1000 migrants in Germany sexually assault, rob and rape women at one train station on New Year's eve. Feminists actively are trying to cover it up.

Reddit View
January 5, 2016

tldr: see title

Many of us have pointed out that feminists will avoid and even censor any discussion of rape when it is not committed by white men. The famous example is in Rotherham UK where 1400 children were raped by Muslim gangs, and groomed in prostitution as young as 8 years of age. The right wing were not able to stop it for over a decade as they were labelled racist and islamophobic by the left and feminists. The police and a liberal local government actively covered it up and allowed it; in many cases they said the children were asking for it, essentially. An example of a feminist trying to cover up what had happened, even after the story had become official: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7JmVwMNq4c

On New Years eve 1000 refugees were releasing fireworks and brawling. Gangs of refugees cornered women in subways. Only 10 police were assigned by police to manage the situation. There was one rape and 80 or so sexual assaults. http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/01/04/revealed-1000-migrants-brawl-rape-sexually-assault-steal-one-german-train-station-new-years-eve/ . Also: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35231046 . The story is everywhere now, including Reuters and NYT so check your favourite source.

However the default subreddits are not letting this hate speech be told. worldnews has banned it as local news, although it is front page news all across Europe many right wing papers, the number 2 story on BBC, and reported widely in America now. A moderator did however give somebody the real reason: https://i.imgur.com/21U1AIU.png .

Worst of all is that the 2XChromosomes subreddit has deleted all threads talking about the mass sexual assaults and rape in Cologne on that evening. The default sub for females is actively covering up mass sexual assault!

The silence is deafening. Leftist/Feminists enable rape by attempting to cover up assaults. They choose to virtue signal or fight for agendas that make themselves feel good, even when it results in more rapes for other women. It is the ultimate act of selfishness and hypocrisy.

I know we aren't really activists here, but we can do good by pointing out the progressivism pecking order to women that are close to us: 'oppressed' rapists come before female victims.

Post Information
Title 1000 migrants in Germany sexually assault, rob and rape women at one train station on New Year's eve. Feminists actively are trying to cover it up.
Upvotes 2433
Comments 516
Date 05 January 2016 08:14 PM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/39335
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/3zly08/1000_migrants_in_germany_sexually_assault_rob_and/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
the red pillfeministclose

[–]ModMachiavellianRed[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (86 children) | Copy

Worst of all is that the 2XChromosomes subreddit has deleted all threads talking about the mass sexual assaults and rape in Cologne on that evening. The default sub for females is actively covering up mass sexual assault!

Rest assured we won't be censoring discussion of this on our subreddit.

EDIT: Assumedly paid shills or muslims reported the thread that came up before on this subject until the automod canned it. We've hard-authorised this one, so file as many reports as you like and it won't go anywhere.

In fact, if you want to hide the truth because it offends you, if you're going to emotionally align with rapists because you can't BEAR to have anything negative said about about "your people," feel free to unsubscribe from this subreddit. The close-minded and easily offended are not welcome here, we haven't got time for your bullshit sensibilities here.

Free speech will reign here, so suck it up or fuckoff.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorCopperFox3c278 points279 points  (81 children) | Copy

Those who benefit most from freedom are often the worst defenders of it.

Why? Because they have grown soft, too trusting, too gullible. Freedom gave them the opportunity to indulge their own feelings absent of reality. Absent of the harsh truths of life. Absent of the power struggles most face. Everywhere they look, they see with their feelings ... not the power struggle that lies underneath. This describes modern-day Progressives in a nutshell.

But the reality is that all things in this world are about power. When you forget that, you are lost. Easily taken advantage of. If that reminds you of your old blue pill self at all, it should. The struggle is life itself. Lift, game, conquer, etc. Without the struggle, we are nothing.

[–][deleted] 81 points82 points  (68 children) | Copy

Why? Because they have grown soft, too trusting, too gullible. Freedom gave them the opportunity to indulge their own feelings absent of reality. Absent of the harsh truths of life. Absent of the power struggles most face. Everywhere they look, they see with their feelings ... not the power struggle that lies underneath. This describes modern-day Progressives in a nutshell.

Nah, it's because Germany didn't help the Jews the first time around (the Holocaust), and don't want to be compared to Nazis the second time around.

[–]scmarioo76 points77 points  (60 children) | Copy

As a German, I confirm that this is true.

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (59 children) | Copy

The difference is that the first time around, the Jews weren't helped because of an ingrained racism consistent with the global countries (no country helped the Jews, even Canada turned them back). That's not to say that not one citizen helped, but there wasn't a government investment made.

This time, however, there is a rational fear of a culture clash (the evidence of what we're seeing now all over Europe and Scandinavia).

[–]vizakenjack 10 points10 points [recovered] | Copy

Well, the Jews aren't stupid, in Israel they kick african immigrants out, and basically deny asylum to any non-white/non-Jewish refugees.

In their own country, they're pretty nationalistic.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (31 children) | Copy

Well, the Jews aren't stupid, in Israel they kick african immigrants out, and basically deny asylum to any non-white refugees.

Except that history basically proves you wrong.

Operation Solomon.

"was a covert Israeli military operation to airlift Ethiopian Jews to Israel in 1991. Non-stop flights of 35 Israeli aircraft, including Israeli Air Force C-130s and El Al Boeing 747s, transported 14,325 Ethiopian Jews to Israel in 36 hours"

That being said, it does provide insight as to why people think Israel is racist towards Blacks (which it's not). They view it as BlackStruggle 2.0 TM.

and basically deny asylum to any non-white refugees.

Then why do Israeli Arabs exist, why are they allowed to marry, vote, have jobs, the right to political representation (basically everything South African apartheid is not), and why do they like living in Israel when they could go to Gaza? Even the ones who refuse full citizenship (on personal principles, so as to not recognize Israel's sovereignty) are ensured that they have the right to apply for citizenship, are entitled to municipal services, and have municipal voting rights. When they're jailed, why are they allowed to pursue education at the Open University in Israel instead of rotting away in a prison (as their enemies do to them)?

Furthermore, that denies the existence of a strong multiculturalism in their Knesset (Parliament), full of Christians, Druze, Muslims, etc.

But despite the overwhelming truth against your claims (without a shred of evidence), we can continue the circle-jerk if you want...

[–]vizakenjack 5 points5 points [recovered] | Copy

Not really, I actually wanted to clarify, but thought it'd be self-explanatory. What you refer to is the operation in early 1990s to save Ethiopian Jews from persecution. Even though some Jews might be favorable towards other Jews who're not white, many Ashkenazim are slightly racist even towards their fellow Jews of non-white origin, such as mizrahim and ethiopian jews.

Netanyahu rejects calls to accept refugees.

Ethiopian jewish women in Israel were treated with sterilization drugs, so that they become infertile.

Israeli society is pretty racist towards Africans. They don't see it as a bad thing if it means preserving the "Jewish character" of Israel, which I guess is true. Right-wing politics is strong in Israel.

The only downside, is that the liberal Jews in the U.S. advocate "diversity" for the non-Jewish countries, whereas when it comes to their own country, they protect it wholeheartedly from it.

Israel's leaders were also smart to solve the situation with sudanese refugees, by relocating them to "tolerant" Europe that'll gladly accept them because "muh democracy".

Anyone who's not ignorant, knows that Israel does a lot of things that will raise eyebrows in the west, yet when Israel does it, they can get away with it.

It's hard to imagine that in any western country, a man can be jailed to prison for simply lying about his ethnicity when having sex with a woman, not in Israel, especially if the said man lied to a Jewish woman.

Or banning a novel solely because it's about the love between a Palestinian and a Jewish person, apparently they don't want it in Israel because it might promote mixed marriages between Jews and non-Jews. Oy Vey!

tl;dr Jews know what's bad for Israel and keep it away from it, whereas leftist Europeans allow their countries to be ruined.

p.s. I'm right-wing myself and wish the western leaders were as smart as Israeli ones. So don't assume I'm listing above things as a bad thing. We need to treat our countries like israelis treat theirs.

[–]2rp_valiant3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

right on - all the Jew-bashing from the right really confuses me because if anything, the Jews have it figured out. But then again they live in the shadow of the holocaust and know what happens if they let themselves be victimised. The rest of the west has grown too complacent because the last war we fought were against someone so caricature-like in his evilness that the western standpoint is basically "prevent bad people from getting into power", leading to the massive expansion of the left and its "we're so tolerant!" rhetoric. Politically, we all live in the shadow of WW2.

[–]Bearhardy0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

I read that it was about bringing young people to the country because germany was getting full of old people

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

If that we the case, then they could have opened their borders to young people from other (established) countries.

Who in America wouldn't want a free German university education + social benefits, etc?

If it was about bringing young people to the country because germany was getting full of old people, then that was incidental.

[–]billcosbyeatsbabies0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

very smart observation, i hadn't thought of it that way. maybe german authorities are pulling strings behind the ban on major subreddits? politicians play dirty, it's certainly not out of their ability

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

very smart observation, i hadn't thought of it that way.

I mean, I have nothing against immigrants, or even economic migrants. But if they want to be in a specific country, they have to pass the same immigration standards as all other immigrants, and they have to abide by the country's rules. Some of the greatest inventors and innovators of all time were immigrants - Nikola Tesla, Elon Musk, Steve Jobs, Albert Einstein, even Jim Carrey. They're greatful to be in their new country, and will actively (usually) work hard to leave it better than how they found it.

politicians play dirty, it's certainly not out of their ability

Sometimes it gets gloriously dirty, such as when Putin brought his dog to a meeting with Merkel - despite knowing she'd been mauled by a similar dog at birth.


[–][deleted] 51 points51 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]sqrt77445 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

That is great, thanks for the jpg.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Time and again, history has shown us that aggression and ambition are winning attributes. And people wonder why women like these things in men. RP is all around us, but so few people can see it. Astounding and confounding.

[–]Mr_Donnerhuhn0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

It's pretty deliberate though.

https: //sustainabledevelopment .un. org/content/documents/ Agenda21.pdf

[–]billcosbyeatsbabies0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

i think its all intentional man, think about it. people wayyy up there, pulling the strings for profit. contorting countries, changing the course of history with the stroke of a pen

[–]TRP VanguardArchwinger378 points379 points  (241 children) | Copy

It's not that people don't care about rape by minority groups. They're just petrified that if any attention is given to anything other than the primary issue of female power over the majority cis-white-male-patriarchy engine, then they'll lose the war. It's the same reason you can't raise pro-male issues that aren't anti-woman in the slightest.

"My best friend was raped in prison last night." "OMG shitlord women are raped more shut up about your privileged patriarchy and cry me a river about your one stupid rape."

"My dog died last night." "OMG shitlord why are you comparing women to dogs?" "Uh...I wasn't. I was just talking about my dog?" "And not about women and the issues we face?! Fucking misogynist."

If we take our eye off the ball for a single second, people might realize that women are stupid cunts and stop taking this feminism thing seriously. We can't let that happen. Down with men! But just white middle class men from the United States and Europe.

[–]1Halfjor189 points190 points  (15 children) | Copy

The fact that a mod (who also mods ShitRedditSays) removed the news story from TwoX is mind boggling. It just goes to show that womens' issues themselves are not actually what drives them. It's just something for them to mask their anger under.

Other than that, the muslims might actually be higher on the left wing pity hierarchy than women.

[–]25russianbear2534 points35 points  (2 children) | Copy

Feminists have nothing to gain from poor colored folk. They have more to gain by taking away from white men and guilty until proven innocent is the best away about it for them.

[–]antariusz16 points17 points  (1 child) | Copy

It's not that they are pitied... It's that women actually want strong male authority figures in their life.

But will deny it until the day they die.

If they admitted to it, it would allow non male authority figures (beta men) to emulate alpha qualities.

They want men that just get it. Even if that means takeover of Western European / u.s. Culture by Islamic militants.

The MAJORITY of women will ADMIT to having a fantasy about being raped. I'm not saying they would enjoy the actual act itself. But how many times do you need to see it in action before you realize that women are TERRIBLE at determining what will give them the most happiness in life.

They see conquering heroes coming to save them from the weak culture they are trapped and unhappy in (in record numbers) .

[–]Polaris382153 points154 points  (28 children) | Copy

The really ironic thing is if those Muslim "refugee" types that they rush to defend end up acquiring too much power, they will have no problem putting the femicunts in their place. You think you are oh so oppressed now, how about some Sharia Law and a REAL patriarchy?

Those white men you want to keep shitting all over are your best defense against the criminal acts, but the way white men have been so demonized and emasculated by modern society...

[–]1grubek95 points96 points  (3 children) | Copy

Feminism is a shit test. They do not want to win.

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (2 children) | Copy

... But the majority of people are BP so they take feminism at face value. This is how democracy fails.

[–]sqrt774433 points34 points  (3 children) | Copy

[European here] Give us our fucking guns back.

[–]DewArmy 3 points3 points [recovered] | Copy

Why'd you let them take them away?

[–]sqrt77445 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

Happened before my time, commies were scared of people with guns. Now it's the women and cowards.

[–]mcavvacm13 points14 points  (1 child) | Copy

All I'll say is that I won't die defending these woman when they get their wish and shit goes to hell.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I won't either, I will fight for my heritage and culture.

as bad as the west is, I'll take it over Sharia law any day.

[–]FiveLions44 points45 points  (15 children) | Copy

I can't find it, but there was a great post on here that this is what women deep down really want. It had everything to do with Muslim Patriarchy and the Beta West being completely overtaken by Islam...Very scary stuff, to me.

I feel like people are terrified of Islam...I'm not terrified to speak up about it anymore. I've been doing it for a while around friends and family...I get horrible looks. I don't believe there is such a thing as "Radical Islam", I only think there is Islam. The radicals are just martyred examples of what the general population wishes they were.

[–]2renzy778 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy

I can't find it, but there was a great post on here that this is what women deep down really want. It had everything to do with Muslim Patriarchy and the Beta West being completely overtaken by Islam...Very scary stuff, to me.

It was this one: Feminism will actually destroy the West

The discussion revolved around an article, "How the Feminists’ “War against Boys” Paved the Way for Islam"

[–]shwel_batata 4 points4 points [recovered] | Copy

I live in a Muslim majority country where I can walk freely at 2 a.m. without fear of being molested. And no, "the general population" doesn't want to be radical. We too worry about putting food on the table, getting sex, and taking care of our families.

[–]slay_it_forward8 points9 points  (10 children) | Copy

Of course not everyone is going to shoot up a place but the guy's point still stands, there is no radical Islam, just Islam. Some Muslims like yourself choose not to carry out the directives of your holy book.

PS fuck you for following such a fucked up religion.

[–]shwel_batata 3 points3 points [recovered] | Copy

I'll ignore the rude comment but reply to you. Have you ever considered that we simply enjoy fasting in Ramadan, giving money to charity, praying occasionally and minding our own business? When you grow up in a Muslim household, it becomes part of your identity. I don't even know if I'm a Muslim or an atheist because it doesn't matter. A big chunk of us don't even think about God or read the Quran. I don't speak for everyone but it's just the religion we were born into. Just because some people are using religion to murder, doesn't mean I need to suddenly renounce part of my identity. It's just not relevant to me.

Also if you call yourself a Christian you too are choosing not to carry out the directives of your holy book.

[–]slay_it_forward4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

People aren't using Islam to murder, Islam specifically orders it's followers to murder. Big difference.

Yes, you should renounce the Muslim part of your identity. Passively following a religion that advocates horrific acts against humanity only encourages it's active followers by giving it more strength in numbers. You should tell your family members what a fucked up religion it is and encourage then to renounce that part of their identity as well.

Have you heard of an accomplice to a murder? That's essentially what you are.

I'm not Christian. I don't follow any religions. Anyone that follows a book of fairytales written thousands of years ago is a moron. You can pick out the wisdon from these books and leave it at that.

How do you rationalize following a child molesting rapist?

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points  (9 children) | Copy

"OMG shitlord women are raped more"

Men in prison are raped more than any other group per capita.

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (8 children) | Copy

You don't even need to add the per capita part. There are 3 times more rapes reported in prisons than all rapes outside of prisons combined. Nearly 100% of the prison rapes are male victims. Even if 100% of the non-prison rapes were female victims (which is highly unlikely), that's still 3 times as often.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (6 children) | Copy

Yeah but like 90% of rapes go unreported /s

Actually now that I think about it that might not be super far off the truth if you're talking about prison rapes. Between the fact that men are inherently less likely to report a rape because unlike women who are nearly idolized for "getting through it" men are often shamed either directly, or indirectly, and the fact that it's dangerous to snitch in a prison. I wouldn't be surprised if only 1 in 10 prison rapes are actually reported.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy

Yeah but like 90% of rapes go unreported

That's a completely made up statistic. It's based on a survey of dubious quality, with tortured interpretations and a clear agenda from the people who published it.

[–]tigerjaws2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

You mean the same agenda that said 1 in 3 women are raped on college campuses?

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

You know I heard that women are openly raped in classrooms on college campuses. I even heard of this one girl, on her first day was just arriving, and as soon as she stepped foot on campus 5 guys gang raped her.

[–]Rasalom7223 points24 points  (122 children) | Copy

And any other white men who might or might not be middle class.. because they don't really exist as people anyways right?

[–][deleted] 56 points57 points  (121 children) | Copy

Don't be suprised if in the next 2~3 centuries there's no whites.

Everything will be mixed.

[–][deleted] 86 points87 points  (114 children) | Copy

People who say this are labeled as "racist" but what you say is true and sad.

I think part of the beauty of women are their variations.

Girl from South America has a certain beauty, a red haired Irish gilr has her beauty, an Asian girl has her beauty.

Once we are all a kind of muddied light brown we wont have blue eyed blondes and green eyed redheads. Its really sad.

[–][deleted] 87 points88 points  (79 children) | Copy

And once we're all brown we'll still find ways to discriminate against one another based on increasingly stupid criteria.

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan107 points108 points  (66 children) | Copy

Blacks already do it, red bone, yellow bone, all this shit. Basically among blacks, the darker you are, the less status, the lighter skin, the better. Especially if it's a chick. You seriously can't make this shit up. The people who go on about race the most actually have a more nuanced way to discriminate based upon one's amount of blackness. Hilarious. That's the future for EVERYONE if all of humanity is mixed into a muddied brown obscurity.

[–]CptDefB27 points28 points  (22 children) | Copy

As a note, India has this built into their caste system. I don't know how long the system has been around, but India...

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan64 points65 points  (20 children) | Copy

Wherever there's no white man to blame, everyone wants to be as close in shade to white as possible. Hilarious really, isn't it.

[–]Gadnuk_64 points65 points  (7 children) | Copy

I spent some time in India and this shit is so true. One of our group was Bengali American and when we visited isolated towns they would literally shoo him away when they took pictures with us because to them he was just another dark skinned Indian.

We did a sustainable development project with a small group of Indian students, and I still get FB friend requests from their cousins/aunties/friends who I never even met because there is social status to be had from them being friends with white westerners.

All of the glamorous ads feature 1/16th Indians that are otherwise white because that is socially desirable but technically still represents Indian people.

This could well be because now the country is trying to get past the caste system so they needed to find another way to segregate.

The Danish aren't fond of the Swedes. The English and French hate each other. The Tutsis and Hutus chopped each other to pieces in Rwanda. The Serbs Bosnians and Croats slaughtered each other in the 90s. The Shi'ites and Sunnis are in perpetual sectarian conflict. The Catholics and Protestants of Europe hated each other for centuries. These are all relatively localized disputes that arose between people who are the same race but slightly different in other ways.

It's amazing how we think the world is always progressing towards getting along, when really we are just finding new things to fight about every time we get past the current reason to hate.

It is clearly part of human nature and tribalism. I'm not saying we should accept discrimination, but to think we can all get along by censoring free speech and demonizing those who don't subscribe to the progressive ideals is fucking hilarious.

Tldr: when race eventually ceases to exist we will just find new and elaborate ways to have ingroups and undesirables. It's just the way the world turns.

[–]thisishowiwrite6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

Just to weigh in here:

I can't remember where I read it, but a scientist/philosopher/anthropologist once produced a theory regarding the ancient Incan and Mayan societies' use of human sacrifices.

Essentially, humans CRAVE an enemy. There always has to be an "us" and "them". By sacrificing someone occasionally, they produced a "them" for the remainder of society to gather together and demonise or at least view as different.

Doesn't seem so barbaric when you compare it to the modern day media jerking our strings over black/white, islam/west issues does it?

[–]fingerthemoon1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

According to Steven Pinker's book 'The Better Angles of Our Nature' (he's actually atheist), things are getting much better. He has a lot of empirical evidence that we're living in an unprecedented time of peace. Violence is down all across the board. Worth listening to what he has to say.

Here's a lecture about the book: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5X2-i_poNU

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy


[–]ether_reddit1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

It won't end until we discover life on other planets and have something to unite against.

[–]icecow0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

also wiki Narcissism of small differences

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

well, white is just the body fighting a vitamin D deficiency. And for brown countries, a way of signalling you don't have to work in the sun like a pleb, white is just signalling affluence and lack of menial labour.

It makes perfect sense. dark blacks worked the field, light skinned blacks were house-niggers... of course there was hate, they were the ones who liked the masters, and were treated better generally.

Everything makes sense if you look at the why

[–]bluedrygrass0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

I don't think the explanation is that complicated. That may be one of the reasons behind it, but it gives more of a vibe of people preferring lighter shades for the sheer beauty and cleanness of it. "Pure" and all that stuff.

[–]1Halfjor42 points43 points  (10 children) | Copy

Exactly. You see stuff like that on Twitter all the time. "Light skin niggas this, dark skin niggas this". Even if it sounds like they're joking it's very real. I overheard a black man telling his wife about someone and she said "Oh, that nice light skinned girl?"

People will segregate themselves into oblivion.

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan46 points47 points  (7 children) | Copy

Exactly, getting rid of white people won't end racism, if anything it will just change its complexion, people will find new ways to hate and segregate regardless of how diverse (or not) the rainbow is.

[–]crackalot30 points31 points  (5 children) | Copy

It won't end racism, but it'll end the white race. Which is exactly what it's designed to do.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

So they're proud of being black but want to be white?


[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Malcolm X wrote about how his parents treated him better and that he was the favorite child because he was the lightest skinned.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

This isn't exclusive to black people.

A joke I used to tell in highschool was something along the lines of "white people are so racist, they hate other white people".

Then I would go into some detail about irish vs English vs german vs French etc.

It's just a built in mechanism for humanity to be tribe like and to treat people that don't look similar differently.

[–]bluedrygrass0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

White people don't fight each other because of race, but because of ideals, cultures and interests.

In Africa, black people slaughter each other to death purely based on racial differences (that no one else can tell, as they're all black the same)

[–]skulk2fade20 points21 points  (13 children) | Copy

My Fiance is Chinese Australian and I find this to be true. I find them to be more racist than whites (i am white).

I idea behind why this is is true, is that as a white man I know I have to be really really careful with any critical thing I say, otherwise I will get racist thrown in my face. But I think with minorities they don't need to worry about it as much and therefore end up being more racist without realizing it.

I am an atheist and I have been called racist because I wrote on fb i disagree with Islam. I tried to explain to commenters that Islam isn't a race of people, but eventually i just gave up!

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (11 children) | Copy

White males are some of the least biased people in the world. Anyone who says otherwise has an agenda.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy

I'd say about the same, once you account for affluence.

people aren't special, they are just people. Take a white dude in the swamp, put him up against a poor chineese, you'll probably see the same bullshit, in a different flavour

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Liberalism is a mental disorder. Tons of rich liberals who hate as much as poor people. Tribalism is the core of liberalism. There can only be peace when you are of their tribe. Just like Africa or the ME.

[–]bluedrygrass1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

"Whites are the adults of the world"

The more you think about it, the more it makes sense, behaviourally.

[–]Ransal9 points10 points  (4 children) | Copy

lmao I haven't heard this yet.
Imagine it, they hate/envy white skin color yet don't want it to be pure. It has to be a perfect balance of white and black to suit their desires.

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy

Irony knows no bounds, honestly dude the world is a pretty fucked up place.

[–]choomguy2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah, but it's my fucked up place.

[–]PaulMurrayCbr1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Rachel Dolezal, anyone? The ultimate black girl.

[–]Momo_dollar4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy

Asians of all types are probably the most racist and also the first cry "racism is wrong" when they are the victims.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Honestly in all my life I have never met an Asian who bitched about racism.

They tend to just stoically soldier on and achieve, whether it be in a menial field or the heights of main stream success.

[–]Momo_dollar0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

The frequent amount of " why don't white girls like Asians" posts tells a different story.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Tell me about it.

I spent some time around Caribbean people.

They hate American blacks. Hate them. They had some of the most racist shit I have ever heard.

The basic tenet of Caribbean/African hate for American blacks is that the American blacks give the Africans/West Indies guys a bad name.

[–]Backfist42 points43 points  (26 children) | Copy

This is why white people should just be racist instead of having a defeatist attitude but the problem is it will morph into supremacy and oppression as white people have a tendency to whoop too much ass when properly motivated. White people would rather fall on their sword and not play bad guy than to ensure the continued survival of their race. We will be the first major ethnicity to get cucked out of existence and it will be completely voluntary.

[–]cadthrower24 points25 points  (1 child) | Copy

"Multiculturalism for white countries, monoculturalism for everywhere else!"

[–][deleted] 8 points8 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted]  (10 children) | Copy


[–][deleted] 6 points6 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]thisishowiwrite5 points6 points  (4 children) | Copy

Pretty sure he wasn't talking about the media in the 17th century, but rather the agenda today.

Edit: I'm Australian, and there is a HUGE multicultural push here. Has been happening my whole life. I've never understood exactly why we need to place such an emphasis on bringing in foreigners, but apparently it's for "cultural" reasons or some shit. Well, I can't remember the last time I saw a decent street party or a neighbourhood barbecue, and that was once a mainstay of Aussie culture. I feel like our culture is being diluted rather than reinforced.

[–]alphbux3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

I think in the past immigration did good things for Australia with the Europeans coming over after WW2. But they share similar views on morality to us. Islam is irreconcilable.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

You should just start asking people why diversity is good. It's actually surprising how poorly thought out their reasoning and answers are - if they can even formulate one.

The best they can do is usually some form of 'exchanging ideas' but my personal favorite that's become something of a meme at this point is how many just immediately go to 'cultural foods!'.

As if it's literally impossible a Scottish bloke can figure out how to roll sushi or something.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy


[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

of course not, being white with blue eyes and blond hair is a recessive gene.

if we are lucky, sickle cell anemia will be gone by then too.

[–]interestedplayer0 points1 point  (48 children) | Copy

To be honest the problem is also that there is nobody moderate speaking a moderate truth. its either absurdly "nothing happened", or as even here "1000 migrants". yeah 1000, by which you mean less than 100 (how would 1000 people produce only 80 claims) and migrants, by which you mean refugees.

but this is todays problem, polarization. either you have to be for 1.000.000 refugees randomly in your country with 0 checks or you have to be against any LEGAL migration (very different).

either you have to believe in "islam the religion of peace" (who are we fucking kidding), or you have to believe in islam the magical race which makes everyone a raping terrorist.

edit: in come the people who obviously have no idea about Germany. Have you ever been to Germany? There are no Ghettolands here. And there are barely any radical feminsts. Nobody gives a shit about anything like rape culture or stuff like that.

Besides our retirement system is on the verge of collapse. American women on average give birth to 2.1 children (replacement rate). German women on average give birth to 1.2 children. Do you want us to force breed them? If not, and we also don't want our retirees to go hungry, we NEED migration.

I would hope to find a differentiated opinion at least in TRP, if not here, I will not find it anywhere.

And NO its is NOT free speech to wilfully misinterpret facts! If there was 1 rape CLAIM against a mob of white hip hop listeners and I posted 1000 white het hiphop listeners rape women, you would downvote me to hell. Selection bias GOGOGO

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (4 children) | Copy

What the actual fuck.

We NEED migration.

Aha... So instead of importing educated people from all over the world with actual incentives, instead of incentivizing German women to have children, instead of focusing on the German elderly and the failing retirees ... your solution to Germany's debt problem, due to essentially falling population is... to... import... unskilled... essentially totally incompatible... financial... refugees... without... even... doing... basic... immigration checks...

Are you paid to spout this shit?

[–]Sdom147 points48 points  (24 children) | Copy

To be honest the problem is also that there is nobody moderate speaking a moderate truth.

Interesting - you have ZERO evidence that these claims aren't true, and yet you're already claiming the numbers are exaggerated.

its either absurdly "nothing happened", or as even here "1000 migrants". yeah 1000, by which you mean less than 100

The estimate is based on eyewitness accounts. On what are you basing your 100 number? A hunch?

(how would 1000 people produce only 80 claims)

What, is there some quota that each migrant had to rape one woman? And also, there were also reports of these men shooting fireworks at crowds of people, brawling with each other, and groping women that went past.

and migrants, by which you mean refugees.

80% of the "refugees" into Germany are actually from a wide array of countries other than Syria who are taking advantage of the fact that Germany wasn't vetting anybody. Generally official refugee status is not that easy to get. So yeah, chances are they were mostly migrants.

[–]interestedplayer0 points1 point  (22 children) | Copy

What, is there some quota that each migrant had to rape one woman? And also, there were also reports of these men shooting fireworks at crowds of people, brawling with each other, and groping women that went past.

In the title it clearly states rape, rob and sexually assault. Do you now equate rape with shooting firework into crowds? That's a wider definition of rape than feminism.

Migrants =/= refugees. Migrants (legal ones) are Italians, greeks and turks for the most part. I don't know if you live in Germany (I do), but these people don't rape anyone in central stations.

[–]Sdom114 points15 points  (20 children) | Copy

In the title it clearly states rape, rob and sexually assault. Do you now equate rape with shooting firework into crowds? That's a wider definition of rape than feminism.

The reports said 80 sexual assaults and one rape had been reported. It's possible there was some under or overreporting, but I have no reason to doubt the claim.

My point was that the crowd was behaving in a lawless manner, not that shooting fireworks at someone is rape.

Migrants =/= refugees. Migrants (legal ones) are Italians, greeks and turks for the most part. I don't know if you live in Germany (I do), but these people don't rape anyone in central stations.

AGAIN, many of the people being called refugees aren't actually refugees. Refugee means something very specific, and generally it takes a few years to get certified as a refugee.

The German government wasn't vetting anybody (making them prove their refugee status). So, a ton of people poured in who weren't actually refugees.

How can you live there and not even have a cursory understanding of how this works?

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

In the title it clearly states rape, rob and sexually assault. Do you now equate rape with shooting firework into crowds? That's a wider definition of rape than feminism.

Dude to feminism everything is rape... You look at some chick and it's rape because you're mentally undressing her... You don't look at some chick and it's also rape because you're body shaming her :P

[–]NutellaPancakeMan11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy

"and migrants, by which you mean refugees."

spoken like a true cuck

"German women on average give birth to 1.2 children. Do you want us to force breed them? If not, and we also don't want our retirees to go hungry, we NEED migration"

Giving incentives is a better solution than importing crime and a different, incompatible culture.

[–]zpatriarchy19 points20 points  (1 child) | Copy

migrants, by which you mean refugees.

you are wrong. they are migrants because they choose to travel through safe countries that were adjacent to theirs.

once people do that, they are no longer refugees, they are economic migrants.

[–]1Halfjor20 points21 points  (4 children) | Copy

"Refugees" implies that they're going to go back, and if you think any of those people are ever going back you're out of your mind.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

refuge. it's in the name.

migrate, also in the name

[–]gebrial0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Lol even a simple Google search is enough to prove that this definition is completely backwards. In fact a refugee is one that will not willingly go back due to fear of safety

[–]killxorxbexkilled0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

The only thing these repulsive parasites are seeking refuge from is every having to pay for anything again.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy


[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

German here, can confirm.


Nope. You may have a gang or two in the larger cities, e.g. Berlin or Hamburg but that's about it.

Not too many SJWs and radfems either.

[–]interestedplayer0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

Diese trottel wollen mich jetzt auch noch davon überzeugen, dass ich nicht weiß was in meinem eigenen land vorgeht. 1000 leute vergewaltigen frauen vorm kölner dom und die polizei schreitet nicht ein. Das ist doch sowas von absurd.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Schlimme Sache, ganz ehrlich.

Und warum sind die ganzen erst mal in Deutschland? Weil irgendwelche Wirtschaftskriege geführt werden damit die Waffenkonzerne weiter Aufträge haben, und die Leute die aus den Kriegsgebieten kommen werden dann hierher geschickt, wo dann gezielt Gruppen wie Pegida gegen sie aufgehetzt werden.

Dann kann die Elite also die Bevölkerung untereinander aufteilen und gegeneinander aufhetzen sodass sie leichter zu kontrollieren ist, nach dem Motto "Divide and Conquer".

Das ist auch einer der Gründe warum die Eliten mithilfe der Medien den Feminismus propagieren, man kann dann Frauen und Männer gegeneinander ausspielen.

[–]Redasshole0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

Come on. I hate feminism as much as you do but what you describe isn't possible.

A thousand rapes and no one bats an eye? It can't be a conspiracy that big. I mean, even if most people are blinded by feminism etc. they still are clever enough. There must be a valid reason why nobody is talking about that, even stupid people couldn't justify not talking about it because it harms indirectly feminism.

Come on.

[–]1Ronin11A0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

It's not that people don't care about rape by minority groups. They're just petrified that if any attention is given to anything other than the primary issue of female power over the majority cis-white-male-patriarchy engine

This, and reporting that Syrian immigrants are raping nice, welcoming German women doesn't jive with the PC Narrative about how evil America and Trump are for not wanting thousands of immigrants pouring in simultaneously. Seriously, even the account of the US reporter who was gang-raped in Egypt* while covering a story was fucking BURIED (relevant link edit: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/lara-logan-breaks-silence-on-cairo-assault/).

Meanwhile, they're trying to manufacture causation between college football and "rape culture" on American university campuses.

[–]PaulMurrayCbr0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

"They're just petrified that if any attention is given to anything other than the primary issue of female power over the majority cis-white-male-patriarchy engine, then they'll lose the war."

In other words: the primary goal of Feminism and SJWism is the protection and propagation of Feminism and SJWism itself, rather than their stated aims.

In this, they work just like any other organisation.

[–][deleted] 108 points108 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (1 child) | Copy

Rotherham, not Rotterdam. Different country mate.

[–]littletoyboat6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy

In First Amendment rights, while it is wrong to defame any faith group collectively (like, say, “Muslim men hate women”), it is impossible to demonize an idea ( “Sharia law is misogynistic”). People tend to confuse the distinction, which leads to improper arguments, and illogical conclusions.

I'm confused by this last statement. Under the 1st Amendment, you're allowed to say pretty much anything that isn't going to directly and immediately incite a crime.

I can say both “Muslim men hate women” and “Sharia law is misogynistic”. Whether those statements are "wrong" is up for debate, but neither are illegal.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

I was going for the moral wrong of defaming a faith group, and the moral right in demonizing an idea.

People tend to think it's illegal to criticize ideas or faith groups, which it's not.

You worded it better than I did.

[–]littletoyboat2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Oh, I see. Glad we're on the same page, because everything else you said made perfect sense.

[–][deleted]  (6 children) | Copy


[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (4 children) | Copy

Members of the British parliment were involved with child sex rings as well. It's all actively suppressed and censored. European people need to wake up and acknowledge the problem before anything can be done.

There were 4 more scandals, I believe, not including the aforementioned 10 listed above.

1) Involving the BBC

2) Involving the Royal Family / Seville

3) Involving the Police Forces

4) Involving the Parliament

It's funny how they want to ban Trump while another petition about stopping the immigration has been ignored in the media.

People will brush the real reason aside - they're already victim-blaming in Germany, telling people to "keep an arm's length away".

Trudeau fucked Canada, plain and simple in both altering his immigration policy and in even having it in the first place (and limited security checks).

There are police roaming the Toronto transit now, more police than usual. I wonder why - otherwise why do the "Fare Collectors" have guns?. Sure, Canada hasn't had the misfortune of terrorist attacks being successful, but plenty have tried, and CSIS (Canadian CIA) won't be able to stop every incident - although they've done a wonderful job so far.

ISIS threatened New York on New Years - things aren't looking good.

It might be politically incorrect to state the real reason for such attacks - but it doesn't mean it's any less valid.

Fuck, even Charlie Hebdo was a joint attack from ISIS and al-Qaeda...

[–]billcosbyeatsbabies0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

csis is splendid at surveillance tactics, moreso than the nsa i believe. canada is really secretive, we're basically a wolf in sheeps clothing.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

As it should be, given that it's a surveillance agency.

JTF2 (kind of like Navy Seals) were rumoured to be non-existent until a war reporter accidently wrote about them in Afghanistan.

[–]billcosbyeatsbabies0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

im a fan of just starting total world chaos and seeing what it boils down to. probably nuclear fallout, possibly just a total collapse of society. all those diseases stored deep underground in scientific bunkers would maybe erupt to the surface under the guise of a terrorist attack. with the us government secretly pulling the strings, ensuring the citizens that they are safe from the terrorists if they give up their rights and stay in mass fema camps to survive! then we're all really fucked, and its like that scene from terminator where we're enslaved and have to escape. looking forward to it.

[–]WhoIsOBrien5 points6 points  (4 children) | Copy

Didn't know about these "Gangs" and just read some of your links and they made me mad.

I wonder what TRP's opinion is in respect to preemptive violent measures against minorities, before they become majorities?

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (3 children) | Copy

Didn't know about these "Gangs" and just read some of your links and they made me mad.

What should make you madder is that these incidents were covered up by the media, the police, and the government for fear of backlash. Like what other rational response would there be?! Over 1,500 non-Muslim girls are systematically raped, in simultaneously separate events for years, by a consistent type of perpetrator...of course people are going to be mad! It's not like we're going to be recreating the Rape of Berlin (wherein the Russians collectively raped German women as retaliation for Germany's betrayal of Russia in WW2)!

I wonder what TRP's opinion is in respect to preemptive violent measures against minorities, before they become majorities?

It wouldn't even be preemptive. Why? Because already they're a minority in Germany and shit like this is occurring. The same happened in Sweden, where Arabs burned down synagogues and Jews were banned from a Holocaust memorial event for fear of upsetting Muslims...

Your best bet is to vote in politicians who do not shy away from the issue, and actually understand the issues.

It's funny how people mock George Bush for stating the reason was "they hate us for our freedoms". Articles like the one OP posted show that that is exactly the case.

[–]hamsterbator0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

is this shit in the news in England??? why have I never heard of this except online I don't understand how our news outlets can obsess over one kidnapped girl but completely blow over something huge like this.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

It's not politically correct to report on it.

Hence, calling the Pakistani Muslims "men of South Asian ethnicity".

The woman who reported the Rotherham scandal was forced to attend diversity training... and threatened with being fired if she reported anything like that again.

Officially, for Rotherham, the reason for the coverup was due to a fear of backlash. I can't think of another reaction that would be more rational! I could argue that the actions portrayed were similar to ISIS and their treatment to the Yadizi sex slavery, but I feel that would be unfair to ISIS!

Winston Churchill would be rolling around in his grave.

[–]hamsterbator0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Sigh.. Of course these are the obvious answers I was expecting.

I just shake my head at how large the blinders are, and how unwilling the media is to simply deliver the fucking news just because it goes against their narrative. It just makes me so angry...

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

It get's worse...I'll send you a PM.

[–]TRP VanguardtrpSenator197 points198 points 2 (56 children) | Copy

Let me shed some inside information:

In Germany 4 years ago, one of the things I noticed immediately, and shared with my American friends, was how safe the country felt. I explained that all the social services gave people little incentive to commit crime. The German's looked at it as, "Yes, some people are abusing the system, but we rather provide the basics for them, rather than have them resort to crime to get by." And seriously, the country, in even the bad parts, felt safe -- the worse that would happen is you'd get scammed or have your bike stolen. But nothing serious. Walking through a poor immigrant neighborhood (mostly Turkish) brought absolutely no worry into me. Even when I went to the poor white areas, which mainly consist of radical anarchist neo-nazis, I never once felt threatened -- hostility for sure, but never any serious physical threat.

In the past, they let immigrants trickle in, so even the more hostile ones would have time to settle down and feel like a significant cultural minority. This created a lot of pressures for them to integrate into German culture.

Now, fast forward to today, and that's all changed. The mass influx of these immigrants allowed them to create ingroups where they don't need to deviate nor change from their current cultural hang ups. They aren't integrating, nor are they inviting. Today, I actually feel worried at times walking down the street. I have friends tell me about being robbed, I've seen people get punched, and stores actually broken into and robbed. It's crazy -- I'm sure it occasionally has happened in the past, but now it's actually at a frequency where I notice it. It's crazy.

In the past, when I was alone at night, drunk, walking home at 3am across a bridge in an emptied out neighborhood with everyone asleep, and saw a group of 5 brown guys walking in my direction... I wouldn't really worry. I'd just expect them walk past me, and maybe offer me some drugs for sale at the most. But now, when I see 5 immigrants walking in my direction while I'm alone and it's empty on the streets, I definitely get a slight chill.

It's crazy how much the nation has changed... And this whole thing is actually quite interesting to watch. Since the German people have a pretty MASSIVE insecurity about being seen as nationalists or racists, you get some weird groups. You have one camp of German's who just completely ignore it. They wont pick sides and try to evade the subject all together. Then you have the bleeding hearts who constantly try to defend the immigrants and make up excuses for their behavior like, "Oh they are in a new land and are having a hard time transitioning from a place of war, chaos, tyranny, etc..."... Then you got a new and interesting camp which is growing. German's who were otherwise afraid of being viewed as racist, are actually coming out and being openly against an ethnic group. I've NEVER seen that from a casual normal German in the past. The only ones that would do that would be the neo-nazis and anarchists. But now I see regular German's being openly unsupportive of it all. It's crazy.

Pretty sure this is how WWII started. Fucking aye Germany, get your shit together.

[–]eccentricrealist19 points20 points  (11 children) | Copy

It's pretty fucking sad. Germany used to be my dream, man, I was planning to move to Berlin once I'd gained a good amount of passive income. If I ever get to that point, though, I'm going somewhere more rational like Australia, with their tighter immigration policy, because there's no way I'm voluntarily going to a warzone.

[–]sqrt774416 points17 points  (9 children) | Copy

Yeah, fuck this place. The Germans aren't having children though, so they're accelerating the decline. Birthrate fell to the lowest in the whole world - even though the massive number of children the immigrants are having is included in the statistics, so the actual Germans are having even less than the stats would imply. There will be no war here, for a war there has to be two sides. One side is actively committing cultural suicide.

[–]angryuser_trp1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy

I don't understand why is that so? Are all the Germans working so hard that they don't have the time to ease in and have a bunch of kids? For the record, I'm from Czech republic, right next to Germany...

Surely it can't be financial issue... Kids in reality do not cost all that much. Sure, there's an initial investment considering the number of accessories needed, but a lot of that is reusable and doesn't have to be bought again with other kids they could have. So what is the fucking problem?

Are all of them viewing kids as a hassle? I got a kid myslef and another is on the way. My daughter's fucking delighted to see me come home from work and do some rough-housing after. Obviously it's more difficult to visit all the places you normally could go to, but once they grow up a little, there's little validity to the so-often-heard argument of 'being locked at home for life'.

As much as I can't stand Islam, there's one thing that oviously makes it work - keep the women at home and have plenty of kids with them. With all the equality being thrown around, it would seem that women seeking career instead of having children is the primary reason why entire West has reproduction issues.

[–]sqrt77443 points4 points  (6 children) | Copy

I have two myself and want more, so I'm with you. The birthrate problem is multi-faceted, there are many reasons. Cultural more than financial IMO.

  • Many attractive young women waste years studying worthless crap at the university, whoring the whole time, on the pill -> many end up infertile, or get so caught up in the student life that by the time they are "ready" to start a family, the biological clock has almost run out. The result is one or no kids. Our degenerate "health insurance" pays for this by subsidizing the pill and offering "free" abortions.

  • I'm a physician at a fairly large regional hospital. Our gynecologists, whom I hate, perform more abortions on young German women than live births. Sick, sick culture we live in.

  • Many, after completing vocational training refrain from having a family to get ahead at their jobs. The sister of a friend of mine, for example, won't have children so she can get a permanent position at the travel agency she is training at!! How fucked up is that?

  • Having more than, say, 2 kids is socially alienating. People consider it "antisocial".

  • Many are unsure of the future of this shithole of a country and don't want to raise kids in such an atmosphere, thereby compounding the problem. Who wants to send their potential future children to a ghetto school? And home schooling is illegal here, so your kids get taken away and you wind up in jail.

  • Theft (aka taxes) are absurdly high. You get back a pittance for each child born. It isn't enough to entice the fairly well-to-do German women to have children, but it does encourage the foreigners to have huge families.

I doubt the Czech replublic is much better...

[–]angryuser_trp2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

This topic has been on my mind for a while already. The thought of going into politics and doing something about it has crossed my mind a couple times before. Problem is it ain't that simple unless you're already rich, famous or got contacts in the right places. Besides, that kind of life is not what I want for myself.

So right now my goal is to just lead by example. Do things right myself. If people ask why do I complicate my life with this (like having kids, for example... believe it or not, people are genuinely asking why was the first one not enough), I explain with facts. And also shame them for being part of the problem especially if they complained about our nation dying out at some point themselves. Shaming is a powerful tool...

Couple years back I read about one Jewish woman that had many kids. She also taught her children that having a big family is basically their goal in life. For the life of me I can't find the article now, but the point was that her family grew very big very fast thanks to her children teaching the same stuff to their own children... Something like 80+ people made up the whole family while she was still alive IIRC. I'm thinking of trying to achieve something similar.

Problem is the moral codex that the children should have. Since I am an atheist, I can't refer to some scripture and say "there, this is how it should be"... And it is true that although religion may just be a tool to control the masses, it provides moral values to many (except Islam, that'll just teach ya to chop heads in the end). I'm thinking I could write down something of my own. Not a religion obviously, but some kind of guidance to fall back on to keep the kids on the right track, hmmm...

[–]sqrt77440 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Referring to your political thoughts, don't even get me started. You wouldn't get anywhere, politics is a dead end. Just imagine a politician promoting actual solutions to the above problems, starting with the first point. Ain't gonna happen, and even if it did, he'd be utterly destroyed and lose at the polls - not only because the mass media would have a field day making fun of his policies and manufacturing fake consensus for the status quo, but because virtually every woman and a majority of their manwhores would vote against him. The only plausible way to effect real change is to slowly but surely make the state irrelevant by supporting alternative solutions wherever possible, and supporting any and every attempt to reduce the size and scope of government.

As for the moral aspect, what you are saying reminds me of Kant's "categorical imperative", but really it's an empty philosophy. Without God, everything is arbitrary, so it makes little sense to not live as a self-centered hedonist. I wish you luck, however, but also would recommend a reassessment of your religious stance (FWIW I'm a traditional catholic).

[–]angryuser_trp0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Indeed. Politics-wise, the general populace wants solution, but only as long as it doesn't mean they'd have to get their own hands dirty in the process :)

I haven't heard about Categorical Imperative before, so I'm gonna read on that later today. Truly, without God, many may perceive everything as arbitrary. However even Christianity still has potential to get silly. There still are people representing the voice of God that could draw power from their position, so it inherently still is susceptible to misuse. I may even go as far and say that I believe in something. I just don't think the representation of God in the sky is the right one, nor Allah with his virgins, most certainly not Scientologists, Ashtar Sheran, or anything else like that. All of these have structure with people in positions of power and I don't feel like promoting them by becoming a believer in said religion.

I don't want to promote worship in something imaginary (ie. something people claim for hundreds of years that exists but nobody has seen yet). I don't want something with power structure. But then anything without power structure falls quickly to opposition that has it. I'm probably going way out of my scope now...

so I'll have to do a lot more research before I talk more crap about this topic.

[–]angryuser_trp1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

  • Indeed. Getting education in a field that has almost zero use in the real world is really booming here the past few years and I view that as a problem.
  • As for abortions, it seems to not be so bad here, see links: http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/ab-czechrep.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Czech_Republic Most likely it has a lot to do with every young girl and her dog being on the pill though. And the fertility rates are still terrible.
  • This is an issue. Women are not expected to have children. They're expected to NOT have them so they can be reliable employee... This is a cultural problem that needs to be addressed (and yesterday was too late), else we all will be banging heads into the floor in direction of Mecca sooner rather than later.
  • I remember well that anyone who had more than 1 sibling was picked on regularly for it. Oh the irony...
  • Future of the country is what it's people make it out to be. Many seem to not understand that THEY are the fucking country.
  • This is a problem everywhere I believe. Especially since the tax money gets pissed away for questionable purposes more often than not...

[–]Maddin14311 points12 points  (3 children) | Copy

there's a german saying - "wehret den Anfängen" (beware of the beginnings(?)). I agree with you, there is currently a situation evolving, that is a very fertile ground for hatred.
However, as long as there is no real economic downside to refugees everyone in Germany feels, i don't think this will boil over.
But enter the next economical crisis. Things will change then.

One more piece of information: the gangs raping these women were not refugees of the current syrian crisis. They were a minority already known to the police.

[–]throwaway320_1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

However, as long as there is no real economic downside to refugees everyone in Germany feels, i don't think this will boil over.

The 'refugees' travel from 'Syria' through a lot of safe, mostly European countries to get to Germany. That makes you wonder if they go to these north-western countries for the safety or for the welfare state.

[–]Maddin1430 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

or if they just have heard of Germany. I am from Austria, and we had a lot of Syrians travelling through to Germany.
I think this isn't solely a 'let's use the welfare state', but more of a we-don't-really-know-anything-about-the-other-countries thing.
Many Syrians didn't really know anything about Austria.

[–]strat_op11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy

Pretty accurate summary. To add onto the German Media is extremely biased in supporting the refugees at all costs. Just an example, the state controlled ZDF did not report on the Cologne matter for a whole day. Even worse is spiegel.de, the biggest online news site which first commentaries all essentially read "it may sound dangerous but blaming refugees would be racist".

However according to recent studies 41% of Germans already have the feeling that critical voices are silenced and not reported in the media. Only 25% believe the picture painted by the media does accurately reflect the situation and the refugees entering Germany.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy


[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen28 points29 points  (9 children) | Copy

The mass influx of these immigrants allowed them to create ingroups where they don't need to deviate nor change from their current cultural hang ups.

It's even worse than that in my opinion. It is modus operandi especially for Muslim groups.

As long as they percieve themselves to be weaker and a minority, they will keep their heads down and play nice, but as soon as they've got leverage their behaviour will change drastically.

That's even how Mohammed behaved. All those tolerant things he said about people with other religious believes, where made when Islam was a rather small movement and as soon as they rose to power, the commandments of violence where propagated.

Combine this with the Muslim concept of abrogation, and you know, why ISIL are in fact the real Muslims and not the paper Muslims.

[–]TRP VanguardtrpSenator2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy

When it comes to the Muslims, they are actually pretty upset about it, because it's making them look bad, and essentially making their life harder while they try to get by. However, Muslims tend to turn a blind eye to things. So while they don't necessarily like what's going on, they don't really speak out actively against it.

[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen12 points13 points  (4 children) | Copy

People coming from Muslim countries or having been brought up with such background are not necessarily Muslims in my opinion.

There are many here in Germany (I happen to live in Cologne by the way) who self-identify as Muslim, but they are actually only holding onto some of the rituals, like i.e. mutilating their boy's genitals or not eating pork, in the same way that many Westerners practice Christmas and Easter and self-identify as being part of a Christian culture, but they are actually no Christians.

Talking about ISIL, the majority of practicing (sunny) Muslims at the very least sympathize with them. Especially the men.

The NYE-incedents are perfectly congruent with what I have learnt about the opinion many Muslims have of us Germans and especially our women. We are all dirty infidel cowards and that is why it is perfectly acceptable to lie to us, rip us off, etc. pp. and all our women are dirty whores (mostly true unfortunately). What you can take, that is yours - women included.

Working in the kitchen with many Muslims especially from Africa, I've witnessed the lifecycle of a first generation young male Muslim in Germany more than once.

They come here and they are shocked about the cultural differences and especially how women are allowed to behave. After some time - usually 3-9 months - they will loosen up. They have made friends with other guys from their home countries, and they explained to them, that it's perfectly OK to fuck German women before marriage, since they are dirty whores and it doesn't count. They'll also be partying very hard. some only take drugs, some other start selling.

They will simultaniously start looking for an ugly landwhale to marry. Once they got that, their status of residency will be changed to permanent.

They will wait for three years, which is the minimum period of time when their status cannot be revoked, and then divorce from the bitch. Divorce rape isn't as bad here in Germany and they will mostly still be students, so there is nothing to gain from them anyways.

They will then go and get a "good" woman to marry from their homecountry. Depending from where they are, that woman now has to wear the appropriate headwear or even a burka and everything in between.

They will then also start living the life of a good and devout Muslim.

[–]unseen1unknown23 points24 points  (16 children) | Copy

It's hard to tell if Germany is completely cucked or if the people who are against this massive immigration are just being censored so heavily. On the news here in Australia a couple of weeks ago they tried to say that neo nazis had rioted against police.

I have the feeling though that it would of just been normal people fighting against Anti Fascists and SJWs and the police but again I dont know.

The elite definitely fucked up big by trying to implement their policies of replacing germans with the Middle east so quickly. That whole arguement of needing immigrants to pay for all the social security the baby boomers promised themselves can fuck right off

[–]1nzgs12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy

Don't refer to them as "anti fascists", it's the kind of hijacking of language these people want and you are validating it. They are the fascists, authoritarian fascists.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's hard to tell if Germany is completely cucked or if the people who are against this massive immigration are just being censored so heavily.

german here. there is a massive bias going in in the media. it borders on pure propaganda. if refugees are presented in the media, its always children, women with children, or the occasional doctor from syria.

the event in cologne on NYE didnt even show up on the most important news sites like spiegel or zeit until the 3rd or 4th of january.

[–]tigerjaws22 points23 points  (6 children) | Copy

I think that it's actually that people are starting to realize what a mistake it was to allow 1 million of those 'refugees' in. It's just that the media is controlled by the leftist/feminist agenda trying to push it, so you don't really hear the people's voices. From what i've been reading online, people actually are developing very negative views about the refugees. I find it hilarious how the feminists are openly trying to push Islam without realizing that it will genuinely impose a REAL patriarchy

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

even worse, its 1 million in one year. in the same year, only 700k people were born in germany.

[–]throwaway320_0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Don't forget about family reunions. IIRC, 80% of the migrants are young men, with likely having a woman and children back home.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy


[–]CobraBanshee2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

One of the biggest mistakes in recent history

[–]herpy_McDerpster1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Lol 1 million. More. Many more.

[–]sqrt77440 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Too many good German men died / were "disappeared" during and after the war. Basically a whole generation was raised by single moms. The result was quite inevitable - a feminized culture, with "emacipated" women and dickless dudes. The dominant culture is psychologically damaging for youth in general. Add public schooling and censored media (aka brainwashing) to the mix and you end up with a generation of clueless, helpless wimps. Women who think they can do everything a man can yet irrationally extend their feminine love (which ought to be reserved for husband and family) to a world of foreigners that only want to abuse it, and men who are incapable of defending themselves or their society due to some mutant variant of good will.

[–]ArcadesRed13 points14 points  (3 children) | Copy

Anger and nationalism, one tends to feed the other in a situation like this. Frankly, when it all goes to hell, I wont be able to level judgement against them. In 10 years I would be surprised if the German government looks remotely like today.

[–]EpsonXP10015 points16 points  (2 children) | Copy

Is hugo boss listed on the nyse? I might have to grab some shares before they get a contract to make uniforms for German military

[–]1Dis_mah_mobile_one1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Never gonna happen. The BundesHeer doesn't have the budget to go back to Hugo Boss

[–]Disillusi0n3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

"They're friendly until they outnumber you."

[–]caviarpropulsion0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

this post makes me hug my folder with love and adoration one reserves for a child. No, I won't bin it.

[–]l0ng_time_lurker0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Yeah had to gift gold for those platinum lines of truth.

[–]TRP VanguardtrpSenator0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Not needed, but much appreciated

[–]2popthatpill25 points26 points  (4 children) | Copy

Here's a comment I found at Sailer's:

I spent 5 months in Europe for a study abroad program. While walking through city streets in Germany and the Netherlands, I was cat-called by Arabic and North African men, never the European men. A friend of mine was groped by a Turkish Muslim man in the streets of the Hague.

Yes, I know it is disrespectful and against everything I’ve been taught and believe, but it’s really hot.

When men act like men are a little scary….I have to be honest…huge turn on.

I know I should be horrified but I must admit we like it.

Haha, that’s probably why I’ve dated so many Muslim men .

Just as I thought - mass immigration is basically just women pushing for the importation of more AF.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

I know I should be horrified but I must admit we like it.

And yet feminists keep telling us that women everywhere hate catcalling and that they want it to stop. Ha.

[–]1grendalor7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yup, only want it to stop when it comes from betas.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Nope, she's a traitor whore

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (4 children) | Copy

I was banned from world news for debating with a leftist if Islam was a Fascist ideology or not. I provided some key polling data and excerpts directly from the Quran, personal experiences, accounts from former Muslims and historical documents on the early history of Islam; I then compared them to actual fascist documents/quotes. The libtard was "baffled" at my "racist" (they didnt see that irony) assertation. (whether you believe this or not, the debate still can be had)

When I was banned it said "for making gross generalizations about an entire religion"....Even though the discussion was entirely civil (surprisingly from both sides). How the hell am I supposed to speak about Islam without making generalizations? Generalizations are how people communicate about groups efficently...

Okay so I have lived with and worked with Muslims my entire life. I count them as some of my best friends, but that means I've also seen some messed up things. Like when my best friend in high school told me he would make sure he would behead me cleanly if the "great war" ever happened (from Iran), thanks dude. Or when my buddy's Muslim mother (Pakistan) literally beat his sister within inches of her life for wearing makeup in high school.

These aren't "gross generalizations" but the actual reality of either the culture or religion, these things are simply not the norm in western society. I love Muslims and for that reason I want to see them fix or improve out of this medieval way of thinking. Unfortunately, the left rather defend this affront to western values to appease some kind of "white/colonial guilt".

They want sooo badly to "fix" white male culture/society but refuse to "fix" Muslim male culture. Luckily for us, its one of their most blatant hypocrisies and only further pushes them outside the norm.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Islam is a filthy religion that is violent through and through. Liberals will never understand this.

[–]warsie1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Fascism is a very specific thing to say. Ba'athism as an ideology, ok fascism. Islam as a religion? Uhhh, no.

perhaps sunni islamist groups like ISIS. perhaps

[–][deleted] 64 points65 points  (30 children) | Copy

Even if it did get out to mass media and it was focused on, people still wouldn't believe it. The evidence is everywhere that the migration crisis will destroy our culture, but to say so is still 'racist' and people don't want to speak up. In addition, no one wants to believe it will happen to them, the first thing i thought was 'this wouldn't happen in countries like the UK because...' then i realised that's what i was conditioned to believe. Yes feminists don't want to hear it but neither does anyone, this doesn't fit the narrative for pretty much any group of society. This is a bigger issue than feminism.

[–]CaptainGloom33 points34 points  (28 children) | Copy

The UK's already fucked, you must have heard of the Rotheram grooming circles?

[–][deleted] 47 points48 points  (26 children) | Copy

I put it sixth on the list. The defining war of this century will again be centered in Europe, but this time a civil war, between native populations and the muslim immigrants, because wherever you look in the world Islam does not mix with other cultures without violence. Top of the list I put The Netherlands, simply because they are reaching the stage where the majority of pupils going through school in cities like Rotterdam are Muslim now, and any politician who speaks up needs 24h guard against assassination. Next in the danger list is Sweden, because they have taken proportionally the greatest number, and already have no-go areas. Also, it is a feminist paradise, so that handicaps them from taking useful action soon enough. After that Denmark. Then probably France, Germany, then the UK. It will be interesting to see what happens, but it will not be pretty, because of the numbers involved, and the fact that the 'enemy' is so spread out.

The tragedy, of course, is that most of these muslim immigrants don't want anything to do with this, and will get caught up, just like the native population. I imagine that will go two ways. A good number will 'defect' and just leave islam. Another group will set about an Islamic Reformation, as Christianity went through some centuries ago. What happens to the rest? That is the big question.

The curse is, 'may you live in interesting times', and indeed we are. But the Left, and feminism, is severely weakening the West, which is why this can happen. If our culture (and western men) was as strong as it was in the 19th century, it wouldn't be a problem. When these guys look at Western women and decide they are just sluts, can we really argue?

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy


[–]dogextraordinaire15 points16 points  (7 children) | Copy

If Trump gets elected in America, I'm immigrating. Quite a few of the people like me I know (young, professionals) have also expressed similar sentiments over quiet drinks.

[–]Real_Pokemon19 points20 points  (3 children) | Copy

Come in, you are welcome.

I, too, am a European immigrant in the United States disillusioned with cultural Marxism. If Trump comes in, we clean up the US. Then, we go back and clean up our ancestral home, Europe.

[–]bluedrygrass0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

There is no way Trump is gonna be let to be elected. In America, out of any country? That would be extremely masochistic from the puppet masters that made a point in making America the stronghold of progressivism.

If Trumps manages to be a serious candidate, some enormous scandal will come out about him, until his reputation will be completely destroyed.

If by any chance he still managed to survive the media nuking, he would be assassinated, JFK style. Or poisoned, or whatever.

Trump doesn't have a snowball chance in hell to be president.

[–]Real_Pokemon1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Perhaps they do assassinate him. If that happens, we win 100%.

[–]sqrt77441 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I'd love to share your enthusiasm, but I doubt much will change with Trump in America.

[–]sirjuicybooty0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

You know people keep saying this, but I think it would be interesting to have him as a president. Not that I support him by any means, but I feel like he would fuck the whole political system up so bad that it HAD to be fixed. After that its anyone's game.

[–]ChairBorneMGTOW6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

When this war comes (and it can't come fast enough in my opinion) I'm leaving my job and going across the Atlantic to fight. If these raping, shit-blooded scum can run off to fight for the Islamic State and come back with no consequence, I'm gonna do the same, but for the good guys instead.

[–]sqrt77442 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

I don't believe it, Europe is killing itself already by not having children. There will be no war. A slaughter (of Europeans) perhaps, but not a war.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Look around, wherever there is a large population of muslims in close proximity to another culture there is conflict. Look at Nigeria, look at Sudan, look at Lebanon, or Philippines. There comes a point when even SJWs can't stick their heads in the sand anymore, and even if they could, the general population could not. They will only stand so many Colognes, Parises and Rotherhams.

[–]macksdowntownsong1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Lets take the whole "refugee" thing for what it is to a lot of these Muslim guys who are coming to Europe. The idea of a safe zone in the Middle East or going to other Gulf States does not appeal to them, why? Not any blonde women in those Gulf States. I have to say that from my experience, Middle Eastern men are so thirsty for blonde women that they will go well beyond their means to get with one., hands down the most desperate for blondes.

Of course these men don't want to go to the Gulf States, they want to go to Sweden where they can grope blondes all day. A lot of them want to come to America because they desperately want that blonde they longed for. The irony here is that they're actually acting in ways that make it that much more difficult for any kind of brown guy to get those same blondes because they ruin the status of most men of their race. Arab and Middle Eastern guys have among the worst game in the world in general.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

After that Denmark

No, Denmark is doing much better than France, Germany and the UK are.

[–]tigerjaws4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

The UK is already happening holy fuck man, look at your population

[–]gosserbeer16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

Austrian here, another thing that I noticed is how the big german media outlets and politicians tried to keep silent about this topic as long as they could. This happened on new years eve, yet it took almost 4 DAYS for this story to be reported in mass media. Despite police reports.

It's absolutely sickening how they only responded to it once it was clear that this was too big to just blow over. And then you have other groups trying to put the blame on the women themselfs(!) the police, or because "their culture is just different". It just makes you want to puke.

[–][deleted]  (43 children) | Copy


[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorCopperFox3c41 points42 points  (6 children) | Copy

Progressives are not really liberals ... they violate every tenet of classical liberalism. www.illiberal-liberal.com

[–]Mr_Donnerhuhn1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

They're Marxist, or some derivative/active-branch of marxist. be it socialist, communist, feminist, mainstream mediaist, whatever. All branches of the same tree.

[–]ASAP_Bickle3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy

Classical liberalism is a far right wing ideology, individualist.

In the last 70 years in America and Europe, it has been hijacked as a term for left wing ideology, collectivism.

Since we're living in 2016, the word liberal in the way that most people use it is synonymous with progressive.

[–]Newdist21 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

2015 is no longer the current year

[–]2rp_valiant23 points24 points  (0 children) | Copy

The problem is that we've swung too far to the left - classical liberalism and the belief in legal and opportunistic equality is considered right wing now, if only because we've moved into a political space where the norm is "give minorities and women more rights than white men" to account for real and imagined historical oppression. The force vector on politics has been pointing for the left for so long that once we actually got to the point where real equality was in reach the leftist activists just kept sliding the scale further to the left rather than declaring "actually, this is where we want to be".

It's a weird world where wanting actual equality is considered right-wing hate speech. The idea of pursuing rape and violence cases on the basis of merit alone, or allowing the diversity of an industry to be decided by the mix of people who want to work there, has somehow been swept under the rug in favour of trying to "offset" historical imbalances. Because two wrongs apparently make a right.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

Sounds like you're in a transitional phase. I was like you over a year or so ago. I slowly started consuming alternative right ideas and saw the error in my ways. It's strange to witness your own transition, it just means you're self-aware. That's a good thing. And just a warning from someone who went through the same transition as you: Your liberal "friends" are the most intolerant people you know. Coming out as a conservative to a liberal is like coming out as gay to a conservative father.

[–]punis118 points19 points  (10 children) | Copy

I'll be honest with you, it's you who is changing.

You begin to see that the progressive goals of global peace, equality, tolerance and infinite economical and technological progress are utopian. Reality is the cure for liberals. Human nature is inevitable, progressives think that ~2000 years of civilization can change 300k years of evolution.

Begin to see reality without rose tinted glasses and accept the world like it is, I can point you towards some books about this issues if you'd like. Archeofuturism by Guillaume Faye is a favorite of mine about the future of our civilization.

[–]CanIHaveSomeGum2 points3 points  (7 children) | Copy

Please do, I'm looking for some good reading on winter break

[–]punis11 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy

I recommend:

  • Archeofuturism by Guillaume Faye, if you a have a deeply ingrained lefty/liberal mentality you can skip some of the "Far right" stuff, there are some nuggets in there. The last part of the book is a fictional short-story, which paints a picture of the post-post-apocalytic world where the Archeofuturistic ideals were implemented in full. An utopian short story I guess.

  • Fighting for the Essence by Pierre Krebs

These two books are pretty Eurocentric but I'm sure most americans can relate to the themes being discussed. (it endorses nationalism, or delineation of nations by self-ruling ethnic groups; it supports a caste or class hierarchy; it endorses social Darwinism, or giving more wealth to those who are more competent; finally, it denies social equality, that "freedom" is a definable goal, or that we can all get along.)

Slightly off-topic (more related to "RedPill" sexuality than "RedPill" politics):

  • The Way of Men by Jack Donovan

Currently reading:

  • Generation Identity by Markus Willinger, Philippe Vardon
  • Anthem by Ayn Rand

[–]1Ronin11A3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy

I don't agree with everything said here but I respect the hell out of you all for having different opinions and being men in your own right.

That's how a civilized society should be.

One should be able to disagree or even dislike another's opinion while fighting to the death for their right to hold it.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy


[–]1Ronin11A1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Only if the 117 in your name refers to Sierra-117, in which case, bro-fist, Spartan.

[–]ChairBorneMGTOW14 points15 points  (8 children) | Copy

If you believe in socialism, you're still trapped in a beta-male / female mindset. If you think that you deserve somebody else's money to be redistributed, you're a freeloader - the opposite of an independent actor with his own agency. On the other side of the coin, if you feel that your money (which you traded for a set period of your finite life that you'll never get back) is desreved by those who haven't earned it, then you're a slave to imposed guilt.

Red Pill men, Alphas, and MGTOW are - by the way they self-define - fundamentally right wing / libertarian. Nature is right wing. If you're still hanging on to the fantasy that socialism or wealth redistrubution or multiculturalism can work in the long run, there's another Red Pill you need to take, because you're living in an illusion.

[–]Danthedancingman21 points22 points  (0 children) | Copy

You see this often, and you've conflated several topics. In my view you are the one living in a rigid ideological political illusion that cucks you unless you are already in the top 1%.

There are many kinds of alphas, and the idea that union leaders from the past were not alphas is ridiculous. Red Pill and MGTOW are individualistic yes, and individualism is given much lip service on the right. In my study of economics, wealth redistribution is critical to preventing feudal societies. The state of nature is a two class system with haves and have nots, determined by birth. A red pill man born into the lower classes can accept that it is in his rational best interest to collude with his cohorts in a union. The real failure of our society is the failure of unions. It is good to have aspirations of owning a factory, but if you find yourself standing outside the gates being forced to fight for scraps, then accepting the narrative from the factory owner that you shouldn't want to unionize because if you too have a factory in the future you wouldn't want your workers in a union, that makes you a BP cuck in my book for buying into his illusion that helps him today for the promise of your future gains at your current expense.

The United States would have turned communist if it were not for the trade unionists that mitigated the problems of the robber baron capitalism.

There is a class war going on, and not everyone is going to be a hedge fund manager. Left unchecked the elites buy the system and lock everyone out. The true alphas of this world have zero problems with wealth redistribution, and understand that government is a tool to do so. They absolutely believe in wealth redistribution, from the poor and middle classes to the rich. They spend enormous amounts of money spreading libertarian agendas that provide them the intellectual cover to do so. What they are doing is red pill yes, but if I buy into then they've cucked me.

The men who fought for unions are just as much a part of nature. Labor and capital are in constant conflict, and while sure we all want capital and to find ways to build it, on the economic level there is no contradiction between being red pill and being a populist if you are lower or middle class. Donald Trump, for all his many faults, understands this and has made great leaps because he has given lip service to such populism violating core conservative ideologies.

You've conflated quite a few things, wealth redistribution is not the same thing as socialism nor is it multiculturalism. The system we have now is nature. Wealth accumulates upward, and extremes in inequality drive social unrest and revolution.

If are are a 1%er, of course you want a right wing government as a red pill man. RP ideology encourages you to try to get there. But not everyone has the abilities to get there, and if you wind up on the factory floor with little hope for advancement, organizing your brothers can be red pill too. If you fight for the class you are not in, you are being cucked. That doesn't mean you can't have those aspirations, you should do your best to pull yourself up by your bootstraps and join them rather than beat them.

Any time you let an ideology determine your reality, you are living in an illusion. No ideology, even RP, is going to be perfect in all situations.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy


[–]venicerocco0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

So you believe then that we should burn down Wall Street and take our money back that was redistributed to them via government policy? Is that natures way? Or should we use the rule of law to get what was taken from us?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

I don't consider myself a red piller, but I fully agree with you elsewhere. I've always considered myself left-wing, liberal, in favour of equal rights for all. But watching that first video, it's just fucking rage inducing the level of cognitive dissonance in the entire audience. To listen to the man speak, I'd hardly call him a rabid right wing traditionalist. He was simply stating facts. I don't recognise these people as liberal any more, they are illiberal, racist, sexist, and authoritarian in their views.

[–]jadedintheusa2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

I'm also a liberal who doesn't understand the social justice cultists. But I need evidence that the OP's (and Breitbart's) assertions are true. Blaming refugees for this is premature and no evidence to my knowledge has been provided.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy


[–]jadedintheusa12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy

I don't disagree. Modern feminism is essentially fascism and they have no interest in the truth. Only what serves their ideology.

[–]veritasxe1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Essentially, the Right in the U.S./Europe have failed at all of their policy initiatives. Every single aspect of Modern Conservatism has been a disaster. The new narrative being pushed out by the Right is that of the oppressed majority. It began with issues being frames in terms of highly salient activities and themes - War on Christmas, War on whites, War on tradtional anglo-saxon/judea christain/western way of lifes, etc - these themes have morphed into what we see right now as the main concern of the frustrated Western male. Not being able to express themselves in terms of their wealth (Asians have taken that), education (Jews/Asians) etc.

The key is always salience of the terms/narrative.

Also, the story was largely made up. A single woman was raped.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

A single woman was raped, and countless others were sexually assaulted. How does this make it any better? This was in a public place, thousands of people and lots of police close by. What do you think would have happend, if there was no one around? This will only get worse.

Your whole comment could be turned around, the left has failed with pretty much everything they wanted to do. They have caused so much damage to our society, the level of indoctrination is incredible. They are responsible for the downfall of our society.

[–]csehszlovakze0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

they are cultural marxists, that's how

[–]DaphneDK72 points73 points  (20 children) | Copy

I find absolutely hilarious that the city of Cologne (why can’t you call it Køln like everybody else?!) has responded to the attacks by issuing a code of conduct – for the young women and girls to follow – so that they cannot avoid being sexually assaulted in such a way another time. Now how’s that for victim blaming.

The rules in the conduct will be posted online and updated regularly. Among the rules, are that girls must maintain an arm’s length distance to strangers, not be separated but stay within their own group.

Next up: wear conservative attire and don't make eye contact. After that: don't leave your home unless absolutely necessary.

[–]Cheveyo35 points36 points  (1 child) | Copy

Next up: wear conservative attire and don't make eye contact. After that: don't leave your home unless absolutely necessary.

Or "Don't leave your home unless accompanied by your husband a male family member."

[–]GainzdalfTheWhey7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

Wear black bedsheets covering everything, use net things on the eyes so you wont bump into men

[–]DocTomoe10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

Køln like everybody else

As a German: Actually, it's Köln.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy


Reporting on the code of conduct for women (from the female mayor no less)

no mention of the ethnicity of the perpetrators.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Whats even more hilarious: the female mayor of Cologne was recently attacked by a crazy neo-nazi (with a knife). Maybe she should have kept an arms length of distance? Just goes to show how stupid her statement was. Fucking left-wingers have lost grasp on reality.

[–]infiniteslinky1 point2 points  (10 children) | Copy

Well, if you have a group of people that refuse to assimilate to your social norms, you have to teach your people to protect themselves from them.

[–]DaphneDK8 points9 points  (9 children) | Copy

There is a social contract in place. This is more strict in Germany than the USA. The citizens give up their right to arm themselves, in turn the state will ensure their protection. If the state is no longer capable or willing to protect the citizens, its first action of the day should be to relinquish its monopoly on arms.

But I was mainly struck by the extreme difference from the common feminist response to rapes in Western countries (such as the "slut walks"): that any suggestion that women might also be aware not to put themselves in dangerous situations is tantamount to victim blaming. And then we have here the major coming out and saying that girls will have to just suck it up and learn not talk to strangers.

Anyway, I mostly left Europe myself. Doubt I'll come back permantly. Many things can be said about SE Asia, but they don't put up with shit like this the places I go. There are also pockets in the USA where that still apply.

[–]boomerbux68 points69 points  (6 children) | Copy

The only good part about this is watching the left wing squirm at the unintended consequences of bringing in millions of men who make Genghis Khan look like a liberal. Not sure if they are too stupid to see it, or it's all ok as they just want to see white-male-western society brought down as hard and fast as possible. Already the backlash is beginning in Germany and Sweden, where violent anti-muslim attacks are starting to occur. That may also be part of the left wing plans, knowing extremists will eventually attack muslims, and then they can label anyone who criticizes indiscriminate immigration policies as a racist/extremist. Looks to me like the plan's going to work.

[–]Sdom155 points56 points  (3 children) | Copy

...it's all ok as they just want to see white-male-western society brought down as hard and fast as possible.


That's why they won't oppose migrants who themselves are from an actual rape culture. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

They're dancing with the devil because they're too stupid and nihilistic to understand what's happening.

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (2 children) | Copy

I still think they see women being forced to wear hijabs and kept on a tight leash and get secretly wet over it.

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]beginner_1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

And now the anti-migration politics of the European country I live in and the negative publicity all around the world gets full reward. Muslim migrants are almost complete avoiding my country and most want to go to Germany or Sweden. And obviously this will only get better because if the already have friends/relatives in Germany subsequent ones will go there too.

[–]Drenmar36 points37 points  (1 child) | Copy

Interesting. The leading feminist publisher in Germany is doing the opposite thing. But the people are calling the main editor Alice Schwarzer a nazi now, it's a bit hilarious.

On the other side we have leading politicians like Claudia Roth saying that it's not a migrant problem and we shouldn't overgeneralize here. Then she goes on saying that it's actually a problem with all men :D

[–][deleted]  (12 children) | Copy


[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev16 points17 points  (5 children) | Copy

Police literally tells women to stay away from foreigners,

Right. So there aren't any "misunderstandings". /s

Mofos need to GO.

[–]killxorxbexkilled2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

But they won't just go. They must be forced out and forced out with ruthless violence.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

Well, truthfully it's probably the government that needs to go first, but I am afraid you're correct about the Sand People also.

[–]killxorxbexkilled3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Thank god you understand that force is the ONLY method that will work with these people. This is why they have been ruled by force/dictatorship for millennia. The Western liberal/progressive mindset is so goddamn arrogant they project their way of thinking onto others and expect them to adopt their mentality no questions asked. Because THEY understand concepts of freedom/liberty/individual rights they think that EVERYONE else does too which, as anyone who isn't mentally retarded knows, is total bullshit. This is a for real clash of cultures - WE CANNOT COEXIST.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

They better go, before Europe goes all


[–]drallcom32 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Fun fact: 2/3 of them are already rejected. It's just that no one deports them.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy


What's interesting is that the mayor of Cologne Henriette Reker tells women to follow this new code of conduct like covering themselves up and avoiding men in public – considering her backstory. Before she was elected mayor she was responsible for handling the refugees affairs in Cologne. During her election campaign a man made an attempt on her life and stabbed her, but ultimately failed to kill her (obviously) and was then arrested. Afterwards he said he did it because of her refugee politics, that he wanted to do Germany and the police a favour and that he didn't want to live in a Muslim society 20 years into the future. As far as I know nobody in the media has pointed out this irony… yet.

[–]1IamGale0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

That's insane... Stabbed survived and now watching everything turn into a muslim state.

[–]higgns11 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Bonus: In the German legal system you can only throw the very person who commited the crime in prison. Not just anyone who helped, like in the USA ("conspiracy" law)

It clearly states:

§27 StGB:

(1) Als Gehilfe wird bestraft, wer vorsätzlich einem anderen zu dessen vorsätzlich begangener rechtswidriger Tat Hilfe geleistet hat.

(2) Die Strafe für den Gehilfen richtet sich nach der Strafdrohung für den Täter. Sie ist nach § 49 Abs. 1 zu mildern.

(1) Those who help another to commit an intentional crime will be punished.

(2) The extent of the punishment is to be determined by the extent of the punishment for the offender. It is to be softened after §49 paragraph 1 StGB.


edit: not as shitty translation: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_stgb.html

[–]drallcom31 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Sure, but you still need to clearly proof it and that's difficult for a person who doesn't even really exist.

I was referring to this US law, where the exact proof isn't needed and being part of that crowd is reason enough:


[–]DocTomoe1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Not just anyone who helped, like in the USA ("conspiracy" law).

Actually, yes, you can. We call it "Beihilfe". It's only applicable to the more severe crimes, though.

[–][deleted] 34 points35 points  (2 children) | Copy

So funny how feminists and liberals have such a boner for the people on Earth who are literally the most incompatible with their ideal society. It makes absolutely no sense but no one ever accused SJWs of being rational.

[–]1OneRedYear20 points21 points  (0 children) | Copy

tingles for the bad boy on a cultural level

[–]generallyaprick1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

The cognitive dissonance of lefty sjw feminists when it comes to Muslims never ceases to amaze me either.

[–]mahlzeit21 points22 points  (3 children) | Copy

Not a German, but Austrian - pretty much the same culture though, so I think this is generally valid in the German speaking world except Switzerland (who were smart enough to not open their borders in the first place).

Public opinion was already turning, this has been going on for a few months. Back in August-September there was a genuine "all are welcome" euphoria, but once people started seeing who was coming over the borders, that euphoria fizzled out and turned into a tentative uneasiness. Governments reacted, and in about December pretty much everybody started building fences and blaming each other.

Now it's turning even faster, and the so-called "Gutmenschen" ("goodhumans", basically politically correct immigration supporters) have lost the moral high ground and lost it hard. The interesting thing from an RP-perspective is that this is the line. They've attacked the women, now it counts, apparently. Who could have predicted that?

This thing is all over social media, and while mainstream media did play it down and try to hush over it for the first few days, they have no choice but to report on it now. They're losing credibility fast, as well. It's boiling under the surface of society, people are really pissed off. I'm looking forward to Merkel's next approval rates, they're going to plummet into nothing.

Also, next month there's an important local election coming up where I live and I'm going to enjoy the shit out of the election coverage. I'm going to bunker popcorn, because I don't think the shops have as much popcorn as I'm going to need for this.

In a wider context: Poland and Hungary have already shifted to the right and an isolationist policy, and the other EE countries are either not attractive to refugees or doing the same thing. Germany and Austria will probably do the same, depending on how stupid our politicians actually are. They'll have to close the border, or they're going to have a completely antagonized citizenry on their hands. There are already frequent attacks on refugee centers. If it goes on like this we'll see actual armed nationalistic militias forming with the support of the general populace, opposing the governments. This is going to be crazy, and it all depends on how politicians handle the next months.

Keep your eyes on Europe for the next months, there are enormous changes coming, and this event is definitely a catalyst.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

I don't really think anything will change. I've been living in Germany for 6 years now and what I've noticed is that germans tend to like taking it up the ass when it comes to certain nationalities and races. It also doesn't help that the country is ran by a border-line schizophrenic deeply religious feminist.

[–]mahlzeit6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

I know what you mean, but I'm pretty sure that'll change. I know that officially everybody tows the party line, but when people are alone and no foreigners are around and they trust each other, it's all about "das wird man ja wohl noch sagen dürfen." And I'm noticing more and more people start voicing their opinions on Facebook, people publicly supporting the right wing parties without shame, thanks to all the things that are happening.

I don't really know where it goes, I don't know if it's good or bad. On one hand the current immigration madness needs to be scaled down, on the other I hope we don't overshoot again like last time. For now I simply am enjoying the massive Denkzettel the current governments of Germany and Austria will get for their arrogance and holier-than-thou attitudes, and deservedly so.

It also doesn't help that the country is ran by a border-line schizophrenic deeply religious feminist.

Yeah, but how long will the people be willing to follow her? It's all fun and games as long as everything's good, but when brown people start showing up in their neighborhood and looking at their daughters, then even the most tolerant Germans will start thinking twice about what's going on.

[–]SpaceChris9 points10 points  (2 children) | Copy

German here. Feels like 1933 here. At this point, i'm not sure how to handle it. I always spoke my mind and pointed out what will happen. On the other hand, i'm kind of tired of it all. Probably time to move back to my home Budapest and let dumb germans bleed for their ignorance and (maybe) correct their problems later. Let darwinism do its magic.

[–]netgrey 8 points8 points [recovered] | Copy

American here, I feel there's some bad winds blowing. We have Obama pushing to get these same immigrants into the United States while simultaneously trying to take away firearms from our population.

We also have armed white men taking over a federal building. If things continue this way for another 8 years under Hillary Clinton, I think there will be a civil war.

[–]SpaceChris5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

I feel you. It is obvious that politics, judiciary and police merely exist to keep the midle class in line and productive. They don't have the power to protect us, but they do have the power to keep us from protecting ourselves. I always liked the stand your ground mentality of US americans. It liked the idea of self reliance. But now I FULLY understand the concept! It only takes one communist lunatic (google Merkels past) to destroy everything. And if you can't protect yourself, which is the case in Germany, you are basically a slave. It's true: When facism will creep back, it won't say "I'm facism", it will say "i'm antifacism". However, thanks to TRP, i became more of a facts based person. I studied history and it was always those that kept their ears to the street who survived in the end. Thank god i didn't buy property in this cuck country. Now i got a load of cash and freedom to go wherever i want to go.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy

these savages don't belong in the civilized world.

Liberalism/SJW is imploding on itself, as it is stuck between calling a large portion of muslims out for their barbaric ways, while at the same time trying to protect their "culture"

As a right winger, it is beautiful to watch.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

There are 2 areas where "rape culture" is a real, scary thing. Prisons and the parts of the world that obey Shar'ia law.

Feminists ignore one and import the other. lol

[–]NutellaPancakeMan7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

I shit you guys not, the federal office for migration and refugees (Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge) did a promovideo for seeking asylum in germany: http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article145792553/Der-Werbefilm-fuer-das-gelobte-Asylland-Germany.html

You usually only promote stuff you want to sell, but it strangely seems that seeking asylum itself in germany is the product here.

Contrair, at the bottom of the link you have a video where they negatively promote immigration to germany which is aimed for people from the balkans ( next to "Ruinieren Sie nicht sich und Ihre Familie" Don't ruin yourself and your family) Just compare the weather and mood from the first video with it. Seems they dont want people who integrate too well...

[–]Ninebythreeinch8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy

This is why far right is growing in Europe. Feminists, immigrants, government, media going on peoples nerves. Will history repeat itself? Looks more and more like it will.

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points  (18 children) | Copy

I'll never understand the logic..

These people have turned their own country into the absolute worst shithole in the world..

Why wouldn't they turn the next country into the same shithole

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev21 points22 points  (5 children) | Copy

You're watching it happen. Liberals don't have logic, they have "FEELZ!!"--logic is nothing more than a coercive tool of the oppressive patriarchy, or some other bullshit.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (9 children) | Copy

Exactly, it is baffling how stupid the politians have been. Places like Syria, Iraq, Somalia, Chad, etc are not shitholes because of the geography, or genetics, or the food, but because of the culture of the people living there. So, if you let them move somewhere that is peaceful and civilized, like Sweden, but say 'bring your culture with you, we are multicultural now', what the hell did they think would happen? If they instead had said, 'sure, come on in, but you have to leave your culture and religion behind and adopt our ways, become Swedish/Danish/German/whatever' then there wouldn't be a problem (and the number would be far fewer, of course).

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (6 children) | Copy

Dude there has to be something else at play here. Nobody is lacking this common sense.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Fear. Until the Salman Rushdie affair, I don't think any of us (including politicians) saw the clash of civilizations to come, and by that time there were already so many muslims in the west. They have been flailing around trying to solve the problem ever since. I think America, in particular, looked back at the success of rebuilding Germany and Japan after WWII and expected to achieve similar goals with Iraq and Afghanistan. Give them democracy and they will thrive. But actually, culture plays a big part, too. Some people are not ready for it yet.

Once you have many in your society, what can you do? Take any overt steps, and you piss off both feminist SJWs (and so public opinion), and also the Arab oil states. Our society is highly dependent on oil. So they try to pretend it will go away, and people will just change and become more civilized.

While I think there are some in an elite looking for short term profit, I don't think most politicians are that machiavellian, just stupid and afraid. This situation is out of their control unless they actually pull the trigger and start closing borders and repatriating, with the conflict that will engender.

[–]NeoreactionSafe145 points146 points  (80 children) | Copy

Let's remember why this happened.

The globalists want to destroy all the pre-existing governments in the middle east so the CIA goes out and finds people like Al Qaeda radicals and now ISIS types and gives them funding in order to overthrow countries like Libya, then later to overthrow Syria. Millions of muslims are forced out of their homes and many are killed.

These people got fucked by the globalists.

Now they are desperate and angry refugees entering Europe with the attitude:

"You European 'types' with your phony left wing ideas destroyed my homeland and fuck you all I deserve to rape your women."

...meanwhile the European far right sees the rapes and wants to fight back.

You now have two Beta groups, manipulated by circumstances to hate each other when they really didn't before this started.

The globalists set each side up to hate each other, then they fight each other and pay no attention to the shot callers, the globalists who are laughing at how easy this was to pull off.


[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock69 points70 points  (12 children) | Copy

They're overthrowing them to install central banks by the Rothschilds, maximize profits for weapons and 'defense' manufacturers, and exploit cheap labor (lower than minimum wage)

Mass immigration causes conflict, provides cheap labor, higher production of children (tax payers and wage slaves), and a reason for the government to crack down on the people under the guise of national security (read: martial law and fema camps).

[–]Bhiim18 points19 points  (0 children) | Copy

You have no idea how relieved I am to hear this being discussed on TRP.

[–]Polaris3827 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

Its hard to say for sure what the ultimate game/intention is here, but I think dr_warlock is correct or very close.

[–]kingis230 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

What? Where are you drawing these conclusions from?

[–]Bhiim6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

Get ready for a wild ride my friend.


[–]TRP Vanguardnicethingyoucanthave0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

They're overthrowing them to install central banks by the Rothschilds

So let me see if I've got this straight: The Rothschilds who are Jews want to destroy prosperous (and for them, profitable) western democracies who are tolerant of Jews and replace them with Muslim theocracies (that will not be profitable for them) who are intolerant of Jews?

That makes no sense at all. The Rothschilds will not benefit at all from the destruction of Germany. Jews in general will not benefit at all from it. As Islam gains power, Judaism itself is under threat. The very first nuclear weapon that gets into the hands of say, ISIS, is going to result in the destruction of Tel Aviv.

If "the Jews" are running things behind the scenes, then they're doing a shitty job of it. Because they're setting us on a course for a future in which Judaism isn't practiced openly, but exists only as a secret society.

The Rothschilds didn't profit from Stalin, and there weren't any happy Jews or kosher delis in Moscow. They didn't make money at all in Soviet-era Eastern Europe. And they wont do well in a Muslim Caliphate either. They do make money in stable, liberal, western democracies though. So if you think they want to destroy their gravy train in favor of a system that will treat them brutally, you're going to need to explain why.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

and /u/RedMorpheus

The elite want to return to a royal/serfdom system of the medieval ages AKA get rid of the middle class (caused by the industrial revolution). They want themselves at the top while everyone else toils in the fields and factories with as much automation as possible. They'll do this with federal reserve banks (every dollar is debt), monopoly on media (indoctrination and distraction), monopoly on food supply (Monsanto), monopoly on water (Hershey's tried), mass surveillance (cameras, online data collection, bio tagging), police state (militarization and lack of accountability), and privatized prisons and soveriegn coproate law ie TPP), and finally immigration. One piece of the puzzle is inserting the poor and unintelligent in significant numbers that destroy the region and out breed the current population. Poor, and just intelligent enough to work the machines and willing to work for less than minimum wage is what they desire (discussed later). Anybody that doesnt cooperate will be taken to privatized prisons.

Feminism caused a devalue of labor in the workforce, help creating the need for multiple household income earners, thus pay more taxes to the government to help pay off debt to the fed which is designed to not have the ability to pay it off. Women destroy power structures and spend all sorts of moneythey dont have on useless crap, placing families into debt and need to toil in corporate america. Women in education and media outlets bombard men with nonsense to betatize them into excepting financially and institutional submission (beta males don't fight back). Gender role swapping creates confusion and androgyny, a being preferred for drones. Uniformity.

The subversion and slow boiling of western rights have already hit critical mass. Bread and circuses keep most of the masses distracted while censorship, lies, buzzfeed, flag waiving, and female rescuing and support on MSM to keep them ignorant and divided among political theatre. Except theirs one problem, the internet. It's the last bastion of free speech. 90% of MSM is owned by ~8 companies that control the narrative. The entire school system has become anindoctrination and debt slave installation. And now the online alt-media is the final frontier to prevent information about injustice and truth from 'spreading. We're already seeing this with the new online 'hatespeech' laws with top social networking sites in addition to secret algorithms that hide political dissonance from wall feeds, and intentional censorship by admins and mods on sites like Reddit.

Mass surveillance, gun confiscation, and martial law is the final solution. Keep track, disarm, and gather the sheep with heavily armed force. The capital to place humans under boot is already in place (privatized prisons and FEMA camps). Now all they have to do is keep track of everybody's position and communication to track dissonance. The government has stingrays (ground and air), mass data storage systems and tracking by the NSA, no fly and 'extremist' lists without notification of the individuals and groups, and they're trying to access the valuable data storage capital from mega tech companies via bills like CISA (recently passed). These tech companies often know people more than they know them selves with mass automation software that gathers and analyses patterns from users cookies, search history, purchases, online posts, and profile information willingly given plus discrete gps info transmission with cellphones.

sidenote: the government is hoping to bio-tag all new borns in the near future. Dna storage in the database and gps tracking just like a pet.

The government has been at guns for awhile. Now laws that require mere accusation can get your guns confiscated. If a relative or significant other claims you're dangerous and so happen to mention you own guns? confiscated. Get a restraining order placed on you by a woman? confiscated. Get convicted of domestic violence, a term with widening definition, and exanded to 'emotional abuse', and ambiguously written? confiscated. Slowly they find little reasons justified by indoctrination and the narrative to get rid of firearms, a powerful tool to fight back against tyranny.

As globilzation takes place via military campaigns and the collapsing of boarders both legally and culturally, the fight will turn in house using what stated above to manage it and the police state to enforce it. We're already seeing this with the military (long arm of the elite, read: war is a racket), they're allowing women into combat which means the elite have switched tactics ==> shadow warfare. The elite and government are looking for an excuse to utilize the patriot act and martial law. Mass immigration of poor, diverse, criminal, and often violent ideology peoples will cause the chaos they need to justify it. The FEMA camps will finally be used. They're creating a problem and will present themselves as the solution.

One government. One bank. One nation. Brave New Orwellian World.


[–]TRP Vanguardnicethingyoucanthave1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

The elite want to return to a royal/serfdom system of the medieval ages AKA get rid of the middle class

Do you think the elite enjoy their iPads? Do you think they use the internet? Do you think they're happy when the new Gulfstream jet comes out, or they get to drive a Bughati?

This is a serious question for you to think about. Do they like those things?

...because those things can only come from a very large pool of educated free people. If you had destroyed the western middle class in the 1950s, there would be no big-screen TVs, no awesome CGI movies, no Google, no Google maps, no Internet, etc. Proof of this comes from the Soviet Union.

And if you destroy the middle class now, you can't even imagine the stuff you'll miss out on in the future.

So, do you really believe that "the elite" prefer option A: total power+boring lives or option B: practically unlimited power+the fruits of a vibrant, inventive middle class

Do you really believe it's better to be Stalin (total power, but sucky technology) or a multi-billionaire in the west?

[–]Sdom170 points71 points  (12 children) | Copy

You make good points, but I think there's something at work you aren't considering - Liberalism has suicidal tendencies.

There are many leftists who believe that their society deserves to pass from the world for its past misdeeds. That's why they lay down and just take it so easily, and why they suddenly find their balls when it comes to right wingers in their own society.

Look at the militia types in Oregon - they haven't hurt anyone or destroyed anything, and many liberals are calling for them to be killed. GO IN AND SHOOT TO KILL! It's interesting how easily these supposed pacifists flip the murder switch. Not simply because the right wingers will try to defeat them - the Muslims will do that and worse - but because the Muslims will destroy the west in doing it, which is their aim.

Looking at them through that lens makes a lot of shit make perfect sense. They think their society is so unjust it needs to be destroyed. They're like doom day cultists or something.

[–]DonaldJTrump2k1626 points27 points  (2 children) | Copy

Liberalism has suicidal tendencies.

I wouldn't say its liberalism as much as it is cultural marxism and Wilsonianism. Globalists love to use cultural marxism to pit us against each other.

The globalists like for us to use terms like "liberal vs. conservative" to further divide us but these days its more nationalist vs. globalist and Wilsonianism vs. Jacksonianism.

Don't fall for globalist traps.

[–]Sdom11 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

What we call liberalism IS cultural Marxism. These people aren't classical liberals. Classical liberals were what we now call libertarians.

When you look back at the history of the progressive left, the hand of Marxism or outright Communism is always there. Who do you think organizes all these student protests? At the student protests here in the States this fall, they were waiving socialist flags and the last word of their slogan was, "We have nothing to lose but our chains," which is basically the last line of the Communist Manifesto - "Workers of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains!"

If you think that's an accident, you're out of your mind.

[–]AndThenSheSaidNO20 points21 points  (0 children) | Copy

If ISIS are a death cult, those in favour of unfettered net immigration of millions per year are a suicide cult.

[–][deleted]  (6 children) | Copy


[–]DonaldJTrump2k1627 points28 points  (5 children) | Copy

Red Pill also applies to politics. It's a separate spectrum from women, but it still has the same concept in that Blue Pill politics is actually believing that the governments presented to the citizens are as they appear.

In reality, they are all puppets of the globalists, banking elite and Rothschilds and pretty much all politicians will do their bidding.

Example, Republicans and Democrats. The blue pill way is to believe there is actually a difference between the two parties. The red pill way is to understand that there is no difference, they are owned and controlled by the same globalist interests, they just use different talking points to rile up certain factions of the base.

US Government is just a puppet government orchestrated behind the scenes by mega donors, the ultra elite, and the Rothschilds.

Two heads of the same snake.

[–]Enjoyitbeforeitsover1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

How would you respond to someone who might mention that our forefathers didnt envision America turning out like this?

[–]indeydius16 points17 points  (2 children) | Copy

Islam is going to cause re-feminisation and reversion to gender roles wherever it reaches a critical mass in the West (7-15%). Women are nothing if not pragmatic at an instinctual level. The Mayor of Cologne (a woman) proposed updating the "code of conduct" for women, telling them to maintain a distance from strangers in public and to only go out in groups ( https://archive.is/WV1wN ). In the US that would be called victim blaming.

In the hierarchy of oppression, immigrants are seen as higher than women or children because the Left must side with the underdog and it must side with an underdog that makes it appear maximally anti-xenophobic. Michel Houellebecq predicted this in his novel Submission.

Islamic male cultural frame is stronger than Western male cultural frame. People know this instinctually. Women will adapt by re-feminizing because it is the only option open to them. It's a response to power. There will be feminists attempts to tame Islamic culture but it will take generations.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

There will be feminists attempts to tame Islamic culture but it will take generations.

no there won't. they will submit like they always do and be taken as warbrides. Women don't fight real threats, they talk a big game, but yeah..no.

[–]bluedrygrass0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Feminists crave to be raped and submitted by some unpredictable masculine strange. Not gonna happen, it's exactly what they're aiming for.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

Proof of rape by refugees: "that doesn't fit our narrative...so it can't be true"

Alleged rape by college student: "burn him at the stake! He's the living embodiment of rape culture! Muh-sogeny!"

[–]thenemaxofredpill53 points54 points  (1 child) | Copy

Nazi skinheads everywhere are shaking their head. You know times are dire when skin heads are like "we fucking told you so".

[–]ArcadesRed21 points22 points  (0 children) | Copy

And their ranks will swell with young men.

[–]Valentinus917142 points43 points  (32 children) | Copy

This coverup may be economically influenced as well. Considering that Germany is an industrial economy and their low birth rate and impressive education system means they need unskilled labor for their many factories. So they import it and they don't want public sentiment to turn against immigration, hence more reason for the coverup.

[–]Sdom194 points95 points  (10 children) | Copy

Close, but not quite. They already have access to unskilled labor from Eastern Europe, and automation is making unskilled labor obsolete anyway. Their problem is that they are facing a population decline, which is a big no-no for a socialist welfare state. Welfare states are like Ponzi schemes.

The problem is that these people aren't Mexicans. They aren't just looking to put their noses to the grindstone and work. They are very politically active and share a religion that commands them to consume societies. Basically, liberals are dicing with death and don't even realize it.

[–]Endorsed Contributorseattleron28 points29 points  (0 children) | Copy

Socialism, the biggest pyramid scheme ever created.

[–]eccentricrealist2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

It's pretty funny, because I was arguing about illegal migration, Trump and how what he says is that illegals make it much more difficult for legals, etc., then they ask me my thoughts about Europe, and they can't get it through their skulls that most of them are men, most of them aren't Syrians, most of them will stay on welfare, most of them don't give a shit about law and will ask for Sharia. God damn, the "progressives" are really scary sometimes.

[–]Sdom10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

They're dancing with the devil while explaining away his horns and tail.

[–]infiniteslinky5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Actually this is pretty well put.

[–]football10100 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

They are very politically active and share a religion that commands them to consume societies.

Islam does not command it's followers to consume societies. Muslims believe that you should respect the laws and culture of the country you live in but still maintain your own beliefs.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

They already have access to unskilled labor from Eastern Europe, and automation is making unskilled labor obsolete anyway.

Part of the unskilled labour needed it female procreation to compensate for the below-parity birthrate.

[–]Sdom10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I said that in the next sentence. Did you read the whole post?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

This is spot on! I live in germany and this is just spot on... I will leave Germanistan right after i graduate. My country is turning into a shithole.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

This coverup may be economically influenced

Nope, it's the only real reason, this was the reason behind feminism too, it was funded by the 1% because it created a larger labour force, it was a major success because it stopped economic growth in the lower classes by devaluing their labour, now for the lower classes which is the far majority of people, although they have to have a man and a woman working to make ends meet, they are no richer than before, so the only gain of the feminist action of getting women into jobs has forced women to have to work for no actual added income into the household.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (5 children) | Copy

It also has to do with the German guilt thing.

After the whole Nazi thing Germans are ultra sensitive about their optics where race is concerned.

[–]selfiereflection4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

The problem with the government not stepping in is that fringe groups may start to deal with the issue themselves. I can only imagine the shitstorm if an arab gets lynched in the next few years due to no one wanting to control the situation better.

[–]1OneRedYear6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

The west is going to roll right very hard. I wouldn't be surprised it hasn't happened already.

[–]Endorsed Contributorseattleron5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

100% correct. The Germans are dying to be know for something other than the Holocaust. They hate that the first thing the world thinks about when it comes to them is Hitler. It's why they loved Inglorious Basterds. A story about a different outcome to Hitler where he's killed in Germany and burned before the whole starving and killing millions goes through? Yeah, Germans will be all for that. I don't blame them, but this was just stupid in every sense of the word. 1,000,000 middle eastern migrants all at once? Good fucking grief, that's a train wreck waiting to happen.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy

But hardly any of the immigrants are willing to work

[–]Endorsed Contributorseattleron11 points12 points  (2 children) | Copy

They're owed something, and even though some of them are 6'3 and 230 pounds and 25 years old, help them because they are so oppressed.

[–]LambdaMale2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy

What Cover up? OP mentioned some subreddits, that is bad enough. But every German news site I look at, it is the top headline. Even the left-leaning, super correct ones. The Chancellor (female) is condemning it, the Mayor of Cologne (female) is condemning it, several cabinet members (leftist males and females) are taking a hard stance. "We can't have no-go areas", "must be punished to the full extent of the law", etc. And they all mention that the mob "looked North African".

At least in German mass media, they are as clear as politians get (for once).

[–]alphbux12 points13 points  (1 child) | Copy

This happened New Year eve. It took several days and the NY Times to report on it before the major German news did.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

But every German news site I look at, it is the top headline.

Their monster got away from them and I honestly believe they don't know what to do now. Pop some corn. This show is gonna get good.

Oh, and if you have any of your bets put on Merkel, pull them. She's a dead horse in the next race. Her own party will destroy her to distance their policies from her results.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

We've been told multiple lies about who these people are namely the fact most are refugees, but what's emerging is it happens to be the countries with the aging populations (Sweden, Germany, France) taking most of them in, refugees are now out of the question. The governments in these countries want to bolster their working class as you say and anything against this process is against their policy. It's of their personal interest to keep deceiving the people so they can get more tax revenue and reap the rewards when pay day comes. It's genius.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

The more automation we get, the less will we rely on low paid, low skilled labor - and I for once fear what will happen when X millions of imported people get told that their purpose of actually being there has been extinguished.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I wouldn't be surprised if it was being covered up by security services tbh. The scale of it to me suggests it is coordinated and organised.

[–]csehszlovakze0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

it's not about unskilled labor, it's about wages: more potential employees push wages down

[–]ThePantsThief5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Holy shit. I almost don't believe that first video is real. I'm speechless.

[–][deleted]  (8 children) | Copy


[–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (1 child) | Copy

On a related note this news article was removed from worldnews as apparently it wasn't the appropriate sub.


People in the UK haven't wanted this to get out as they believe it will spread islamophobia.

How ironic though the fear of an ideology explicitly telling it's followers to murder you is now an irrational fear.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy


[–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (13 children) | Copy

I grew up atheist in a "moderate" muslim country and I never understood the bend-over-backwards-while-sucking-muslims-off sentiment American/european politics share.

I think this is due to a certain cognitive laziness, an inbuilt tendency to think in parallels humans share. Not all religions are evil> islam is a religion> islam is not evil!

Islam is unlike Buddhism, unlike Christianity, and certainly unlike Judaism. It's blatantly racist(ask non arab muslims), sexist, self hating, self righteous and self pitying.

The Quran literally says non muslims are fit to be treated as subhuman slaves, non muslim women can be taken as sex slaves etc.

The worst part(IMO), is how it's built to resist reform: Islam claims to be the FINAL and UNALTERABLE interpretation of god's will.

The Christians had the protestant schism, the lutheranian schism and plenty of other schisms. In each case a religious leader was able to convince the masses to a different interpretation. This is nearly impossible in Islam. To alter the last revelation is blasphemy.

The west is committing cultural suicide, tolerating barbarians like this. Much of the religious right needs to bear responsibility too, for islam's outsized impact on our culture. When a fatwa was issued on Salman Rushdie, when death treats were made on the Danish cartoonists, or when Charlie Hebdo happened, the pope and other religious leaders all invariably blamed the writers for bringing this violence against themselves.

The best weapon in my arsenal against barbarians like this is the Anti-theism of Richard Dawkins, of Christopher Hitchens and of Sam Harris. I don't know about you guys, but I'm getting a concealed carry license and stocking up my armory. I'll be really wary when I meet Muslim fucks in public.

[–]rpscrote1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yep. Getting my concealed carry license now because of how this shit is going down, and knowing the bleeding heart liberals just can't wait to import more problems into our borders

[–]Linrraba0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

When Charlie Hebdo happened all the simpathy for them was gone when they saw the charges they draw. Pretty much everyone I know think they bought onto themselves. "Im not condoning their actions but" apologetics comments everywhere. Sourisseaux came to my country. I wish I could have shaken his hand. Dude is a hero for keeping it running.

[–]sqrt77445 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy

The solution is simple. Decriminalize firearms. I'd make sure my wife carried a gun and knew how to use it.

[–]chances_are_ur_a_fag0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

lol, that'll happen in Europe

[–]sqrt77442 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

With any luck the state will become irrelevant so their laws won't matter, just voluntary interaction and free markets. Not going to happen tomorrow, but shit like this just makes it more likely. Either that or the idiots will successfully turn this country into another socialist "utopia" or Syria part 2.

[–]chances_are_ur_a_fag0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I truly hope to see free markets in my time

[–]mugatucrazypills6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

The cUckloid Kingdom will move decisively to deal with this threat by holding an emergency session of Parliament to discuss banning Trump from the realm.

He was giving Muslim gang-rapists bad feelings and has been warned of this before by their representative, John Oliver.

[–]ManoshD10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy

One part about the story that somewhat worries me as a brown guy who can easily get mistaken for one of these "refugees", and something I will post a separate thread on, is just how much this is going to ruin these for the westernized ethnic guys who ethnically resemble these dudes. I used to hear about how in the 90s, a lot of men from non-white groups had great success getting laid in Europe because women actually found them appealing. Now that "refugees" and immigrants started to pour in, women started to be more weary of them and this resulted in women becoming far more racially loyal and nationalistic. It's weird, it's like this forced diversity actually ruins things for people of minority groups who are trying to contribute to western society and be model citizens here.

Illegal immigration and bringing in the lowest common denominator from 3rd world countries helps no one. I sincerely hope that Trump gets elected president.

[–]Wrong_Opinion15 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy

Lo and behold, the subreddit that the feminist groups claim is a club on how to rape women is one of the few carrying this story, denouncing the crimes, and pointing out the censorship of this tragic tale.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev36 points37 points  (20 children) | Copy

And this, gentlemen, is why those of us stateside can NEVER let them take our guns.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy


[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

We germans are not even allowed to defend ourselves. We are not allowed to carry certain knives, we are not allowed to use pepper-spray (they sell it as protection against animals.. otherwise it would be forbidden altogether). If you shoot or hurt an intruder, you will probably be punished unless you can prove that you were under serious threat (as in: the intruder wanted to kill me).

Fucking incredible! There is simply no way a woman could defend herself against a single person.

I wish we were allowed to own guns like you americans. I'd feel alot safer.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah, I don't give a fuck about rape.

So long as women don't give a fuck about false accusations of rape, about divorce rape, child custody rape, then I don't give a fuck about whatever pet issue women have.

We are all equal now and equality dictates that if women have absolutely no obligations to men then I, as a man, should have no obligation to women.

When a woman owes me something I'll return the favor. Until then, they can all go fuck themselves.

[–]wildhaymaker59 points60 points  (28 children) | Copy

Multiculturalism doesn't work.

[–][deleted] 100 points101 points  (18 children) | Copy

More like tolerance of intolerant and violent cultures/religions doesn't work. Multiculturalism in the US, particularly here in Califirnia, works well for the most part between different ethnicities and cultural groups. You don't see Catholics hell bent on killing Buddhists or Chinese mass raping Mexicans. Islam is the problem here and it's ironic that Feminists are defending it.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor43 points44 points  (13 children) | Copy

The melting pot worked. It allowed the best ideas, traditions to thrive while the worst died. Deliberately forcing multicultural values does not. At best, it creates cultural mediocrity, where everyone surrenders anything good so as to not offend anyone else (and if you are white, expect to surrender ten times as much). At worse, it creates hostile defacto segregation.

Trust me, the SF Bay area isn't all as happy together as the media might want you to think it is.

[–]mustang_mike15 points16 points  (4 children) | Copy

Hah no shit. Go walk around certain parts of Oakland as a white dude and you'll find anything but happy togetherness. Most of SF's beef is between the rich/poor, but there's a fair amount of racial/cultural tension as well (and not just black vs white).

[–]redpillavatar9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy

Science says that diversity doesn't work, and that it causes people to distrust their neighbors.

Though, I do agree with you that Islam is mainly the problem in this specific case.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Wrong. Diversity in big numbers doesnt work. People assimilate when in small numbers. People are integrated, when they want to be part of a culture. The moment there are enough people, who cling to their own culture and refuse to assimilate, thats when xenophobia kicks in.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I think that's something that isn't talked about the way it should be. There is just a fundamental problem with Islam, as written, and multiculturalism. Sam Harris has had a couple great points, and he basically made Ben Afleck look like a fucking idiot on Bill Maher. I'd link but I'm on mobile.

The Left Refuses to have a real conversation because they'll immediately paint the other side as racist. The right hasn't done themselves any favors because they either come off as racist, or in fact are.

[–]blooddidntwork4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

the only thing good about multiculturalism is the food. as someone, somewhere said

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (2 children) | Copy

I'm a brown man (can easily pass for tanned caucasian, mexican, native american, puerto rican) and I was married to a white woman. I seriously hope this intermixing does not happen. Pretty much all the good systems we have in this world is white generated. Feminists always compare to Scandinavian countries for a socialist state. They forget that that system was created by people whiter than white america, whiter than may be elves.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy


[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (1 child) | Copy

Thank you TRP mods.

I may not agree with everything said on here, but we have free speech here.

That is what matters.

[–]Spidertech5004 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

We do not have free speech here, don't get that in your mind. We have a very strongly curated focus here. We can talk about things of relative rp importance but that's not free speech. This isn't your megaphone for social issues. Just to be clear

[–]Statecensor10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

These women should be respectful of Islamic culture and not provoke men with their heavy coats and thick winter clothing.

[–]Darth_Sin7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy

Gotta love all that multicultural tolerance. Oh wait. When civilized people invite uncivilized barbarians into their lands, under the pretext of nonsensical buzzwords, they should not be surprised at the results. First Sweden, then Rotheram and now Cologne, it is going to get a lot worse for Western Europe.

The reason feminists and the regressives are not saying anything is because they are all weak and pathetic fearful cowards. They will happily attack and demonize white men who are for the most part peaceful but when faced with actual misogny and actual women hating, they will do what women have always done - Whimper in fear and be forced spread their legs.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (1 child) | Copy

I think they are secretly turned on by the entire muslim culture. They want to be dominated and treated like property.

[–]THE_BIONIC_DICK3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

As a western man rape has been pounded into my head as at least as bad as murder or worse but does this diminish the severity of rape?

Don't get me wrong I dont get off to struggling or dead in bed women so I'm not gonna go rape some bitch; but with my knowledge of how common rape fantasies are and how willing feminists are to let this slide it seems to me to bring further doubts about how we've been programed to feel about rape and how traumatic it is.

Conclusion: Either our society's anti rape propaganda is largely a shit test or I've been right for years that feminism wants women to get raped so they will become whole hearted feminazi drones for the purpose of money and power.

I know it's some prety awful shit to think outloud, you don't have to tell me.

[–]skulk2fade9 points10 points  (4 children) | Copy

I don't think its all about race, these people grew up in environments where women were objects, sold and bartered, trading goats for wives etc. So naturally when they come to the west, their core beliefs don't change, they are still the same people believing the same thing, then people wonder why this kind of stuff happens.

[–]theDarkAngle15 points16 points  (1 child) | Copy

I dont think anyone was suggesting that Middle Eastern and North African men are genetically predisposed to assaulting women. Of course this is about culture.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Which makes the left-wingers that scream "racism!" look even dumber. They don't get this, they don't get that it's not about race but culture. It's not about what's on the outside, but what's on the inside - in your fucking brain.

[–]PsillyWolf6 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy

Why would feminists want to cover this up? I'd think they'd want to do the opposite.

[–]ArcadesRed5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

They are not white men. So after years of rhetoric, it takes a while to shift directions.

[–]Endorsed Contributorleftajar8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

Subtle point about media manipulation:

Each person on that panel was chosen deliberately by the show's producers, intended to represent a certain perspective.

Look at the guy they chose to represent the truth. Short, glases, balding, horrible posture, highly reactive manner. They deliberately didn't choose someone likable.

Stay vigilant on this sort of thing. Pretty much all corporate media is brain programming.

[–]PsillyWolf2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

As soon as this post became popular... It just happened to gain traction in /worldnews ... Interesting

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

"alright guy's words out, we're gonna look like the piece of shit censoring news we don't like scumbags we are if we don't show it."

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

I think I understand why we have the such a strong law enforcement show up and black lives matters protests. You can not have a mob of a certain group of people go unchecked when they come from a background of committing certain kinds of crimes. It acknowledgeds to the protestors that what they are doing is acceptable, and that next time they can go "harder".

[–][deleted]  (7 children) | Copy


[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

I think you are grasping at straws

[–]neptunesunrise19 points20 points  (1 child) | Copy

I don't think he's grasping at all. That is one incredibly soft man on the left, and this picture tells me that all three of them know it.

The guy in the middle is also smirking, not smiling.

[–]Royalartist4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

My take on this is that feminism, liberalism, socialism etc. are pretty much the same and are exactly like a religion in that they are driven by faith and a fervent desire that what they believe is truth. It is all very much wishful thinking. Take for example the Jehovah's Witnesses who don't believe in blood transfusions. They would actually prefer their kids to die than to go against their beliefs. This is how strong the religious imperative is and we see it all the time in all religions. If we consider the left as a religion and diversity and cultural equality and all that nonsense as a part of their religious faith then it all falls into place. They would rather die than go against their beliefs. They would rather be raped or allow others to be raped than deny a fundamental tenet of their faith which is cultural diversity and equality of races, sexes, patriarchy blah, blah, blah. We in the West have separated politics and religion but I suspect we were wrong to consider them different. They are the same animal.

[–]mammothleafblower6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

More proof that liberalism is a dangerous mental disorder.

[–]hb8only 7 points7 points [recovered] | Copy

if they have a clue how hot are hungarian women, they will never go up to germany...

[–]Squeezymypenisy14 points15 points  (1 child) | Copy

Didn't hungary tell them to fuck off?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yuuup, they said nope, no more immigrants you guys can fuck off to Cuck-any.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy


[–]Donuteater7804 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

And yet people say Trump's wall won't work.

[–]disposable_pants7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy

Maybe these were all migrants, maybe this was a coordinated act, maybe 100 women were raped, not 1. Maybe, maybe, maybe.

The issue is that the story has become political before all of the facts are even close to coming out. The actual articles are full of unclear and conflicting information, yet the titles are fully politicized. The BBC article in the OP, for instance, mentions the 1,000 number but provides no source for it (Security cameras? Police report? A specific area -- that fits 1,000 people -- was filled with this?). An eyewitness claims that someone grabbed women's breasts, but also notes that the criminals were trying to pickpocket and steal, too. Eight refugees were detained, but "there was no official confirmation that asylum seekers had been involved in the violence." I've seen it called a coordinated attack, but how or why it was coordinated has yet to be described or confirmed by police.

Be smart; don't let someone tell you "what this means" because no one knows exactly what happened at this point.

[–]skoobled1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Absolutely. It's wise to be cautious about this. Don't be one that's letting emotions cloud the issue. It seems facts are confused right now...

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy

Canada shall soon follow in Germany's direction.

After Trudeau won the Prime Minister-ship, he stated that he would follow through on all his plans while in power (which can be unlimited in Canada, no term limits here!). After the Paris attacks (literally a week later), he doubled-down on his policies.

Now, instead of allowing mass immigration of men, women, and children, he's only accepting women and children. Not only is this a bastardization of his former policy (of which anyone can see he's trying to save face), but it also spells trouble for Canada in the future.

Eventually the women and children will become legal residents, and eventually citizens. There is nothing inherently wrong with this, so long as they actually like living here and can contribute to the bottom line (as other immigrants do). However, when you become a citizen, you can sponsor others to come over as well. This is usually done within the limits of family members - say, the initial group of men and boys who were left behind the first time.

If they're still alive after the Civil War, they'll have undergone nearly a decade of resenting the place that took in their wives, daughters, girlfriends, best friends, parents, but not them.

They'll arrive on Canadian shores, fully sponsored, but this time some will be extremely angry for the liberal party's passivee-agressiveness. And it will not be good for anyone (people have held simpler grudges).

It only took 19 people to usher in 10 years of war, panic, and mass hysteria in America (9/11). Of the 250,000 immigrants, if only 100 are bitter about what happened to them, that's 100 too many.

People have already been deported (albeit Pakistani Muslim immigrants) for threatening and trying to blow up Toronto's financial sector multiple times (Bay street is the Canadian equivalent of Wall Street), trying to blow up the nationalized train service (VIARail/AmTrak), threatening to blow up city centres, etc. It just hasn't sparked international outrage because CSIS (the Canadian CIA) and the RCMP (the Canadian FBI) have stopped all the plots so far. Recently 4 girls from an Islamic private school ran away to ISIS. The school denies it was Islam that caused them to run away...even though the principal is a Wahhabist (e.g. loyal to Saudi Arabia)...

Plenty of radical Islamists have spoken at Toronto's UofT Muslim Student Association, there was the "Toronto 18", and Mississauga is a hotbed of terrorist influences. Omar Khadr's family lives there - for those unaware, it actually started with his father Ahmed, who was officially Canada's highest ranking al-Qaeda operative, and was instrumental in brokering power deals which led to al-Qaeda's influence. For all intents and purposes, he was practically a founding member. It'd be like if Anwar al-awlaki's family moved to Dearborn, MI.

Had the Paris attacks occurred a week earlier, Harper would have been re-elected. His "policies of fear" as opponents like to state now appear to be "policies of truth".

Guess it's not too late for Trump.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy


[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

If you watch the Bill Maher show (featuring Trudeau's foreign policy minister) you'll see how weak the party platform really is - it doesn't even hold up to comedic scrutiny...

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

But the girls love that hot cuckold.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (5 children) | Copy

Your numbers are so wrong, it hurts. I live in this city. People and media talk about some hundred migrants and about 40 registered assaults. About 80 policemen and special units arrived on scene.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor19 points20 points  (0 children) | Copy

Citation please, because all the news I've seen, some included in the post, say the OP's numbesr.

[–][deleted]  (3 children) | Copy


[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy

I read some news about it and got imformation from victims but haven't been on scene. The authorities are still investigating about what happened exactly btw. I saw a video which shows like 200 people at the cologne central station, so as i already stated, the number 1000 is far from truth. I mean, think about it, this would be very unlikely. But what happened is apparently that many of this huge amount of migrants got drunk, escalated, robbed and touched several; one victim got undressed. German tv states that even children were involved. Around 40 files were charged, so the number of victims is probably the same.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy


[–]1PantsonFire12343 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy

This shit will only escalate more and more because we've but a whole lot of politically correct bitches in charge.

[–]theDarkAngle3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Fundamentally I do think this has a lot to do with women and feminized men being in charge. I think they actually think they can placate these barbarians with sex and money.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

This is women in charge, they cannot run a country.

[–]1PantsonFire12342 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Fucking right they can't. Worse still, real leaders like Donald Trump are considered 'dangerous' candidates due to the very character traits that make them a good leader. It's ridiculous.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

On New Years eve 1000 refugees were releasing fireworks and brawling. Gangs of refugees cornered women in subways. Only 10 police were assigned by police to manage the situation. There was one rape and 80 or so sexual assaults. http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/01/04/revealed-1000-migrants-brawl-rape-sexually-assault-steal-one-german-train-station-new-years-eve/[2] . Also: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35231046[3] . The story is everywhere now, including Reuters and NYT so check your favourite source.

to be fair, didn't woodstock 99 have 8 rapes and god knows how many assaults? (depends on where you look, but somewhere between 2 and 8)

I get the ragebait on this, but it's a strawman. It's not justified immigrant hate, it's police fucking up. I'm from a redneck town, and if there wasn't a shit ton of fights during a celebration, then I assumed someone had made a beer run.

[–]Fulp_Piction5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Can anybody point out why? I don't get what the left have to gain from this? Is it to cover their own asses for being so open to opening the borders?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

When I heard about this I was wondering why I didn't see it on world news. Holy shit.

[–]Sys_init1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Am i correct in saying there was no penetration going on? just groping etc? That's what i gathered from the articles on this anyway.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

I think one woman was penetrated via hands - and forced penetration means rape. They ripped her clothes off etc. Most other women were "just" groped, robbed and called names (whore, cunt and so forth).

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy

Jesus fucking christ, stuff like this is why I'm seriously considering leaving europe.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

why are you still there? if you're a non-muslim man i dont think they want you there

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Because I'm at university. Once I'm out, I'm moving to aus or America or something. Far from here.

[–][deleted]  (4 children) | Copy


[–]LessASnowmanThanAGod2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Feminism: Where "rape culture" is more significant than rape

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I love the smell of oppression in the morning

[–]FlintShaman3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Thank you TRP. I had no idea how many of you were so keyed in to The Game these days and how it's being used to manipulate everyone into war with each other. It is such a relief to know there are other men out there who see it for what it truly is. Men who are willing to stand as a vanguard to stop the encroaching darkness.

[–]alphbux1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I can't believe they removed the thread from the frontpage.

[–]Atavisionary5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

It is the cathedral in action. A lot of the time topics related to this isn't appropriate for theredpill because of its narrow focus. If you want to discuss politics, cullture, and society more generally but also from a very red pilled perspective, please join us at the /.. . r.. ./ darkenlightenment subreddit. We discuss HBD, Red Pill, politics as well as other topics a lot.

[–]macksdowntownsong5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

American here and the left wing in this country is doing all it can to bring these "refugees" here. First they say it is 10,000 but it isn't just 10,000, they will keep upping the quota to being much higher than that each time. People don't get it, this is something entirely different. We are not bringing into thousands of latinos that vote Christian or Thai refugees, we're bringing in a group of people who are extremely loyal to their religion and this is an entirely different situation. The "refugee" system is not going to bring in highly educated Muslims, it is going to bring in the lowest of the low. Americans are known for having a strict vetting system which is why we typically get successful immigrants and hardly have the social issues dealing with racism and segregation that Europe does, this could change if we truly allow that many refugees in.

Don't know about you guys but I am going Republican this election!

[–]TRPn00b2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

FWIW it was the top story on the frontpage around 7:00 today and it's still the top story in worldnews with ~6000 upvotes...


[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy


[–]boredguy934 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Anyone seen as looking out for 'british natives' gets fucking destroyed over here. Look at the treatment of UKIP. it is labelled as a racist party. i really am worried what britain will look like when im picking up my pension

[–]Kelly_Gruber2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

You made your bed Germany, now lay in it. This is only a tiny sample of what's to come when you allow anyone into your land.

Yesterday's mental illness is today's Liberalism

[–]Fuggernugger2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

You can't censor anything nowadays with the internet being what it is. But it's really pathetic how the media would try to cover up crimes like this just so they can be "right" about refugees.

[–]choomguy4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Jesus, that's freaking unbelievable. That's why feminism has no credibility. Basic tenet of red pill, loyalty an honor are male concepts.

[–]Momo_dollar1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

This problem hasn't occurred overnight. Its been building up for over a 100 years. Let's not forget WW1 wasn't about an assassination, it was about control of the middle East. The Ottoman Empire was weak and allied to the Germans, had there have been no war all that oil from the Arabian Gulf would have profited the Germans and not UK, France, and ultimately the USA.

Prior to WW1 the British and French had already started taking over parts of North Africa, after WW1 and with the collapse of the Ottamans they took over the middle east, carved out new borders, put in puppet dictators and shared the spoils of war in the form of control over oil rich nations.

Since then everything has been about maintaining that control. From taking out the democratically elected leader of Iran in the 50s and replacing him with the despised Shah, to every military base that's been set up , to supporting dictators that are subservient to the superpower's agenda while shitting on their own people and all concepts of freedom, to everytime that first Britain and then the USA invaded Iraq and finally taking out former friend Saddam Hussein because he simply wanted to replace the dollar with the euro as his countries trade currency and refused to open up his oil to the 7 sisters, to taking out the Taliban who in 1998 were being wined and dined in Texas but had the audacity to refuse the offer made to them and choose the offer from an Argentinian company to build their pipeline. Incidentally, or not, the company that they met in Texas and whose offer they refused had close alliances to then governer of Texas G W Bush and, coincidentally or not, future President of Afghanistan Muhammad Karzai worked for that company.

I think they let the refugees flow in because it's convenient and can be used when fear mongering is the appropriate tactic. Now a woman getting raped on a train can't be used to justify any political agendas. But when they want to pass the backdoor law for apple and android they can then turn round and say "10% of the migrants are using whatsapp/telegram to talk to ISIS commanders" "IS sending instructions to migrants through encrypted messaging services"

[–]zenkibudo1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Not sure why any clear-thinking, truth-loving folks would stay subbed to the default 2XChromosomes sub. Not sure why it's a default, for that matter. I've come to love and expect more from reddit. Finally, not implying that OP is subbed to 2XChromosomes -- just to be clear.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy

The worst part is while Worldnews let it be posted there, and is now at the top of the front page they've locked the topic, and effectively halted conversation on the topic.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

I'm curious what people overseas opinion of Americans are now. For years it has been that America is arrogant and how we want to be the world police ;now with the rise in islamic extremism in places like France and Germany im curious whether their opinion of Americans are changing.

[–]pms7773 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy

You made it happen by destabilizing ME

[–]wiseprogressivethink1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Liberals are, how do I put this, fundamentally dishonest.

They claim to hate racism, but voted for Barack Obama, who attended a racist "church" for 20 years, and they love talking about how awful white people supposedly are.

They claim to hate "rape culture" (which isn't even a real thing), but they voted for Bill Clinton, a man who has credibly been accused of sexual misconduct numerous times, and they defend an actual culture in which actual rape is actually excused, if not openly encouraged.

Basically, liberals just hate white men, and accuse all white men of being a bunch of racist rapists, but don't really give a shit about actual racism so long as the racist is nonwhite, and they don't really give a shit about actual rape so long as the perp is nonwhite.

[–]Summertime_Dimes-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

You are talking about the regressive left and not the progressives. The difference is a stark as the difference between religious conservatives and libertarians. The regressive left is basically fascist. They aren't liberals by any means and by failing to make that distinction (as you have done) alienates potential allies on the left who hate regressive politics.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I believe this is an issue to do with the location it occurred in, if it was America, Australia or the UK things might have been very different. Open to all conjectures here...

[–]Fapper2k0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Thank god they don't let them in the UK, at least in those numbers.

It amazes me that most people cannot make the correlation between this influx of migrants and our interventions in the middle east. A lot of those people support the interventions but then berate them for running away and coming over to screw us.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Someobody pointed out that in democratic countries, feminists attack men, because that know they are safe to do so. But the same feminists wont attack non-democratic countries (ie Saudi Arabia) or non democratic religions.

[–]Finzi0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Where is the coverup? It's all over every major news site and on the Worldnews sub. Who cares what XX mods do?

[–]InAStateTRP0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

[–]UnpluggedMan0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I once said that when the west falls it wouldn't be like Rome, where Barbarian hordes rampaged unimpeded through major cities raping and killing at will.

I stand corrected.

[–]My_Dog_Jax0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Guys this isn't news. Women only give a shit about themselves. They only "care" about people or situations if it is in their own self interest.

Not news. Not new.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy


[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

There is nothing to understand. It is a petty power grab by women. They do not go against muslims, because muslims will smack them in the face and won't take their shit. They like easy targets. They wouldn't be doing this if there were actual danger, or associating with feminism made women look bad.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter