706,399 posts

Uhh, guys

Reddit View
Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy link
PDF EPUB TXT PNG
luciferhasthebooty
May 10, 2020
418 upvotes
antifeminists
post image

Post Information
Title Uhh, guys
Author luciferhasthebooty
Upvotes 418
Comments 67
Date 10 May 2020 08:43 PM UTC (5 months ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/706513
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/gh96fr/uhh_guys/
Similar Posts
Loading Loading
Comments

[–]PutridMeatPuppet91 points92 points  (27 children) | Copy

So much for equality...

[–][deleted] 25 points26 points  (26 children) | Copy

It was never about equality. It's end goal was always female domination and absolute misandry. Very similar to Goku Black and Zamasu's zero mortals plan, except you swap out "Goku Black and Zamasu" with "feminists" and "mortals" with "men".

We live in a soycuck simpciety these days, and that is why feminism is allowed to thrive as men are forced to suffer to the point of suicide as a result of feminism.

[–]PutridMeatPuppet26 points27 points  (0 children) | Copy

I know.

I guess i forgot the /s.

Feminism was always about female supremacy. Any lip service about equality was just propaganda to fool the suckers into acquiescence.

[–]Rozycka12310 points11 points  (24 children) | Copy

Not always, there was a time when it was about equality

[–]CosmoaicComputer5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

^ doesn't deserve to be downvoted

[–]Rozycka1232 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Thanks

[–]Philletto3 points4 points  (8 children) | Copy

I wonder now if it ever was. Sure, right to vote sounds fine until you realize women will preference vote for women but men don't preference men. Do da math.

[–]Rozycka1230 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy

Not necessarily, and even if they did prefer to vote for women what’s wrong with that?

[–]Philletto3 points4 points  (6 children) | Copy

Prefering to vote for a candidate based on their sex is sexist. How can you defend that?

[–]Rozycka1230 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy

It isn’t ok

[–]Philletto1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy

So you accept that equal rights is in fact a takeover of power, but without the responsibility?

[–]Rozycka1230 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

So you think women shouldn’t have equal rights?

[–]Philletto7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy

Only with equal responsibility.

[–]julianleung0 points1 point  (12 children) | Copy

Never.

[–]Rozycka123-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

never say never

[–]Rozycka123-1 points0 points  (10 children) | Copy

what about when it was getting the right to vote and own property?

[–]julianleung-1 points0 points  (9 children) | Copy

How about the intertwined responsibility? Getting listed And being the main faniancal contributor to the family?

Yeah. And you only want free rights. That is not equality that is supermacy.

[–]Rozycka123-1 points0 points  (8 children) | Copy

Why are you saying you? I didn’t say I only wanted free rights. You’re just putting words in my mouth.

[–]julianleung-1 points0 points  (7 children) | Copy

You dont but feminists to this date still refuse to bare the corresponding responsibility. Equality is just lip service, supermacy is the actual observable fact.

And on top of that, giving men property right is equality, men need resources to cope with the hypergamic nature of females. So giving them that right is understandable. It is just like building more toilet for girls.

To bridge the gap of inequality brought by nature.

[–]Rozycka123-1 points0 points  (6 children) | Copy

I didn’t say I was a feminist

[–]julianleung-1 points0 points  (5 children) | Copy

You are. You are alredy a supporter of 1st 2st wave feminist ideology.

You are enjoying the rights 1wave 2 wave broubgt you but still have no intention to bare the responsibility.

[–]Jakeybaby12516 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

See, now they're just contradicting themselves. Make up your fucking minds!

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy

[deleted]

[–]Freeze_Wolf5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

And take twice the crack cocaine as they did

[–]zombiesidechivk8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy

Didn't know I was a feminist, I though I was an equal rights advocate, but apparently people get to decide for me

[–]Yeet_Melon1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Choice is a lie

[–]autisnal5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy

Let me explain.

Feminism, according to feminists, is trying to tackle the major issues of the patriarchy and toxic masculinity. According to them all gender biases stem from these issues and once they have fixed them then all the male problems will be solved as an automatic side effect. Any failure to fix male issues is caused by not enough feminism.

Large amount of casual feminists don't understand the above and think when feminists say something about solving male issues they actually mean solving male issues. As a result they say that feminism is tackling male issues too, despite it obviously not.

'Feminism is for men too' is also a necessary phrase to tackle the risk of any male advocacy group taking off. When this happens they pull out the feminist taqiyya* and just pretend that feminism is for everyone. This only lasts long enough to stop any group from forming and then it's back to the usual.

\ This is not a dig against Islam, it's just a good word to borrow.*

[–]Freeze_Wolf3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Anti-Feminist and MRA subs are starting to rise and form since the Reddit team is probably staying out of this street fight that’s happening

[–]username21360 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

My theory is that feminists think that men have the real life version of god mode or like playing as a GTA protagonist. Like we can go around and kidnap and rape women day and night with little to no repercussions, this is probably why they will hint at (but rarely admit) the fact that they truly believe that all men are potential rapists.

So because they believe that men are at the highest possible level of privilege, any sign that men might not have it as great as they thought is a threat to their narrative which is why they tend to be hostile to men’s rights when you would think they would be ok with them because if we go by the basic definition of feminism, we are both on the same team or have the same goal in mind: equality.

They, believing that men are already at the top, think that they can technically achieve equality by both bolstering up women’s rights as well as tearing down men’s so that they can say that we are equal now. However, it is either the privilege divide in their heads is so far between that they actually believe that no matter how much they achieve or destroy men’s rights we will never be equal or their thirst for power is so potent that they don’t know when their goal is achieved and when to back down.

What do you think?

[–]julianleung0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Apex fallacy. Well it is in line with their world view. They ca only see the top 20 something % of the male population, others are invisible to them.

[–]QS263 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

That Reddit literally proves female incels exist.

[–]Lickiecat2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

The more open they are about it the more people will dismiss their stupid agenda.

This is a good thing.

[–]juanp23502 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Hm, that's weird, everyone told me feminism is about equality!

[–]McBlakey4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

The sidebar of the feminism subreddit says otherwise

[–]nacho-chonky1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

It’s about equality except that it’s only for women and it helps men by only helping woman, the brain of a feminist must be a party

[–]hawknose331 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I mean they aren't wrong though.

[–]BASSKORN1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Then stop saying you're "fighting" for equality

[–]superrian051 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

r/thefairersex has become an echo chamber

[–]chis_wona1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Liking the Samsung phone, but yeah wth

[–]luciferhasthebooty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Cheers

[–]_Sorrow_171 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's so damn disappointing that feminism has turned from equal women's rights, which I have no problem with, to womens supremacy, which I do have a MASSIVE fucking problem with, like "here come join the feminist KKK over here to oppress men and establish our rule". It's honestly sad.

[–]beniesixx984 points5 points  (15 children) | Copy

Hold the fuck up . Its about everyone wth is wrong with these feminazis ? Its supposed to be equal rights for everyone including trans people as well , who the fuck do they think they are ? This is beyond stupid feminism isn't about just women , who ever thinks that is beyond stupid and doesn't understand how it was supposed to be . This really pissed me off

[–]juanp23507 points8 points  (13 children) | Copy

Feminism IS indeed about just women, women gaining privileges over men more specifically, otherwise it wouldn't be called FEMInism

[–]beniesixx98-2 points-1 points  (7 children) | Copy

And the good feminist know that , hell they purposely go out of their way to help men and trans people. I remember when I was little there was a place for d.v. victims that was ran by a feminist who went out of her way to help men victims , she taught me that feminism isn't about just helping women . I carry that with me

[–]julianleung0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy

There are no good feminist. They are just lip service feminist.

[–]beniesixx980 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy

Then what am i

[–]mellainadiba0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

Im obviously mister antifeminists, im basically popping out anti feminist spam lol... but yeah I have actually come to learn recently now you are right.....ive come across some good ones now and I am going to tone down my rhetoric as a result.... they are massively drowned out with the crazy postmodern whack jobs ones though so they have a lot of work to do... feminism needs to let the more sane voice rise, right now the whack jobs are calling all the shots

[–]beniesixx980 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

Sadly yes , and then the ones like me go unheard because they assume I hate children and men , and that because I'm a feminist I won't respect them . But in reality I want everyone to be equal , hell I have a baby brother who I worry about because of false rape reports to him being able to afford medicine he needs to live . I worry and fight for the men in my life (who aren't abusive pos) because men needs equal health care and mental stability , as well as being able to see his kid without child support costs .

[–]mellainadiba0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Yeah I hope sane ones like you can get the loudest voices. There are feminists out there who believe in critical thought, self reflection, and free speech and don't prescribe to the victim hood complex and one way (in mens direction only) per dynamic.. but basicaly that is the exact opposite of post modern feminism today... its literally going mad the law maker ones and then the media ones... this victim hood thing and expansion of the concept of misogny and patriachy has reached such heights is incredible.... ice bergs are sexist now FFS

[–]beniesixx980 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Its sad really because I can't even bake my fiance a cake without someone claiming I'm a slave to him. Or my favorite argument is trans women can't be feminist

[–]beniesixx980 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Because the good ones are willing to listen and talk

[–]beniesixx98-3 points-2 points  (4 children) | Copy

But it wasn't supposed to be that way , it was meant to be equal for man , woman and everything in between but thanks to the feminazis its turned into a man hating cult .

[–]SeizmicETC3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy

One could argue the opposite of what you claim by simply pointing out the word itself is sexist. "Feminist" is a play on of feminine/femininity which is exclusively female.

If feminism was originally supposed to be what you claim, why wasn't it simply called humanism or equalist?

[–]beniesixx98-2 points-1 points  (2 children) | Copy

Because back then it was supposed to make us equal , we wanted everything to be the same for man and woman , it was started by women to help get us on the same level as our other halfs , but it was never just about women , it was supposed to be for equal rights for example sexual assault in a work space, yes women fought hard for to get that in place but it goes for everyone because women understood back then just like today anyone can be a victim. Or D.v at first it was like a man couldn't hit a woman but thankfully they changed it to if anyone hits anyone they go to jail , and good feminist know that . We want equal for everyone straight down to the equal jail time . And a good way to find who truly wants equal rights or not ask a feminist if she believes a woman should sign up for the military draft ,if she says no then you know she's not what the movement stood for. Feminist started this to be equal down to being OK with signing up for the draft , or going away for the same amount of time for stealing or killing someone. We want to be equal ,not more ,not less . My great grandma and grandma both were o.g feminist , they taught me we are supposed to be equal , men should be able to leave d.v relationships and have shelters to help . This newer crap lost sight of that .

[–]SeizmicETC3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Back when?

Also, that wall of text had nothing to do with my point at all, you didn't address it once.

[–]julianleung0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

It was, is and will be always about equal rights but unequal responsibility.

I dont see hypergamy ending any time soon.

[–]julianleung0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Equal rights at the expense of ________. You fill the blank.

[–]Sakura-Kaiba0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

you should reply "There are only two genders. (Even if you don't believe in facts, facts don't care about your feelings.)"

[–]username21360 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

That’s not the point of the post though.

[–]QS260 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

At least she’s honest

[–]iHaveAtinyWoody0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

They're right. I dont want anything to do with that shit.

[–]KingGizzardSquidward0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Tell me something I didn’t know lol

Feminists can’t even define the meaning of their own movement. They’re complete dumbasses.

[–]C3re8rum0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I just read through some posts. The last time I was this disgusted with the amount of hypocrisy and hate was when I learned of the anti-vax community. They don’t even have comments available. I kind of want to make just one rational post asking a couple questions like for example why comments aren’t enabled etc. but I am afraid i would be wasting my time(come on I have dungeons and raids to do 😆)

[–]ajax51500 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Where is this post. It’s time to cast the votes.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter