NEWSFLASH: 45% of white women with COLLEGE DEGREES voted for Trump.

Reddit View
November 12, 2016

Summary: a significant number of white women voted for Trump, to the surprise of everybody but us.


45% of white female voters who earned a college degree voted for Trump (plus 62% of white women without). Read about it in the Washington Post here.

The article is ok, with some conjecture here and there, but many of the conclusions should surprise none of us.

This is directly from the population of "basic bitches", the easily triggered feminists who deride the "patriarchy" and find all things male as oppressive, sexist and wrong. But let an Alpha walk on the scene, and boom, the tone changes.

This is the guy who's shamelessly treated women like objects, has owned the Miss America pageant and was recorded saying he'd grab women by the genitals. Let a weak man say any of this, and imagine the kind of firestorm.

Lessons learned: How many should I list? Feels over reals, AWALT, etc. If women hated men and the "patriarchy" as much as the world leads you to believe, no chance in hell he's getting 45% of the white female college degree vote.

Be strong, hold frame. Obviously we can't all get his level of fame, money and power, which totally helps him. But If he was meek, apologetic and beta, he'd still be getting roasted alive.

Women don't hate chauvinists and "jerks". Those are only shit tests. What they hate, what they will destroy, is weakness.

EDIT: I don't want to make it a race thing, either. I'm staying specific to the facts of the article. What I'm getting at is that this same demographic produces a large number SJW's with vitriol for the "patriarchy" and the oppressive white male. But let a dominant Alpha arrive, who actually does so many of the things that the men they complain about do, and look at the outcome. Did they vote for the college degree holding woman? Nope. A strong man showed up, and they got the tingles. So he got their votes.

Post Information
Title NEWSFLASH: 45% of white women with COLLEGE DEGREES voted for Trump.
Author momomotorboat
Upvotes 1069
Comments 192
Date 12 November 2016 02:14 AM UTC (4 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Original Link
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
tinglesalphabetaAWALTframeshit testdominancethe red pillsocial justice warriorfeminist

[–][deleted] 137 points138 points  (23 children) | Copy

That is not why white women voted for Trump. We aren't idiots. Women voted for Trump for the same reasons men did: immigration, anti-PC culture, jobs, defeating the establishment.

His goofy personality was a detractor, if anything.

[–]a_scourge27 points28 points  (2 children) | Copy

Yah most female trump supporters I know say the exact same thing. Women can certainly be right wing. It helps if they have conservative, strong, redpill men around them. But he's just the altright posterboy, and if anything was the candidate for a Morgan Freedmanesque "stop talking about it" approach to the gender wars. Clinton wanted to turn gender into a bigger issue.

Which is probably part the Soros agenda to divide and conquer. Even trp is a result of the division which has been manufactured by the globalists to destroy and fracture families and communities.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

The fact you are getting upvoted really comforts me. Perhaps TRP is starting to look higher than petty gender wars (not that they don't make victims... but they are a consequence themselves and not a cause. Much like blaming a bullet and not the shooter) and investigating the sources of those.

I know man need to have pussy for optimal emotional balance, but he needs to see the rest of the societary damage aswell if he is to craft a smart solution for himself.

[–]HeatseekingLogicBomb13 points14 points  (17 children) | Copy

Republicans aren't an anti-establishment party. The establishment isn't "whichever party is in power now". It's "the two party system".

Women tend to be massively predisposed to collectivism. They're also highly social creatures, and PC is their doing, yes, even many non-"liberal" ones. There are a decent number who are very intelligent, principled, and Christian, or any combination or all three. But to say his personality (and resultant inter-gender social dynamics) was not a factor is disingenuous or ignorant. I am not even a supporter of his (nor Hillary's, obviously). But Trump is basically a cult of personality. Let's be real here. The perception of him is why people think he'll deliver, and why a guy who has been really liberal on a lot of issues his whole life was able to run as Republican and get them to completely rally behind him. Typically most people realize politicians don't deliver on promises. Many were not just "willing" to go with him, they were adamant. Many were just "anyone but Hillary", but again, I've passed the bottom line.

The bottom line is his personality and gender dynamics were a serious factor.

[–]aDAMNPATRIOT11 points12 points  (9 children) | Copy

The establishment is the 1 party system that pretend to trade power every 8 years. Trump just fucked it.

[–]Organicdancemonkey-7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

There's a reason the people like Bush family, Paul Ryan, and John Kasick stood against Trump, and it had nothing to do with morality.

[–]HeatseekingLogicBomb0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy

I hope you're right, but he's been part of that group for a long time. I understand, he has to "play ball" with the big businessmen. It may be he was being Machiavellian, it may be that he has his own agenda, only time will tell.

[–]bluedrygrass2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

If he really goes against the powerfuls, he'll get JFK'd. There's a saying that the first thing a new president is shown is the video of JFK's assassination. From a different prospective...

[–]aDAMNPATRIOT0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

If he was still a part of them they wouldn't have burned every last shred of credibility the media had trying to stop him, the effect of which was to red pill millions of Americans.

He's gone rogue, for us. Trust me.

[–]HeatseekingLogicBomb0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

That's a possibility, though people unfortunately do still trust the mainstream pretty faithfully. About 190 million didn't vote, but I sincerely doubt they're really "red pilled" about politics. Obviously, even if he isn't anti-establishment, Trump's supporters perceive or hope him to be. So, clearly not everyone there is simply voting party-line, or is okay with his more controversial positions. They just want something different, and find it a worthwhile risk.

I think approximately 55% of the population voted, which is pretty standard for the presidential. Yet people really against either party have been rather marginal for each of those last 4-5 election cycles, which means obviously multiple decades.

[–]aDAMNPATRIOT0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

70%+ have 0 trust in mass Media

[–]HeatseekingLogicBomb1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Thought Gallup's poll was 90%? I can only hope that's safe to extrapolate to everyone. Though from what we see from about 30-40% of people (liberals), I'd say it's not.

Granted I'm just assuming there that the party divides extend into non-voters, as Libertarians are estimated around 10-15% of the population. Surely there are other groups, but a number of them go and support parties. Libertarians generally are just (still) aiming for their 5% of the voting turn-out, and Anarchists would be really marginal, like a handful of percent if that.

[–]aDAMNPATRIOT0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

My figure is generous, yeah. It varies poll to poll obviously. And yes they found that liberals trust it way more than independents and conservatives.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (6 children) | Copy

Many people (women included) voted for him because he stood for policies that no establishment politician would stand behind (the wall, anti-TPP/NAFTA). He ran on the Republican ticket, but that doesn't make him the establishment. Paul Ryan hates him. Karl Rove hates him. The Bushes refused to vote for him. That should tell you something. People are sick of the establishment politicians who are out of touch with the majority of Americans.

[–]HeatseekingLogicBomb0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I agree, I am just saying who he is, his character, makes them believe his policy proposals. Even if most of the time people can accept politicians are playing them. They feel like Trump's different.

Both things are factors.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (4 children) | Copy

Republicans love him though. If people were tired of establishment politicians, they wouldn't have just reelected 97% of congress. Republicans voted Trump because he's a Republican. More Republicans voted in the states that swung it.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]RustedWheel 0 points0 points [recovered] | Copy

It is though. You can see the demographics of who voted for who. It's the same as every election.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]AmeriStasi0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Based Female Pede right here. Haha. Le Pen is like Trump but doper. I hope she crushes Merkel after getting elected - god willing.

[–]lulalady296 points297 points  (51 children) | Copy

This has less to do with Donald Trump's personality, and more to do with his presence disrupting the establishment.

That's what educated people want. To blow up a system that they feel doesn't have their best interest in it.

Have you even... asked a woman why she voted for Trump? Or are you just rationalizing something without any quantitative or qualitative data?

[–]Heizenbrg159 points160 points  (18 children) | Copy

I know right, there could be a myriad of reasons they would support trump.
Is it just me or is this sub becoming a place where people try to spin a story into a trp reddit post?

[–]TX_trp60 points61 points  (4 children) | Copy

I've been avoiding this sub lately because of this reason. It's almost like a popularity contest.

[–]professional_dev45 points46 points  (3 children) | Copy

I made a post in here saying how TRP is becoming a bit hypocritical with some of its posts.

The post sparked discussion but was instantly removed by the mods. Remember all the time when we made fun of feminists because they were censoring everything that can be construed as constructive criticism? Surprise it's in TRP now too!

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

It would have been removed for concern trolling.

Your points are valid, but if something's stupid to you, it should be obviously stupid to other people.

Either point out why it's stupid or ignore it and let other people realise it's stupid.

[–]Toastlove4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Of course it is, this place has a narrative and world view its trying to push. Anything that is trying to bring you round to its point of view is not going to let people deride it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

If you've still got the post, PM it to me. I'd like to at least see what sort of content the mods think should be removed. It's possible it came across as concern trolling. If anything, this is a great lesson in how to change the opinions of others deeply rooted in their false beliefs. TRP is probably about 75% correct. There's a long way to go on anything that isn't describing how to have your fair share of one night stands. One of the things that keeps me here is that this is one of the very few places where people can bring up any idea and get a fair and honest analysis from the community without censorship.

We can't let TRP go the way of feminism. I agree that it's becoming a circle jerk and that often blatant hypocrisy is ignored in favor of the narrative. This is not an inevitability as we get bigger. We need to get rid of random anecdotal stories highlighting sidebar content and start moving into nuances of social dynamics rather than overgeneralizing a few (important, but limited) concepts.

[–]clearedmycookies29 points30 points  (6 children) | Copy

Can we stop these type of post? There are many, many reasons why anybody of whatever category you want to place them in would vote for Trump. The entire election was a shit show to begin with and Trump winning the election was about as predictable as the Cubs winning the world series and Leo winning an Oscar in the same year.

Stop trying to spin everything into a TRP post.

[–]anonlymouse10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

The requirement for quality posts ironically results in low quality posts.

You can't just post a straightforward observation with one sentence. You're the forced to ramble on, and the original point which was tru, but simple and less significant gets lost.

The primary value in this sub is the sidebar, and then posts by GLO and Archwinger. Other than that, not too much real quality.

[–]anonlymouse3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy

Reliable prediction models, which predicted all elections they had been applied to beforehand, all showed Trump would win. It was predictable if you have a rational mind and know where to look.

[–]ChipMania-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy

You're so clever and informed dude, it must have been obvious from the start who would win for someone like you

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

It was obvious that Trump was going to win. If the media were unbiased the entire general election would have been like the primaries, except hillary would have been unable to drop out.

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

3 grand and change here.

That's a lot to a college student.

[–]HeatseekingLogicBomb7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

Susan Kolod, a psychologist in New York who specializes in relationships and sexuality, has a theory about why so many women voted for Trump. It all goes back to what they look for — and how they act — in romantic relationships. “In my experience, there are a lot of women [my friends and patients] who are very successful, assertive, competent. And around their spouses, they become obsequious and dependent,” Kolod said in a phone interview this week. “It’s not just married people; singles, too. There’s still a wish to be taken care of.”

Spin? The article is literally about women being submissive and being drawn to DGAF masculinity.



Tagged because I'm not spamming replies to you.

You literally sound like you're tempering right now. Yeah, there are a ton of reasons. The OP's post is on TRP topic 100%.

The fact that this is mainstream media talking about this? This female psychologist, and the female article author, are going to get brigaded by SJWs for it. It being multiple women alluding to the fact that Trump tapped into their hindbrains.

I'm not even some devout Trump supporter trying to rationalize this. There just isn't spin necessary, at all.

[–]Archibald_Andino2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

There’s still a wish to be taken care of.”

There is no question this describes a very large % of women. This is where the cognitive dissonance comes from. Feminism ordering them to be independent career climbers vs. their true feelings they can't pretend are not there.

[–]OmegaMan21 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

TRP is but a lens or perspective through which one views the world. In my opinion it goes a long way towards explaining a phenomena that would otherwise remain inexplicable.

[–]kremer50 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

that's like, so red pill man

[–]MonteInVirginia3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

Disrupting the establishment.

Like trying to overturn/meddle with Roe v Wade?

[–]lulalady1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Lol. Trump is pro-choice. Always has been. I doubt he changed his mind, he just spewed the Republican rhetoric when he joined the party to run.

[–]enjoys_fisting4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

That and the fact that no one hates women more than other women.

[–]jav2531 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I agree with this. The sub does try to dehumanize the female a bit too much. It could just be that quite a few White women saw right through Hillary's act the same as the Men did. It's also worth noting that Trump pulled more of the minority votes than Romney though still only by a laughably small percentage of the total.

[–]Gogoing9 points10 points  (10 children) | Copy

and more to do with his presence disrupting the establishment. That's what educated people want. To blow up a system that they feel doesn't have their best interest in it.

lol. Trump's cabinet is truly a thing of nightmares: Ben Carson, Rudy Guliani, Chris Christie, Sarah Palin, and Newt Gingrich. Drain the swamp? Trump is about to fill it with toxic waste

[–]OmegaMan20 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

This is a typical response from the left. Whenever they don't get their way, they resort to slander, innuendo and denigration. Reasoned debate and thought is totally beyond them.

[–]Gogoing9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy

cool red herring. your comment is quite ironic perhaps try reading it again to see the irony.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

This is true.

You didn't use the leftist method in this context, he did. Funny.

[–]WolfofAnarchy-3 points-2 points  (6 children) | Copy

The left is truly hilarious. First you trash trump for not having experience, then he assembles a RUMORED team of politicians and you get on his case

[–]Gogoing7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

I'm not "the left" and thanks for putting words in my mouth

[–]sfstexan1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

What's a rumored politician? Like somebody who may or not be a politician?

[–]clearedmycookies1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

like for reals, What's a RUMOURED politician?

[–]WolfofAnarchy0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Whoops, meant to say that it's not confirmed yet.

[–]live520 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Because they are smart enough to know that even Trump is better than HRC. As Susan Sarandon said, ''I don't vote with my vagina." Good for you girls.

[–]ChipMania0 points1 point  (14 children) | Copy

People think Trump won because he's some sort of alpha male that everyone aspires to be. He's a fucking hate filled sad old man that thinks he's still 20, and has been divorced countless times. How is that alpha? He sounds more like a fucking moron to me. This sub worships the ground he walks on and its annoying as fuck because he's just a vile cunt.

[–]blackedoutfast9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

u mad bro? he built a business empire. his wife is a hot eastern european former model. he destroyed the Bush and Clinton political dynasties and took over the GOP mostly by tweeting whatever random thoughts came into his head while giving zero fucks about political correctness. and he just won an election to be the most powerful person in the world.

[–]Archibald_Andino3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Pointing out the truth to combat this media falsehood isn't supporting Trump: pointing out the huge numbers of non-white men who also voted for him, pointing out the huge numbers of minorities who stayed at home for Hillary, yet enthusiastically voted for Obama, etc.

[–][deleted] 3 points3 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]ChipMania-4 points-3 points  (3 children) | Copy

Was it hard typing that with your tongue so far up his arsehole mate?

[–][deleted] 3 points3 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]ChipMania3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

Haha you're a fucking joke mate, both candidates were fucking AWFUL and I haven't lapped shit up. I just find it humorous you retards worshipping some fucking moron that wants to make America great again. Have fun with that.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

If your life sucks, you don't lose the chance to get alpha. You actually get the chance of becoming even more alpha than you could before.

Evil and failure are the strongest catalysts. Good guidance is one too, but i do believe the first two are basically unmatchable.

Or is our success the reason we are there?

[–]TX_trp0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy

I'll have to agree with you on this one. People don't realize that they voted for someone that doesn't even align with there ideals. It's like people saying they voted for him because they want increased wages..... WTF??? Wasn't Trump against increasing wages or did he change his story just like he does all the time?? I've tried to ask multiple Trump supporters why they voted for him and then go on to explain that every reason why you said you voted for him he's against it, they proceed to bring up some bullshit like "He's going to stimulate the economy". How?? Because I haven't heard him go into details on any of his plans.

I thought trp promoted intelligence but from what I've seen recently it doesn't. I will admit we had two shit candidates running for the office but pick the one slightly better than the other.

The thing that bothers me the most is that this is the beginning to the end and people don't realize it. Every advanced civilization tore itself down from the inside. This is the perfect example of that. I've also spoke with people that said they want that. They want America to be shaken up. Which I don't understand because why would you want your family going through shit like that.

[–]Werewolf35b3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy

Those Democrat tears are pretty salty aren't they?

[–]TX_trp0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

I'm looking at the situation from a reasonable perspective. Forgive me and my ways but I look at situations logically.

[–]frgualidiot0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

Trump came out in support of increase min wage clueless. He's a liberal.

[–]TX_trp0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

He's not going to raise the minimum wage. There are interviews over the past year where he says he wants to keep minimum wage where it's at.

[–]frgualidiot0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

And there are times when he says he's going to raise it.

[–][deleted] 167 points168 points  (26 children) | Copy

Or as CNN reports it.

55% of college educated white women support Hillary. Only stupid people support Trump.

Also at 11. The myth of Media bias. Is this the new Bigfoot? Stay tuned.

[–]Endorsed ContributorAuvergnat59 points60 points  (19 children) | Copy

Or, as girls on my Facebook newsfeed report it (paraphrasing):

-"People voted for Trump because they couldn't have a woman president. They hate women."

-"Yeah but so many women voted for Trump too."

-"well I guess a lot of women hate themselves. That is sad."

[–]Archibald_Andino15 points16 points  (13 children) | Copy

The narrative is that mostly evil white men defeated Hillary. However, Romney actually got more of the total white vote than Trump did (59% to 58%). The real reason Hillary lost is because 7 to 10 million minorities (you know, the ones protesting right now) refused to support Hillary the way they did Obama. The last week of the election was Michelle and Barack begging black people to get out and vote. It didn't work. They stayed at home. She didn't rally the minority vote. She didn't really nearly enough of the women vote.... yet the narrative continues.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (11 children) | Copy

Not so much the minorities as dems in general. Bernie supporters gave her a big fuck you

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (10 children) | Copy

She has no one but herself to blame really. She was one of the least likable presidential candidates in recent memory. Scandal after scandal after scandal, and hardly any voice in the media. Seriously, how often did you see Hilary talking on TV compared to Trump or even Bernie? She simply couldn't connect with the general population, and her motivations were clearly rooted in ambition and legacy alone (though you might say the same for Trump, at least he resonated with a specific population).

I've never seen so much discontent in the democratic voting base, and I basically live within the democratic voting base. Trump would've been seen as a joke and democrats would've flocked to the polls if they had just chosen a safe, vanilla, scandal-free, and right-leaning democrat. Instead they pushed Hilary. Why? SJW nonsense and because she's part of the establishment. Hey, we had our first black president, let's check off the next box, a woman! After that they would've pushed for a Latino candidate, and after that probably a random black woman they found serving some podunk district in a swing state. On top of that, the democratic leaders basically just saw it as Hilary's time. Nevermind what the people want, we want a woman president and this one has been around long enough. She deserves the presidency. She's earned it.

Well, this is proof that no one has "earned" the presidency. It goes to who the people want. I don't doubt we'll have a woman president someday, but the people don't just want a woman, they want someone who they want to lead them, and when you try to show something down the throats of the American people that they don't want... they bite down hard.

[–]smirk_addict3 points4 points  (6 children) | Copy

Exactly. I wasn't a Trump supporter but id rather him than her. Anybody who truly pays attention knows that woman will say or do anything to be president. They went with her because they thought they could rally votes for her on some social justice female empowerment shit. Rather than old white man Bernie. A guy that was getting his ass beat and arrested with Dr. Martin Luther King. There is no doubt he gave a damn. This is what the democrats deserve.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy

I wasn't a Trump supporter either, but mostly because of my particular key issues (e.g. healthcare, where most of the patients I work with benefit greatly from the ACA, and research funding, which looks like it will head downwards given his plans for government attrition and dislike of the NIH). Save for my personal convictions, I would definitely go for Trump. The government is clunky and inefficient. If I were at the helm I'd certainly downsize most parts of it and divert more funds towards scientific research while leaving the rest for support to private industry and incentives to stay in the US.

His presidency if anything has me a bit uneasy with the SJW movement that pretty thoroughly surrounds me. I'm in a liberal city in an academic environment. When Trump won, people started seriously talking about moving to other countries. The LGBTQ cohort started playing the victim, hard, but the reality is that Trump has really never expressed any negative views towards the LGBTQ community ever. Pretty much any standard republican was far more right-leaning in that regard. It was hysteria without basis, all because they had a personal bias of not liking the guy. It was all very disappointing from a group of people I expected to have the ability to critically analyze a situation.

[–]Vermouth19911 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

I seem to recall that on a Republican rally (when he first won the GoP candidate spot, I think) he said he's with the LGBTQ people. Even if that's just lip service, that was lip service that no Republican guy ever cared to make before.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Exactly. I'd never say that Trump is a better option for LGBTQ than Hillary would've been, but come on, Ted Cruz held a massive convention to address his concern about the "moral decay" of the country, specifically relating to Gay marriage, and basically spelled it out that he'd try to reverse it. Christie voted against gay marriage. Rubio literally had a plan spelled out to make gay marriage illegal again. Trump says gay marriage is, "fine."

Now, do you think we'd have our FBs blown up with random 22-30 y/o liberals shouting about the horrors to come and how we need to protect our LGBTQ friends from harm if Rubio won? No. The politically informed might throw a fit, but most people would simply say, "oh, well I guess the republicans are in power now." For Trump, they are having a visceral reaction to a man who is unapologetically alpha. Honestly, I don't even think he's a good choice (better than the alternative, but what does that say?). He realistically has no plan. But it kills me to see otherwise brilliant and educated people showing their true ignorance and ability to be manipulated by popular opinion.

If anything, this is a sign that a republican candidate can openly claim indifference to gay marriage and still win the votes of republicans. This is literally how large paradigm shifts in cultural acceptance occur, when you have a leader of an opposing party who has decided to give up the fight against that particular issue, that is the first step towards bipartisanship.

Future republican nominees will undoubtedly realize that they can capture the republican vote without opposing gay marriage while also swinging some young voters who are fiscally conservative but socially liberal.

[–]Vermouth19910 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

Wow, really? He was that much of an activist when he was young?

[–]smirk_addict1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Sorry, I'm on my phone and since the mobile site updated I no longer get notifications when people reply to my messages. But yeah, Bernie Sanders has been on that shit since the 1950s.

[–]Vermouth19911 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Thank you for replying. And in case we ever converse again in the future: I have a definite "better late than never" attitude towards replies to my comments. :)

[–]red-pill-man1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Michelle Obama will be the Dems nomination in 2020. Book it.

[–]bluedrygrass0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Seriously, how often did you see Hilary talking on TV compared to Trump or even Bernie?

She couldn't deal the pressure. A few too many people saw the videos of her fainting and having ridicolous tilting when overpressured. All her answers were scripted, she even had an earpiece in some live debates!

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Hey, we had our first black president, let's check off the next box, a woman! After that they would've pushed for a Latino candidate, and after that probably a random black woman they found serving some podunk district in a swing state.

Why is this? It's because the owners (the globalists such as Soros) can more easily manipulate an unknown who runs with no particular policy platform.

[–]mphjo5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

The narrative is that mostly evil white men defeated Hillary.

The SJW feminazi scum media narrative is that evil white "uneducated" men defeated hillary. Throughout the campaigning, the media tried to shame white men into voting hillary by trying to say that only "evil white uneducated men" would vote trump.

That was the propaganda the propagandist used to try and win the election for hillary. It didn't work because most of the country is getting sick of the idiot propagandists in the NYTimes, NPR, etc.

[–]greatslyfer2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Basically saw this post from a girl on my FB feed being mad at white women and the men who somehow "manipulated them in to losing their dignity" by voting Trump.

Yes, we all believe that women are being mentally controlled by the evil aliens known as the patriarchy, you are to be taken very seriously.

[–]aanarchist11 points12 points  (3 children) | Copy

most women hate themselves deep down, they're smart enough to know about female nature and how it makes them hopelessly dependent on men, yet despite it being so they can't help but be a thorn in man's side to the point where things like red pill and mgtow arose to solve the problem that is woman, to the point where there's dudes looking to make robots that replace women entirely. hard not to hate yourself as a woman imo.

[–]Endorsed ContributorAuvergnat0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

Utterly stupid. Like, women hate themselves and would avoid voting for a woman because of it..

[–]bluedrygrass1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Utterly stupid? Maybe, but it's the female nature. Females are ten times more socially aware of what makes them different from men. Men are SO oblivious, and treats women like they are men and expect them to reason and feel like men. But women knows what's up, they see how we are less influenced by emotions, less malicious, less self-centered.

[–]LOST_TALE25 points26 points  (1 child) | Copy

45% stupidity rate. College=op

[–]babybelly4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

There are many stupid people in college

[–]Murgie0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Sounds like you want them to place your feels over their reals. 45% for, or 55% against, they're both facts. Ditch the persecution complex.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Stop being stupid. It's called a joke.

[–]Fedor_Gavnyukov28 points29 points  (0 children) | Copy

you are molding the article to fit your own belief aka hamstering. don't hamster.

[–]TB3o342 points43 points  (2 children) | Copy

How to you get all that from single statistic? Don't you think it's a bit of s stretch?

[–]Swallowed_the_pill8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy

It's pretty ironic that he is using one statistic to draw a whole bunch of conclusions. Just like feminists typically do with the wage gap and other myths.

[–]TB3o34 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Exactly. I'd like to think that TRP upholds some kind of standard, but too many posts like this reach front page...

[–]Canadaismyhat16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

"When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail."

Sure makes the community look bad when basic philosophy is stretched like this and misapplied. This sub is self-defeating as often as it is educational.

[–]lightenday5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

God damn this sub has gone to hell.

[–]danishih0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

almost unreadable over the last week or so. if it carries on for much longer it'll be dead to me

[–]PM-ME-YOUR-SEXTAPE15 points16 points  (2 children) | Copy

Rly? Not on my campus apparently. Basic bitches bursting out in tears

[–]doveenigma139 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

Not just that. Middle aged hippy bitches losing their mind on my Facebook.

[–]sfstexan8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

55% of them are in tears. Pay attention to the other 45% watching them cry with a slight smirk.

[–]1ShallITinder10 points11 points  (2 children) | Copy

I've had a way better experience with white women that lean right and are Republican compared to the left wing "equality" types that mostly pretend to be tolerant. Just to clarify, I am a brown (Indian) but born and raised in California. I've lived in other states and notice that I have an easier time with "country girls", redneck girls, girls from conservative families, and girls that generally go Republican. Most of the white girls I've been with have had conservative views, haven't found them to be racist at all. I mean even Ann Coulter and Laura Ingraham dated Dnesh D Souza.

On the other hand, it is the left wing "tolerant" type of white girls that immediately put all guys of minority groups into a box. Every Asian guy is this way and every Hispanic guy is that way. These same women who would go politically correct on everyone will have their OkCupid preferences to where only white men are allowed. I am not saying they're racist but it makes no sense to me for them to try that hard to prove they're so worldly and "not racist" yet exclusively go for white guys, using minorities as some sort of stepping stones.

[–]Utterberetacht1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I’d call them both racist and hypocritical. Unplugging from the matrix has not only put me through the Five Stages of Unplugging, but also a feeling that I’ve been betrayed because they’re supposedly against racism.

[–]_PowerBull0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

They're psychologically projecting.

[–]Hillary_For_Prison3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy

Ever comsider that maybe, just maybe, even most women are tired of Hillary and the democrat party's bullshit? Sometimes there is a simpler explanation than alpha/beta evolutionary theory.

[–]SamuraiPizzaCatz2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

Watching a lot of these theories come to fruition on here just further validates my own theory that half of theredpill is autistic.

[–]Hillary_For_Prison2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Autistic isn't the right word. You see the same crap over on twoX and in the fembot forums. The TRP reddit exists to further a narrative. There is some truth to the narrative but also some error. Adherents tend to apply the theory of TRP very broadly and ignore that stuff besides some heavily suppresed evolutionary tendencies can influence people. They aren't autistic though. The mirror image of TRP is in just about every fembot subreddit.

[–]SamuraiPizzaCatz0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Eh, I mean autistic in the context of over-analytical to the point of being borderline socially retarded.

Don't know a better word for it, but we get each other's drift.

[–]NeoreactionSafe45 points46 points  (36 children) | Copy


And these are the girls and women I see smiling.

The white women want masculine men without all this multicultural bullshit. They want family and children and beautiful children that look like them.

Frankly they want the men to be men again.


"Kill the Beta"... even the women are saying this now by voting.


[–][deleted] 11 points11 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]NeoreactionSafe2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well give it some time.

I expect to see some women who care to be sexy and sophisticated more in the future and less of this degenerate shit.

Just wait a few years and see.


[–]Danr630[🍰] 8 points9 points  (3 children) | Copy

This actually came up in a news article a few years back with the metrosexual movement was in full swing. There were a group of women saying they simply wanted real men - even if that included bad manners and back hair.

[–]_the_shape_8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

And therein is one point of relevancy (among several others) to TRP.

Women, it turns out, are a lot like Hillary, amusingly: a public position ("oh yeah, I totally dig fedora-wearing nu-males with circulation-restricting skinny jeans") and a private one ("I just want an imposing, powerful man to dominate me")

[–]NeoreactionSafe1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

That feeling finally made it into the election.

Yes, women are sick of this bullshit and want masculine men back.


[–]BrackOBoyO2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

South park parodied exactly this

[–]harsheehorshee11 points12 points  (8 children) | Copy

So you're saying multicultural people (that aren't white) are not masculine?

[–]starts_shit34 points35 points  (2 children) | Copy

Hes saying white women should be with white men, because hes a white supremacist

[–]redpill_llipder1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

He didn't say they should be. He said they want to be, which is very different.

[–]redpill_llipder2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

Stop looking for reasons to be offended. He never said that. He said 1) that white women want masculine men, and 2) white women don't want multicultural men. It's illogical to conclude from that that he thinks multicultural men can't be masculine.j

Note: I'm not arguing the accuracy of his assertions because I don't want to research to find out if they are correct. I am just arguing your conclusion doesn't follow from what he said.

[–]harsheehorshee0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

I understand. Just because he's saying white women want white men does not imply that masculine men is limited to white men. It is just saying that white women don't want nerdy weak white men. However, the implication is still there. Especially regarding statement number 2. Can't ignore the white supremacy there.

[–]redpill_llipder0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

I don't think I would even call number 2 white supremacy just because it is about attraction and I don't think anyone is obligated to be attracted to anyone else. If that's white supremacy then you would have to agree that most guys are size-ist for not being attracted to fat girls.

Although, admittedly, if the white women don't want multicultural men for some reason other than they aren't attracted, i.e. they don't want them because they think black people are worse human beings or something, then sure of course that's white supremacy.

[–]harsheehorshee0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I disagree partially in terms of in race to in race preferences - it CAN be manipulated and affected by environment and exposure. Asian women have been dating white guys and have the highest out marriage NOT because they are unattracted to asian men (that has long been debunked) but because of soft power (hollywood, cultural influence). If you are a young asian girl watching these things, and if you look around and see confident white dudes with shy quiet asian males (because the asian males see themselves as goofy cucks on tv), hypergamy will definitely have an influence. Same concept goes for women in general towards black men. American soft power does hypermasculinize them (whether the general african american male populace really is like kobe bryant..aka they're not) and the influecne does show. "Preferences" is merely a pretty word disguising the real influences you receive when you are young by your parents, environment, and the media you consume.

[–]NeoreactionSafe-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy


The 12%-14% European ancestry population seeks survival.

To survive it needs masculine men.

If other people's are doing well or poorly it doesn't effect things.

Remember the globalists push this multicultural bullshit, we don't.

We aren't interested in being slaves to the globalists.


[–]SirBootyLove9 points10 points  (5 children) | Copy

Are you suggesting multicultural people aren't attractive?

[–]NeoreactionSafe3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

The European ancestry population of the world is about 12%-14%.

Within that population you have concepts of beauty that reinforce it's survival.

So yes... survival is always attractive to the ancestry that seeks survival.

And this is true for everyone.


[–]redpill_llipder0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

He's saying white women in general don't want multicultural men. He didn't even necessarily suggest that it's due to lack of attraction. But, even if that is what he wants to say no one is obligated to find anyone else attractive. (notice he didn't even say anything about his own levels of attraction to multicultural people.) Comments like this are as bad as lard ass feminists screeching, "Are you saying fat people aren't attractive?" Like I told someone else, stop looking for reasons to be offended.

[–]blackchadthundercock 0 points0 points [recovered] | Copy

That's exactly what he's saying. We're all going to hear the "white power" rhetoric for a while. It's already gotten to the point where guys are scrawling "white power" & "fuck niggers" on bathroom walls at schools. This is how violence starts.

To them I say feel free to gloat at Trumps win, but don't think that gives you a license to start violence & treat us as second class citizens again. We ain't going back to the early 60s & colored signs just because Trump won.

Dont start nothin' won't be nothin'. Us minorities do know how to push back when backed into corners. We have experience in these matters.

[–]a_scourge9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

Most white people condemn such rhetoric. Violence even more so.

Most altright and even *nationalist, nrx and DE 'participants' or proponents don't support such racial attitudes either. In fact from my perspective the true cause is that of good vs evil, wherein the globalists are evil and they can only get away with their weird pizzagate abuse of innocents by keeping good people divided by race or gender. Menicus Moldbug launched the movement and what he describes as the multi tentacled monster of DC is currently on the run, mostly because black, white, Hispanic, male and female Americans rallied around a patriot

[–]Organicdancemonkey-1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's this sentiment he expressing.

[–]xsquivelx1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

I mean those pretty natural evolutionary traits if you ask me.

[–]GlennDoom820 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I think Noreactionsafe is referring to how Trump is in support of strengthening the white race in America. That notion has ppl wringing hands. It threatens non-whites something fierce. Difficult to know what the right call is if you want to both be an American and be proud of your heritage, cuz historical justice.

[–]baseballfan9010 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy

White women love strong men alright, which is why they have a reputation for loving the big black dick. True thing about the children looking like them though, they want to settle with a good white man.

[–]_PowerBull2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well black women do prefer white men.

[–]dudet230 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

What! What are you talking about! Mixed race children are BEAUTIFUL....

[–]NeoreactionSafe0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy

Having had a mixed race girlfriend once it was just sad to see the child who looked entirely African even though he was just 25% so by DNA.

It's really a misfortune of how DNA works.

When the European (who has many recessive and rare genes) mates with someone from the "Generic Brown" gene pool you get something that looks generic.

Fortunately most white dicks are large compared to other ancestries so the dick size for white men is never a problem.

Asians are the smallest.

Remember that each ethnic group tends to "match" so if the average white guy has a 6" dick the average white vagina is designed to perfectly "catch" that 6" dick.

Asian women are designed for a 5" dick.

Africans are maybe 6.5" on average.


[–]baseballfan9011 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy

Well, White people dicks are average at best, you can't call them large by any means, and you have to compare them to Asian dicks to consider them large. But really they are competing against much larger black dicks, and I've even heard Arab dicks being much larger. This is why there is a reputation for white girls going to black men, and fantasising about black men, or in Israel white Israelis flocking to Arab men for sex, then when it is time to settle down, they want a nice beta white guy.

But I agree, superior white genes can only be passed down by mating with white people.

[–]NeoreactionSafe1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Who really cares, you know?

I mean the result is that women want babies that look like them... don't criticize what comes naturally.

Let the women choose the DNA that they want.


[–]dudet231 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

You sound a like a fucking cuck. "Big black cock " is pushed by jew media in Hollywood. It's based off historical fear and disgust if blacks mating with white but the fact that it is in the national consiousness doesn't mean it's reality.

I'm sure lots of stupid women do believe it though.

[–]ParisAintGerman0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Been sipping on that cool aid haven't you. Sounding ridiculous.

[–]baseballfan9011 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

All I'm saying is we must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children, because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the earth.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]NeoreactionSafe0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

That is the globalist plan of course... end the differences in unique looks and create a universal slave class with the same bland brown color.

So I agree... it's tragic.


[–]culesamericano2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Ok if this is true then the report should say: uneducated women more likely to vote for Trump than educated women

[–]rigbed14 points15 points  (5 children) | Copy

I saw this statistic too, and I was blown away. The true silent majority are the double talking white bitches.

Only reason minority women didn't vote for him is that they just didn't vote-they stayed home confronted with two bad choices.

It's clear that the redpill is strong with this election. We can argue over trumps alphaness and agree to disagree, but there are several things we cannot deny:

Hillary tried to use words to cover up actions. She talked good and did bad. Trump said worse things than she did but his actual actions were nothing to be ashamed of. Actions instead of words.

Hillarys campaign was the most self centered campaign we may ever see. It wasn't about women. If it was she would have Elizabeth Warren as VP so that when she got impeached or jailed there'd be a woman backup. But she chose a cuck. Her slogan didn't emphasize the people, it was about her, literally. She continually tried to push the pussy, and she payed the price. Trump grabbed it.

Trump was a terrible debater, and he technically lost each one. However he made them highly watched and entertaining. The more people who tuned in were exposed to hillarys shrill laugh when confronted with hard questions. Trump would just blow off a question, hillary tried to laugh them off. In a very unconvincing fashion. Take notes for when confronted with hard questions of your own.

Trump delivered a ex tempore acceptance speech which lacked content but was delivered humbly and with aplomb that is unmatched. Hillary had to write hers probably that night and you can hear the vapidity as she continues to pander.

A business mogul may not be the ideal people's president. But Bernie, who would have shattered the glass ceiling of religion and president, and most definitely was a people's president got fucked over by hillary. Hillary is not a good role model for young women. She got to where she is by attending law school and getting lucky enough to be married by tall guy also in law school and having a bastard son and ugly daughter and defending her husband after being cucked. Is it any wonder why she is trying to cuck all of us?

Hillarys message to little girls is work hard, go to good school, find an alpha and do whatever it takes to keep him. Bill is only 6'1" with a five inch penis. If he can be an alpha most of us can. But that's irrelevant.

The trump party has plenty of women little girls can look up to. I was brainwashed into being disgusted with Ann coulter. I gave her some serious research and Ann coulter is the most unappreciated woman in the spotlight today. Unlike hillary she went directly to an Ivy League, dated an Indian, kept her legs together, and has not swayed on her beliefs or views. Watch ann coulter a roast and tell me that that is less sexist than hillary not winning. Ann coulter has faced this without a man to back her up. She's stronger than hillary in every way imaginable. For you Asian guys she should be a hero.

Both trump and Ann are in my denomination as it turns out and blue pill me would have looked at them as blemishes on presbyterians. Third eye woke me sees how incredible these two are. And I haven't even mentioned kelly Ann Royce. Republican women aren't women apparently.

If you follow the Donald sub it's clear that this election was extremely corrupt from the get go. Hillary may have used illegal immigrants to get votes. But ultimately it didn't work. The cities could not compete with the countrysides. The Amish are neither redpill nor blue pill which makes them redpill. Trump is apparently a monster but who voted for him overwhelmingly? They did. They recognized old fashioned morals when they saw them. And they jumped at it. Hillary tried to get people to come in and vote for her. She didn't try to win the people that were already here. Even Bernie mentioned native Americans. Hillary did not.

For you redpill environmentalists trump is otherwise perfect but for this. We will have to see. A republican congress may hurt our cause. We will see.

Look around at the response to his election. Crying and unproductive rioting. They feared hate crimes but they're causing them. Supporting our own president elect brands you for attack. Hillary actually Is a racist but supporting her is somehow okay. Trump doesn't want to deport American Latinos he said Mexicans. Somehow blacks are the defendants of illegal immigrants now.

I'm going off on tangents here because I guess I'm still riding the Pepe high. For you redpill guys look around you at the crybabies and realize that you're no longer them. You're no longer at risk of immigrants living in your home and cucking you. You now can embrace your masculinity. Save your tears for your mother. Elections are never worth crying over. Especially when We've narrowly avoided a Warhawk.

[–]ChanmanVXIIX5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

I agree with you fully just

The Amish are neither redpill nor blue pill which makes them redpill

RP is really conservative in term of social dynamics, amish are pretty much the extreme version of it. They're not red by default but it's in their values.

[–]judethedude4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Ride that pepe high brother, nice analysis.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_20162 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

She continually tried to push the pussy, and she payed the price. Trump grabbed it.


Somehow blacks are the defendants of illegal immigrants now.

Correction: illegal aliens.

Especially when We've narrowly avoided a Warhawk.

Yup. #DraftOurDaughters would've really come in handy for WWIII with Russia with Hillary at the helm.

Trump was a terrible debater, and he technically lost each one.

Don't know bro. He had a fatality with the "you'd be in jail remark." It was a 1 hit knockout.

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]rigbed0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Other end of the coin true

[–]untitled_redditor1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Since when is merely having a degree worth anything?

Imagine two women, one paid $100k for a Bachelor of Fine Arts and another who never went to college. They both work at the same coffee shop, earning the same money. I think the first women has worse judgement than the second.

I consider it a stupid move to pay $$$ for a degree that you never use.

[–]sfstexan0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Yes. But we all expect the one with the bachelor of fine arts to be the liberal one, is the point

[–]untitled_redditor1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Hmm... Recently the voting habits of men and women with college degrees has been compared to those without degrees too regularly to agree with you.

In fact, I haven't seen a single article specifically talking about the type of degree. It's merely if they graduated. Which, as I already pointed out, is beyond stupid.

[–]harrison3bane3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

so when women support this subs objective it's all fine and dandy?

otherwise theyre just powerless toys to play with?

[–]j-a-gandhi4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

The only women I know who voted for Trump did so because they are pro-life. Almost half of women are pro-life, so the numbers fit fairly closely. But pro-life women definitely aren't the easily triggered feminists. They dislike Trump for being a jerk, but they value their principles more than stupidly voting for a woman who has waged a war on women in the womb.

[–]EdvardMunch1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yes! I've finally found an example I can go wow the TRP guys with! Don't even need lube, I'm gonna force this shit in somehow!

[–]Willow-girl1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Trump doesn't make me tingle but I don't agree with the direction the Dems were going in, turning America into a giant welfare state where half the population is gaming the system to get some government freebies.

[–]666Evo1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Let a weak man say any of this, and imagine the kind of firestorm.

Billy Bush got the arse just for laughing!

[–]rf_mikael1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Totally, it's just most women are too ashamed to admit they are genuinely attracted to guys like Trump.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

The number is higher when you cut out garbage educations like liberal arts.

[–]etherael4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Got a link for those statistics? Very interested. I have a theory that used in this parlance "college educated" is shorthand for "indoctrinated".

[–]Hillarysdilddo_20161 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is directly from the population of "basic bitches", the easily triggered feminists who deride the "patriarchy" and find all things male as oppressive, sexist and wrong.

Honestly, I'm not sure what you're trying to say here? That 45% of white college aged women voted for trump might be more than I would expect, but surely not all women are feminist or liberal. Plus, since they're white women if they have half a brain they would know not to vote for the party that is racist against you (democrats).

tl;dr; it's surprisingly high but not unexplainable without the alpha angle.

[–]ghee991 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

yes, well said.

and I've learned in the last few years, if you want a decent woman, don't ever date a democrat or a liberal

if you date a republican, the odds are 99.99% better that she'll actually be a decent honest women, and not some SJW lib-tard.

thats not to say EVERY republican woman is perfect, although if you look at the women at Trump rallies they are 1000 times hotter, and they are not brain-washed by feminist, man-hating ideologies.

plus, although all women really want a real man, a republican woman is self-aware enough to know that she wants a real man.

a liberal woman thinks she wants a metro-sexual with a man bun, and then when she gets one, she wonders why she's still unhappy.

[–]1nonthaki0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

In interviews, Many women when they asked why they voted for Trump - they say they voted for him , because they think he will bring more jobs to the country ; and many of these white educated college women desperately need jobs , and that may be why they didnt vote for Hillary cause they think Hillary wont improve the economy and wont bring jobs .

So , to think that all women who voted for Trump voted because he is an alpha is incorrect . Many women do like his DGAF unapologetic attitude , and some women sure do like his 'grab a pussy' personality (Only Rich guys can do this without being ostracized) .

But the most important thing , is many women shift gears to whatever opinion brings benefits to them . Some of these college educated women needed jobs more than the "equality" and "anti-patriarchy" stuff . They will of-course interpret it to us by saying -"He is a business man and rich and is honest & thats why i like him and will vote for him" . Maybe, behind the scenes , they might be thinking - "Oh . He is so rich . He grabbed her pussy. He beat her badly .What a strong alpha. " and thus their feelz and needs(jobs) may override their thoughts about his misogynistic attitude .

The other college educated women who comprise a lot of SJW's, libtards, feminists and "wage-gap" theorists and "homosexuality" approvers and "ban fat-shaming" cults will vote for Clinton because if clinton wins , their desires might be fulfilled .

Then , there are other women - african american and white who voted because their sons are fighting in the army ; so they thought Trump would be more caring about the American soldiers than Hillary .

Women swing to whichever branch they need at the present to not fall down . After all , weren't we all monkeys once? :)

Men do too , but only when pushed to the extreme . The male Trump supporters like the Red Pillers do it because of being oppressed by feminism and most others do it after seeing how immigrants are destroying the country. If such conditions didnt exist and if Clinton wasnt evil and wasnt supporting SJWs, feminists etc , we would have supported Clinton over Trump . Hell , 1/2 of the people who voted might have supported Bernie instead of Trump if Bernie was the opponent .

And , I do believe race was an important factor in this race . White people saw that immigrants are destroying their home country and voted correspondingly. I dont think thats a mistake or a wrong thing to do .

[–]andhakanoon0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

This is a very one-dimensional way of looking at things. Your argument is basically a mirror of the argument that the idiots whining after losing the elections are providing: that people voted for Trump because they're misogynists and couldn't bear to have a woman in-charge. Everything cannot fit into your Red Pill philosophy, and you don't need to work so hard to MAKE everything fit into it.

Also, stop peddling media-fed falsehood about how Trump has "shamelessly treated women like objects, has owned the Miss America pageant and was recorded saying he'd grab women by the genitals." I thought people on TRP were supposed to be woke, but you're nowhere close to that.

[–]realister0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I think it's a race thing black women voted Clinton

[–]bigcitytruth0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Hillary was a weak candidate.

[–]logicalthinker10 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

I think it has a lot to do with Clinton being such a sucky, bitchy, whiny person. Women hate other women with a passion we can never understand. And if you activate that part of their lizard brain, you can make them go ape shit. Clinton just gives off this pathetically fake, cunty, elitist vibe that never goes away.

Remember, people vote based on emotions, not ideas or policies.

[–]solmiler-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

I agree that women hate other women but Hilary is not the type of women they hate. She is the type they adore ie. she has no enviable qualities.

[–]TermsOfColors0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy


After I left the polling place, as I walked to my car, I told the guy in the parking lot holding the Trump sign:

"That son of a bitch better do a good job."

[–]omega_dawg930 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

most white women would follow a rich man into satan's bedroom.

money talks. period.

[–]1PantsonFire12340 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

This just proves that their attempts to drive a wedge between white men and white women weren't as effective as they had hoped. I'd wanna bet good money on the fact that a big percentage of the white female voters that voted Trump did so because their strong frame boyfriend did.

[–]summersss0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

What i took away from this is that women talk alot about not wanting to be degraded and standing up to people who speak like trump, but that's only on a personal level and if those men don't meet the checkmarks of wealth and looks. "he was talking about other women, not me!" lol.

[–]doveenigma130 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Was it that many? I could swear I heard it reported that it was around 20% of college educated women voted Trump. Of course that was during the election, so it was exit polls, which were very different from the real numbers.

They were probably very reluctant to say they voted for Trump since he said pussy, and other really mean things that were so much worse than treason.

[–]Hjalmbere0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Lessons Learned: Radical feminists are a very shrill minority of people. The live inside a bubble where they think almost everyone agrees with them except for a few Neanderthal reprobates.

[–]Legalcat140 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

I have a masters in mechanical engineering and the whole "white people with a college degree" thing always irritated me. I voted Trump and planned on it from the very beginning.

[–]Wise_Kruppe[🍰] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I think most educated people tend to vote Democrat because they care more about things like climate change, nasa funding, etc...while Republicans tend to be from your rural areas. The people who work the physical labor jobs and don't really care about anything not taught in the bible.

[–]Cantpumpthefrump-5 points-4 points  (1 child) | Copy

Take a look at the Hillary railies/protests. They are all young mud women, obese white women and a few mud men sprinkled in.

Honestly you'd think the photo was taken in India or Mexico and the few whites caught in the shot are tourists.

[–]Ptoss1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

i saw a shit load cuckolded normal looking white dudes. da fuq are mudmen? they some sort of kids story monster?

[–]Toolman890-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy

Most of these women are older women who are married and have listened to their husbands. I think if you get a statistic of women below 34, the brainwashed sloots we have to deal with, it will be much different. Usually the sub 34 young women bracket votes 70% to the left. Those 30% who vote to the right no doubt do so because they have male family members who have influenced them. This is only going to get worse as the left works on destroying the family unit so that all women are one mass voting bloc under their control.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Don't know why you're getting downvoted. This 45 number is almost certainly due to older white women.

[–]natman2939-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy

I haven't had a chance to read trp in a while but I have been practically living in the_donald....I never really thought about it until seeing you say

we can't all get his level of fame, money, and power

but is it fair to say big don is role model for TRP? Super-Alpha (almost to the point of needing a new category...he makes alphas into his betas) extremely successful in virtually every walk of life, and so mad dripping with pussy that he replaces supermodel wives the same way lesser men exchange their car for newer models

I'm so fucking proud to have that man as President

[–]Wise_Kruppe[🍰] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Jesus, get a grip. You sound like a horny school girl.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter