You always hear about ‘Men act entitled to Sex and its accepted!’ ...But is it?

The only time a sane man acts entitled to sex is if he’s been taking the woman out on dates or doing things for her (im not saying its right for him to expect it and Never right to act terribly to her for it, but im just pointing out there is usually a somewhat understandable reason a simple expectation built up in his head.. its usually not out of the blue, even if still wrong for multiple reasons, and I have no sympathy for those men but its still partially her fault for stringing him along)

But If a random dude comes up to any woman on the street and demands sex, 10 guys would jump in to save her and it’s not even close to accepted by anyone.

Which brings me to my next point about women and public entitlement. Most Women feel unabashedly entitled to random Men’s protection.. usually against other Men, but even against say an accident or wild animal.. she expects, and gets, unknown Men to risk their lives for her when in danger. Its just expected. This isn’t a small thing, its literally putting his life on the line for a person he doesn’t know.

So what kind of collective public service do women give men back in return thats comparable? None that I see (enlighten me if im wrong)

Ok so thats public, but 60 years ago you could argue ‘well they take care of all our kids privately and take care of the house etc.. so we all collectively agree to play our role as public protectors since they play their role as private emotional and household caretakers’.. fine fair enough..

but how about now in 2020? Privately its supposed to be all about Equal Roles now and Women aren’t supposed to be doing these roles any more than Men right? Even if they still are somewhat the collective goal seems to be that they shouldn’t. Basically if the mainstream narrative is to be followed, other than the pregnancy and birthing (not to be taken lightly) everything else is supposed to be equal...

except even then its not for Men.. Men are still expected to provide for their family and its very embarrassing and shameful if he doesn’t, but he’s also expected to help with all the traditional female activities too.. but if a woman doesn’t earn enough money its more acceptable than if a man doesn’t etc..

So privately they’re entitled to his providing and protection (women and children first on the lifeboats, man fights intruders etc..) but he’s not supposed to expect any traditional female duties from her?

And then women are publicly entitled to protection but have no public responsibility for anything themselves?

What am I missing here? If its not blatant hypocrisy and double standard, please explain to me how this makes sense otherwise? I genuinely want to know if theres a logical justification that makes sense for this..

otherwise Im defaulting to calling it obvious mass-accepted double-standard of most Women just wanting their cake and eating it too.