696,979 posts

Is third wave feminism just a big shit test πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚? Tell me what you think.

Reddit View
April 11, 2020
58 upvotes
/r/antifeminists/comments/fz6flx/is_third_wave_feminism_just_a_big_shit_test_tell/


Post Information
Title Is third wave feminism just a big shit test πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚? Tell me what you think.
Author QS26
Upvotes 58
Comments 19
Date 11 April 2020 02:32 PM UTC (5 months ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/706820
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/fz6flx/is_third_wave_feminism_just_a_big_shit_test_tell/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
shit testfeminism
Comments

[–][deleted]  (5 children) | Copy

[deleted]

[–]giron7779 points10 points  (3 children) | Copy

Unpopular opinion: Id say the second wave femenism wasnt really needed either. Women could get jobs before, it just wasnt popular cuz women didnt want to for the most part. 2nd wave basically forced women to work, doubling the work force, halving the salaries (so now u need 2 people working to be able to sustain a family), reducing number of families and children being born, hence raising immigration levels, ...

[–]giron7773 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

I mean... theres the narrative that men forced women to stay at home and oppressed them, etc, but is that narrative really that accurate? A lot has kept women at home (ie sanitary issues before the introduction of tampons, proper bras, etc) and once those were created (by men), more women joined the work force. Obv there was some sexism and some men didnt want their wives to leave the house, but was that really the norm?

[–]Dancersep381 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

2nd wave was a mixed bag. Some of it was needed. Women couldn't get a car loan without a male cosigner, regardless of ability to repay, for example. However, the other shit they snuck in there too? And now 3rd wave is just 100% useless nonsense.

[–]giron7771 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah i can get behind that some of it was def needed, but i think someone can make a very valid argument on how it did more harm than good

[–]QS26[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Exactly

[–]Diogenes--8 points9 points  (10 children) | Copy

Children test their boundaries. It's instinctual, it's how they know what's OK and what isn't. And women are children.

In the past, men had "testosterone", which makes us awesome. Men with testosterone laughed at womens' dumb shit.

The problem is that modern mens' testosterone is in the shitter. With low T, they're stupid and weak, much like those other low-T people: women. Thus every man we lose to low T becomes an enemy; a soy guzzling male feminist leftist communist etc. - all the terrible ideas women love so much. Ideas which appeal to the weak and the stupid. Thus the numbers get stacked against us - it started out at an even 50/50 men v. women, and that was the best it could be - and it's terrible now, probably 80/20.

Raise your T, guys. Lift weights, especially squats. Get more sleep & sunlight. Do it consistently, high T isn't something you achieve, then go back to sitting on ass. High T is something you need to maintain.

[–]QS26[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

I would know I used to be a male feminist and once I stopped I felt like I had more testosterone and I started growing longer hair πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚.

[–]shkreli4prez20201 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Read "Industrial Society and Its Future". It explains exactly what's happening to our civilization.

[–]Diogenes--1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

That guy was incredibly smart. I've read some of it, reading it in full is on my to-do list. He lived exactly as I plan to - in a cabin in the woods.

The only thing I don't get is killing people. Wtf lol, why? Let the morons ruin their society, who cares? You're in a cabin in the woods, it won't affect you. Idk, maybe an IQ that high is accompanied by a case of the bonkers.

[–]shkreli4prez20201 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I think there were two main things that drove him to do it:

1) He wanted to start a revolution, and believed he needed the notoriety to draw attention to his manifesto (that was one of the reasons it got publicized, and ultimately led to his capture).

2) He was extremely jaded and dissatisfied with society, and wanted to kill some of the people he believed were responsible, eg timber lobbyists, advertising executives, etc. That was his revenge for the psychological pain he believed society had inflicted on him.

[–]DelusionalDonut13-3 points-2 points  (5 children) | Copy

This sounds kind of sexist..

Calling women stupid children..

Yet if feminists called us stupid children, no, when feminists call us stupid children, we flip out.

I see hypocrisy on both sides, and if we want our arguments to be compelling, we need to erase it from ours.

[–]QS26[S] 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy

That’s true

[–]DelusionalDonut131 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

Love how I’m being downvoted for pointing out the sexism here tho.

[–]QS26[S] 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

That’s not fair I agree

[–]DelusionalDonut131 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

I’m glad someone is on my side.

[–]QS26[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Np

[–]Dancersep382 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yup! Next question?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

"Its god testing us" he is trying to make us become stronger by making us go through tough times.

/s



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

Β© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter