699,178 posts

This woman (below comment) could not have debunked this feminists femisplainer (above) any better. So succinct yet so powerful. A whole movement debunked in such few words. A femisplainer put in her place. WOW

Reddit View
May 5, 2020
109 upvotes
post image

Post Information
Title This woman (below comment) could not have debunked this feminists femisplainer (above) any better. So succinct yet so powerful. A whole movement debunked in such few words. A femisplainer put in her place. WOW
Author mellainadiba
Upvotes 109
Comments 9
Date 05 May 2020 02:33 PM UTC (4 months ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/706559
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/gdyt8f/this_woman_below_comment_could_not_have_debunked/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
feminist
Comments

[–]Egalitarianwhistle8 points9 points  (7 children) | Copy

Anyone have the link to this page? This is bad ass. I am an MRA because I want equal rights before the law.

[–]mellainadiba[S] 6 points7 points  (6 children) | Copy

https://womenagainstfeminism.com

The page is the, in the press page

Youtube:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqwHXC3qpRxBjAkPfVWHMMQ/videos

Check out Sydney Watson too, not related to these guys, or Karen Straughan. On twitter Lisa Britton

[–]Egalitarianwhistle4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

All of those women are great! Thanks.

[–]SuboptimalRubbish0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

[–]Broadside_Beers1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

That isn’t necessarily transphobic. Nothing there indicates an irrational hatred or fear of trans people. I would say the most accurate conclusion one could draw from that tweet is that she believes that males are males and females are females, and the general stance that sex and gender aren’t interchangeable terms and are non-malleable.

My beliefs or hers, or yours, or anyone’s in regards to this are a whole separate discussion to the subject of men’s rights.

If a child rapist stated 2+2=4 we wouldn’t then be attacking the moral character of the rapist to disprove her statement. To do so verges on ad hominem.

Edited due to auto correct fail

[–]SuboptimalRubbish-4 points-3 points  (2 children) | Copy

Are you indirectly stating that what she said is as true as 2+2=4?

Trans men, certain intersex people and men with persistent Müllerian duct syndrome CAN have periods.

Trans men, certain intersex people and men with persistent Müllerian duct syndrome CAN become pregnant.

Trans men, certain intersex people and men with galactorrhea CAN lactate.

Also:

Not all women have periods.

Not all women can become pregnant.

Not all women can lactate.

That's the truth.

[–]Broadside_Beers3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

Dude... it’s a whole different discussion. As I clearly explained. The example was just, an example.

Just because you disagree with someone on one subject doesn’t mean they are wrong in all of them.

That’s it. Nothing more nothing less. My example was demonstrative of that. Please don’t Strawman me.

[–]SuboptimalRubbish-4 points-3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Erm... How is that a strawman?

Besides, I disagreed with what they said. Not on other matters they didn't speak about. Did I?

[–]spoderman6162 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

WTF is a femisplainer?? Call her what she is: a CUNT.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter