I Just wanted to share my research, I might create a blog but I am not sure. I am open to any suggestions or feedback. This information has been developed over the course of half a year of internalizing the reality of the red pill, life experience in testing, observing and corroborating that information with other men's experiences. I hope this helps others as it has helped me when I began researching.

What this understanding allowed me to do, is to be free from the bondage of the system that left me frustrated, thinking it was something that I was doing wrong in my inability to keep a relationship with an attractive female for more than a few months. It freed me from feeling the pains of heartbreak (which are illusions) and to see women truly as they are, very illogical and untrustworthy. That does not mean they don't deserve respect and can be admirable, but I am no longer blind to the rules of how I was prioritized or treated differently. I am glad I am awake.. I no longer have to play this game if I don't want to and the best part is, I can see through what's going on nowadays.. I know exactly where things lead and why they do. I know my strengths, my weaknesses and I know why certain events happen, I am no longer left wondering why or if it was something I ever did. I am also sharing this for men, who have grown up without fathers, for us, our model was the bullshit we were told that providers are attractive and that good men are what women wanted, not only by our mothers, but by every media outlet, from TVs, Movies, Songs, etc. Here's the guide:

Understanding Women, Their Attraction The Truth About It:

  1. A women’s interest in a man is his face. That holds the highest value to a woman. No amount of self improvement, money or status can compete with it. She will argue personality, but personality without face is what leads men to the friend zone. She does not rationally choose this attraction criteria, it is part of some automatic biological process that differs from men, who are attracted to face and body, with face being predominate but not to the same degree as women’s value of it. 
  2. Knowing rule (1), she will then only be interested in a man’s money and status if that is all she can get. Meaning, the men with the face she adores no longer find her face and body attractive. She will not be as highly or even remotely attracted to these kinds of men as she was to her initial partners of men in rule(1), therefore she will easily justify cheating, or monkey branching, or ‘falling out of love’ from a man if she can snag a man of rule(1) at anytime. 
  3. Women do not find a man’s ‘caring’ or ‘goodness’ as of any sort of criteria related to her attraction. This can easily be proved that men in rule (1) traditionally treat said woman in worst ways, verbally, sexually and in relationships, yet said woman would go back to that man if given the opportunity most times. In this context, it does not matter of the level of ‘caring’ or ‘goodness’ but specifically, who is doing it. A male of rule (1) can mistreat or treat the woman exceptionally well and she will still have an affinity of attraction towards him in ether case. It is important for men not of rule (1) to understand that when a woman speaks of wanting a ‘good’ man, she is speaking within context of a man of rule (1) and not even thinking of men under that threshold. The context is always within the realms of her fantasy. Men of rule (1) are within that realm. It is important for men not of rule (1) not to believe that her need for ‘caring’ is an objective goal she desires, it is not. It is a subjective goal she wants men of rule (1) to provide her. It cannot be attained by any men of rule (2). 
  4. Women may not find a man even remotely attractive as written in rules (1)(2) or even consider him at all for a sexual encounter. However, said woman will still want to acquire the attention of the unattractive man for purposes of self validation. In this relationship, it is important that men not of either rules (1)(2) to understand that this relationship is a one-way relationship. The woman has no reason and will have no interest in a two-way relationship with said men that are not in rules (1)(2). This is best known as a the friend zone and the relationship is in the woman’s benefit, not the men within it. 
  5. Women operate on a self-interest, self-preservation paradigm, meaning their emotional, physical and financial health is first priority over the man she is with. The exception of the case, is if she is with man of rule (1) in which case, she will endanger her own emotional, physical and financial health in order to continue her relationship with said man of rule (1). This is because nothing validates said woman more than the attention of a man of rule (1). IN the case of men of rule (2). A woman will not be interested in said man’s emotional, physical and financial challenges and upon a certain threshold, a woman will leave said man as the deal of money and or status is compromised. Rather than leave outright, women will instead indulge in affairs with other men who she feels can satisfy her desires, she will opt for men of rule (1) if possible but will likely lead into men of rule (2) as she may not be able to attract men of rule (1). 
  6. While traditionally men have been shown to be attracted to women who convey that they are vulnerable and lacking of some sort of resource or ability, women conversely, do not want to associate with men who themselves are vulnerable or lack in some sort of ability that she feels is an important aspect to her desires. This is of course, trumped by a man of rule (1) or a super wealthy super high status man of rule (2). In all other cases, a woman will run from a man who shows an excess of vulnerable traits and is lacking of essential assets, such as a car, a home, a salary and lifestyle to match. The reason for this described in rule (5).

  7. For all men not of rule (1). It is important to note that no amount of self improvement, wealth creation or level of social status will ever replace the validation of a man of rule (1). Instead, what the strategies listed in articles, videos and other media related to TRP self improvement guides are doing, is trying close the gap between men of rule (1) and men of rule (2). By suggesting followers of a self improvement paradigm to lift and become muscular is not because a body in itself is the reason a woman will find a male attractive, it is instead that when the body becomes ‘ripped’, weight has been dropped and often the boost of testosterone along with the weight cut, will also slender the face and exposing more of the internal structure rather than fat which if has the correct structure, is more attractive to women. The compound effect of the face improvements, body improvements and the rest of the self-improvement suggestions on wealth and status are a strategy to compete against men of rule (1) who may not even have a said body, said wealth or status and may even live terrible lifestyle such as doing drugs, selling drugs, minimum wage jobs etc. It is a probabilistic strategy based on a rating of a woman’s own attractive nature to snag a rule (1) man. If she is unable to steadily attract a rule (1) man, she will eventually settle for the highest level rule (2) man. The same rules apply, in that the initial attraction cue starts with the face, then all other traits follow. So it is again possible for men in the TRP community with the least attractive facial features, to remain unable to attract females due to the way attraction is generated within women. Men not of rule (1) must know this fact.