I been holding quite a few Skype sessions and I’ve noticed a trend in a certain belief: that women will also continuously participate in sex long-term based sole on physique.

In short, that a high level of attraction gives some type of innate value that can’t be found elsewhere in other men simply because the other high valued men aren't perceived.

I’m sorry to say that this simply isn’t the case.

This is due to the implimitation of factors like the Ease of Hypergamy (EOH) movement which has been brought on by the "new digital age of socialization", the resulting change to the basis of the 80/20 rule, the subsequent differences between being high-valued and being attractive, and the ever-shifting SMV range of a wonam (ala “The RP Guide to Defeating the Enemy: Attraction”).

Even those at the top of their physical game will see a constantly wavering amount of intrigue from plates, leading to a difficulty in how or if keeping them in tow for the long run is feasible.

While all of the elements I’ve listed above are commonly discussed on TRP, up until now they've been discussed in a relatively informative manner. I will be aiming to approach them on a more practical and personal level.

All things considered, long-term plate spinning is based…


"On Inherent Value and The Ease of Hypergamy"

“Strangers when you meet, strangers when you part -a gymnasium of bodies namelessly masturbating each other. People with no morals often considered themselves more free, but mostly they lacked the ability to feel or to love. So they became swingers. The dead fucking the dead.” ― Charles Bukowski, Women


We need to begin with a basic lesson: why dicks have no inherent value.

[Part 1: Dicks, Unlike Pussies, Lack Inherent Value]

Let’s assume every male college student in an anatomy class always had a pen in their pocket. Gina needs to take notes every day but always forgot her pen. She commonly borrows the pen of the Gus, who sits next to her, as it’s convenient and writes well enough.

One day, Gus’s pen doesn’t write as well as it once did. Gus begins to rant on about how Sheena used his pen last period and didn’t have this problem, but that doesn’t matter to Gina. She just needs a pen. She turns and quietly asks the guys sitting on the row behind her if she could borrow one of their pens.

Immediately the entire back 3 rows erupt, frantically fighting to pass their pens forward. With such a large option of pens, she choose the most convenient yet reliable looking pen from the bunch and continues taking notes like before. Although Gus values his pen highly, to Gina, Gus’s pen has become an afterthought.

When creating a new product or service, it’s often encouraged to understand not what you value highly but what your consumers will value highly (u/trpSenator created a great post ~one month back that does very well at detailing this). The same applies here.

In an economical sense, Dicks™ are saturating the marketplace; they’re everywhere, easily attainable and are never constantly/actively sought after. This in turn relates to sex.

As such, we can’t expect our dicks or the act of sex alone to maintain a high-value perception of us as, for women, that commodity is in ready supply from multiple facets in their life, some of which remain unseen to us.

This leads me to my next point.

[Part 2: Ease of Hypergamy]

The Digital Age has spawned a new challenge we all must learned to overcome: a woman’s ease of access to multiple hypergamous behaviors.

While the boom of promiscuous acceptance is indeed a factor, I’d like to touch more on how the range of access to the to 20% within the 20/80 rule has changed within the past few years.

Let’s use a new analogy.

Gina collects pens.

Previously, in order to build up her vast collection, Gina would drive to a city or state she’d never visited before, peruse the mall with a fine-toothed comb and hopefully stumble upon the pen she was after. Sometimes she’d come up empty-handed and other times she’d stay home as she couldn’t afford the time it took to drive all the way out of town just for a pen scavenger hunt.

Then, a colleague of Gina’s introduced her to Amazon. This changed everything.

Now Gina could select exactly which pen she was looking for at any time and have it shipped directly to her house. She is also no longer limited by how far she can drive, as now she can have pens shipped to her from across the nation, What’s worse, the pen suppliers can even compete by lowering their prices just for Gina’s business in real time.

The drastic increase in dating site participation is no coincidence. Women use these sites for one thing and one thing only: to seek out the 20% of high-valued men in their area.

This doesn’t bode well for the top 20% of men either as they are now in a competition with both each other and the top 20% of other areas, a competition that prior to online dating was easily avoided.

Let’s look at it another way.

In the 90’s, Kevin is in the top 20% of guys at his college. Gina takes notice of this and begins sleeping with Kevin. Mike is in the top 20% of his college, but Gina has no way of meeting Mike, so he’s not a factor. As such, Gina is more submissive to Kevin as her options on available 20% men are very limited. Also, Kevin is not pressured into meeting a certain level of standard regarding Gina as he knows he’s the highest male within her reach. The couple is happy.

Move to the 2010’s. Kevin is in the top 20% at his college and is still sleeping with Gina, but Gina comes across Mike’s profile on Tinder. Gina now has a Plan B (and C, D, E, etc). With so many high-value fall-back options, her investment in Kevin is much more reserved and should Kevin fail to meet up to her now-increased expectations, she’ll move on to Mike. The couple is tense, a tension built upon the abundance of options on Gina’s end vs. the lack of abundance on Kevin’s, even though he’s at the top 20% in his given area.

This is the bases of the LSSW (Local Sexy Single Women) ideology.

So within this newly-established framework, how does one maintain a long-term plate in the face of EOH?

Unfortunately, becoming the 20% is no longer enough to permit sexual commitment.

While the top 20% have always had to compete to some degree, in the face of EOH, the guarantee of at least some sexual commitment from high-value women is gone. In order to establish even the slightest sexual high-value commitment in the long-term, you must become at least the top 10% of your respective area.

Due to certain limitations, whether genetic or otherwise, reaching the top 10% will be impossible for most men. And that’s the point.

In lieu of EOH, sexual commitment of high-value women is nigh impossible. It should always be approached as such.

Back to our analogy, there are simply too many nice pens in the market and simply too easy for her to find one. If she hasn’t yet, she will eventually. There are few exceptions.

But let’s say your pen is unique. It writes in a way no other pen can and you’re sure of it. While your type of ink may be impressive, as I’ve stated before “impressed” does not mean “intrigued”.

[Part 3: Sexual Expertise Doesn’t Illicit Intrigue or Attraction]

Sexual prowess/sexual ability is not a stimuli which causes female attraction. It is a simply a byproduct which may or may not reflect an actual stimuli.

Sex is not why she’s interested and sex will not draw her within frame. It’s not the sex that matters to her.

In short,

It’s not the promise of good sex that leads her to sleep with someone. It's the intrigue sparked by why others have rated the sex so highly.

Let me break this down some.

A bakery opens on main street and begins selling donuts. Gina has never visited this bakery as she’s on a strict diet, and yet every time she walks by the lobby is packed with lines out the door. She hears her colleagues talking about it. She see smiles on the customers faces. So finally she drops her diet and tries one of their donuts.

Now here’s the important part:

She neutral about the donut. Prior to her diet, she remembers having better donuts. BUT, because everyone else values these donuts so highly that they’re packing out the lobby every day, she concludes her personal perception is WRONG and continues eating the donuts.

Groupthink is a powerful thing, swaying massive amounts of men and women every day. It’s the bases of pre-selection and the sole foundation of modern-day marketing practices. It’s concept is so simple yet so effective: “All of these people can’t be wrong, right?”

Even though the donut was average, she changed her perception of what “average” is based upon the compiled perception of her peers. What’s crazier, she’ll slowly begin to define these particular donuts as high-quality simply based on the same notion! (ala “The RP Guide to defeating the Enemy: Mindset”)


So what can be taken from all of this? Several things:

  • Long-term plates are nigh-impossible to maintain in the long-run. Top 20% is no longer enough to keep plates interested long-term. There are too many other options and they’re too easy for her to access. As such, one can never expect it.

  • Dicks hold no inherent value to women. Sex is readily available at all times for her and whatever reason she’s chosen for sleeping with you can easily be exhausted.

  • Sexual prowess is defined more by perception than experience. Her and other womens’ perception of you will define your sexual prowess, not inherently how well you stroke her walls. Granted, a certain level of sexual expertise has to be maintained, but assuming she’s your plate and not a ONS, I’d wager these qualifications have been met. She won’t based the quality of sex she's had on the amount of orgasms, she'll based it from r how other women would rather be in her position, the man's frame throughout and man's SMV at the time of the interaction.