Introduction: I ran across this story on CNN.

Don't bother reading it. The short version: 17 year old boy gets a BJ from a drunk 16 year old girl.

Long version: 16 year old girl has 4 times the legal limit of alcohol and does not remember what happened. I guess that is supposed to invoke an emotional reaction or something? So, the bitch got sloppy fall down drunk and blacked out. NOT "passed out." She was "blacked out" and that is something entirely different.

Hell, we did it by the barn load (literally).

Bottom line, or so I thought: 17 year old boy remembers that it was all consensual.

Now what crime has been committed? What can possibly be proven beyond a reasonable doubt? It is not He Said/She Said. It is He Said/ 0.

Maybe it is that dividing by 0 that is the whole problem here which would explain the logical singularity the SJW's have created with the "rape" hysteria, but I digress.

Analysis: Basically that is all the story says folks but we can go further. We can imagine the mechanics of forcing a drunk, slobbering bitch to give a "non consensual" blowjob. Has this CNN author ever gotten a blowjob? Does H/she understand teeth? This whole story is total, and absolute crap. WE KNOW what happened. They were making out and fucking around. He may or may not have whipped it out but SHE went for it. She sucked his dick. There was no mother fucking "forcing" going on here. Like the man said, this was consensual.

But...but...but wait! She was blacked out.

Ummmm.....

Apparently it is now accepted without objection that any and all blackout sex is rape! The defense lawyer background in me sees a boy who said it was consensual. The girl says she doesn't remember. How does the boy go to jail and get on the sex offender list? How is this even a facade of the presumption of innocence? I don't get it. How is this a "forcible" rape? How?

Why is nobody speaking up that it is logically very unlikely that one would, or even could "forcibly rape" a girl by inserting ones penis into her struggling blacked out mouth?

This is hardly the first example of this growing black hole from feminism that we have seen. Don't forget that plying a girl with drugs to "gain her compliance" (which we used to call "buying her a drink") is now rape. Think not, ask Hot Cosby. South Park was making jokes about this for years. The fact he was a horny dog was part of his well known comedy routine (that men are hound dogs who will fuck anything). Everybody knew what it meant if you were a hot girl going into Cosby's private quarters. No girl needed to be "plied with pills" to fuck the world famous performer Bill Cosby.

Yet there he is, women crawling from under the stained mattresses of their shame charging an old man- a GREAT man, an example for African American men, with RAPE. Nothing protects men. They will destroy you.

Feminists speak openly on Facebook about destroying the patriarchy and taking power from men. We have to hide our real identities just to blog to protect our homes and relationships from being targeted.

Conclusion: Keeping it real and personal. I am pretty sure the first 5 or so sexual acts I experienced were while I was dead drunk and nearly blacked out, although I really don't remember. Dammit, what is the Statute of Limitations on these things anyway?

Perhaps that is the wrong question. Here is the right one: How long before all of this collapses into the feminist singularity?