MYTH: Patriarchy Oppresses Men Too. Patriarchy Is A Feminist Myth. READ COMMENT DESCRIPTION TOO

Reddit View
May 3, 2020
83 upvotes
post image

Post Information
Title MYTH: Patriarchy Oppresses Men Too. Patriarchy Is A Feminist Myth. READ COMMENT DESCRIPTION TOO
Author mellainadiba
Upvotes 83
Comments 32
Date 03 May 2020 09:35 AM UTC (11 months ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/706587
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/gcnth3/myth_patriarchy_oppresses_men_too_patriarchy_is_a/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
feminist
Comments

[–]NohoTwoPointOh7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy

I can attest to academic and research fraud. Saw yesterday on a thread here. Feminism has subverted academia to push disingenuous agendas.

[–]mellainadiba[S] 8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy

Can you remember the thread? Oh yeah hugeee amount of research fraud. Check out what feminists did to a study below, by falser making up what the study said (I mean you debunk the feminists simply by reading the study back to them) they got this fake news into 15000 journal citations, Forbes, WSJ, TED talks, CEO talks, training etc.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HX1Ae-ZJgs

were seeing all this women are Wonderful crap now in media even Times, WSJ, Forbes, especially in COVD which is so weird their taking the opposite of what is true and peddling it

[–]QS260 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

FACTS

[–]Auntie_Hero6 points7 points  (5 children) | Copy

Any country where women can vote, work, carry guns, own land, hold public office, run corporations and serve in the military IS NOT A PATRIARCHY.

[–]18Apollo180 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

A form of social organization in which the father is the supreme authority in the family, clan, or tribe and descent is reckoned in the male line, with the children belonging to the father's clan or tribe.

This along with the strict gender roles of the past definitely still effect our current society. But they're just as harmful to men as they are to men

[–]mellainadiba[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

It was natural roles. See below

Even historically not true. Imagine being a woman 200 years ago. Flip a coin if childbirth will kill you, let alone the incontience, prolapses and damage that might occur to which there will be no treatment. No contraception, at any moment you can get pregant. Pregnancy might kill you. no medicine for you swollen ankles and morning sickness. flip a coin if any illness will kill you. You have a monthly period, there is no such thing as modern sanitary products, you bleed into a cloth IF YOU ARE LUCKY, nothing for endometriosis, PMS, not even paracetmoal, no public toilets, no wonder they used to call it a curse, on top of your period you pee sitting down and there are no modern toilets nor public ones. In a world that needs physical work, you are weaker than men.... given all of this no wonder women are not in universities, and scientists and politicians... why would you give women the burden of work as well in this kind of life? Why would you risk making a woman a doctor when it is 50:50 she will survive childbirth. Of course rich upper class women DID become doctors and scientists and inventors though. Don't forget that.

Men were not the bourgeoise. 1 percent of men were. Men were not doctors, and lawyers living the high life. Men were dying in coals, in the fields, on the sea, women were at home also working hard, less danger, but hard and also at the mercy of their biology.

That exclusion of women in science and work may have some sexism, but there is also biological reasons. Life was bloody hard. You'd be lucky to live past birth, then 30, then 40. Men and women did what they could to survive. Anywhere were women are oppressed men are too. Yes 1 percent of men may lead, but thats not 99 percent of men. Theres no point talking of male inventors, university etc and females being excluded because 99 percent of men were too. Women cant vote, GUESS WHAT men cant too, in most countries some women gained the vote before all men gained the vote. Only 1 recent of men can vote! Women were also largely protected and shielded from going up coal mines, chimneys, war etc

Secondly 1% of men is not representivie of society. Women are not oppressed any more than anyone else and YES historical too: very succinctly explained in 7 mins:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L254KuLx-4Y

Also society is gynocentric. It makes rules and operates in a women and children first mode, so male leadership numbers make no difference to men. Men are more sexist to men than women, if anything women are more compassionate towards men. Some of the best MRAs and best antifeminists are women. All my favourite MRAs are women (a lot done even call themselves that)

Secondly 1% of men is not representivie of society. Women were excluded. So were men. Women are not oppressed any more than anyone else and YES historical too: very succinctly explained in 7 mins:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L254KuLx-4Y

In. a physically demanding world

[–]Auntie_Hero0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

form of social organization in which the father is the supreme authority in the family, clan, or tribe

Still not America.

[–]18Apollo18-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy

Go back 100 maybe 200 years and it completely was. And this effects are modern society still

[–]Auntie_Hero0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Go back 100 maybe 200 years and it completely was.

Go back 100 or 200 years and nobody was whining about it on the internet. Wanna play THAT game? I got all day, sparky.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter