better) reproductive opportunities. If you want to know why Plate Theory irks women so much look no further.

The only way this compromise of sexual strategy can be advantageous to men is if he can be relatively assured that the child he’s raising is his own. This is where men’s Existential Fear of paternity fraud begins. He cedes his own strategy and the sunk opportunity cost for reproduction in exchange for the certainty that he’s invested in a child that bears his name and his blood.

I call this men’s Existential Fear because denying men the certainty of paternity presents the same existential anxieties as a woman’s control of Hypergamous doubt taken from her. Women fear the idea of being forced to birth and raise the child of a suboptimal man not of her choosing, while men fear the idea of being deceived into raising a child not of their own genetic lineage. And until the advent of DNA testing only a woman could be certain that the child was her own.

This is root level stuff here. So important was the determination of paternity for men that an obsessive concern for it was written into our mental firmware. The risks of falling for paternity deception was that important, and the men who evolved this compulsion were selected-for. The reason we Mate Guard, the reason our hindbrains default to jealous suspicions, the reason we cannot bear the thought of another man mating with our woman is rooted in the fear of investing ourselves in a child not our own.

In the previous essay I mentioned the natural revulsion response humans have towards things that are inherently harmful to us. A reservation or revulsion of snakes, spiders, feces, rot and necrosis are part of the evolved firmware we’re born with. I would also argue that the revulsion women feel towards “creepy” (low SMV, Beta) men and the revulsion men feel towards “slutty” women is part of this. Both these revulsions are adaptational protections against our respective Existential Fears. Each represents our Instinctual Interpretive Process letting us know what our ancestors had to avoid.

The Mentor

“But Rollo, isn’t it a noble thing to adopt or mentor a child that is not your own?” 

I get this response a lot when I discuss this, and yes, it absolutely can be when the choice to do so is of your own making. In fact, the reason adoption/mentoring seems such a noble undertaking is exactly because it requires a man to repress his natural concern for his ow paternity. Kinship affinity will always play a role in men and women’s relationships with the next generation. Human beings are innately tribal and familial because tribalism promotes the advancement of selected genes. So repressing this innate predisposition is exceptional, maybe even noble depending on the social context, but it is so because it requires a man to ignore his natural wiring. For what it’s worth, I think multi-generational mentorship in Red Pill awareness is going to be a new imperative in the coming decades.

It’s just this pushing past our natural, evolved, concerns about paternity that’s been the operative dynamic of the Feminine Imperative in consolidating power. The human revulsion response can be molded. Usually this is through some form of operant conditioning. Revulsion can even be conditioned to be associated with pleasure. The Feminine Imperative has been remolding men’s evolved need for paternity to its own ends for some time now.

The popularization of ‘Poly Relationships‘ is one of the more recent redirects of men’s paternity need. As I mentioned above, the goal state of the Feminine Imperative is ensuring that women’s sexual strategy – and anything that foments it – is the socially ‘correct‘ imperative. Men must become more like women if they want to be accepted by a social order defined by women’s experiences. Men’s sexual strategy is only acceptable when it serves a woman’s purpose, so men’s existential imperative of ensuring paternity is always going to be in conflict with women’s strategy. A man insisting on his own paternity and the perpetuation of his name is in direct conflict with women ensuring she chooses to breed with the best specimen and be provided for by the best male she can lock down.

This being the mechanics of it, it comes as no surprise that the social conventions of this era encourage men to abandon that evolved need. We make “heroes” of men who marry the single mother and assume the parental investment costs of the man she chose to breed with. A fem-centric society makes this a noble responsibility – “He Manned Up for the loser who wouldn’t take that responsibility” – all while ignoring the simple fact that this ‘hero’ is only completing women’s Hypergamous imperative. And it’s come to the point that a man abandoning his sexual strategy is part of women’s expectations and entitlements of Beta men.

For the men who insist on their own strategy, the message is one of shame. Only a man who’s “insecure in his masculinity” would think that a child would need to be his own. In fact, the very title of “father” is offensive to a social order based fulfilling women’s imperatives. Father’s Day must become, ‘special persons’ day‘. Men should never insist that a wife assume his last name. And of course, DNA testing to determine paternity (even in light of life threatening illness) is to be discouraged if not outlawed.

[–]ConcealingFate12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy

This isn't news though. We have our own lingo and people don't want to associate with it but if you reword a few things here and here, people will eat it right up.

[–]systemshock8691 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

A friend of mine linked me to a funny comment on showerthoughts - I looked at the OP and it was something about the supply and demand of dick vs. pussy. 4k+ upvotes. I told my friend it's funny that a RP concept got upvoted so high (he's for a lot of the improvement things taught here but against the sub in general)- he said he didn't even realize it but he can see how it is a TRP theme. I guarantee there would be thousands less upvotes on that post if it used RP terms in any way. Most likely it would have been downvoted into oblivion. I'm not dissing my friend but common sense really does go far if you don't give the pea-brains their pitchforks or say anything too harshly real.

[–]trpfieldreport0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Can you find that thread?

I'm going to copy-paste it and use a couple of red pill terms as an experiment.

[–]systemshock8694 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

The fact that "suck my dick" is considered and used as a profanity when "eat my pussy" is not goes to show the importance of supply and demand

[–]Squeezymypenisy25 points26 points  (3 children) | Copy

That bp comment sounds like a woman speaking. It seems she got downvoted because she bashed hookup culture lol. How ironic is that. NYC is a goldmine for ONS though. Seriously is one of the greatest for hookups when every girl thinks Mr grey is right around the corner. And even if you do have money they are still easy because they think if they please you enough sexually then they will get a ring. Shit is fantastic. Instead of Las Vegas, guys should be going to New York. A Hookup State of Mind indeed.

[–]Upvote_To_The_Left0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

there is no hookup culture here dude. it's a social fabrication that developed from stupid TV shows and movies.

There are so many sexually frustrated people here is amazing. Seriously... The hookup culture is a myth.

[–]Squeezymypenisy0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

There is. Everytime I've been there i have gotten a one night stand. Maybe you are just in the wrong part. It's a big city.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy

Women don't know how to act anymore since they've been "liberated". They have no guidance. This generation will stumble hard before the next one start to wisen up.

That's why Millennial girls are the guinea pigs and should be avoided in LTRs.

[–]1Snivellious15 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy

I love the BP rant there. He's bitching about "red piller bullshit", then whining about how he keeps getting ditched after two months of dating for a better guy.

[–]razorwan9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

What the blooper said about NYC has veracity to it-- women in NYC are pretty much the rock-bottom of modern whorism. They have absolutely ZERO punishment for being a slut, and their options are astronomical compared to other cities.

[–]Ifuckinglovepron6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

The blue piller comment was still stating a red pill truth, lol.

He just did not know how to spell AWALT.

[–]1CowardlyPetrov0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Ha, you beat me to making a similar comment.

[–]bloodfoxtrue4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy

Just unsubbed from the nyc subreddit. Bit too liberal for my tastes. Good that there are still some red-pilled in there though!

[–]2rp_valiant1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

surely wall street is pretty red pill?

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]2rp_valiant2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

what about the ivy league upperclassmen who have always seen themselves as above others anyway? and the ruthless pragmatists like the guys who run http://wallstreetplayboys.com/ ? They're about as red pill as it gets and I would've thought that was more common considering the reputation that front office financial services have.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (7 children) | Copy

Society is much more redpill than you think. Bluepill is merely a cloak of political correctness. I dated a 17-18 year old girl when I was 15. Having an overprotective African mother, I heard from her some of the most redpill statements imaginable. Some would be considered too extreme for this sub.

A few days ago a redpill-ish post made the top post on the front page. A woman asking for divorce on one of those judge shows because her husband was too nice. Part 2. I cant find the post but those are the videos. In the reddit post the comments were a mix of bluepill denial and rp anger phase. Mostly people were angry at the woman. What's funny is that I fit into neither category. I wasn't even mad when I saw it.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire216 points17 points  (4 children) | Copy

I heard from her some of the most redpill statements imaginable. Some would be considered too extreme for this sub.

Come on now, man. Spill it!

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

The only reason this doesn't make me mad is how everyone wants to give her shit for her selfish behavior. Other than that, I'm laughing so hard! Time to watch part 2....

Oh man! Second part gets even better! At the end when the guy is speechless is just great.

[–]Shanguerrilla2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Awesome video links. That story is pretty nuts. I wonder if it's fake though, the nature of it and all.

Lemme get this straight, You're complaint is he cooks too often... too well...?

-Yea.. He made me gain weight.

Haha

EDIT: you know what I particularly love about that video? That woman is incredibly honest. She is confused or doesn't understand her motives, but she is very truthful and blunt in them. It screams to me that her behavior along the road to divorce was trying HARD to 'push' her husband into being more alpha and dominant. That was specifically why she started going to comedy clubs and overtly not discussing it (his passion) with him and did a lot of her shit. I think she only wanted to do comedy to spite him, push him, and 'punish' him by keeping it from her "because he had a wife at home when he was doing it." She did everything she could think of to 'make him mad' because he was too nice and she wanted the real side of him she needed.

What an interesting video, thanks for posting.

[–]Transmigratory2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

BP guy says this is RP nonsense but then whines about not finding something real... wut.

[–]Upvote_To_The_Left2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

dating in NYC is the most redpill shit you can find.

source: I am 29 living in NYC. it's a fucking warzone down here.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah, but hit up a small town spot and you should clean up nicely.

[–]Dr_HoaxArthurWilmoth2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

I hit up NYC for a weekend a month for 3 years.

Some of the best clubs and bars I have ever been to. Only Germany trumped NYC when it came to clubs. (I haven't been to London, so I can't compare those).

The sheer numbers of women were overwhelming. I could strike out out 10 times in a row, but that 11th time was money. Anyone can get a $90 a night hotel room in Princeton, NJ and take the train to NYC and back for two nights. I recommend that all TRPers do it at least once.

Oh, pre-game it and get to the clubs early. If you are there at 10pm, you are getting in - no artificial line, especially if you just ask a promoter to put you on the list - that's how they make money.

[–]yummyluckycharms-2 points-1 points  (10 children) | Copy

New York women are fantastic! I love going to NY for work or pleasure as I know that the women down there are eager to live out their desires without the BS.

This liberal sex positive lifestyle is healthy and great for men - I dont understand why there is hate

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (9 children) | Copy

No it isn't. At best, it's a temporary gain to a minority of men at the expense of the rest. Not to mention the fucked up children and cesspools of STDs and dysfunction that result from it.

[–]yummyluckycharms-1 points0 points  (8 children) | Copy

In life, the goal should be taking care of oneself first and foremost - and helping others when you but not if breaks rule 1.

If 90% of men cant get laid, then thats better for me, better for the species due to darwinary evolution, and even for the society has eventually it will be replaced with a better one.

Win-win

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (6 children) | Copy

I think you should reconsider your position. You're 90% of men, don't even BS and say you're not. The mechanisms that affect us, affect you and I'm assuming that from a statistical point of view. That's why you're here.

Also, improving your grammar and punctuation would help convey your message concisely.

[–]yummyluckycharms0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy

Hey - speak for yourself.

Am I bill gates wealthy - no, but I do quite well for myself. In canada, most people dont make 6 figures - I do. I think that puts me comfortably in the top 10%

I think if you worried less about someone's grammar, and more about increasing your earning potential, you might have better success entering the top 10%.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy

Well, here's my view on the matter: you forgot to capitalize your country, you're masterbating to your own income, and to top it off - you're actually comparing that to USA. You and your 6 figures of Canadian maple pulp sheets aren't in the 10% here.

As I was saying. 90%. Your argument is invalid.

Darwinian Evolution is your play? The success of a species is its proliferation, and adaptation. Guys not getting laid is asking for violence. That should go well for someone with a smart mouth.

Also remember, money is a mean and not an end. Everything is on rent here. We're getting billed by the minute so I suggest you drop by Books-A-Maple and pick up a grammar book.

[–]yummyluckycharms0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

oh boy - somebody just went full retard. Never go full retard

1) One doesnt need to be the top 10% globally - one needs to be in the top 10% regionally. Why this needs to be explained is a mystery. On your planet - do people use transporters? Need to know.

2) The entire basis for darwinian evolution is adaptation - in fact - he states this like a thousand times. Its almost like you've never read his book.....

Look - you're free to your opinions, as uninformed and uneducated as they are. You're probably better suited to being in your usual reddits such as askmen and relationships, where the cuckoldry is high but the IQs are lower. I suspect you would feel much more comfortable there

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Be honest, how long did it take for you to comb this one over?

1) Oh, regionally? Oh, good. Now, I can move to Zimbabwe and pretend that I actually have an argument.

2) I said 'adaptation'. You can't read for shit. I thought my argument was clear. We live in a rapidly evolving global economy (including the sex industry in every facet) which YOU are a part of. You are not part of the 10%. You can claim it in the Daily Maple Tribune if you want, that's your business. You're on the internet. That also follows my argument; what is best for the 90% is also probably in your best interest in the 'survival of the fittest' context.

I wouldn't trade a pound of a silver for an ounce of your idiocy.

[–]yummyluckycharms0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Im amazed that you were able to spell zimbabwe....perhaps if you did go there your argument would be valid

Mind you when your mainline of argument is

what is best for the 90% is also probably in your best interest in the 'survival of the fittest

it is clear you never read darwin or understand the concept of evolution, where changes are made within small breeding populations first - and not within the larger population. How does one fail grade 5 science so spectacularly?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

It's like you refuse to believe that you're not in the club. Let it go, man.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter