The theory - the social programming of society

I've theorized before what the intended goal of feminism is. It's social programming at its base that does a number of things, (a) a means to boost the economic and social standing of women in society through the creation of an environment where women are encouraged to move into to work, as well as the destruction of social stereotypes which does have an effect to project a psychological barrier with regards to the human animal in a social setting. This is being done by our governments through work place and post secondary enrollment quotas. The other aspect of this (b) has been to rebalance the social standing of men and women in particular regards with the treatment of the sexes. This particular area as emphasized in red pill, MGTOW culture seems to indicate that women's hypergamy is being provoked into a hyper active state, while men at the same time are becoming more pacified by a new age of globalist culture involving pornography, drugs and prostitution as a means to pacify their biological imperatives. The other end of this same division is the destruction of women's general value to men, this I believe can be seen with the paralleled growth of Red Pill, MGTOW, MRAs in that order who're wholly aware of the biological imperatives and abusive behaviours of women/Matriarchy.

I overall theorize that feminism is an actual long term piece of globalist programming meant to free men from the last corner of feudalism existent in today's society, while at the same time forcing women to stand within an egalitarian economic roles alongside men, rather then through the exploitation of them. There are quite a few concepts that need to be covered and explained, I will do so hopefully to round out a fair perspective that will be logical and constructive, though it will be fairly limited given the abundance of resources on the aforementioned topics covered.

Part I Globalism/Banking system - control of that which makes all things in our society material, which is money

The biggest concept by far is that feminism, along with many other types of social programming are not of a natural origin. The bankers have since the late 1600s been waging their war for control and obtained it successfully through their conquest of Europe and the World during the last World War where global financial control was centralized at the Bank of International Settlements with the SWIFT banking system. There the bankers in such have learned to create, manipulate and exert social force towards their end goal of a world government. With this they must create and slowly move the public through paradigms, particularly from a nationalist mindset to the globalist mindset, which is very predominant in Generation X+ thanks to the inception of the internet by the globalists. The Internet is a globalist dream tool, they learned that the unhindered trade of material goods also lead with the flow of ideas, concepts and communication. The internet has effectively eroded nationalism in many to some extent by bringing us so much closer to other people, only two decades ago would we never be able to communicate with someone on the other side of the world to perceive the concepts, perspectives of others in far of lands. Now places like China can be seen and heard, ideas shared and the distance between individuals eradicated to some extent. Another important thing to understand about the bankers is that despite the great evils to bring us to World Government, the evil's we would've suffered to the Monarchists, feudalists, aristocratic/plutocratic human systems before them were exponentially worse. The bankers spread the rights of man with their agent Napoleon, they broke British Monarchy, Spanish, French feudalism and smashed the Roman Emperors hold on Europe and gave the plebeian man and women rights non existent to the lower classes. The bankers were the abolitionists in the British Empire and the ones who forced the American Civil war to bring the American plutocracy to heel. Right now we're being moved to global governance by the bankers who're using technology and the new SDR, a globalist currency to depeg USD hegemony from the current economic paradigm, which is to come to further globalize and push anti-corruption reforms alien to our plutocratic managers, particularly the American plutocrats that have benefited atrociously by this and are trying to stall present IMF reforms where in the bankers have already bypassed with the BRICS development bank.

Part II Matriarchy and globalism - have men been the true sovereigns of societies?

Matriarchy: human system used to socially enforce male participation in the institution of a union or marriage where a male is expected to fulfill the stereotypical provider role and to submit in subservience to the expectations of the women in his life, mostly notably those highest in his feminist social hierarchy, ie mother, wife, daughter etc. Matriarchy is most notable for its subversion, not psychically as this human system is purely psychological, caters specifically to the promise of fulfillment of a man's biological imperatives.

What does feminism have to do with the economic and social consolidation of society and or past precedents? Matriarchy, a concept so foreign it even baffles some who've been red pilled. The evils of women have been talked about for millennia by men, the most popular literary example is the Odyssey, a trip where Odysseus must avoid the pitfalls and destructive temptations of women only to return to his wife who has accumulated a vast party of suitors all vying for her hand in remarriage whilst at the same time laying economic ruin to his house through the consumption of his resources and at the same time being a threat to his familial line(his son). Women have always been the rulers of men for the longest of time, they've always misappropriated men's desires to further their own faculties, this is done with the promise of sexual intimacy(vagina), their ability to produce offspring, and the projection of a partner who's emotionally intimate and capable of maintaining the economic and social status of her partner. Women take advantage of this but men are ultimately responsible for engaging and tolerating the sadistic nature of women, this again is seen in literature with Adam and Eve, Adam doesn't have to leave paradise but chooses to do so despite the nature of Eve, he bite the philosophical poisonous apple so as to avoid loneliness.

That said what is happening now? The social programming known as feminism is bolstering female hypergamy(inherent female biological mating strategy) causing women to entirely avoid beta males and only lavish their attention onto what they personally/locally perceive as alpha males through reinforced stereotypes well into their 30s. Feminism has also deprogrammed women from shaming others into marriage and instead allowed for the full throughput/acceptance of female hypergamy in society, meaning women will not throw their attention on 80%(Okcupid data, example of the mating perceptions of women) of the male population, which also gives to the other notion that women view a majority of men at face value, as disposable. This is validated through biology, you don't need 1:1 men to get women pregnant, but only a few to reproduce with many women, the economics of this destroys the value of a majority of men entirely, allowing women greater focus on those who cater on their biological imperatives, those being the strongest, the highest in social standing, and the most materialist males also known as Alphas. The beta males(80%) are the losers in this scenario, they're left to fight for women's attention with an initial social dating value of 0-, in order to do this they must acquire a tolerable yield of resources(house/property), social standing, physique and be totally subservient in order to attract a woman's attention(giving her the world as it's presently called). The male boomers are the car wreck of this scenario, where in the economic repositioning of women has allowed them to economically punish men through divorce courts and allowed a thriving divorce industry of marital councilors/lawyer's to feed of a women's hypergamy.

Other historical imperatives, the Matriarchy has been around as long as humans have been. Women generally in the past outlived their husbands, the disposable male provider because mens work was intensive, dangerous and the life expectancy of old was no where near as high as it is for the general population. Women were also expected to manage the man's estate if he went to war, help manage his economy, social status and aided in carefully managing his public image(things still done presently). Its also no secret that politicians advocated directly to women in the past prior to women's voting rights, they pandered to female issues because they knew women could manipulate their husbands in their own interests. The patriarchy has always served the matriarchy, men even presently initiate around 90% of all relationships and the expectations and stereo types of ancient times are still present in society, we serve the female interest in the hopes of progeny, sexual intimacy and emotional fulfillment, fantasies the female perspective does not share as we've learned with hypergamy.

Red Pill Economics - the convergence of egalitarianism in Generation X+

The response to feminist social engineering has been swift in Generation X+, the proliferation of the internet which includes porn and gaming have created male spaces that once where not so readily available to previous generations of men, as well created outlets for men without the necessity of women. This has in effect destroyed the mating social value of women(MSV), added as well female hypergamy is extremely undesirable to men who view promiscuous women as a high risk factor in regards to the process and creation of their own progeny. This risk is the biological nightmare of all men(considered worse then male rape by men), the raising of another man's children, the waste of his own resources, time and effort aiding in the self projection of another man through false progeny into the future and the high risk(50%+) of an economic raping through extremely bias courts which are predatory on female hypergamy. Essentially the internet has made younger men far more conscious of the problems with women, the loss of their effort and time and the creation of alternatively competing interests which add more self fulfillment then the once social placard of family, kids and a house. The economy is also another thing engineered, the downfall of the west is actually the reconvergence of dollar parity within reality, the punishment of feudalistic rent seeking practices by the rich and upper middle classes and the opportunity to create intensive social pressures which can be exploited to further globalization. Economic pressure and the repositioning of women as earners has stripped a lot of men from their traditional placard as providers, as well stripped away their capability to fulfill the feminist requirements of women to garner their attention as said stereotypical provider. This overall creates a situation where a majority of younger men no longer see themselves capable of fulfilling the obscene contemporary biological requirements of women within a tolerable setting and makes modern female behaviours and attitudes intolerable when contrasted to modern day technologies which compete now for male attention, damaging women's (MSV). The result is formation of movements like the MRA who seek to socially re-engineer society to not economically punish men as much, while those who're MGTOWs refuse to play ball with the hypergamy of the modern female, gynocentric government that treats men as disposable as evidenced through spending in social programs. This movement is silently encroaching as the internet further makes men aware of the problem and women have already begun to react by using the same old mating strategies, meaning the proliferation and hyper sexualization of women in the West, however if current trends are an indicator men are not going to bite, men who're far more socially programmed in counties like Japan have shown that the divide between men and women will only grow further with the continued hypergamy and engineering of women into economic parity.

Conclusions - the collapse of the Matriarchal system

Feminism is a double edged sword, one that reprograms men to make them more tolerant to female hypergamy, but at the same time causing a massive downgrade on female (MSV) due to the biological imperatives of men. The result of this globalist programming has essentially freed a majority of men from the pressures of marriage and allowed them to pursue other imperatives that are steeped in globalist dogmas. Women on the other hand are being collectively manipulated into holding their economic weight through mass subsidization by the governments of the west. The destruction of women's (MSV) has depleted a significant amount of male attention and has oddly increased male beta social value as women hit their biological restrictive in their 30s for children. The miss match in imperatives doesn't allow women in their early teens to twenties to behaviourly mold men anymore into subservience to the Matriarchy, instead feminism has caused a massive displacement of female strategic interests by fooling women into the immediacy of their biological imperatives in their youth(going after the Alpha males). This in turn destroys their long term (MSV) with beta males(80%) in their 30s when they're reproductive biological imperatives hit. Basically we are moving towards egalitarianism, thanks to feminism as one cog out of many being used to engineer us towards globalist society. Its not all bad, men have considerably more free time to self develop and women enjoy the fruits of their individuality free from social dogmas as well, however there are the consequences of such. Even men suffer from hyper sexuality as they're unable to form long term pair bonds with women. The decrease in population is due to a number of those factors, primarily economics as materialist possessions are a must for attracting female attention.

This leaves several questions, will there be a population boon in several decades with the social engineering to match? Will the globalists re-engineer society to stabilize populations if ever the populations in all industrialized nations keep free falling, and if they do how so will they do it from the current paradigm? There's been talk out of The Economist(globalist paper, part of CFR, Foreign Affairs network) which has stated 2.1 birth rate is necessary to stabilize China's economy. There are many other unknowns, which is why we discuss things here on the super information exchange that's the internet.