A wave of relief rolled over me last night when I was reading Might is Right, acclaimed by critics as one of the most incendiary books ever written. Naturally, it was right up my alley.

Redpillery has been spread by pseudonym'd alphas for over 115 years, as far as I can tell, and before that it was just what you'd call 'Common Knowledge' and its likely your father would have told you this at a young age. There is so much knowledge that I'll just write some choice quotes here and a brief modern day redpill afterthought:

zC: Alpha fucks in poem form:

Down a winding pathway in a garden old,

tripped a beauteous maiden,

but her heart was cold.

Came a prince to woo her,

Said he loved her true;

Maiden said he didn't,

so he ceased to woo.

Came a perfumed noble;

dropping on one knee;

Said his love was deeper,

Than the deepest sea.

But the winsome maiden,

said his love was dead,

and the perfumed noble,

accepted what she said.

Came a dashing Stranger,

took her off by force;

said he'd MAKE her love him,

and she did - of course

zC:wow... 1896 and people understood women's attraction to alpha and disgust of beta. He goes on to explain it, but not in our present day vernacular:

  • Superior males TAKE racially superior women and inferior males are permitted to duplicate themselves, per media of inferior feminines.

  • The word "brutal" in real life means the reverse of effeminate. A man is brutal who will not turn the other cheek. WHAT IS IT THAT BRUTES DO THAT IN NATURE IS WRONG?

zC: This guy is outrageous, but he's right. He smashes on Marxism a lot in this book and laughs at the concept of equlity numerous times. And rightfully so.

  • "... He is a MAN. Hence, everywhere he is first favourite, especially with the feminine gender - whose sexual instincts are as true to Nature as the needle is to the pole"

zC: Again, Nature dictates our role in life. No matter how hard a barren 40 year old feminist says otherwise, her value is nil at that point. Encouraging young women to emulate that instead of following her nature should be a criminal offense

  • Healthy animalism is the foundation of all virtues whatsoever.

zC: My all time favourite quote here... he basically says one of my favourite lines, which is "women would rather share an alpha than be strapped to a monogamous beta". This is why alphas have multiple women and betas can't seem to get a date or a lay" :

  • "Better the mistress of a king, than the wife of a subject," was a saying once popular amongst European women.

  • Slaves and women are notoriously incompetant of self-control - of holding their own "business" - when not inspired and assisted by male friends. They are intended by nature to be loved and defended but not to be equalized" zC: I have the perfect image for this quote... again... this isn't a new concept. Its been the red pill reality for over a hundred years, just too many betas to break it into the mainstream.

  • Over intellectualism (bad enough in a man) transfigures women into freaks. (feminists at any protest prove this to be true) The more Animal Nature a maiden possesses; the more of a true woman she is. The better wife and mother she will make.

  • Women's noblest occupation is not merely to read erotic novels, but to BREED MEN, to raise up a race of unsubduable fighters. Her vilest occupation is to raise up cowards, laborious jackasses

  • There is nothing particularly inviting about barren dyspeptic, blue stocking "New Women" in pants and spectacles; talking idiotic snuffle through their noses... It is this kind of woman that causes so much domestic unhappiness. The have been "educated" among false lines, filled with bookish artificialism, and therefore when called upon to take up their maternal duty they are organic incapables. Hence the divorce court scandals - the fruit of wholesale degeneracy - encouraged by State interference with domestic affairs

zC: Wow - so MensRights worrying about getting divorce raped is over 115 years old. Holy shit. The article continues:

In other words, it deliberately promotes unfaithfulness and unlimited freelove (zC: Carousel ride) It undermines the husbands control, but at what dreadful cost? With the "equalization" of women comes wholesale panmixia - scientific concubinage, State regulated polyandry (whoring) and the poisoning of all family relations.

zC: This is what "equalization is good for: the destruction of the family, and business has been booming for over 100 years. Still think women should vote? Still think Catholicism is a bad idea? You probably do, but I've made the move to Traditionalism myself, and won't look back. The article goes on:

When average women find is Statute Law a "deliverer" and a "champion" more powerful than their husbands and brothers, they become both unfaithful and profligate [pleasure seeking] especially if "well educated". And it cometh to pass that "no man know his own father"

zC: Today, we often talk about how the State has replaced the husband and the father. This has long been the case. Also, approximately 10 percent of all babies aren't born to the husband. No man knoweth his own father indeed.

Final thoughts: Ragnar Redbeard, rest his soul, was bang on the money about a lot of his redpill insight. His book is also chock to the brim with passages about how men ought to be ruthless, democratic governments pander to the weakest among them and therefore are a weaker form of government than a strong monarchy, and he also goes on about the differences between Aryan and other races. It truly is one of the most incediary books of all time. He knows his women facts though, and he didn't have a forum to tell him these things.