Kaley Cuoco's Husband Files For Alimony - women collectively lose their shit

Reddit View
October 23, 2015


Post Information
Title Kaley Cuoco's Husband Files For Alimony - women collectively lose their shit
Author RedPillGold
Upvotes 769
Comments 217
Date 23 October 2015 04:09 AM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/37443
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/3pv62l/kaley_cuocos_husband_files_for_alimony_women/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
the red pill

[–]Borsao66344 points345 points  (45 children) | Copy


My ex made a good bit more than me, especially after the market crash in 2008. So after she figured I wasn't any good as a BB ride anymore, she filed for divorce. She'd been stashing away her paycheck for several years while I paid the bills, and then refused to mediate a settlement (the savings are communal property in my state). So I asked for alimony and all the sudden she realized she was on the hook and wrote a fat check to end it.

The sword can work both ways.

[–]tio1w[🍰] 44 points45 points  (5 children) | Copy

The sword can work both ways.

It can but usually doesn't...

[–]Witness_My_Greatness17 points18 points  (4 children) | Copy

Think that's bad? Try getting custody over a kid, even when the mom is a fucking piece of shit.

[–]trprich9 points10 points  (3 children) | Copy

The DHHS data shows that of children abused by one parent between 2001 and 2006, 70.6% were abused by their mothers, whereas only 29.4% were abused by their fathers. And of children who died at the hands of one parent between 2001 and 2006, 70.8% were killed by their mothers, whereas only 29.2% were killed by their fathers. Furthermore, contrary to media portrayals that leave the viewer with the impression that only girls are ever harmed, boys constituted fully 60% of child fatalities.

Source : http://www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php

[–]Witness_My_Greatness3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

Jesus H. that's bad. I shouldn't be surprised though.

[–]tio1w[🍰] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Society as a whole doesn't care and can't care.

For all they're concerned if they were abused they must have done/be something wrong in order to deserve it, otherwise why would their saintly mothers harm them in any way?

[–]Luckyluke2310 points11 points  (12 children) | Copy

bro this is like the first man positive story I have heard out of a divorce man. shit..

[–]Borsao6619 points20 points  (1 child) | Copy

It gets better. I had a good friend (at the time) who was a divorce paralegal and she wrote all my paperwork for cheap. I was slaughtering them pro-se (self representing) and they couldn't figure out how I was doing it. She'd literally hired the best divorce man-raper in the state (legislative consultant on family law).

Finally the attorney pulled the exe aside in the hall and said "Listen, the judge isn't going to care how good or bad the marriage was. Either you pay him his cut now or you're going to end up paying his cut AND be on the hook for spousal-support (alimony) for two years. Settle this today."


[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

As a divorce attorney I've accomplished more than a few. The problem with most men and getting divorced is they marry broke and worthless women (do not marry a woman who makes less than $35k a year if you're going to get married). Women hate it when I ask for spousal support, demand an equal splitting of the assets (which usually includes their fat 401k), and subsequently get it before a judge. Granted this is when you have a guy who made good money for a long time but the job market has destroyed his career and funny enough the woman still has her six figure plus job and wants a divorce while the guy is trying to transition to a new gig (for richer or poorer? ladies say fuck that).

Problem is too many men just give the women anything they want and walk away calling it divorce rape. I prefer to fight it out than settle at mediation as I almost always get a better deal for my client than what the other side is offering. Last guy I took to a final hearing got $500 a month for seven years as alimony which isn't shit in the grand scheme but the wife had to split her 401k in half (which had over $300k in it), and she got to retain the house but was ordered to pay him rent (I asked the judge for an order of rent rather than forcing a sale as those can take forever) till the house was sold. Rent is another $500 a month. And she has to pay him child support.

Granted this is a woman earning over a $175k a year while my client is barely getting $40k a year (so he gets a good chunk in child support for 50/50 time sharing with his two kids). She tried all kinds of mental horseshit at mediation and was shocked when I demanded a caucus and told the mediator to step back when the mediator attempted to insist on letting the harpy have her rant about "people told me you would do this and I said no that wasn't him" schtick that most women try to pull.

I've gone after scum bags and assholes who destroy women and try to abandon their parental responsibilities. This guy wasn't one of those guys. He's a good guy who ran into some bad luck and found out his wife truly didn't love him. I had to be his frigging cheer squad and testicle attacher. Got him angry, got him vengeful, and so far it has worked out for him.

His ex is paying for his rent (not including utilities) till the house gets sold or seven years runs out. He gets a nice fat child support check that he's using to create a college fun for his kids (his choice, I feel bad for him and told him to sock it away for himself but he wouldn't listen). And walked away with his dignity.

Guys getting a divorce, need a lawyer, not despair.

[–]Stormhammer4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

As much as I hate to say it, when my sister divorced her husband ( they just has differences - no cheating on either part or anything ), she ended up having to pay out to him.

You definitely get left torn, because you're like fuck yeah! Then it's your family... -_-

[–]Luckyluke236 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

yeah man rather have a rich sister than a broke one

[–][deleted] 4 points4 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]pdtrading[🍰] 2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy

What state is that? I wonder if NY has something like this.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]Sdom14 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

He seriously needs to chill with the 20 year old Asian bitches though.

Why, does he have a gun to their heads?

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]muh-soggy-knee0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Asians in their 20s are pretty hot. Not sure I'd be complaining haha

[–]pdtrading[🍰] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Lol I laughed when you said that she was a stone cold bitch in the most complimentary way. I see, so New York seems rather fair. I guess the goal has become to marry up in terms of career woman, but honestly its such a bad spectrum. I thought marrying a chick from another country would be key, (though I've been loosing sight of the concept of marriage); but even those woman are becoming ridiculously Feministic. I take it that you moved from New York. I actually work in Manhattan, and went to school with ALOT of these asian girls that ended up in the big 4.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Men absolutely have to look at marriage through a business lens given how women want "partners" and not "husbands" nowadays. I handed my wife a lock solid pre-nup over a year before we got married. I made her email me questions about it and i attached the emails as exhibits when it was executed over six months before the wedding. I did create a trust where we are both beneficiaries and I have to put five cents over every post tax dollar I earn where that amount exceeds $50k a year during the pendency of the marriage, but in exchange she waives all rights to alimony. I also put in an arbitration clause and grounds for appeal of the arbitration that can take the form of a separate divorce trial if the result reached in arbitration is inconsistent with the goal, intent, and agreed upon results of the pre-nup. I also attached all the supporting case law as exhibits to control the interpretation of the matter with a limitation on interpretation of any additional case or later reached legal opinion or stare decisis (I have fifteen pages dedicated to this in the prenup).

My wife's cousin in Massachusetts read the thing and called me and asked me if he could duplicate it for his purposes and I joked with him how he was a Mass. attorney and I'm a Florida attorney and he couldn't practice Florida law. He later figured out the equivalent cases he needed to match it.

Also, the thirty page trust is attached as an exhibit. And breach of the money thing doesn't void the pre-nup, it just creates a nuisance penalty (have a in there to make sure of it).

Child support would get me for a hefty chunk of change but that's why my corp. are owned by trusts and not me.

Avoid broke women, they are no good.

[–]scarletspider3155 points156 points  (12 children) | Copy

It's interesting how the only time alimony even makes the news is when a woman has to pay.

[–]Hoodwink76 points77 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's like a school shooting or tornado.

It's some tragedy to gawk at.

[–]AdorableAnt31 points32 points  (0 children) | Copy

Man bites dog is news, dog bites man not so much...

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman9 points10 points  (9 children) | Copy

Well, the 1 billion $ settlement of that one guy made the news as well.

[–]rp_divorced19 points20 points  (8 children) | Copy

That one ended in the best way possible when she deposited the check against her lawyer's advice which constituted acceptance of the agreement she was trying to vacate so she could get more. The stupidity knows no bounds.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

Oh no! Now she only has a billion dollars! What ever will she do?

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy

Stupidity or greed coupled with lack of foresight and accountability?

[–]Fuck_shadow_bans1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

Link, please? I haven't heard of this one.

[–]FeeFeeFeaster3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

[–]trprich0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Here are the full details of the Case, if anyone's interested.

[–]darkrood94 points95 points  (9 children) | Copy

Here is wonderful modern Chinese saying shared among women:

"Ni de shi wo de, Wo de Hai shi Wo de." (What's yours is mine. What's mine is still mine.)

Don't be surprised if you ever get cleaned up, you've been warned.

[–]TrueMetal20 points21 points  (5 children) | Copy

Hah! I've heard that from my parents as well, who grew up in communist Romania.

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (1 child) | Copy

A Romanian Ex-GF used to say the same thing all the time too. Her mother was head of the he house though, despite a fairly masculine father; I still feel sorry for the guy. It was clear he wanted a son and got two daughters when he showered me with gifts of old army equipment.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (2 children) | Copy

funny, as most modern feminists have a lot in common with the communist regimes of the 20th century.

[–]TrueMetal6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

Hell yes. It's all the same mechanism as you would see in what we'd call Cultural Marxism. The sheer amount of rationalization needed for these people scares me. That hamster must be running at warp speed, the bearings on the wheel should have burned out a long time ago.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Took a political history class, it was all women and the prof had a hard on for marxism so Im not surprised.

[–]IoSonCalaf7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

"Don't get mad, get everything!"--Ivanna Trump

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

American here, ive heard this saying before as well, years before I found TRP. Just another example of how women's thought processes knows no nationality.

[–]nuesuh13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy

Enjoy your equality feminazis

[–]symko12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy

Good, maybe the feminist hive mind will finally end alimony......................one day. i hope he remembers to include that he is,'accustomed to a certain lifestyle and he needs more money to travel to Europe.'

Pour that red wine in your glass and sip it, Feminazis.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]TurduckenII7 points8 points  (6 children) | Copy

What will happen when lesbians start getting divorced now that gay marriage has become legal nationwide?

[–]PedroIsWatching5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

I don't know, but I can't wait to find out.

[–]trprich5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

A Kansas sperm donor caught in the middle of a child support case says he wanted to help a lesbian couple when he made the donation nearly five years ago.

Instead, he may end up paying for his action.

A judge ruled that William Marotta must pay child support, even though he says he signed documents waiving his parental rights.


[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

If there's a kid involved, you can bet child support will come from the sperm donor... As for alimony, I guess the more masculine one will have to pay because masculine=bad.

[–]ElectricFleshlight-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy

A sperm donor has never once in the history of donation ever been forced to pay child support if he followed the proper channels and donated through a licensed sperm bank. Quit being hysterical beta bitch.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Just because it hasn't happened before doesn't mean it can't happen, but thanks for tearing me down instead of trying to build me up or contribute something to the discussion other than just shooting down what I had to say then calling me a bitch like a child. Way to spread the fraternal spirit, bro.

[–][deleted] 130 points130 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]drallcom3 77 points77 points [recovered] | Copy

Now he gets alimony and can bang younger women (who don't cut their hair off). I'd like to high-five him.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (1 child) | Copy

yeah damn she lost at least 1.5 points after that hair cut.

[–]trprich3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

[–]sirmadam7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

She should've kept her hair as it was, daft bint.

[–][deleted] 35 points35 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]sirmadam8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy

Just so you know, she doesn't have any kids.

[–]1Kolbath22 points23 points  (0 children) | Copy

They got married after only a few months of dating... I think she might be super impulsive. Her haircut, for example: She was hot with long hair but she pumped out a few kids, walked into a barber and said,"I want to look like a Twinkie."

One of my irritations with the "Fappening" pics of her is she has that fucking hideous haircut. Why, Kaley!? Why couldn't you take your slutty pictures with your long hair?! It's enough to drive a man not to masturbate.

[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen16 points17 points  (5 children) | Copy

I never understood what guys found so exceptionally hot about her. She's a 7 in my book at best. She's got funny body proportions, she's chubby, her face is unsymmetrical and she's got pouches like a bloodhound.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy

I thought she was pretty cute in the first couple seasons of the big bang theory, with those bangs and the long hair (and she was still ~20). But just like the show, no one really cares anymore that she is 9 years older.

Maybe part of the reason guys found her attractive is that it gave omega males 'hope' that they get a 7+ girl.

[–]zomgimonreddit2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

She's actually hot in the pilot, then either she gained a bunch of weight or they started showcasing her arm fat. I assume they had to make her more "relatable".

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (14 children) | Copy

One wonders if they are aware, on any level, of their rampant hypocrisy.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]Tman56914 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

There are plenty of women who are aware, but don't really care. After all, why put effort into changing a status-quo that favors yourself?

[–]Dishevel11 points12 points  (9 children) | Copy

Not just women. It is the mentality of the left as a whole. Women's rights, gay rights, racial equality, the "War on Women", all of these things are simple. A certain segment of society believes wrongly and attempts to make it complicated so that they do not have to face their hypocrisy head on.

[–]Alqahid 5 points5 points [recovered] | Copy

Racial Equality. Oh good. My spine still hurts from the cringe I got after I read 1 tumblr post about Egyptians, Arabs, Romans, Vikings and Chinese being black and that white people are the source of evil and most killing.

It doesn't matter what I say, whether I prove more people died cause of Genghis Khan then any European ruler, or prove that White Ancient Greeks where more advanced then any Ancient Chinese dynasty, it's just hopeless. I don't even understand WHY feminazi's hate white people, while most of the time they are white themselves.

[–][deleted] 10 points10 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]iamkarnath1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Shame is the real mind-killer.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]iamkarnath0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I'm talking about "toxic" shame. The kind religions are built on.

As the catterpiller chooses the fairest leaves to lay her eggs, so the priest lays his curse on the fairest joys. -Blake

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

They've tricked many women into being useful idiots by pandering to them that they're somehow a victim of the 'patriarchy'... but we all know middle-class white women are the biggest benefactors of affirmative action and other forms of government favoritism which far exceeds that of any man regardless of race. Why doesn't anyone bring up this point? Well they have, but it falls on deaf ears because Patriarchy.

If we go full blown Marxist, the white women will be thrown under the bus even faster than they are trying currently with the whole 'white privilege' bullshit. Divide and conquer, one niche group at a time. If the Marxists can convince society to introduce policy based on 'equaling privilege', which I believe is their end goal to enact more communist policy, the white-female Marxists will be decapitated shortly afterwards from all their benefits and authority in one fell swoop, not realizing they were being treated as pawns the entire time.

[–]recon_johnny3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

we all know middle-class white women are the biggest benefactors

We do, but they don't. Truly. They rationalize shit beyond a level I thought was possible. I saw this rationalization mechanism in full fucking force again---from my wife---about 15 mins ago. I thought in my head "Do you know what the fuck you're saying?". She doesn't, so I just A&A and Ignored.

[–]Elodrian0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

How does Genghis' body count stack up to Stallins?

[–]putinbush100 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

About 40 mil. Give or take. He killed enough that there was a change in the O2 levels around the world. Thats pretty fucking cool.

[–]PedroIsWatching0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

The commenters on the article are screeching about how he signed a prenup and he should be happy with that in response to anyone that brings up the hypocrisy. Never mind that they're all conveniently forgetting that if the shoe was on the other foot they'd be calling for the prenup to be struck down and to take the guy to the cleaners.

[–]2popthatpill22 points23 points  (0 children) | Copy

This shows us that the intuitive understanding women have of spousal support is that it's something that's supposed to flow from men to women, not the other way around.

This is another example of women determining society's moral standards - which, of course, they rig to favour themselves.

[–]Dylan_Tnga5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Wow, hypocrisy is off the scale on this one. Good find.

Another irresponsible guy that wants to live off the hard work of a woman. Seriously Ryan, Get a job and support yourself. You aren't physically challenged.

LOL. Talking about this like it's a common situation when it's the exact opposite. 90% of the time or more the woman is leeching off the mans income, and divorce rapes him the moment a better, more alpha prospect comes into the picture.

Again, this is hypocrisy at it's finest

[–]remyseven43 points44 points  (3 children) | Copy

And women wonder why chivalry died. It's because you wanted equal rights. You got 'em!

[–]Ex-AlodianKnight5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy

Wait, Kaley Cuoco divorced? That's fast

[–]1Kolbath12 points13 points  (1 child) | Copy

Wait, Kaley Cuoco divorced? That's fast

It's fuckin Hollywood. I think they preprint divorce filing documents on the back of the wedding licenses there.

[–]justadavid0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah, she's the one with the gawdawful short haircut.

[–]Born2Ball11 points12 points  (1 child) | Copy

I'm sure they can somehow blame the patriarchy to rationalize this.

[–]hebola4lyfe94 points95 points  (46 children) | Copy

Women are shit people. My own mother would react exactly like those women . The hypocrisy in every woman's life is so overwhelming that they themselves can't see it ; it is as if they wake up wearing it like their own skin every morning .

I think women are trolling us and society by communicating telepathically with each other. Are they seriously this oblivious or maybe they are pretending to not see it ?

To think that I use to consider taking them seriously at one point . I honestly thought women were reasonable people . Now I realize how fucked up they are .

[–]sweetleef62 points63 points  (21 children) | Copy

The hypocrisy in every woman's life is so overwhelming that they themselves can't see it

In most cases, there are no universal, objective truths or codes from a woman's perspective. Rules and standards do not apply equally to every person, but are applied selectively according to how that rule makes the woman feel in a particular situation.

The idea of a woman getting alimony makes the woman feel good, so it's a good thing. A woman paying alimony makes her feel bad, so it's bad. The fact that the two positions are logically inconsistent and unjust doesn't enter into her thinking.

[–]Endorsed ContributorNiftyDolphin7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

The idea of a woman getting alimony makes the woman feel good, so it's a good thing. A woman paying alimony makes her feel bad, so it's bad. The fact that the two positions are logically inconsistent and unjust doesn't enter into her thinking.

Feelings has nothing to do with it. You're not factoring in solipsism.

Say you have a situation where two parties, a man and a woman, have a conflict and are observed by a third party, a woman (observer).

The observer, if she doesn't have prior motivation toward a particular outcome, and the outcome of the conflict does not personally affect the observer, then the observer will view the conflict as herself being in that conflict in the female's role.

So if she observes a conflict, where no matter what happens, she won't personally benefit, she'll think, "Well, if he tried that with me, then I'd...<reasons>."

If she observes a conflict in which she does personally benefit from the outcome, she's going to place herself in the role of whomever is championing her desired outcome.

So it's not "a woman" it's "me."

"The idea of a woman me getting alimony makes the woman me feel good, so it's a good thing."

"A woman Me paying alimony makes her me feel bad, so it's bad."

Then her positions make perfect sense. It's pure self-interest.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (10 children) | Copy

"Rules and standards do not apply equally to every person, but are applied selectively according to how that rule makes the woman feel in a particular situation.

Men have Logic and Reason; Women have Feelings and Emotions.

[–]sunwukong1552 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

Oh that's bullshit. Women have reason and men have emotion. Were not robots and they aren't animals. Women are just women, you can hate them or you can love them for what they are.

They draw their identity heavily from their emotions while men form a more intellectual concept of their identity. We usually form it around our goals and ambitions while women form it off their relationships.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

You're right and basically said the same thing I said. I'm saying those dominant characteristics override the others. For men L&R usually overrides F&E; for women it's usually the opposite. I'm not saying or implying the non-dominant characteristics aren't present. Most of the time Men's decisions are based on L&R, while most of the time Women's decisions are based on F&E...and that is when they actually make a decision. Usually they get to subtle-hint their way through life and wait to be lead to where they really want to go. Subtle hints allow them to bypass rejection and responsibility for their actions. Brilliant really.

[–]sunwukong1550 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Okay I gotcha. Men need to be tough, that's always been true. But trying to act like men don't have emotions is stupid macho shit that I get annoyed with.

Also when I hear people say women don't have any logic or reason.. Just comes off as whiney anger phase shit.

Good message for newcomers though. Rely on your reason and logical, be a man. Understand women are gonna be emotional. But don't think both parties lack the others main characteristic.

I honestly pity women. Being emotional they can't function well under the feminist society we have. Men can at least try to adapt and not get fucked. Women are much happier and better off in a traditional society. It's nothing but hard work and extra responsibility in both societies for men however, so fuck it, we'll manage.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I don't pity the ones who have their emotional act together. I've known a few who were pretty cool and had a handle on their Emotional Chaos Syndrome, but they are a needle in a haystack. I have no sympathy for those who manipulate with their emotions. It's like Karmic payback when they feel as though their lives are falling apart. So much of the problems we all face are self-created in one way or another. Some events are out of our control while others are not.

"Women are much happier and better off in a traditional society."

Bingo. I totally believe this. Feminism has tricked them into thinking they can have it all, and that includes trying to do everything men do: leading comes to mind. You can see why they hate the beta chumps they end up marrying. They resent having to lead. They would rather take comfort in knowing their man has it under control.

Hopefully the pendulum will stop swinging in this direction and eventually go back to a natural course of relations between men and women. At least we're fortunate to have discovered this sub and grown from it. We're miles ahead of the majority of the population.

[–]jdotg-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy

Men have Logic and Reason; Women have Feelings and Emotions.

Isn't that how the force in star wars works lol fucking jedis have reason and the dark side uses emotion. George Lucas was a red piller. Not a single women jedi.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

For some reason, I was reading up on the force yesterday. Tl;dr both sides have things about them that do (and don't) line up with red pill ideology.

The dark side's (or sith's, in particular) reliance on emotion is what I'd consider breaking frame at times, but for the most part the rest of their tenets are pretty red pill. Some examples including a strong belief of survival of the fittest, using deep levels of anger to accomplish goals (anger phase, anyone?), and growth through conflict (our version would be called living by the stone) amongst others. The Jedi may have logic, but they also sometimes suffer from pacifistic tendencies and inaction due to overthinking things.

The Sith definitely, in my mind, have more of a red pill philosophy, especially when you consider examples of the ideologies of each side. Even Yoda dragged his feet at times. However, you can see cases of Sith that mastered self control despite supposedly being the more emotional side. Darth Malgus being a great example - killing off his lover because he knew she could be used against him.

I've been considering writing a sort of "philosophy of Star Wars" post for a while now. Lots of red pill lessons throughout the Star Wars universe. If there's some interest, I'll start working on it.

[–]justadavid0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Princess Leia is supposed to be strong with the Force ...

[–]jdotg0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Supposedly but you never see her use it

[–]through_a_ways9 points10 points  (6 children) | Copy

The idea of a woman getting alimony makes the woman feel good, so it's a good thing. A woman paying alimony makes her feel bad, so it's bad. The fact that the two positions are logically inconsistent and unjust doesn't enter into her thinking.

Women aren't unique in this, though.

The difference I'd say is that the vast, vast, majority of women are like this, while only the majority of men are.

[–]sweetleef16 points17 points  (1 child) | Copy

Women aren't unique in this, though.

I agree, a majority of men do this to some degree.

A difference, though, might be that men in general are at least capable of recognizing that objective truths, standards, and reasons exist. They choose to ignore them when it's convenient, out of selfishness, laziness, impulse, greed, etc., but they can at least acknowledge them.

In contrast, women seem to be incapable of recognizing them at all, if they produce a result counter to their feelings.

For example, I know a woman whose boyfriend is a petty criminal. She consistently justifies his crimes for always-changing reasons. After talking to her at length, it's clear that she genuinely cannot grasp that his crimes are wrong, at least in the way her feelings define "wrong". She understands that crime is wrong in general, but HIS crimes aren't the same kind of wrong, because of whatever reason she can invent (parenting, bad luck, malicious bosses, stress in his life, etc., etc.). She really cannot comprehend that liking the criminal doesn't change the character of the crime; it's some kind of cognitive dissonance so powerful that she's truly blind to it.

On the other hand, the boyfriend knows damn well what he's doing is wrong and will openly say so - he just doesn't give a shit.

[–]RedSugarPill6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

You just clearly explained a lot of very successful men.

[–]1kick60 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

No, they're not unique, BUT society collectively beats men over the head with the reality stick assuring that the men who are this stupid pay dearly for their delusions. Women? Not so much.

[–]through_a_ways-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy

society collectively beats men over the head with the reality stick assuring that the men who are this stupid pay dearly for their delusions. Women? Not so much.

This is only true with regards to male-female conflicts.

[–]1kick60 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I disagree. I think men have all of their perceptions constantly re-aligned with reality.

[–]occupythekitchen2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yes there is herd mentality, women biologically strive to fit in the herd so if they hear eating shit is good their whole life 90% will and compliment the taste if the majority is doing it. Now a handful will say hey this is shit I'm not eating this and that's when the flock turns on them. "Oh she's too good to eat shit with us, who does she thinks she is..."

[–]zephyrprime0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

This explanation is right on. Women's do not believe in logical thinking. Their rationalizations are selfish like those of a child.

[–][deleted] 28 points29 points  (8 children) | Copy

but did you see the last part, written by a woman. Some are good, some are bad, blanket statements don't work

[–][deleted] 30 points31 points  (4 children) | Copy

We have stereotypes for a reason. There is always an exception that proves the rule.

[–]_orion-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy

The positive statement was obviously made by a fat girl

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Can you say why you thought she was fat? I pictured /u/girlwriteswhat - and she's definitely not fat - moderately attractive, in fact.

[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Michael Jackson named his son blanket. You got a problem with Michael Jackson?

[–]TRP VanguardHumanSockPuppet4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Women are not shit people. They're just shit men. Stop expecting them to have the principles of men.

Women evolved needing other people to provide for and protect them. Of course they're going to mercilessly seize at every advantage. It's the only strategy their biology knows.

Every social attitude and law in existence declares that women are your inferiors. It's time you started acting that way yourself.

[–]1kick63 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

They're not trolling us, they're shit testing us, and we're collectively failing as a culture.

[–]TRP VanguardCyralea6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

It's partly because women are much better at compartmentalizing reality than men. They're perfectly capable of picturing themselves as good, upstanding human beings by separating their good, empathetic behaviour from their psychotic, self-serving behaviour.

Most women will mentally rewrite the facts such that she is a victim entitled to the things she's taking from others. In that way she only sees the good in herself. You could literally ask all 3.5 billion women if they think they're a good person and they'd all say yes.

Were a man to exhibit these qualities most people would rightly think him insane.

[–]occupythekitchen2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

The guy who shot from the clocktower in Austin had a diary. He knew he was going crazy but couldn't reason himself out. At least he had awareness of something being wrong

[–]1runnerrun22 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

They've been getting away with it in the current left-wing political climate, that's why they keep doing it. No patriarchy to call them out on it.

[–]foldpak111-2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy

I can't even imagine living as a woman. What a fucked up way to live. They aren't even capable of friendship.

[–][deleted] -5 points-5 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]ModRedSovereign[M] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

No concern trolling.

[–]ItsCold_ItsCold9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

We aren't the ones carrying out harassment campaigns against people with different opinions from us or creating entire movements to systematically fuck freethinking men over, all with the full support of the majority of both western government and western people. I wouldn't call it hate so much as extreme aggravation.

[–]Science_isthenewcool0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

Nice concern trolling. Stfu, read the side bar and the top 100 posts of all time before you comment again newfag.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

bro I'm not disareeing with you but you calling him a newfag paints you in an even worse light than Shelwyn LOL.

[–]Science_isthenewcool0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Look at how many fucks I give.

[–]plenkton11 points12 points  (9 children) | Copy

Men and women both speak. One might assume both speak from rational faculty. Wrong. Not bad, just wrong.

Men's speech is formulated by response of logic.

Women's speech is formulated by response to emotion.

Again, not bad that it's different, but the assumption that men/women formulate speech the same is wrong.

Men are our specie's builders, and thus their rational faculty encourages value-creation, which is (currently) best achieved through cooperation. Men use logic to determine how to best serve each other, and therefore themselves.

Women are our specie's lifegivers, and are able to best acquire resources by manipulating/bargaining-with males. Their emotions determine who they pander to, and who they should exclude. Their emotions best enable them to survive, and thus it's their primary tool for dealing with reality.

[–]rowdymark7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

[–][deleted] 0 points0 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]plenkton1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Man's cooperation stops when you directly limit his reproductive ability. However short of that, men do cooperate.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]plenkton-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

That is primal behaviour, which women take part in more than men.

[–]zephyrprime-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy

His behavior is logical. He is preventing other males from poaching his mate. His actions are no less effective and practical than that of a male lion chasing off other males from his pride of female lions. He does not expect you to mindread and know that it was his girl. You are being solipistic and only seeing things from your own vantage point because you are butthurt. Whether the other male knows or doesn't know the girl is his is irrelevent to him. What's relevent is that another male is hitting on and potentially taking his mate away. Does it matter if a gun is shot accidentally or on purpose when it is aimed at you? It matters to the police but in the moment the only rational action for you is to get out of the way of the bullet as fast as possible.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]DrXaos0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

He doesn't expect you to know. He expects you to obey.

[–]foldpak1117 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

I want to see her get thrown in prison because she can't make montly payments, never gets a chance to see her kids, and driven to the point of suicide. I have absolutely no mercy.

[–]IronMeltsinmyHands22 points23 points  (12 children) | Copy

Bitches ain't shit but hoes and tricks.

My good friend Tupac errbody! Nigga dead tho.

[–]wiziwig55 points56 points  (2 children) | Copy

Bitches ain't shit but hoes and tricks.

That was dr dre and snoop not tupac.

[–]maadkekz1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy

Are there any precedents for this?

What are the odds that Kaley's more expensive lawyers will see to it that our man receives little to no money at all from this? Let's not forget the legal system is heavily skewed in favour of women.

[–]onehonesttruth2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

There is in my family.

My dad had very poor employment throughout his life, and brought nothing to the table when it comes to finances. My mom was the one with a solid career. They divorce, my dad asks for half the value of the home (which he never contributed for). She had to refinance her home to re-purchase her half, even though she had paid for it entirely. Thankfully, her lawyer and his lawyer agreed on the original home purchase price, and not the current market value of the home at the time (which had increased in value by like 20%).

[–]arobotspointofview0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I think that's still true to some degree, but not as much as much as I used to believe. I now believe that divorce is skewed in favor of children and the person who makes less money - which is usually the woman anyways.

[–]Brave_Horatius0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

If you look at the actual laws they're often drafted gender neutrally but the presumption is there that it'll be a woman benefiting. A lot has to do with the judge anyway. Criminal law is avowedly gender neutral but women end up on different charges or get lighter sentences

[–]rp_divorced1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

I know this is thinking logically and is trying to apply logic to the thoughts of women which in general is a stupid thing to attempt, but there's a possibility the women who are making the comments on that article are not the usual commenters that we see on a daily basis.

These commenters might be the one's who usually keep quiet because they understand that men are still the leaders despite what the feminists say and are expected to "man up" and seeing a man come after a woman's money is enough to get them to speak up. Now, we all know they're just as crazy but I have a suspicion that this is a completely different group of women.

[–]justadavid0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

... it might be interesting to start a "pile-on" (a.k.a., "brigading") on threads like this. I know, I know, I'm just saying it might be interesting to expose women to "divorce rape", "alimony", and so forth. ... "So you're saying no one should get alimony? Are you willing to write your Congress-critter and advocate that?" ... "So you're saying the only people who should get alimony are women ... after they get the kids, the house, half the assets, and continual alimony and child support from the man? That's divorce-rape and it happens every day."

Might be fun to take the truth and post it. Regimes like feminazis cannot tolerate any truth. --D

[–]gosserbeer1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Where are the comments coming from

[–]RedPillGold[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

different Facebook articles - I searched for kaley Cuoco after I found that article

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

"What a loser! He must be a crap tennis player and not taught by his parents that real men support themselves and not leech off of anyone else."

Real Men ™

[–]Realworld521 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

It is ironic and easy to point out the injustice, but as a gender what the hell are we going to do about it? At what point will their be representation for the men in this country?

[–]swank861 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I believe most of the comments belong in MRA with the other whiners. Sure there is poetic justice with a man eligible for alimony, but we shouldn't succumb to the idiotic levels of women.

[–]Bignmybrain0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Is it just me or does any one else see an issue with one individual who makes a shit ton on money wanting money from another individual who makes a shit tonier more of money more than the first individual?
Regardless of gender, it's shitty to try and take money from someone because you can't live within you means. I don't know the situation and all I have is the title and explanation from this post, but he's either a bitch or trying to prove a point by hitting her where it hurts... Her money... Which is what bitches do. I don't see anything positive coming out of this.

[–]zephyrprime0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

"shaming him into the ground for being a deadbeat loser".

If he were a deadbeat loser, he would be MORE justified to having her money. The whole reason alimony exists is to support the spouse who has much worse income generating ability. A deadbeat loser has horrible income generating ability. What kind of job will he get? Some poorly paid low skill manual labor or service job. A person who can only make a modest income after divorce is exactly the type of person alimony is supposed to help.

Feminists are showing once again how feminism is about women getting more benefits (monetart but also sexual and social) for women at the expense of men. It is not about equality and hasn't been since first wave feminism.

[–]wetmont0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

How do you pronounce her last name? Is it like when you say Cuckoo clock? And shouldn't that be Coo Coo clock?

[–]IMakeUpJargon0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

The first syllable is pronounced "woah" with a "k" sound at the front, so "kwoah". The second syllable is pronounced "koh", so it's kwoah-koh.

[–]skeletorcares0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

To women my/our money is ours. Her money is hers.

Her debt? Also mine.

[–]symko0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Regarding alimony I'd like to point out that the minute alimony hurts women en masse is the day that alimony dies.

As a realist, single mothers are the most impoverished minority in America. Single mothers are on section 8, welfare, lower housing income and WIC. These women couldn't even imagine the nightmare of paying alimony. What's amazing is that feminist believe they are winning! When you don't tow the line, you get left behind.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I hope he uses some of that alimony cheese on his new girlfriend too

[–]BlueVegas0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

So why was this post deleted?

[–]getRedPill0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Some user posted in Los Angeles Times this comment

Ryan Sweeting is delusional if he thinks he'll get spousal support after a marriage that only lasted 22 months with no kids. He's an able bodied person with his own career and that prenup is probably airtight as far as spousal support is concerned.

User's nickname is "LaBellaLuna" and is obviously a girl. They aren't able to see this happens daily but genders reversed. They don't even notice.

[–]ElectricFleshlight0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Alimony is never awarded for marriages that short. Why don't you talk about reals instead of feels?

[–]TheMGhandi-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

A woman usually is fine living on her own, and hopes for a man someday. A whore can't stop wanting service or entertainment from a man. Hard to say who is complaining about what, and what kind of woman would even support feminism. Let's call the spade, a spade, shall we?

Oh, and, let's only mention women in this sub? I'm getting tired of all the mentioning about those who aren't women. Are they even worth mentioning? Not a dime if you count change, or even two cents.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy

This is exactly why I posted my post on consuming media that isn't meant for you.


This article should be a waste of your time. rage bait, statrting a fight over facebook on some shit that isn't even designed for your eyes.

And every BS statement in it will eventually have source amnesia. you'll forget all teh bullshit parts being bullshit, and eventually internalize it as reality.

[–]RedPillGold[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I'm don't read these female drama articles normally, this one just caught my eye

[–]LeftShark86-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy

While the role reversal is a breath of fresh air, I don't think we should be supporting this type of bs behaviour from men or women.

The article doesn't go into much detail, but it looks like they had a prenup in 2013, so the money situation should be clearly defined already.

[–]sirmadam0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

They can be thrown out, remember.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Pre-nups are usually only thrown out when it benefits the woman.

[–]johnchapel-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy

Females are not always feminists. So you can't exactly accuse hypocrisy here.

Frankly if you ask me, aren't they saying the same shit WE would be saying to him?

[–]Clockshade2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

It's good if he can get spousal support. So many men are fucked by the system, I'd be happy if he can fuck it back, even if it is just the tip. Good for him.

[–]johnchapel2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

Sure. Fair enough. But the concept of alimony is fucking retarded even when you set aside that it historically fucks mostly men.

Suddenly applying it to women doesn't legitimize it. All it is now is a reason to never get married.

[–]TattedGuyser0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

There's a lot in this life that's 'fucking retarded', doesn't mean you can't use it to your advantage. If you can get a free 1,500$ a month to put towards your life goals, shit why not? Use it.

[–]johnchapel-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Specifically because taking a free lunch off the backs of those who didn't offer it makes one a lazy peice of shit.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter