Michael Kimmel, male feminist founder of the Stony Brook Center for Studies on Masculinity, the institution indicated by reddit admins as providing good reading on "positive masculinity", forced to step down on accusations of workplace sexual harassment and sexism by past collaborators

Reddit View
October 5, 2018

You can't make this shit up

When the reddit administration censored TRP through quarantine, they forcibly included a link to the Stony Brook Center for the Study of Men and Masculinity in the sidebar, as an officially endorsed counterbalance to TRP's "toxic masculinity".

They removed the link a few days later, likely as more and more people pointed out how the founder and major scholar at this Center, Michael Kimmel, was a notorious denier of male victims of abuse.

But it gets even better: Kimmel has also been accused by multiple past colleagues of sexual harassment in the workplace and of sexism, on top of homophobia, transphobia and racism.


The allegations against Kimmel were first reported by the Chronicle of Higher Education, which cited comments by a former graduate student. The former student, who asked to remain anonymous, said Kimmel had suggested they have sex six weeks into her graduate course, and later in her career.

Nobody could ever imagine a male feminist trying to leverage what little power he has into some coerced sex with an underling.

Following the report, another former graduate student published a detailed account of their time working with Kimmel on the website Medium. Bethany Coston, now assistant professor of gender, sexuality and women’s studies at Virginia Commonwealth University, accused Kimmel of sexist behaviour, such as giving paid work to male students while women were expected to work for free.

Oh lookie here, a male feminist giving unpaid work to women, probably thinking that he's being so progressive in even getting them involved in the first place. Shocking I tell you, shocking.

We fully appreciate the need to weigh due process along with all the shortcomings of formal sexual harassment complaint procedures and the power inequalities inherent to these processes,” the Promundo said in a statement.

Ayy fucking lmao. If this was anyone but a knight paladin of feminism and PoundMeToo, he'd have been thrown under the bus immediately and without appeal. As it is, he gets to have "due process" and only be temporarily suspended pending investigation. I guess his accusers need to be believed less than those who have the good sense to accuse less-feminist men.

Post Information
Title Michael Kimmel, male feminist founder of the Stony Brook Center for Studies on Masculinity, the institution indicated by reddit admins as providing good reading on "positive masculinity", forced to step down on accusations of workplace sexual harassment and sexism by past collaborators
Author Derek1382
Upvotes 949
Comments 108
Date 05 October 2018 12:31 PM UTC (2 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/52837
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/9llupa/michael_kimmel_male_feminist_founder_of_the_stony/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
the red pillfeministfeminism

[–]gbdoragnic194 points195 points  (33 children) | Copy

And the leader of #MeToo raped a boy, she is a pedophile , the Irony isn't even surprising. There is more evidence against her than Cosby , this isn't a mere accusation there are court documents, payoffs , her own tweets , and yet the movement is still taken seriously.

Remember the poster where two drunk college kids a boy and a girl had sex, and the next day jake was charged with rape.

This is just turning up the heat in the pot , sadly there is no safe space for men , even being a feminist doesn't mean you are treated with humanity , as a man you are either , attractive, a atm, or a monster, no such thing as mgtow

[–]1KyfhoMyoba136 points137 points  (13 children) | Copy

NOT a pedophile. Pedophilia is attraction to pre-pubescent people, not teenagers.

Still statutory rape.

[–]1Your_Coke_Dealer74 points75 points  (3 children) | Copy

Comments like this are how I know I’m in a sub focused on logic rather than emotion. This has got to be the first time I’ve ever seen this (entirely correct) point not get downvoted to hell. Elsewhere, pointing out the difference between pedophilia and hebephilia/ephebophilia is very poorly received, as it comes off from an emotional standpoint as attempting to hand-wave/minimize the crime of statutory rape.

[–]xddm265339 points40 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's sad because there's a HUGE fucking difference between the two.

[–]1KyfhoMyoba14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy

By emotional standpoint, you mean virtue signalling white knight manginas, right?

[–]rekabis10 points11 points  (7 children) | Copy

I believe the correct term is Hebephile for any victim between 11 and 14, and Ebhebophile for any victim between the ages of 15 and 19.

And no, I am merely well-read. Nothing more.

[–]Lib3rtarianSocialist3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy

It is not ebhebophile but ephebophile. Please edit that.

[–]1KyfhoMyoba1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Off topic, but how do you reconcile libertarianism with socialism?

[–]eccentricrealist2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

In theory, a true socialist wants the workers to control the state. Anarcho-socialism is probably the closest thing to Marx. It's still not optimal because there's the whole redistribution of goods that kills motivation, when anarcho-capitalism at least still has you competing.

[–]mikesteane1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

What makes these terms correct?

[–]Jaxx_Teller73 points74 points  (14 children) | Copy

Don't forget she directly caused a great man's suicide. Anyone who says otherwise is sniffing their own farts. She absolutely crushed Bourdain, and then profited off his death. She also convinced Bourdain to pay the lawsuit against her for raping that poor boy. She is a monster.

[–]suaressi19 points20 points  (11 children) | Copy

ok fill me in on this please. who is this woman? i tend not to follow mainstream shit

[–]Jaxx_Teller64 points65 points  (9 children) | Copy

Read this Article.

May I introduce to you Asia Argento, one of the most cold-blooded individuals still praised by the media to this day. She pretty much started the me too movement last year with her accusations towards Harvey Weinstein and brought that to the public. However, she continued a transactional sexual relationship with him for years. She obviously sucked her way into acting roles which gave her the career she has today.

Anthony Bourdain starting dating this bitch, and he backed up all of her allegations against Weinstein. Then she got hit with a lawsuit out of nowhere by 17 year old Jimmy Bennett who accused her of sexual assault when he was 17. She got him drunk and fucked him. She's 20 years older than him. She had been friends with this boy for years, and played a role as HIS MOM in a movie that came out in '04 I believe.

It doesn't stop there. She was sued $380,000 for this accusation by Bennett, and she got Anthony to pay the fine. He paid $250,000 to Bennett and was going to pay the rest before he committed suicide! And now her lawyer has said she won't pay the rest that is owed.

Anthony Bourdain has struggled with depression and alcohol for a long time, and after he divorced his wife in 2016, he started dating Argento. Argento then got caught by paparazzi kissing a 28 year old journalist or some shit. Photo's got out, and a few days later he killed himself. She then posted on social media a bunch of insensitive shit about his death, really showing no remorse whatsoever imo.

This is beyond fucked up.

[–]xenigala21 points22 points  (2 children) | Copy

She didn't just play his mother, she played a prostitute who grooms and pimps out her young son. And she co-wrote the script. Throughout his childhood they had a close relationship and she was his mentor in acting. They publicly called each other "mother" and "son" in social media. She encouraged him to break with his own family. And then finally when he is 17 she gets him drunk and seduces him. This messed with his mind and lead to depression. When she accused Weinstein he decided to sue her. He won over $400,000, which her boyfriend Bourdain paid off for her.

[–]Jaxx_Teller5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah thats a really good point.

[–]saibot8311 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy

Pretty accurate. Only one correction. While she definitely fucked Harvey for work her way in to the business was through her legendary director father who's movie making royalty in Italy. She skated her way in on nepotism in the beginning. Only started to fuck Harvey when trying to go international.

[–]1SirKolbath18 points19 points  (3 children) | Copy

Well, there's my daily dose of abject and unmitigated fury. Reading just your fucking synopsis made me so angry that I hit my maximum target heart rate while sitting down!

If I tried to actually read the article my Apple Watch would probably explode. Thank you for reading it so I didn't have to do so.

[–]4matting15 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy

Channel your fury at the gym for maximum gains! lol

[–]Jaxx_Teller7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

[–]1SirKolbath3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Ha! The day I get a real lightsaber we're gonna see some changes up in this bitch!

[–]suaressi2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

just wow. that's all i can say

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy

Asia Argento, an actress. She is one of the original pound me too accusers against Harvey Weinstein. She apparently had sex with a teen boy, who she had previously acted with when he was like 11 (she played his mother). There are pictures, texts and legal documents supporting this.

[–]her_958_resistors7 points8 points  (3 children) | Copy

Remember the poster where two drunk college kids a boy and a girl had sex, and the next day jake was charged with rape.

Here is a high quality recreation of the Jake-Josie poster. Print and redistribute as you feel fit.

[–]1SirKolbath1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

It is, however, a stellar example of why not to drink or pick up barsloots.

[–]her_958_resistors4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

It is, however, a stellar example of why not to drink or pick up barsloots.

It is the most accurate, honest and non-pretentious poster of its kind. There is no false promise of gender equality. It should be plastered all across bars, nightclubs, college campuses etc., so that guys know what they're truly getting into.

[–]quit_pmo45 points46 points  (3 children) | Copy

Hes the reason we got quarantined. Shameful and disgusting

[–]slumdog-millionaire22 points23 points  (0 children) | Copy

The irony is that all of this just proves one of red pill's central dogmas, things aren't what they seem on the surface. People, our society, interpersonal relationships, romance, behavior and human motivations, you can't take these things at face value, you have to be able to see through the bullshit and ascertain for yourself what the fuck is going on. People have no idea what this subreddit is about.

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Is he? The way I understood it, the reddit admins merely thought he would be a decent alternative to TRP, and not the instigator behind the quarantine.

Not that this isn't outright retarded in itself, but it's news to me that he's directly involved.

[–]Moonshineraider1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I'm sure the quarantine shall remain in full effect despite this

[–]snowdenlaydying83 points84 points  (5 children) | Copy

It's an old strategy used by predators across time. Hide in plain sight.

[–]ANGRY_ATHEIST25 points26 points  (0 children) | Copy

Nowadays we call it the "white knight", and this guy is the pinnacle.

[–]Rabbit-Punch15 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy

I don't think it's a secret that being a "male feminist" is a mating strategy for weird creeps.

[–]2Derek1382[S] 14 points15 points  (1 child) | Copy

The "predator" angle gives this slime too much agency. There would be something admirable in the conscious choice to pursue a public image as a progressive saint to hide one's wicked private life.

No, I think he's simply a weak, pathetic man who in the Brownian motion of academia managed to land a prominent position and subsequently used it to perv on his subordinates, unable to channel his desire for sex and dominance into motivation for self-improvement.

[–]Revenant2212 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

It’s like feminists have never heard of the phrase, “a wolf in sheep’s clothing”.

Entertaining af to watch though

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]4matting30 points31 points  (5 children) | Copy

Because they're like pawns in a chess game, and will do anything to please their master overlords, in a hopeless attempt to 'win' some pussy.

[–]2Derek1382[S] 24 points25 points  (3 children) | Copy

Even feminist women are creeped out by male feminists, and regularly shit on them. They invented the term "performative woke dudes" since it seemed hypocritical to just blast "male feminists".

[–]4matting16 points17 points  (1 child) | Copy

They're incapable of generating female desire the same way a top 20% man can, so they adapt their matting strategy to whatever is vogue. Essentially they read what post-wall women's tips and tricks on how to be a good catch, and what they're looking for in a man.

That doesn't work, and they just end up looking like creeps or get put into orbit.

[–]DancesWithPugs4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

I can verify this from personal experience

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

They juggle covert contracts that give them the least favorable terms even if accepted.

[–]5Imperator_Red21 points22 points  (2 children) | Copy

Of course. Women simply don't know any better. They have child-like maturity, their logic is overwhelmed by emotion, and they are highly susceptible to hive-mind thinking. If your dog shits on the floor, it's your fault, not the dog's. Male feminists are worse because they should know better, and because they are using this subversive ideology to raise their own status because they are too weak and pathetic to compete in the male world in a legitimate and constructive way. That is why they are so detestable.

Also in supporting feminism they are acting submissively towards women, and that is extremely bizarre behavior for human males (and for males in the vast majority of other species), so it seems especially off-putting to normal people.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]TheTrenTrannyTrain1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Simple cognitive dissonance, or male hamstering. I bet if you give these cucks a cycle of test and tren, they would do a 180.

[–]TheStumblingWolf5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Typical beta guys who think they can redeem their Nice Guy coins for pussy. They've just fell in deeper than usual.

[–]TheWastedYearz46 points47 points  (0 children) | Copy

Any coincidence is a mere casualty...

You can’t make this up.

[–]Fulp_Piction17 points18 points  (1 child) | Copy

The definition of facepalm.

With all the new members here some of the message will inevitably get lost, but when I first found this place the point that was always hammered home when someone asked for advice was that life isn't about women, it's not about sex, it's about you.

It's not a coincidence that when we start preaching that men should focus on themselves instead of women they lose their shit. Sex is the only carrot they have to dangle on the stick, and we're telling the betas not to chase it.

It's strange that women react so strongly to men not considering them in decision making and just following their own path. Is it just because it's too good of a deal for them to lose or what?

[–]DancesWithPugs4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

The irony is that refusing to play women's head games actually attracts them. Most men don't understand this. That's why we should be studying frame and not getting caught up emotionally in outrage tests.

[–]sixseven8914 points15 points  (2 children) | Copy

Just remember that Kimmel should still be considered an alleged rapist.

Let's not employ a double standard here; if we consider Kavanaugh innocent until proven guilty and shame the left for calling him a rapist, we should do the same for Kimmel. The only difference is there seems to be much, much more evidence against Kimmel of course.

[–]chadwickofwv6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

Oh don't worry. We're talking about feminists. I assume they are all lying, because statistically it's between 95 and 99% chance for each one of them.

[–]1SirKolbath5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is true. I’ve been admonishing my conservative friends who are gloating about the former boyfriend of Ford who penned the anonymous letter about her last week.

Anonymous sources are not credible no matter which side they are supporting. Regardless of this man’s reasons for wanting to remain hidden— and I completely agree with all of those reasons since I’ve been doxxed, harassed, and threatened by leftists myself in an attempt to silence my conservative writings— I do not believe him any more than I believe Ford. If he wants to be believed he can go on record with a public statement like any other witness.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]LeadVitamin1314 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy

I wouldn't compare him to the noble wolf, more like Wormtongue in Lord of the Rings. Just a creepy dude who kisses up to the people in power for his own pervy purposes.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

And just like in Hollywood, their friends look the other way until external influences force them to look at it. Willful ignorance is a fundamental ingredient of the blue pill and one that makes it so cancerous.

[–]DancesWithPugs-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

But you're not allowed to say that! /s

[–]Kyson527 points28 points  (3 children) | Copy

What can you do? My advice- just sit and laugh

It's no secret men despise rapists, male and female- but when the SJWs and feminists want to tell us men we don't care- perhaps rub this little gem in their face to remind them of the following:

A leading figure and academic in their field is a sexual predator

Have a laugh boys, this is one of our easiest victories yet, we didn't have to lift a fucking finger, and the leading discussion board on the entire fucking internet just crowned a rapist as the purveyor of "positive masculinity"

On three: One, two, three, in your best American Indian mocking voice:

Ha Ha Ha Ha- Ha Ha Ha Ha

[–]chadwickofwv5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

I'm like 1/8 Cherokee. Does that mean I can use my normal laugh?

[–]Kyson50 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Laugh away, have a smoke to honor the idiot SJWs in the world

[–]5Imperator_Red36 points37 points  (7 children) | Copy

I actually think that we are living in a computer simulation like the Matrix, and someone is conducting an experiment to see how insane they can make our world before we snap.

[–]saibot8320 points21 points  (3 children) | Copy

Oh, "someone" is definitely conducting experiments. But it's got nothing to do with computer simulations.

[–]DancesWithPugs1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Research social engineering, guys.

[–]1SirKolbath5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

Well, this censorship has me coming pretty close to the edge. How about you?

[–]420KUSHBUSH-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Anarky in the (U)nited World as We (K)now It

[–]btrpb13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is "Nice Guy" behaviour described in "No More Mr Nice Guy" to the nth degree. An extreme case. He does everything for women, to the point of becoming a leading feminist, but he is in fact a total selfish bastard whose ulterior motive is sex.

You can guarantee that in private he is sad, angry and resentful because women don't see him as "the nice guy he truly is" and jump on his cock. Total blue pill.

At the very end of the article he still continues his facade/blue pill programming, "I want to validate these people".

[–]Andorli6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

It is very simple really. Betas are most dangerous in terms of sexual assault since their mentality and mindset are so weak. They want to get into power in order to get sexual satisfaction, it same mentality as white knights where they pretend to be righteous in low stake situations in order to save the damsel in distress and swoop her off her feet with their courage.

Watch out for virtue signalling people, they are the most toxic and hypocritical kind of people out there. They are weak inside, they are toxic inside, so they mask it under the veil of virtuousness and unleash their predatory tendencies when they get the chance. Bill Cosby is a great example of this.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (4 children) | Copy

I always wonder with the constant sex scandals of male feminists, how much of it is that they are actually rapey/harassment prone and how much of it is that they surround themselves with feminists who call everything rape/harassment making accusations inevitable?

[–]chadwickofwv6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

I don't know, but all involved are feminists, so you should automatically assume they are all lying.

[–]WiseMonkeyGoodMonkey3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Choose carefully the horse you back. Some will kick you in the teeth for like no reason.

[–]saibot833 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well they're constantly broadening the definition of rape. In Sweden you can now "rape" somebody over the internet. There is a block button for online harassment but I dunno. They just had to sit there and film themselves in the nude, masturbating, etc, etc... I guess. It's a slippery slope. When everything is rape nothing really is in the end.

[–]SoulRebel994 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is hilarious. Proof that admins dont understand TRP.

[–]Rabbit-Punch5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy


[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil14 points15 points  (2 children) | Copy

The left has been eating itself since the French revolution. This is a by product of it's basic logic. The definition of progressive is always changing. The new progressives are more progressive than the old progressives. So the new eat the old. Always.

[–]2Derek1382[S] 14 points15 points  (1 child) | Copy

There was a twitter thread a couple of weeks ago, from the leftist sphere. It criticized the environment within progressive circles, ending with "... and everyone is itching to eat you alive for social capital".

They hit the nail on the head with that one. Leftists prove themselves socially by shitting on people who are not as progressive as themselves, and will happily eat their own at the first chance. It takes a massive amount of self-deception to walk trustingly into any leftist arena and think anyone's your friend.

[–]DancesWithPugs1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

My experiences as an activist bear this out. It is nothing new. Just 10x more blatant. Our whole society runs on who can be mean to who.

[–]∞ Mod | RP Vanguardbsutansalt3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

In my head Nelson's "Ha Ha" just blasted with the ferocity of an angry train horn.

[–]Rian_Stone13 points14 points  (1 child) | Copy

deleted What is this?

[–]LeadVitamin138 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

You're supposed to do what he says, not what he does. /s

[–]ovrload4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

What I’ve noticed is most male feminists are closet creeps

[–]mikesteane-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

People in glass closets shouldn't preach.

[–]smartscience5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Milo called it: "When a man calls himself a feminist, you can start the clock on rape charges."

[–]suaressi6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

the fact that there's a center for the study of men and masculinity is pants on head retarded and scary at the same time. this radical cultural Marxist ideology being pushed by the left needs to be opposed at all costs. I'm glad i made the decision to decline the offer from stony brook and attend another university when i was a student.

[–]NiceTryDisaster2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Fucking lol. You couldn't make this shit up even if you tried to.

[–]moltenw2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Man, it's like the plot is writting itself.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Way to go Reddit- besmirching the TRP name but then telling us to follow the example of an alleged sexual harasser.

Do your due diligence next time, before offering lousy advice.

[–]Endorsed ContributorMetalgear2224 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Title made me spit water all over my desk. Anyone else notice Reddit admins took down the link to the Stony Brook website upon trying to view TRP?

Can't make this shit up. Poetic fucking justice.

[–]omega_dawg935 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

ok. i'm gonna type this, and i hope y'all take me seriously:


[–]thubtop2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

the revolution always eats its own children.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Sargon of Akkad has been working on a "male feminists who have been accused of sexual assault and rape" video for about 6 months now. Every time he gets close to finishing it more guys get found out so he has to keep expanding his video.

He literally can't keep up with all the allegations against male feminists 😂

[–]Snowaey1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Absolutely disgusting

[–]3SKRedPill3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Don't listen to what people say, look at what they do.

[–]TheGreatLeveler1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

You can't make this shit up. The Reddit administration has made a fool out of themselves.

[–]RedPillWintergreen1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

The most sanctimonious and uncompassionate are always the most hypocritical. That applies to just about everything.

[–]mikesteane0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

It looks like someone has been going through this post downvoting every comment. Someone should get a life.

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy


Oh my gosh, that's priceless. I mean, you already have to be functionally retarded (or have your head stuck up your ass to such an extent that you can feast on your own entrails) to think that someone who is on the verge of becoming redpilled or already there can be swayed to get back on the path of virtue by giving him some self-flagellating male bullshit as recommended reading (what's next? The way things are, I wouldn't be surprised if the same admin suggested to a zionist Jew that he should really really read "Mein Kampf" in order to educate himself, that would be similarly tonedeaf).

But that the same guy they recommended pulled a Hugo Schwyzer on everyone? You really can't make that shit up. I really hope the admin who suggested feels as stupid right now as I think he is.

[–]Hyper_Sonik0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Lol. Buy into a woman's narrative and watch her circle back around to devour you. Lol

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

It's almost like these people just infinitely project. Every. single. time.

[–]gELSK0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

// , I'm pretty surprised by this.

One of the stories that attracted me to Reddit in the first place, a long time ago, was of its founder Aaron Schwartz's commitment to use the internet for free exchange of ideas from all sources.

I had expected that TRP's run here would end with more urbanity from Reddit's operators than fear.

[–]1v1crown0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Could also be that the women have the feminist mind-virus and since he associates with exclusively those women this was bound to happen.

[–]EscapeTheGoat0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Yeah you really can't make this shit up. Just goes to show you. A lot of overzealous male feminists really are just closet pervs.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

They are men who are usually terrible with women and believe that listening to everything they say will get them laid.

[–]NolanKnowstheTruth0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Bahahaha....you can't make this stuff up.

[–]iPommy0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

MY FUCKING SIDES. I love you guys for standing up to this bullshit. I wish I would've been part of this sub back when I was in high school and deeply depressed. (I'm still depressed but not dependent on people anymore.)

[–]derpderp5000-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

honestly can't believe that reddit has the audacity to try to control information and free speech. 'front page of the internet' my fucking ass. what a fucking farce.

[–]ubkingj-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy

This is not a popular opinion, Asia argento love her or hate her simply turned the game on Harvey W. and Co. Being able to play her way into fame and then bring these POWERFUL men down and even start a freaging movement is genius, evil genius! We may learn however, how resolutely cruel the "fairer sex" can get.

[–]rationalthought3140 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

actually she got roped into it because Rose McGowan needed allies in her crusade to deflect from federal drug charges

[–]5t3fan0-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Nobody could ever imagine a male feminist trying to leverage what little power he has into some coerced sex with an underling.

both disgusting and hilarious

[–]BurnoutRS-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Sweet talk them, get them all convinced of how innocent and harmless you truly are.

Its an interesting strategy. For those that are consciously aware of their percieved immoralities, its simply keeping the other players eyes away from your hand.

For the average person, I think its just a strange denial complex. As a man, you will develop some masculine traits in your life. As a man in todays world, you will be introduced to the idea that masculinity is evil or toxic. Should you buy into these notions while also becoming aware of your own masculinity, you will feel an internal conflict. Am I a bad person simply because I am a man?

One of the key issues is whether you believe the "all sex is rape" bullshit or not. Youre horny as fuck and need to satisfy those sexual urges, but those sexual urges are a tool of the devil and to satisfy them you must harm an innocent woman.

So how do keep yourself from breaking down because youre pure evil for having a penis, while simultaneously keeping yourself from breaking down because your biology urges you to stick that penis in something? "Im not like those other guys, Im a male feminist"

"im defending womens rights and all the good I do for them, makes up for my toxic sexuality while getting me closer to them so that I might fuck them"

The whole thing produces rapists and sleazebags. I cant be direct with my sexual advances because then im just another horndog, but if im indirect I get friendzoned. Imagine that last sentence being spoken by a man who is never Red Pilled, never comes to realize the truth. If he sees that being assertive and passive are invalid sexual strategies, he may see himself as left with only one option. That option is aggression, rape, taking what he wants by force

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter