659,329 posts

Simple equation: You must be more virile, than she is feral

by scissor_me_timbers00 | September 08, 2016 | TheRedPill


Reddit View

This recently popped into my head as a very boiled-down version of the equation of male-female sexual dynamics. It cannot be mathematically measured, and obviously there are some complications to sexual dynamics like wit, cunning, intelligence, wealth, status, etc. but I've found that much of this follows naturally when a man maximizes his virility.

What do I mean by virility? Your raw male fire in your belly for success, winning, dominance, conquering. You enhance this by lifting heavy weights, training your mind to focus and acheive, and not dissipating yourself. Don't dissipate yourself with porn or excessive sex. Sublimate yourself. Sexual transmutation. Do not dissipate yourself with all the bullshit distraction of the internet age.

Life becomes much easier when you train your mind and will to be like a magnifying glass focusing light to burn through shit. You gotta build up that raw male energy, like the fiery summer sun, and then apply that magnifying glass to it. Can't burn up ants on a cloudy day. The famous philosopher Wittgenstein said something about genius being the effect of an extremely focused mind burning through shit.

What women want to feel is a man's POTENCY, which essentially is his VIRILITY. You must build the raw energy and then maximize its effect on the world around you and the women around you with the focus aspect. The world is a struggle of wills. The more virile and disciplined man expresses a more potent will.

We all know the true nature of women, AWALT, but this cannot be held against them. It is merely Nature. They are FERAL by nature and they cannot be forcefully tamed. But deep down they desire to submit to a man they deem worthy, and this must be a man whose VIRILITY EXCEEDS HER FERAL NATURE.

Post Information
Title Simple equation: You must be more virile, than she is feral
Author scissor_me_timbers00
Upvotes 66
Comments 23
Date 08 September 2016 10:51 AM UTC (3 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/62096
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/51qpg1/simple_equation_you_must_be_more_virile_than_she/
Similar Posts

TRP terms found in post
Click to open them on Dictionary


[–]NeoreactionSafe 13 points14 points  (61 children) | Copy


We all know the true nature of women, AWALT, but this cannot be held against them. It is merely Nature. They are FERAL by nature and they cannot be forcefully tamed.


Actually they are tamed in a natural environment which isn't distorted by Blue Pill laws like Child Support.

In nature a man can abandon a female... easily... very easily.

Our Blue Pill world rewards the female with "cash prizes" as she acts on her feral nature. (Hypergamy)

Other than that I agree.

Women prefer a masculine man.


The Blue Pill isn't natural.

Our modern problems are created by Fabian society thinkers who wish to invert nature and damage the family overall.

The Blue Pill is our poison pill. (so "Kill the Beta" and reject the poison)


[–]1scissor_me_timbers00[S] 6 points7 points  (8 children) | Copy

Agree with your comment on the blue pill laws like cash and prizes, etc. However, my basic formula still holds. Even with red pill laws preventing a woman's hasty divorce, etc., she will still be feral within the marriage by being a henpecking bitch and/or cheating behind his back. Again, the husband's virility must exceed her feral nature or he is guaranteed to be cucked or henpecked, and fuck either of those fates.

[–]NeoreactionSafe 6 points7 points  (4 children) | Copy

Back in the 1800's there was a 95% lifelong marriage success rate and by best estimates only around 2% - 3% infidelity.

Women feared becoming Old Maids or prostitutes if they screwed up.

Fear works.

Hypergamy can be blocked by fear.

Our Blue Pill world is just too embarassed to deal with the issue and the idea that women might have to fear consequences has been made "politically incorrect" by our conditioning.


[–]poonGopher6969 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

There was also plenty of domestic abuse, back then too. Feminism used to be a good thing, now it's outdated and overused like labor unions.

[–]NeoreactionSafe 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

Feminism was never a good thing.

Cultural debasement techniques had been developed by the early stages of the Globalist Tyranny when they funded Karl Marx to create his work.

Feminism is one of the techniques.


[–]antariusz 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Depends on your definition of good.

If you wish to retain control of a worldwide population that you fear is getting out of control because of unchecked growth.

Destroying anything that encourages population growth is a good thing. Family, children, traditional values.

Like, when I was a kid I would be like "lol there aren't groups of people out there with a global domination agenda, new world order is only something that crackpots believe in".

And then I got old enough to realize there really are a handful of people trying to exercise their considerable wealth and influence to control the rest of us into "just a safe amount" of unrest and growth.

That "conspiracy theories" like the bilderberg group isn't a "conspiracy theory" at all.

From their point of view, they ARE DOING GOOD THINGS. And from anyone's point of view, they are winning.


And yes, I believe that they aren't "trying" to rule the world, it's just s bunch of people coming together for the "best ways to make changes and make things better". The problem is their definition of better is better for them. But not necessarily better for humanity as a whole.

[–]NeoreactionSafe 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's like a mafia.

Many people getting together in secret to achieve objectives while keeping the public in the dark.

The one universal trait is darkness directed towards the masses.

The rulers want power (the light) and the masses are kept happy and in darkness. (ignorance is darkness)


[–]aanarchist -3 points-2 points  (2 children) | Copy

your basic formula is ass. fuck their feral nature, stop being an enabler.

[–]1scissor_me_timbers00[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Lol I don't enable shit. But thanks for the positivity

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

The feral instinct is a fact. If you want to conquer it, you will have to recognize it to the least. I'd name it a "recognizer", and i think there is virility in recognizing. Also there is nothing to enable there, that wasn't already in motion before.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

True but too one-dimensional. There aren't simply just fiery alphas and supplicating betas. There are different kinds of men. My cold and indifferent, dispassionate personality is neither. I hardly even have a sex drive, which kills every possibility to be alpha, but never behave needy or insecure around women, which kills every possibility to be beta. My marriage is best described as comfortable. I find clean clothes in my cabinet etc. it's neat.

[–]antariusz 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

No sex drive? Have you considered getting your T checked?

I know it's not a panacea, but it DOES make your life a lot better to have higher levels of testosterone.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Yes, low-average, with a good diet and lifting (but too much alcohol).

[–]NeoreactionSafe 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

If it's working for you that's what matters.



The general goal of the test is to provide data about cognition and personality variables such as motivations, response tendencies, cognitive operations, affectivity, and personal/interpersonal perceptions. The underlying assumption is that an individual will class external stimuli based on person-specific perceptual sets, and including needs, base motives, conflicts, and that this clustering process is representative of the process used in real-life situations.


In the Red Pill people see what they want to see.

The act of following others ideals of perfection is a lessor level of enlightenment.

"Go Your Own Way."


[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (45 children) | Copy

Well, monogamous patriarchy isn't natural either. The fact that half the men in this sub are still alive is not natural either (wouldn't have happened back in the caves).

[–]NeoreactionSafe 0 points1 point  (44 children) | Copy


Well, monogamous patriarchy isn't natural either.


It obeys Natural Laws perfectly... so it's an ideal.

Nature is defined as all possible expressions of the Natural Laws. (no single answer)

The Blue Pill is an expression of Natural Laws where some Dark Luciferian psychopaths in the Globalist Tyranny created laws that fuck up humanity.

Same Natural Laws... totally different objective... totally different expression.

Natural Laws are eternal, but they can manifest in many ways.


[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (26 children) | Copy

No, natural laws dictate that men impregnate as many women as possible and that women reject all unworthy men (and breed only with the top alpha).

Hamster all you like, but that is the truth. That's what it was like in the caves.

[–]NeoreactionSafe 1 point2 points  (18 children) | Copy


Natural Laws are different than your conception. They originated from the Hermetic Laws of ancient Greece.

Mark Passio:



You are describing "nature" in some other context.


When I use the "Natural Laws" with capitals I'm saying the accepting meaning historically.


[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (17 children) | Copy

You are not talking about nature. You are talking about historical social norms.

[–]NeoreactionSafe 0 points1 point  (16 children) | Copy

No actually there is an internally consistent structure to it.

Watch the video.

Humans have had this deep knowledge of the Natural Laws going back thousands of years.


"What you ignore becomes your ignorance."

Knowledge is the thing.

Make that effort to dig for knowledge... decide you will resist being "dumbed down" into simple notions.

The Blue Pill is about accepting simple, but false explanations. (Disney simplicity)


[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (15 children) | Copy

Frankly all the blue pill Disney movies I have ever seen advocated monogamy... I think you are a bit confused.

[–]NeoreactionSafe 0 points1 point  (14 children) | Copy

Disney advocates the Blue Pill.

We're talking about masculinity which is the Red Pill.

Disney undermines the family... it's destructive to monogamy.


Men love women, women love children, children love puppies

This is "masculine polarity" of relationship.

Marriage 1.0 (before 1950 when Child Supprt Laws were invented) was compatible with masculine polarity.

Marriage 2.0 is bad news. Avoid the new contract.


[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (13 children) | Copy

Disney undermines the family? The fuck man, every single princess gets married at the end of the movie.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter