It's refreshing to find someone that thinks the same way.

Oh there are MANY of us -- I would imagine a significant share of actual MGTOW (i.e. walk the walk, not just talk the talk). We just tend to not talk about it much, the various pussy-&-THOT-chasers tend to be a lot more vocal (also a lot more delusional and addicted/obsessed with "women"; thus more bitter & angry, disappointed, etc... hence the RAGE rants and so on).

I much prefer "uglier" (subjective) women without or with less paint as opposed to women to cake face who I wouldn't even be able to tolerate looking at let alone having sex with.

Yes... I guess much depends on what one's "goal" is:

• If the goal is to finally achieve some teenage "fantasy" -- to have sex with ...to literally just/only "fuck"... some woman that LOOKS like the image of a female (painted, photoshopped, faked) on some poster(s) or swimsuit magazine covers, porn mag centerfolds, or whatever that the guy had pinned to his bedroom wall, dreamed about, drooled over, masturbated to, etc. -- then I suppose the clown-faced woman on the right will likely lead to a significantly more powerful orgasm (psychologically driven)... which nevertheless lasts all of what? At it's peak, probably 30 seconds, at most a few minutes?

• If on the other hand the desire is to actually "make love" with another human being that one feels some honest/deep "connection" to... then the one on the right will simply NOT do: one cannot have an "honest" much less "deep" connection with something that is inherently fake AND shallow.

• The one on the left WOULD do... or COULD do (could have done) -- but alas, it has revealed (by donning the fakeup) -- that it too is simply a fake/shallow cesspit; more's the pity, but no honest or deep connection can be achieved with it either (not anymore). It's like a beautiful dinner plate some superb cut of steak, etc -- but that you know has been made from plastic, or perhaps sprinkled with arsenic and alum -- and thus ruined; had it's value as "food" entirely destroyed.

The one on the right quite literally may as well actually be a "sexbot"/"sex-doll" -- in fact given that the physical resemblance is almost identical, and that the sexbot/sex-doll has none of the baggage of the "human-sexpot" -- the bot/doll is probably superior in that regard. (It's not going to bitch and whinge, make crude derogatory "performance" comments, nag or hassle, etc etc etc).