Embrace transactional sex

It's theory. He talks about how Portman "Seemed like......" etc, he uses weasel language, which is always used when you are talking anecdotes and not data.

So Moby fucked "the most beautiful woman in the world" because she was rich and liked drugs. Whoohoo. But not all men are rich drug dealers and not all women are junkies that trade sex for drugs. These are colorful anecdotes. Sounds like fun too. But I'm not going go deal drugs so that I can screw some junkie.

It's fun to read about, sure, but as a practical matter it's all just stories. Anyone can tell stories and his book is just that, he's his own story teller.

Not knowing that sex is "transactional" is not a blocker to men having sex even if the statement was true. Which again, it's all just theory.

MGTOW don't need this, they have other priorities. They'll have sex if they want it, they won't if they don't. The transactional/validational arguments are better understood when it applies to BP cucks trading time, money, commitment for sex in a marriage. If you must insist that fucking some junkie at the club is still transactional and not validational, who cares? The point is for men not to get stuck in LTRs and be cucks in marriage for one woman who inevitably decreases his access to sex and still strips him of his wealth and income. That's the biggest lesson learned from validational vs transactional sex. MGTOW is about avoiding transactional in marriages/LTRs. What type of sex that's being had outside of marriage by MGTOW is less important because he's doing the right thing to protect himself by not living with anyone or getting married.

Don't get me wrong, I understand what your selling here, it's just got limited value on this sub, IMO.