https://archive.is/MW8rf
Search their mission statement in the link above (archive.is in case it's changed in the future). You won't find a single instance of "black man" or "black men". Not one.
You'll find "black women", "black trans women", "black trans folk", "transgender brothers and sisters", "black people", "black family"...
No "black man". No "black men".
You'll find multiple mentions of "comrades", multiple mentions of "collective", "communal". Variations of "gender identity", "transgender", and related gender terms are mentioned no less than eleven times. "Queer‐affirming", "heterosexual", "heteronormative", etc.
No "black man". No "black men".
Obviously had plenty of space to fit in the standard feminist key words. "Black women", "sexism", "misogyny", "environments in which men are centered", "liberation". They specifically mention "building a space free from environments in which men are centered", and their intention to "disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure".
No "black man". No "black men".
This is a cultural marxist movement that hijacked a movement to end racial injustice and violence against, mostly, black men. They have intentionally included everyone important to the western marxist movement by name or title; feminists, trans women, LGBT, and comrades eat up about 2/3 of the mission statement. Black men aren't specifically mentioned even once.
[–]Egalitarianwhistle6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
It's much harder being a black man than being a black woman. '
Intersectionality got it wrong.
[–]casra88810 points11 points12 points (7 children) | Copy Link
To be fair, 95% of black men are murdered by other black men. So, stop killing yourselves.
[–]BlueBlood7511 points12 points13 points (4 children) | Copy Link
To be fair, most people are murdered by people of their own race.
[–]SharedRegime2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
No ones denied that though.
[–]BlueBlood759 points10 points11 points (2 children) | Copy Link
Deny, no. But some ppl sure as hell seem to “forget” to mention it whenever talking about black murder stats.
[–]Jaktenba1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
There's two points here that you are ignoring.
One, the stat is mostly brought up to show that neither cops nor white people in general are "hunting" down black men. If they were the number of black-on-black murders would be lower.
Second, and this also goes to the guy you're replying to, the number is more impactful when the total number of deaths are mentioned and/or it (and the total number) are compared to other combinations of murder.
Granted the second point only comes into play if all that other information is added, so it doesn't fit here for people that aren't already aware of it.
[–]SharedRegime0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Thats besides the point. Its also not even the reason the stats are shared. Its shared to point out the hypocrisy of the statement.
[–]pkarlmann[S] -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
No, the only number the statistic gave us was that about 95% of Blacks are killed by Blacks. It didn't include a statistic about sexes involved.
[–]WolfShaman2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Here you go.