~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
BobRoss0902
[–]DeepConfusion98484 points485 points486 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
When it is okay to make fun of short men but is not okay to criticize fat women.
[–]j43p160 points161 points162 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It’s never okay to make fun of animals.
[–]pierco82103 points104 points105 points 5 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
Because double standards
Edit : also they aren’t fat women they are “body positive” women.... cmon dude
[–]Chrh42 points43 points44 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Not even that, since you can't alter your height natural, it becomes like comparing apples and oranges.
[–]AijeEdTriach14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Pears and melons..
[–]BinaryFaggot8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
nah I've seen gattaca you can be taller brah
[–]kyledontcare9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Positively ugly.
[–][deleted] 22 points23 points24 points 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
I always use the example of baldness. Shaming baldies is never sexist. You can be offensive, or simply an asshole, but it never falls in the 'sexist' bag
[–]lylasxoxo6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Where do you ever see people "shaming baldies"
[–]Aquilam23 points24 points25 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
One thing that always struck a chord with me is when women get away with dismissing someone as undateable for something like height/eye color etc. (which, don't get me wrong, genetics do matter if you want kids), yet men will be called shallow for not wanting to date someone who is fat.
Why?
One is beyond someone's control (height), and the other (being fat) is a lifestyle choice, that speaks to their level of activity, discipline, diet and eventual life expectancy.
[–]DeepConfusion983 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Absolutely disgusting. The double standards are in favor of the entitled, narcissistic women who think men are disposable bank accounts.
[–]ribbonverde148 points149 points150 points 5 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
Women just say what feels good. They lack intellectual consistency and moral agency. I understand that you get a kick out of pointing it out, but the truth is that you can't convince women of that they are wrong.
[–]jonathino00164 points65 points66 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I think getting a kick out of pointing it out is literally the reason this subreddit exists.
[–]ribbonverde31 points32 points33 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Nah, it's about MGTOW ideas and persuing self knowledge and self actualization. Just pointing out retarded shit women say is getting old rather quickly. "Look what this retard said lolol".
[–]IntrovertedMagma24 points25 points26 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Pointing shit out is an essential part of red pill rage.. New Mgtowers should vent.. Better vent here than somewhere else..
[–]DEVOmay9710 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yea I think r/tumblrinaction is more for that type of thing lol.
[–][deleted] 53 points54 points55 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
i was just banned from r/atheism for saying i don't like fat women. of course the first reply was like, "you sound like you're one friendzone away from a murder spree".
typical man hating and shaming, to which i replied, sorry if i don't like fat women but no amount of shaming is going to make me believe they are beautiful and not gross blobs. banned forever. of course.
[–]WanderlustYouth24 points25 points26 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Damn I'm a religious guy, but I thought atheists were supposed to be non dogmatic or something like that. I guess the biggest religion is that of pussy, probably has ended more lives than all others put together...
[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm as atheist as it gets and I've never had a greater appreciation for religion than in the last few years. Whether we agree on the epistemological aspects of religion or not, there's no denying that there are valuable lessons to be learned from it, such as bearing your cross and walking up the hill with it- as antithetical as it gets to fat western wymyn in 2018. I've never disliked a community that I agree with- at least in principle- the way that I've come to dislike most other atheists. They're smug and annoying, and I used to be that way. God bless.
[–]down_vote_militia4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There's atheism and then there is r/atheism.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
that sub is cancer mate
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I was banned and muted permanently from r/atheism yesterday for simply supporting trump in an anti-trump thread. I didn’t insult anybody or say anything crazy, all I said was that I’m an atheist that supports Donald trump, and that they aren’t mutually exclusive. BANNED for trolling
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
bet it was the same thread
[–]FlappyFlipjacks15 points16 points17 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Yes, this is almost poetic. Women will flip their beliefs in a heartbeat if it serves them. They have no moral conviction or discipline. I'm amazed men have even carried society as far as it is.
When we gaze into the stars we wonder if there is other life. We have been searching for a while, and have yet to find any. The fermi paradox talks about this at lengths. There are hypothetical filters that wipe out civilization, mass extinctions for one reason or another. I wonder if alien societies have existed and how many have been driven to extinction by incompetent female "leadership."
[–]rationalthought3142 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I wonder if alien societies have existed and how many have been driven to extinction by incompetent female "leadership."
it is interesting that the "grays" of UFO stories appear to be sexless like the got rid of both but given their logic scientific side they didn't embrace the inconsistent self-destructive feminine side.
[–]rationalthought3146 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
if women actually followed the principles they espoused, they'd be incredibly awesome people worthy of respect but the reality is most of them are hypocritical judgmental labeling shrews who will mock men and other women they feel beneath their SMV.
As I said look how how they act towards guys they see beneath them. I've seen where they look in disgust if they have to sit next to some guy they clearly loathe based on sight alone on a bus or train because he doesn't fit her standard of looks. And it's not like the guy chose this situation, many times they were there first then they have to have their self esteem crushed by some judgmental bitch who hates that she has sit next to him, a guy who had no plans whatsoever to speak to her so much as look at her but her narcissism makes her think that of course this "gross" guy wants her and is secretly getting off having her sit next to him.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
listening to a woman is like listening to a confused, overly-emotive teenager who thinks they know what is best (for themselves and for you too), despite their failure to recognize their own ignorance.
[–]lister777137 points138 points139 points 5 years ago (37 children) | Copy Link
One colleague was trying to argue with me on fat... saying that for her it is genetics. I told her to fuck off or to offer her body to science since the only way to put on weight without eating is to create matter our of nothing. Imagine, these people are quantum walking machines. I mean this is exactly what it is. It would like making things appear right in front of you. This is what they say, right in your eyes. When lying is considered as morality superior to truth by society.
[–]Hypogamy39 points40 points41 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Clearly her black hole isnt destroying data.
[–][deleted] 20 points21 points22 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Her e-fat horizon hasn't reached it's maximum Schwarzschild radius yet.
[+][deleted] 5 years ago* (31 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]Male_strom41 points42 points43 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
These are all excuses which tend to fall apart once the actual methodology is scrutinised.
Yeah, as far as I’m aware changes in metabolic activity come down to around 200 calories a day per person. Not enough to be able to blame genetics for your weight gain.
[–]Rydia45006 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
once they start eating normally.
????????
The more mass you have, the more energy you burn sedentary. When you lose mass the amount goes down. So the amount of food you need to consume to maintain your new weight WILL BE LOWER. There could be other factors that also reduce how much energy your body needs which is totally cool. Congratulations! You get to spend less on food!
Basically the problem is these people think the amount they were eating when they packed on pounds was the 'normal' amount to eat when it really was not. There should never be the words "once they start eating normally". Diet is not temporary. Everything you eat comprises your diet whether you are following weight watchers or eating pizza everyday. It's not about "going on a (temporary) diet" it's about CHANGING your diet PERIOD.
So basically these people fail and regain the weight not because they went back to a "normal" diet but they went back to their "fat" diet that will pack on the pounds fast because they have less mass and need less energy.
[+][deleted] 5 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rydia45002 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
No, the more mass you have changes your base caloric burn. This is why as you gain muscle mass the amount of calories you need at rest to maintain your weight changes.
The difference between muscle and fat is that muscle can be lost by being sedentary for an extended period of time.
[–]RetiSetGo7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
The amount of calories in a piece of food can be measured precisely, and is constant.
The amount of calories needed to maintain metabolic processes (per unit) can also be measured precisely and is constant. "Low metabolism" is a myth; if someone's body really failed to produce energy properly, they would've been dead a long time ago. If they can feed themselves and are adult age, they don't have some kind of ultra-rare low metabolism disease.
Assuming your metabolism is measured correctly, weight gain/loss can be calculated down to the gram.
There is also basal metabolic rate, you can't get any lower calories spending than that. That's like 1.8k calories for a male and 1.2k for a regular fem.
[–]RetiSetGo5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Energy level != metabolism. Hunger != metabolism. Metabolism is the energy in joules consumed by bodily processes. There is a certain amount of joules needed for your heart to beat. A certain amount of joules for a cell to replicate. These are all fixed values. There is no way somebody is 300 pounds, yet their body is only consuming 1,000 calories a day or something, which is the excuse fat people come up with to refute CICO. 99.99999% of the time they don't have some crazy low metabolism disease, they are just not counting calories correctly, or at all. Otherwise physicists would have harnessed their matter-creating abilities already.
[–]Freenorthman7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Fuck that . Fat People are Lazy gluttons always looking dir shortcuts. All i hear is excusses you probably are a fatty yourself
[+][deleted] 5 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Freenorthman3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
If eating less calories have an inverse effect i.e getting fat on you, you should give elon musk a Call because you could be the Key to solving the energy crisis. I know alot about about nutrition and thermodynamics to say that this is total bs. Google starvation Experiment. There are People that die Not eat for a year + and they lost weight consistently
[+][deleted] 5 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Freenorthman2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I will forget get it and you should to bc this is bs
[–]Freenorthman2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Look at my posting history ;-) there you can See bis much of a soy Boy i am
[–]mrlavalamp20152 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Every person has an equilibrium and once you figure out where that equilibrium is, it is up to you to walk the line and keep your desire for consumption under control.
This is the hardest thing for many because it means telling yourself no, straight up, every single time that craving kicks in.
My evidence is anecdotal, I'm fortunate to be on the opposite end of this spectrum. I need to eat 3 meals day totaling around 2500 calories or I will loose weight. Building muscle doesn't really happen for me, I get toned but I can't really bulk up and I don't care to put that much work into it(supplements/special diet). Unfortunately I love the way food tastes so already planning to eat large portions it is easy to overdo it.
I don't know that I could consistently control myself if my equilibrium was on the low end.
I also think the foods/meals people choose have a large bearing on this though. You can eat a small number of calories but if it is garbage food it won't matter.
[–]reph2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
A lot of this people cant lose weight even when restricting calories.
The hell they can't. Report back after 6 months of 2 hours on a treadmill or bike each day, actually focused on it instead of on instagram.
Massive weight loss through cardio is hard but it is highly effective.
[+][deleted] 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]3josh181 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's what I like to call the fat threshold. When someone has reached a point of being fat that they can justify not working out because it will injure them, which then justifies their weight gain.
At some point of walking to lose weight they'll go under the fat theshold and be able to run again, but until then they've gotta walk.
Also. running on the treadmill is better than concrete. I'll agree running on a running track is best, but treadmills are also a good option.
[–]r24012 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
There is no metabolism that can slow down enough that you cannot lose weight by adjusting caloric intake.
None. Some may take more effort but if by effort you mean the free, non time consuming act of not eating, then everyone has that effort to expend.
[–]lister7770 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Calories is not the unit you ought to measure. Physics is based on conservation of energy and mass. A quick open system design show that metabolism counts. But there is a statistical spread, again. So we know more or less the constant from numerous studies. In worse case, an obese should change its intestinal flore, and quantify its the additional delta mass stocked. Then, a specific diet can be built. I am just shocked that we give degrees in nutrition and medicine to people who understand nothing in fundamental science.
[–]lister7770 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yes indeed. On my side I do about 8h of sport a week and watch out on my food. I know that obesity poses problem to lose weight. The argument I won't accept is "I am genetically designed to be obese, there is nothing I can do about it".
[–]Best_coder_NA-2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
But muh calories in calories out
[–]alia_armelle1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What a great fucking rebuttal
[–]Global_MGTOW56 points57 points58 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Is this where she left her genetics
[–]IntrovertedMagma11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
How the fuck does she fuck??
[–]Global_MGTOW7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Do you know how they built the Dome that sits on top of the Santa Maria del Fiore Cathedral? Probably the same way.
[–]Smyrnahiker4425 points26 points27 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That’s like a size 27 men’s neck. That’s an nfl size neck there. But she has the strength of a 9 year old. Equal rights my ass.
[–]kayfab13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The fat elephant in the room yeah she is one disgusting bitch
[–]PuckeredA_hole12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Whats this got to do with MGTOW
[–]xyzadeel9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There is nothing in thos world that i hate more then fat woman.
[–]Skurtald6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No social construct can make her any thinner.
[–]labiteatibit1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm just glad shamoo is doing good after all these years at sea world.
[–]reaper4122 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Got a dumb fat bitch at work that complains about how hard it is to lose all her blubber but brings in 6 donuts every morning for breakfast.
[–]Deadpanpancakes2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Man? Woman? Dont be so politically correct here boys. Thats a whale.
[–]PotatowitheyesxD3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Didn't she die?
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes. She died of a heart attack. She claimed she was fat and “healthy”. Ya lol good meme
[–]Male_strom1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No
[–]freezingsama2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Are there people who actually believe/get convinced that this is real? I always thought it's only themselves (fatties) who think this is true and everyone else is just too polite to tell them the truth because of PC fee fees bullshit.
[–]IntrovertedMagma2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I fucking hate those glasses with all of my fucking heart..
[–]Flintblood2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Gender is a social construct; biological sex is physiology and genetics. Obesity can be both genetics and social choices.
Being shorter than average or even just average and below is about the least controllable thing ever, yet height is the one thing women consistently use to judge a Man’s attractiveness.
[–]MortalMorals2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Genetics made her cram those twinkies down her big fat gop.
Get the picture?
[–]AntiAbleism2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ugly and fat men don’t need sex but ugly and fat women need Chad.
[–]Blumol2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Gosh that face triggers me.
[–]oldrunnerguy1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Being ugly is genetics, fat people can go for a walk and have a healthy diet. This isn't about fat shaming, it's about living a healthy life and not having a slew of health problems as you get older. This can become burdensome to yourself as well as your partner. Unplug, get out of the house, and make an effort.
It’s not their fault anyway.
[–]rationalthought3140 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
it makes sense if you don't apply any logic whatsoever and have a vagina
[–]FridgeCape0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Duh! Remember? Because feelings! Women’s feelings are the only thing that matters. /s
[–]BayandSilentJob960 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Her face fucking pisses me off
© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]DeepConfusion98484 points485 points486 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]j43p160 points161 points162 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pierco82103 points104 points105 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Chrh42 points43 points44 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]AijeEdTriach14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BinaryFaggot8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kyledontcare9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 22 points23 points24 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]lylasxoxo6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Aquilam23 points24 points25 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DeepConfusion983 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ribbonverde148 points149 points150 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]jonathino00164 points65 points66 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]ribbonverde31 points32 points33 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]IntrovertedMagma24 points25 points26 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DEVOmay9710 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 53 points54 points55 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]WanderlustYouth24 points25 points26 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]down_vote_militia4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FlappyFlipjacks15 points16 points17 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]rationalthought3142 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rationalthought3146 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lister777137 points138 points139 points (37 children) | Copy Link
[–]Hypogamy39 points40 points41 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 20 points21 points22 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (31 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]Male_strom41 points42 points43 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 20 points21 points22 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rydia45006 points7 points8 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]Rydia45002 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RetiSetGo7 points8 points9 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]RetiSetGo5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Freenorthman7 points8 points9 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (6 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]Freenorthman3 points4 points5 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (4 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]Freenorthman2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]Freenorthman2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]mrlavalamp20152 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]reph2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]3josh181 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]r24012 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]lister7770 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]lister7770 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Best_coder_NA-2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]alia_armelle1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Global_MGTOW56 points57 points58 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]IntrovertedMagma11 points12 points13 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Global_MGTOW7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Smyrnahiker4425 points26 points27 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kayfab13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PuckeredA_hole12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]xyzadeel9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Skurtald6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]labiteatibit1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]reaper4122 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Deadpanpancakes2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PotatowitheyesxD3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Male_strom1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]freezingsama2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]IntrovertedMagma2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Flintblood2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MortalMorals2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AntiAbleism2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Blumol2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]oldrunnerguy1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rationalthought3140 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FridgeCape0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BayandSilentJob960 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link