TheRedArchive needs help
With 700,000+ posts and 16,000,000+ comments archived, and new Red Pill content being added every week, keeping TheRedArchive alive and discoverable to everyone is starting to become very costly. As a 20-year-old student who just moved out and is living independently for the first time, keeping TheRedArchive alive is beginning to cost me much more than I thought.

Therefore, if you appreciate the website, have gained a lot of knowledge and insight from it, and want to show your appreciation, you can do so by donating any amount that you want via the options below. The money will be used on the expensive monthly host bill and any future maintenance of the website.
Thank you, and I wish you all a successful 2021 and a good luck with achieving your goals and dreams!

Best, /u/dream-hunter

I still could not see how she make that leap of logic

Reddit View
Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy link
PDF EPUB TXT PNG
KingMaegorTheCool
February 22, 2020
279 upvotes
antifeminists
post image

Post Information
Title I still could not see how she make that leap of logic
Author KingMaegorTheCool
Upvotes 279
Comments 74
Date 22 February 2020 10:21 AM UTC (11 months ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/707103
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/f7qua6/i_still_could_not_see_how_she_make_that_leap_of/
Similar Posts
Loading Loading
Comments

[–]VestigialHead60 points61 points  (54 children) | Copy

Always makes me laugh when feminists claim that feminism is about equality.

If it was about equality it would not be called FEM inism. Feminism is about empowering women, simple as that. It is about gaining rights and power for females.

Nothing at all about equality.

I do not think it is possible to be a feminist and an equalist. They simply do not equate.

Women use the equality claim because they realise they need to soften their image or people will see through their charade.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (29 children) | Copy

It's a term from the early 1900s when women had no rights. Due to ww1 they had to start working in factories (the jobs men held before the war) and it proved wrong the whole idea that women cant work.

And feminism is for equal rights between the genders, always was and still is. It isnt as needed on the west as it was before, but its needed in 3re world nations and the middle east. Its only purpose in the west is to not let women get fucked over by men again.

4th wave feminism in the west/mainstream feminism isnt feminism. Its been stolen by corporations and degenerate males who want abortion so they dont have to face an repercussions for unprotected sex.

[–]VestigialHead2 points3 points  (11 children) | Copy

So you did not read anything I have written here?

Do you know what ism means? Definition: a distinctive practice, system, or philosophy, typically a political ideology or an artistic movement.

The ism is the affix that defines specialised movements or philosophies.

So rac-ism defines a philosophy of being bigoted to people because of their race. Commun-ism is a philosophy of government that focuses on the community - albeit badly.

Feminism is a system that focuses on the rights of the Feminine.

It does not focus on male rights - instead it deliberately seeks to lower the rights of males and increase rights of females.

There is no equality involved. Explain how feminism is working towards equality?

Also read the examples I provided in previous statements and explain them.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy

How tf does wanting equal rights between the sexes somehow harm the other one involved considering it wa started to make them equal. Equality and by extension rights are not a zero sum game, and anyone who claims it is has no understanding of equality.

Men have always had rights. Right to vote, land ownership, ability to open bank accounts, get a higher education, more employment opportunities, could divorce, could get away with domestic violence, etc. It wants until the feminist movement showed up in the 20th century that women could even vote, own land, etc. Not once ever did they they to restrict men's rights by saying men cant vote, men cant own land, men cant get an education. In fact quite the opposite. The feminist movement has tried ending the draft, expose abusers of all genders, and encourage men to get mental help if they need it.

As for all the "men's rights" you brought up, what rights do men not have? The right to get away with domestic abuse? Boo fucking hoo ppl cant get away with beating someone.

None of your example said shit.

[–]VestigialHead1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy

Did you even read my previous posts? I mentioned several areas where feminism has deliberately lessened Mens rights. It seems as if the average redditor reads the first sentence of someones post ignores the rest and then just makes a comment based on their emotions. It is such a common thing that someone responds here as though I did not just give them the examples or info they ask for.

I repeat - Mens rights have been greatly lessened when it comes to divorce - men get shafted constantly with asset grabs, loss of access to children - it is known as divorce rape and is the cause of many a suicide and serious depression.

Men's rights have been obliterated in the dating world. Women can simply claim they did not give consent because they were drunk - men cannot do the same - they are laughed at and dismissed if they even try. Some feminists even claim that we should immediately believe any womens claim of rape no matter what the facts are. So ignore what the man has to say even if he is providing solid evidence. The womens opinion is all that counts.

Men get longer sentences for any crime than women do. The same crime but longer sentences. Yeah that is nice equality. How about physical altercations - women can physically assault a man and if he complains he is a coward - if a man even touches a women he is a violent thug or wife basher. Women only want the rights of men - they do not want the hardships that go along with those rights.

For some reason I do not hear any feminists lobbying to change these things. Yet people like you STILL have the audacity to claim feminism has anything at all to do with equality. If you still think it does then you simply do not know what equality is.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (8 children) | Copy

1) Divorce is a life long contract that merges both parties assets and is life long. Key word in theor is contract. Both parties consented to it, same with the divorce. Over 90% of divorces are settled outside of court and both parties agreed to the terms. The leading causes of divorce are cheating, abuse, one or both parties being poor with finances and putting the family in debt, or more increasingly, pornagraphy addiction. No one is out there marrying people just to "divorce rape" them. If someone does get taken advantage of in such a way, it's not anyone's problem but their own given they decided to sign a contract that merged assets of their own accord and were a piss poor judgement of character.

2) How people debate isnt a government right, and quite frankly no one is entitled to another persons time, money, body, or attention. As for intoxication and rape, if a persons brain cannot fully comprehend what's happening and someone takes advantage of it, then yes its rape. No one is out there laughing at male rape victims. The feminist movement has done nothing but encourage victims both male and female to come out and get help. The only ones laughing at male victims tend to be other men who say "get over it."

3) Men commit far more crime are far higher than women, other factors such as the criminals rap sheet, the nature in which the crime was committed, how well their lawyers defense is, and how well they behave in court can dictate how long a sentence is within the minimum and maximum sentence limits for the given crime. Here us a rather simple graph from the FBI https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012/tables/42tabledatadecoverviewpdf/table_42_arrests_by_sex_2012.xls

4)In regards to the physical altercations no one out there saying women can hit men but men cant hit women. Once again the vast majority of feminists will tell you no one should be hitting anyone, and if attacked a person should defend themselves regardless of the attackers gender. What rights have the punishment of getting beaten? None. On an final note, the only people calling assault victims cowards are once again traditionalist males.

5) clearly you have only been observing whatever contorted mess the mainstream movement has become, as well as "evil feminazi gets owned by facts and logic" videos on youtube. Before you try to undo all the accomplishments of movement try interacting with those actually in it, try observing it and try to understand their arguments.

[–]VestigialHead2 points3 points  (7 children) | Copy

What a load of bullshit.

1) Signing a contract is meaningless when women get more than their fair share out of the divorce. Prenups are useless - courts simply ignore them. The fact remains women divorce rape men all the time. 90% is so wrong. More like 90% of women are agreeable to the divorce conditions.

2) What does debating have to do with anything? I am talking about consensual sex turned against men after the fact. This is being used to destroy many mens lives. The entire #MeToo movement is pushing this disgusting habit - history will look back on this time and #Metoo as an atrocity. I am happy for real rapes to be reported and fully charged. But we need to charge anyone who fakes a rape report with the same jail time and severity as the rapist would have got if they were found guilty. It has become a serious problem that makes a mockery of real rape cases.

3) Sorry but what you are saying is completely irrelevant to my poiint. I am not saying that men that have committed more crimes are getting longer sentences. I am saying men with identical criminal histories get longer prison sentences that women. You are trying to compare apples with oranges and I am comparing apples with apples.

4) YES THEY ARE. I constantly see responses that say - Men cannot hit women. The vast majority of women that are hitting men on social media ARE FEMINISTS. ROFL this one is so obvious it is ridiculous that you even tried to argue against it. It is commonplace that if a women strikes a man and he defends himself then crowds will attack him. They did not attack or stop the women striking him. Completely unequal.

I am not trying to undo the original rights feminism gained. I agree with them. Such as right to vote, property ownership, equal pay. I just disagree with the extra rights that women now have. I am trying to stop idiots from claiming it is not completely focused on MORE RIGHTS FOR WOMEN. And has nothing to do with equality and never has.

My experience has come from quite a few interactions with feminists in real life and online. I am glad you agree the movement is a contorted mess. Yet you still defend it. WHY?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy

1) Both parties agreed to the terms of the divorce outside of a court. The divorce cannot go through without both sides agreeing. And there is no fair share, two people broke a lifelong contract, and as time goes in people's jobs and income change. Divorce rape is not a thing that happens. As for prenups, no courts ignore them. Once again you are lying

2) A drunk person cannot consent. And while yes there are false accusations, the issue with jailing anyone who makes one is it opens up real victims of rape being punished because people thought they were lying.

3) It is entirely relevant. If you know x group is more likely to offend wouldn't you want to impose a stricter sentence to keep someone who's more likely to reoffend off the streets? Your original argument was the same crimes, not same criminal history.

4) No one should be hitting anyone, however you seem to be more mad at the one person in Twitter who hit a guy then the thousands of men who best their wife's regularly. Carrying on however, once again what you are claiming is false. The vast majority of feminists do not call for men being attacked.

5) There are no "extra rights". Name where in any amendment does it say woman can do x but men cant. Name any law that says women can do soemthing but men cant? Oh wait there are none.

6) The feminsimt movement was literally started to attain equal rights between the sexes. I defend feminism because egalitarianism will never have any momentum behind it, and anti feminists are more often than not against equality and want women to be property/bangmaids with no freedoms.

[–]VestigialHead0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy

  1. You have got to be joking. Divorce rape is a well known phenomenon that is occurring repeatedly. I might as well say men do not rape women, that would be just as far fetched as saying divorce rape is not a thing that happens. For you to say it is not a thing confirms that you are one of the people that I am staunchly opposed to - you are the extreme feminist that is working to undermine men's rights. The fact that the women gets the better result more times than not in divorce court is already enough to show unequal rights. The contract is irrelevant. Men get scammed even if the women is the one who broke the contract. Complete inequality.
  2. A drunk person cannot consent? What a load of garbage. Even if that were true how come only the women can use this tactic? If a man gets drunk and a women seduces him he cannot cry rape? Inequality. No the punishing the liars is a critically important ruling. WAY too many false rape reports completely destroying men's lives just because some women decided the man was not doing what she demands or he was not as good at sex as she expected. Absolute evil debauchery being perpetrated by women. This is a worse act than rape in my view. Rape does not destroy the rest of your life - it does not prevent you from earning a living or mean you are ostracised by friends and family. False rape accusations even when overturned destroy men's lives so completely that it is one of the worst things anyone can do to them.
  3. Are you a bit simple minded? If a man who has never committed any crimes commits crime A and crime B he will get X amount of jail time. If a women who has never committed any crime commits crime A and crime B she will get X - y amount of jail time. X is not equal to X - y. If you do not understand how that logic works then this conversation is completely pointless. It is a pure inequality that would be even worse if what you say is true. Oh give the men longer sentences because more men commit crime? That is the dumbest most biased inequality yet.
  4. It is obvious you have no experience with this one. I am in the martial arts world. I teach people how to defend themselves. One person on twitter? More like a hundred thousand people on twitter and another hundred thousand on YT and more on every social media site. Not to mention the many in real life situations I have seen over my lifetime. It has always been a women are fragile so do not hit them chivalry code that men were taught. This made sense because women were being protected by men. Feminism does not like that - Okay fine women have their rights and they now no longer need male protection. Great. But then women think they are somehow just as strong and physical as men and start assaulting them. They are then absolutely stunned when the man strikes them back and is MUCH stronger than them. But women are still pushing their men to go protect the defenceless women who started the assault. INEQUALITY.
  5. I already did - in courts in divorces and when sentencing men - both are unequal. You just do not want to believe it because it will harm the way you see your precious group.
  6. Once again please look up what an ism is. I already explained this to you but you seem to be a bit slow at learning. It is not Equalism It is FEMinism and is solely designed to gain women's rights. NOTHING feminism has ever done has been aimed at gaining rights for men. So it is simply not possible to claim it is about equality. It is almost as if you have confused equality with gaining rights for women? That is not equality. Equality is trying to balance and equalise rights where there is an imbalance. But your confirmation bias seems to block you from accepting this.
  7. I can see I am speaking to a brick wall. You either know I am correct but cannot concede the facts because it will adversely effect your cognitive dissonance or you have a serious problem with English comprehension. So enjoy your blatant mysandristic lifestyle while it lasts. Men are fighting back. And we fight hard.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

  1. Gold diggers exist, and there are cases where courts are unfair in terms of custody, however what plenty if right winger will call divorce rape is just to normal repercussions that come from break such a contract. Having people be responsible for breaking whatever terms of a lifelong contract they willingly signed is not being against men's rights.

  2. Drunk people are not thinking clearly as it impairs their judgement, and the vast majority of feminists will infact advocate for men who were raped while under an alcoholic influence. However it's not discussed as frequently due to the fact women dont commit rape nearly as often as men will. Rape absolutely can destroy a persons life and wellbeing (especially 8j 3rd world shitholes where if a woman speaks up shes stoned to death), and I guess you only care about mental health issues when it affects "da mhen". False rape accusations are bad, however they are nowhere near as common as actual rape, and once its confirmed false the accused get a job again unless they were a rich and prominent celebrity, then they dont need a job. The solution to isnt punished accuses with violence as that leaves any actual victims who never got justice being fucked over again, nor is it lowering the repercussions of such an atrocious act; the solution is not giving the accusation media attention and letting the police handle it.

  3. If using basic logic makes one simple minded than yes. It's the same logic judges will apply to young black males from a city compared to young white males from a rural area, the demographic of young black male from a city is far more likely to reoffend. Better to err on the side of the public's saftey.

  4. All you've stated is biological strength exists? No one is surprised by that but a minority of the population. Chivalry hasn't been taught in decades, unless you count "hey dont go around attacking people" as chivalry and not common decency. As for men protecting women, so what? Women will try to protect men they know even if they're weaker, so getting mad that men feel a need to protect a girl they know from a physical altercation is retarded. No one is out there forcing someone to defend another person. And no, a retarded journo writing for the New York times isnt forcing you to do shit, they're entitled to their ophion just as much you are to your own opinion.

  5. Ik some divorce cases are unfair agaisnt men, however most divorces (those settled outside court, and anyone who bitches about being mad about terms they consented to should own up to being fucking retarded) are not. Divorce isnt a pleasant experience nor is it supposed to be. Once again as for sentencing alot more goes into just the crime, the nature in which it was commited and track record. Certain demographics, as mentioned earlier, are more likely to reoffend more than others, and irs reasonable to prevent someone who's likely to reoffend in jail, even if that person personally wouldn't. What they will or will not do in the future cannot be predicted, and thus it's better to err on the side of safety.

  6. Feminism was started to attain equal rights in a time where women had none. The modern movement is shit I'll admit that, but the vast majority of anti feminists are the same tradfags who wanna go back to when women had none, so its understandable why anyone who claims to be anti feminist gets such a bad rep. You and the antifeminst crowd will act as though equal rights are a zero sum game, and it isn't, as well as calling every minor injustice a man faces a "rights issue". And once again, yall don't give a shit about equality and only get mad at the choices individuals make, something which you are not entitled to change. They made that choice of their own accord, and if you would've done something different in that situation, or won't do certain things then more power to you, it's still not your place to dictate what people do, and someone agreeing to something doesnt make it a "rights" issue.

  7. Some of you fight well, but your cause is utter shit. Quite frankly love I doubt the majority of men's rights activists give a single shit about men's issues or equality, given they only screech about them when a female victims speaks up, and never propose and good solutions. Also I love how you just resort to name calling and insults, truly the men have such mature fighters on their side.

[–]RockmanXX3 points4 points  (15 children) | Copy

and it proved wrong the whole idea that women cant work.

No, the traditional idea was that women SHOULDN'T work and that it was the man's job to be the breadwinner. This is sexist towards MEN. Not being socially obligated to work is a privilege not a curse.

And feminism is for equal rights between the genders

Oh yeah, that's why Feminists wanted the voting rights WITHOUT the draft whereas men cannot have any voting rights if they refuse the draft. In fact, men CANNOT refuse the draft in USA... WHERE IS THE EQUALITY!?

but its needed in 3re world nations and the middle east

FUCK NO, 3rd world isn't a lab for testing out cancerous 19th century ideologies.

Its only purpose in the west is to not let women get fucked over by men again.

Except, men never banded together to "Fuck over Women"! Do you even realize that VOTING RIGHTS and Property Rights were never universal to ALL men? Originally, only the elite men owned the land&had voting rights.

degenerate males who want abortion

You sound like a TradCuck, always blaming Men for what fucking Women choose to do.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (14 children) | Copy

1) any woman who wanted to work was barred from it. Men could do whatever the fuck they wanted in life and not be restricted to domestic servitude or prostitution. 2) feminists wanted to end the draft, and many more were fine with it being for both genders. "Tradition" is what pushed it being male only. 3) cool to know your fine with backwater countries continuing to abuse women and girls because "muh feminism is cancer". 4) until the feminist movement came around men could do whatever the hell they wanted in life. As for only white land owning males being able to vote, yeah it's bad, but eventually all white men could vote, then all men could vote. And they were all and when women asked to vote. 5) also fuck trad cucks, but the only men wanting abortion are those who get upset they chose to have unprotected sex and got someone pregnant. Thinking both adults involved should be responsible and either have protect sex or own up up to making a child is not being a tradcuck or paleocon or whatever the fuck, ita called being anti murder.

[–]RockmanXX0 points1 point  (13 children) | Copy

Men could do whatever the fuck they wanted in life and not be restricted to domestic servitude or prostitution

Are you for real? Peasant men could most certainty NOT do whatever they wanted. They were stratified into rigid hierarchies of the Feudal Ages with ZERO upward mobility, being a manual laborer is not better than being handmaiden/homemaker.

You sound like a child who hasn't even finished his history books on Feudal Era, sorry but i can't take you seriously anymore.

cool to know your fine with backwater countries continuing to abuse women and girls because "muh feminism is cancer"

EVERYONE'S lives are miserable in those backwater countries, not just WHAMENS! The answer to societal backwardness is not some 19th century Leninist ideology. The solution is democracy and we CAN'T enforce it without invading&warring against religious theocracies.

and many more were fine with it being for both genders

BS!! They demanded a version without the draft. Govt was more than happy to take Women in as cannon fodder.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (12 children) | Copy

Even poor men could still do whatever they wanted in comparison to women of the same class. You're argument about "muh peasants" is more about social class restrictions than gender restrictions. Peasant men in feudal times couldn't do much, but could still do more than women could.

And yes men have problems kn 3rd world shitholes, but women have alot more which are caused by.... drum roll please....men. and equal rights isnt a 19th century ideology it's a 20th century one, nor is it leninist. And a democracy is not a true democracy unless all members of the population can have equal rights including voting, (which is what feminism was started for)

The only women against the draft who still wanted a male draft were the same women who were against voting rights to begin with which was the upper class. Rich men were the ones who thought it was "against tradition" to let women get drafted.

[–]RockmanXX0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy

women have alot more

but could still do more than women could

HURR DURR WHAMENS ALWAYS HAD/HAVE IT WORSE BECAUSE I SAY SO!!! Can you SIMP any harder?

equal rights isnt a 19th century ideology

Feminism doesn't have a fucking monopoly on humanitarian values. Just believe i believe all humans should be treated equally doesn't mean i agree with some dumb shit theory that says that Men have been collectively scheming against women for centuries. That's fucking bullshit. GTFO, White Knight Cuck! There's no fair maidens for you rescue here.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (10 children) | Copy

Okay love you clearly are not open for any actual discussion, and are more suffering from a severe case of retardation given you consider pointing out historical facts simping.

You sir have no understanding of basic history and quite frankly its laughable you have convinced youself women did have a better life then men in the past despite their being no evidence even mildly supporting it. The only evidence a person trying to make you're retarded argument could use would be romanticized paintings that do not function as evidence due to not having an basis in reality, or propaganda. There is a clear difference between saying in the last their was a shit culture that unfairly restricted women that arose with the separation of labor in hunter gatherer tribes and sayings it's a scheme.

On a final note dear, before you try making retarded ass arguments that have no founding, be sure to actually know history. Oh wait, knowing historical facts is something only cucked soyboy betas do huh?

[–]RockmanXX1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy

Imagine being so retarded that you think you have the academic authority&knowledge required to conclusively DECLARE that Women "ALWAYS HAD IT WORSE". Men literally fucking died by the millions to protect everyone but women had it WORSE? Scum like you make my blood boil.

you have convinced youself women did have a better life then men

Stop LYING! I said that it was bad for EVERYONE except for the Rich, you're looking at silver linings and declaring "LOOK AT HOW MUCH WORSE WOMEN HAD IT" FUCK OFF, you FemNazi Cunt!

you're retarded argument

Always Spell-Check before insulting someone, Cunt.

knowing historical facts

The only historical fact you have revealed here is the severe inbreeding in your family tree.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (8 children) | Copy

LMFAO SCEOTES MAD.

It's s not retarded to point out something every single academic, historian, or whatever else has shown clear evidence for, as well as anyone doing their own research could attest to.

Men died by the millions because other men told them to do so, and most of their wars were killing other people, not protecting. Apparently pointing out that women regardless of social class had it worse off then men equates me to being a national socialist. If pointing out that the past was shit, but even worse for women generally speaking makes me "lItErAlLt hItlEr" then fine. The only scum here is people such as youself who are so desperate to win the Oppression Olympics that you need to perform mental gymnastics just to "own the libs".

Idc given you never had an a coherent argument and instead have resulted to calling me slurs. Pointing out spelling errors has shown you have no counter argument and know in your smoothbrain that i'm right.

Given you suffer from terminal dumbassery I will stop replying to you as have repeatedly ignored my arguments, repeatedly resorted to name calling, didnt even bother to check you capitalization yet lose your mind over one autocorrect error, and have no clue what you're talking about.

Go back to cooming since every response you've given thus far has shown you've killed off your braincells with pornagraphy. Happy cooming, moid.

[–]MistEchoes21 points22 points  (3 children) | Copy

Feminism only cares about women’s issues. I’ve never heard a feminist express a fuck about any mens issues.

[–]Roge2005-3 points-2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Well i heard feminists say it but feminazis no

[–]SlavNotDead1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

But here is the thing

All “feminists” are feminazis

They support this idealogical bullshit by refusing to call themselves egalitarian instead of subscribing to the movement that actively demonizes men.

[–]Roge20050 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Ok

[–]Canisluous155819 points20 points  (6 children) | Copy

The comments are fucking hilarious.

[–]CosmoaicComputer8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy

I was gonna say something but the more I read the more I felt my brain cells committing suicide

[–]Canisluous15580 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

LEL

[–]Khufu25890 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

Why do you think so?

[–]Canisluous15581 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Because when i read then i laughed.

[–]Khufu25890 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

If this is what makes you happy.

[–]Canisluous15580 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Who said it makes me happy?

[–]DarkDoomDoom18 points19 points  (3 children) | Copy

Lol a male feminist doesn’t exist. It’s just someone that lie to a woman (and probably to himself) in order to fuck.

[–]snupher11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy

It’s not always to fuck. It can be for simple attention, to feel close to someone emotionally, some false sense of romanticism, or even to feel like their excepted. The problem is, them being excepted is like a black KKK member. You’re not really a part of anything, you’re just a pet.

[–]sanrio-sugarplum8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy

Idk, the concept of a male feminist seems a little like straight white SJWs speaking for minorities and getting offended on their behalf. It's for woke points, but not necessarily for sex.

[–]Drayelya1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I’m gonna day yes and no, I’m of the mind that most of them assume that the more “woke points” they get the higher their odds of a relationship or sex become.

[–]RockmanXX4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Someone who supports women's rights

So basically, EVERYONE on earth who isn't a troglodyte, is a Feminist?

They are open minded and educated

This is a judgement i will make myself, you can't declare "Feminists" as open minded and educated.

[–]Drayelya4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

The comments over there are literal cancer, hilarious. 😂

[–]Khufu25890 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Please provide us with your insight.

[–]Drayelya0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Well one in particular was along the lines of “They’re just ugly men angry no one will rape them.”

There were a few similar, lots of hamstering going on too.

[–]Jabronskyi2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

"Open-minded people". Yeah, right

[–]mickcheck1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

But we have gender equality for many years, why fight for it

[–]Zori_The_Zorua2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

Because there is nothing else for those middle aged white women of color to do, so they bitch about every little thing under the name "feminism"

[–]Drayelya2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Next thing you know they’ll start bitching about dicks standing up during arousal.

“My boyfriend and I were getting intimate and he got hard! Oh the horror!”

[–]Zori_The_Zorua2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

The horror indeed Karen

[–]bearassbobcat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

no true feminist fallacy

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Ouchie my broken bone hurts more than your broken bone.

[–]SirAdamborson0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

The feminazi just hate the men. They are pure cringe.

[–]love2travel4peace0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

They can both stay the hell away from me.

[–]username21360 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I love how they admit that these people are a part of their ideology and are the loudest but the only thing the “good ones” can do is condemn them which doesn’t do shit if they are just underlings.

[–]Scottsc200 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I find it hilarious that feminazi's are always claiming every man is trying to tape them. Like, bitch, no one would fuck you even if there wasn't a chance of prison.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter