Summary

There is a perpetual fight for control over the Sexual Market Place. The rabbit hole goes deeper than one might suppose at first, and evolution plays only half of the role.


Have you ever wondered why is it that culture puts so much emphasis on sex regulation, since the middle ages? While it's true that we live in more libertarian times than ever before, when being shamed a slut/infidel would be a matter of life and death (tribal times) or at least great consequencies for smaller rural communities, our culture is still sex negative.

Religion is one of the main mechanisms trough which sex regulation is enforced - particularly the Judeo-Christian narrative viewing sex as "dirty" and a "necessary evil", to be deployed only in the conditions of a healthy heterosexual pair-bonded relationship. I strived many times to understand why such puritanism took form in the mind of man, only to be struck by a revelation I could barely handle at the time.

If you control sex, you literally control how the future generations will behave. If you control how they behave, they can be your obedient pawns.

This is not a conspiratory post about the illuminati/satanic aliens/reptilians/the patriarchy. But I hope anyone on this sub with a bare minimum of understanding over social dynamics knows that there are some humans that aquired so much influence trough their wealth and skills, that they cannot be described as something else than "the elite". For the sake of simplicity, I will be calling this group "the establishment".

I am aware that there are many interests at play inside this group, but there are some particularities that arise from their movements to shape society - one of them being the use of feminism to cause social displacements, that favor nobody but themselves, while the cattle get so infatuated with ideas of exiting an imaginary trap of oppression, they will just do their dirty job and stir the waters enough for the big fish not to be seen while hunting. This is not an attempt to demonize them, or call them outright evil. Those intentions are nothing but the large-scale powerplay that would occur even if ferrets were the dominant race on earth.


Ethics are a social survival mechanism. Some people will stubbornly claim that some things are universally/objectivelly bad, but a Red Piller shouldn't bother with such moralfags in the first place anyway. Ethics were created to maintain balance in ever-increasing communities of intelligent beasts, that could acquire resources by simply tapping their brother into the forehead with a stone. Nowadays we might call these kind "psychopaths", but there is much misunderstanding over this word, popularized mainly by hollywood horror movies (and we all know how well these people do their homework when creating movies).

Allow me to make a quick digression - dyslexia is not a mutation. You, the one able to read these lines with ease, are the mutant. You are in the possession of a gene named FOXP2 that allows your brain to perform advanced speech, writing etc. The dyslexic's brain still perceives these lines as a 3D medium, trying to make sense of shapes and movement, thinking it's still in a forest (they still have the genes, the synapses just aren't right, because the gene switches are messed up). The dyslexic was left behind. Simillarly, some flavors of psychopaths are nothing but specimens that didn't receive the right dose of "ethics" that would make them a functioning member of society, instead displaying what your common ignoramus would call "criminal behavior".

Of course genetics are way more complicated than my FOXP2 allows me to put in words here, but once you grasp this, you understand that the emotions that are the pillars of ethics (trough the pain/pleasure mechanism) are nothing but another trait that can be augmented/suppressed trough repeated reproduction with specific individuals for generations - I always considered sexuality some kind of intelligence, the intelligence of macromolecules to find the best pair for replicating with.

Case study- belgian war dogs - they bred the dogs that showed most fearlessness with other similar dogs, and this created a reinforcement loop; The resulting dogs had their emotional circuitry programmed in such a way that they wouldn't even flinch from hearing bombshells and gunshots when delivering ammunition on the battlefield. Not doing this would've resulted in pussy dogs that run away to safety instead of doing their mission - this is an example of forced breeding. The war dogs were more successful in reproduction because of the human factor - in nature, the scared dogs would have a higher rate of survival and thus, reproduction.

A lot of you still get one-itises, the simple reason for that being the fact that your ancestors had successful pair-bondings, thing which barely holds water in modern times. Unfortunately, this is what happens when you put a 15K years old brain inside a concrete jungle full of distractions and abundance ready to be abused - she'll cheat on your ass. For generations, we bred to be only smarter, which is why there is so much emphasis even in modern times for a partner to have traits like humor or creativity - which are nothing but consequences of intelligence and emotional maturity.

While for the most part of human existence, this concept of ethics held out and discouraged socially unacceptable behavior, once these suppressed traits gained enough power, they turned the table against the majority by creating social masks. Like a snowball, the humans that perceived trough the bullshit of good will and unconditional help had increasing advantages, becoming the new apex humanoids, replacing the traditional virile strongman.


"The trap" is a filter for the ones that still believe in old times values, and will hold back from advancing in careers/personal growth because of personal beliefs. This filter serves to protect the top-sociopaths from having weaklings infiltrated amongst them. The establishment has hijacked the truth, in order to weed out those that are gullible enough to still believe in human innocence, but want authority and responsabilities.

While this social mask is deployed, the establishment is free to breed out those that are "problematic" trough their disobedient behavior, but in the case where one such individual gets trough the filter, his unusual thinking pattern would be rewarded. The cattle are free to believe that the filter is there to protect them, and the sense of safety lets them be productive once again trough the illusion of free will.


So far we've seen that emotional indoctrination and propaganda help the establishment gain control (not that they have complete control over the SMP, but they try to manipulate trough factors such as the chemistry of your diet, the information that ends up polluting your eyes and ears, etc). There was never a such thing as a strive for "equality". It is a powergrab, while abusing the old-school beliefs that are still implanted into humans. Feminism wants authority but no responsability. Feminism is an attempt to change the reproductive behavior of humanity to create better "slaves". As the movement gains traction, an effect of this is blind loyalty and obliviousness for the ones unlucky enough to have the old values still in them - http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20151218-this-is-how-to-fire-someone-the-chinese-way

Both big and small media platforms are employed, and it results in large scale communist propaganda right under your nose. As you can see, logic and truth aren't even required ( 36 shit tests feminists have for men ), because the hamsters will still gulp the self righteous bullshit.

I sense that some of you are still raising an eyebrow "But Nuke, whatdafuq does 3rd wave feminism have to do with the elite?". EVERYTHING. In fact, I think it would be quite a delicious irony to find that behind this pseudoactivist movement were nothing but MEN.

This video shows how large corporations have a great benefit from using feminism to reform industries such as the gaming one. Remember that these people have vast resources, and can see trough the social masks of the blue pilled, having themselves fabricated a good number of them. The "female weakness is power" was a perfect loophole in the male brain to engage in this reform safely, being shielded from criticism by nothing but the hamsterosaurus rex of the people that just waited to have a cause to fight for.

Microsoft for example, has a good benefit from the gaming reform, having bought MinecraftTM prior to the events (calculated move, ofc) from the indie developer Notch, and now they try to put it in schools. The problem is, gaming still has a bad vibe due to the whole american news propaganda, and they needed to show how it's changing thanks to good-willed feminists that actively fight the sexism that would otherwise brainwash your children. Shaping the minds of the young trough technology is nothing but another way to control human behavior.


The current state of affairs is that the target slave, in many ways a polar opposite to the Ubermensch, is the passive person. Follow orders, don't ask questions, be efficient (why do you think coffee is so wide spread while the weeds are forbidden?). You all know the story already I bet. Passivity has ingrained some sort of anxiety and guilt (which is a very vast subject, being a very strong yet subtle human emotion), depression and suicide are rising exponentially the more industrialized a country is. Some events were triggered on purpose to aid in this transformation (such as the immigrant wave, the purpose is to destabilize and also mix blood for a more generalist slave), the PC culture preaching tolerance on one side while striking those who still stand with their heads up, and above all, the engineering of the zeitgeist trough major media (STAR WARS ANYONE?) are nothing but pieces of this agenda.

Fear of debt has a negative effect on the minds of people, particularily young boys and near-wall women. This spews, again, anxiety.

But our own biology still gives hope. Or rather, female biology.

It is also clear that the human society we live in is so violent because women are still predominately breeding with aggressive and competitive alpha males and instilling the violent and competitive genes in the next generation. If women went against their genetic and social conditioning and procreated instead with weaker, passive and timid males eventually human society would become more tolerant and peaceful.(http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread948287/pg1)

I would be worried about this passivity for more than the reasons implying my own persona. I think it's ridiculous to think that we could be the only aggressive species in the universe. If we go past the new age bullcrap about disembodied aliens made out of love/light, we can consider the danger of ETs, with the space era being only in its diapers. THIS IS SERIOUS, if we want to mature as a race, we need to take into consideration diplomatic relations and powerplay with other stuff out there as well. If shit goes down, is this the kind of person you'd want to fight along with? The technological level is not all, but the sheer collective willpower will determine the outcome mostly.


Sorry for the unnecessary digression there, and for ending it on an edge. I would like to split this in more posts, because no one wants to read a novel i suppose. Next time i'm in for an analysis of the future of the SMP, with all the transhumanistic, VR/sexbots, colonizing Mars and the importance of sexuality for calibrating the senses and the mind, to see a glimpse of where we're headed.


Lessons learned:

  • An establishment of powerful people has been trying for centuries to push the emergent properties of human sexuality into one direction or another, for the benefit of the machine, but not the individual. Be free.

  • Feminism is a distraction and a shit test.

  • Most of morality is a shit test. Justice system is a shit test. Seeding anxiety in people is a means of control.

  • STOP BEING PASSIVE. Get a grip on your own life. Have you worked out today?