Reading this article https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-50828386

I love how the feminist BBC phrases things in these articles:

One said social media had become "a catalogue" for men to select their next conquest.

Obviously offering money for sex and being accepted is a conquest.

"We either aren't in a position where we need to do it so we don't speak about it, or we've done it and we're too ashamed."

If you're ashamed, that's on you. Or it should be. But apparently not, because:

Exploitation

That's the heading for the second section. This is the genius quote:

The groomers are offering the woman everything she needs to be a success at her job as an influencer, but ultimately it's exploitation, and that woman will have to do things for that money that she doesn't want to associate herself with, that make her feel shamed."

"Groomers", is a word meaning building a relationship with a child so they can exploit and abuse them. Not really appropriate for consensual payment for sex. have to do. Why does she have to do it?

"He was really pleasant when I was there. At dinner we started drinking and he was asking about my finances - I explained I was in £5,000 of debt. He said: 'Have sex with me and I'll give you double that'."

"Isabel" said she went up to his hotel room and went through with it. "I felt a kind of a mixture of degraded, really annoyed at myself, violated."

But she insists it is not a form of prostitution: "It is a targeted relationship that progresses over time...

Squeak squeak squeak goes the hamster wheel.

I thought this was interesting, I appreciate it is typical BBC news female empowerment hamstering though.