This is why nobody here takes our critics seriously. Feminists take note.

Reddit View
April 23, 2013

This little exchange was retarded. This kid is retarded. Stop bothering me if you can't come up with a decent argument, I tire of your dumb shit.

Edit: He responded:

Post Information
Title This is why nobody here takes our critics seriously. Feminists take note.
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 23
Comments 22
Date 23 April 2013 06:41 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Original Link
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
the red pillfeminist

[–]phattsao 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is SRS trolling. Reason? Logic? None of that matters to them. They have taken a side and they will be sticking to it.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

That last message was beautifully unnecessary.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (5 children) | Copy

I'm not suprised. Our critics seem to be unable or unwilling to refute even the most basic of our arguments. They would rather passive-aggresively create subreddits mocking ours. It's their inarticulate way of expressing they don't like us and really, really wish we would stop. I think the moment one of them would actually engage in an argument, their ass would be dialectically whooped all over this subreddit.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 19 points20 points  (3 children) | Copy

What really gets me is this debate style they keep using, where they go into the argument with the preconceived notion that we're misogynists, so the argument can't go anywhere because they lead their argument with their conclusion.

[–]time4tac0s 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

I think that s a result of us opposing feminism. They live in a black and white world where everyone opposing feminism is a bitter misogynistic pirmavirgen neckbeard.

This is the way of those who value feelings over reality.

Postmodernism not even once.

[–]oreopimp 8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy

This is like asking a woman "why?" after any point or conviction she states. They will 98% of the time have no logic to back it up, just some unthoughtout feeling. They start to go in a circle they are incapable of getting out of. They make themselves willfully dense and are unable to see or understand any conclusions (even basic ones) outside of their own, no matter how logically you present it.

PS. for anybody reading this, if you are ever out w a girl and you really want to have fun, when she says something, could be anything, any point she is making, seriously, just ask her "why?" it is truly amazing to watch.

[–]dropit_sphere 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

In their defense, trgpulr has been pretty reasonable on his thread. I still owe him some responses.

EDIT: airfresh, though, yeah. trolololol

DOUBLE EDIT: I did like the finale there.

[–]TRP Vanguardlegendofpasta 25 points26 points  (1 child) | Copy

Redpillschool: what time is it ?

Whiteknight: It all started about 6000 years ago with the sundial .... ... ... ... Patriarchy

Redpillschool: what time is it?

Whiteknight: you just proved your entire sub is full of misogynists!!!

Redpillschool: what time is it?

[–]RedSunBlue 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

More like:

RPS: How do you trick someone into eating at McDonalds?

Whiteknight: Everyone can be tricked. You're manipulating!

RPS: How exactly do you trick someone into eating at McDonalds?

Whiteknight: [quote Food, Inc. about factory farming ]

RPS: Yeah, but how do you specifically trick someone into going into McDonalds and ordering a hamburger?

Whiteknight: ha ha ha ha you can't read! I win!

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

let's not waste our collective breaths on these idiots.

[–]TRP Vanguardnicethingyoucanthave 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Hey, at least you got a response! Here's my attempt

[–]borderline_sociopath 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I read through all that. Why do you bother? You obviously can't trick him/her into thinking you're anything other than a misogynist soon-to-be-rapist.

I hope airfresh is a guy, and I really hope his girlfriend is getting railed by the guy across the street with the motorcycle.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (10 children) | Copy

I'm going to dissent. You're both keeping your frames, which is great for Game, but horrible for debate. To a truly neutral observer who does not assume any of these statements to be true, all he would see is two people yelling. All you really did was make each other madder.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 12 points13 points  (9 children) | Copy

He made an accusation, to which I asked a relevant question. He then sidestepped 3 times in a row, not once addressing the question, but instead re-framing.

Just because I stuck to my guns doesn't mean I've somehow failed at debate. Some people will not be swayed, that's not a reflection of poor debate skills on my end. You can lead a horse to water...

(in case you are wondering, he did the opposite of "stick to his guns," he attempted a Gish Gallop and failed.)

[–]itsmehobnob 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Gisp Gallop - I learned something new today! I wonder what I'm going to learn tomorrow?

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points  (7 children) | Copy

Then you should have asked why his wall of text didn't address the question. That would have broken your frame, but it also would have addressed the issue of the irrelevancy of his wall of text.

Sometimes, no matter how badly someone wants to hang themselves, they still need to be given a rope.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 9 points10 points  (6 children) | Copy

So my failure was not rephrasing my question to ask why he didn't answer my question?

You're nitpicking. There was never any reasoning with him, nor is there usually with any feminist troll.

This man hanged himself plenty well enough. Don't expect them to admit it, that's the thing of trolls: they just keep going long after they should've been dead.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy

You're nitpicking

In the grand scheme of things, yes. We agree on the important stuff. My dissent is aimed at your attempt to debate him even though you say there is no reasoning with him. I wouldn't even converse with him, if I thought it was hopeless. Otherwise I would have tried harder.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

I probe with a few responses to see whether they'll be responsive to a thought out debate. In my line of work, brody, you find that devoting 100% to every Tom, Dick, and Harry would be too encompassing and ultimately pointless.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

I wouldn't have even devoted what lines you did, if I was as sure as you were that they wouldn't listen to reason.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

Let's rewind because you're either trolling or daft. How do you determine whether they'll be responsive to a debate? Mind reading?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

You said he dodged your question three times, but then you kept responding. We can assume that he was not open for proper debate by that time, or even before, no mind reading involved.

You're just wasting your time on that guy.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter