708,359 posts

Anyone else here not because they don’t like equality, but because women don’t even want equality, just entitlement?

Reddit View
December 10, 2019
126 upvotes

I can’t be the only one who feels this way. Equality would be fine, but women had that chance and now they’re going too far. Anyone else in the same boat?


Post Information
Title Anyone else here not because they don’t like equality, but because women don’t even want equality, just entitlement?
Author epinkb
Upvotes 126
Comments 26
Date 10 December 2019 07:25 AM UTC (10 months ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/707430
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/e8nh84/anyone_else_here_not_because_they_dont_like/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
entitlement
Comments

[–]username213621 points22 points  (0 children) | Copy

I agree.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (0 children) | Copy

That's exactly why I'm here

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy

Feminism is the idea that we can achieve gender equality by focusing on the issues of only one gender

[–]VestigialHead6 points7 points  (8 children) | Copy

Probably need to qualify that as third wave or modern feminists. Not all women want entitlement.

The original feminist movement was started for fairly valid reasons. The things the early feminists wanted were ALL granted and are now part of the core of western society. Modern feminists have corrupted it massively and are now seeking massive entitlement and inequality.

But remember not all women are modern feminists or even old school feminists.

With that rejoinder - yes I am here for similar reasons as you are stating.

[–]julianleung1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy

No, the first wave was also bs if you consider who built civilization.

What they should is to build a all female civilization and compelte with ours to see how capavle they are. Not crying like babies to let men share their rights.

[–]VestigialHead1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy

I agree with the separate island for feminists only. That would be funny to see.,

But what does the builders of civilisation have to do with first wave feminism?

Women had no vote, they could not own property. The rights were definitely skewed in our favour. So I was fine with them arguing against that and correcting the imbalance.

Every person should be seeking actual equality and not favouring any sex or race.

The problem is that most minorities are pushing for inequality and special rights. They misuse equality to gain power for themselves. It is sickening and we cannot let it happen.

[–]julianleung1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy

No. It is skewed towards them. They created nothing but enjoyed everything. Gynocentrism.

Men just minded their own business and shared a fair amount of their contribution to women freely just because thet can give birth to babies. Feminism want men to mind women's problem that men never created. Women's problems are just result of evolution, men have no obigation to fix them.

Feminism wanting equality is just like men wanting free sex and stating that men were given higher libido by god, so women should fix them for men.

[–]VestigialHead0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

Hmm that sounds a little unfair. They created nothing? How do you work that out? Been lots of female inventors and scientists. A lot of the time they were not allowed to have these jobs so did not have a chance to be as creative. I agree that men have created a lot more though. You are beginning to steer towards an anti-women position. Which I fear is not much better than the current feminist anti-man position.

Clear equality is the better position. No benefits for one sex that the other does not get. No negatives or restrictions for one that the other does not get. This means everyone gets the same good and bad. Women get the rights but they also have to deal with getting punched if they mess with someone. That is what I see as fair.

[–]julianleung0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

They created nothing? How do you work that out? Been lots of female inventors and scientists.

See? You just ignore millions of year of men-only contribution even before women did anything.

You just cherry picked a time frame that women steal men's technology and knowledge accumulated and called that contribution.

It is like chinese stealing america's ip and created a lesser copy and you give kudos to the thief.

Creared your female only civilization from square one, this is what i called fair. Inheriting mens contribution while calling men oppresser is just lame.

I am not anti women, it is just that you are a communist.

[–]VestigialHead0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

What? How did I ignore millions of years of mens contributions? It appears you have very limited comprehension skills if that is what you took from what I said.

I specifically said men had created way more than women. Or did you not read that far.

Also "Millions of years". Sorry to inform you but fire was discovered about a million years ago. So there has not been millions of years of human discovery. Also women would have created and invented things throughout that time. Masculine or feminine domination comes and goes and has done so many times throughout history.

[–]julianleung0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

No. Women just dont have the muscle power to make fire from woods. Your assumption failed.

[–]VestigialHead0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Okay so you are just a retarded troll. Well done for making me waste my time responding to you.

[–]Kbrito912 points13 points  (1 child) | Copy

Lumping any group of people together (even feminists) and saying that they want or are something specific is ludicrous. To me the whole "feminist vs. conservative" thing that we see online only exists in people's minds and is not indicative of anything happening IRL.

I don't like some ideas that people that call themselves feminists online are trying to spread, I also don't like the ideas that some people who are considered conservative online are trying to spread. I think both sides have a lot of disingenuous people who don't really mean what they say and that have a lot to gain from stirring the pot, both on the left and right sides.

The online feminist wants entitlement and the online conservative wants the 50s back. What do real people want? I don't fucking know, I'm gay, I don't care about what women think.

So to answer your question: yes.

[–]sdzundercover0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Best comment I’ve read all year.

[–]xeroxe9 points10 points  (3 children) | Copy

I am here because feminism is a female-centered movement.

Any movement that is gender-centered by definition will be selective and therefore biased in their problem-solving approach, as such incapable to objectively pursue equality because it is not subscribed to equality per se, but rather to the advancement of that specific gender.

Think about it this way, how can a movement attain equality by focusing exclusively over only one side of the equation? It is a movement broken from the start. It has no objective point of reference to compare the equality balance. Feminism will never bring us closer to equality, instead it will only bring to women more privileges and benefits because that is the only thing it looks into using a single self-absorbed lens.

This is why women love feminism, because feminism it is not about equality, it is only masquerading as equality while supplying privileges to them — privileges packaged as rights allegedly earned through "heroic women rebellion against patriarchy". By overloading women with benefits, and painting this nice emotionally seductive narrative along the way, they can't say no to this ideology anymore. Material and emotional reward is so high that it entirely bypasses logical scrutiny. If it was about true equality, and I mean true equality, women wouldn't be so all over the place about it.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy

[deleted]

[–]xeroxe1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

And if there was a meninist movement equally cancerous as feminism, I'm absolutely convinced many men would stand up against it and fight alongside women, putting the fire out long before it reaches global proportions. It's a shame that there are very few women like you who return the favor when the time comes, and the time is now.

Unfortunately, women don't care about men as much as men care about women, far from it. This is a well-documented phenomena known as gender empathy gap and it does explain current societal affairs. If we men don't look after ourselves, no one is going to look after us.

[–]RichardJLyon2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

It’s why I reject the term “Women’s Equality” - I reject the premise that the only inequality to be corrected is women’s.

If the goal was equality of opportunity between women and men, “Equality” would be the necessary and sufficient label.

So why do they prefer “Women’s Equality”? So as to preserve primacy in all the areas in which women already have it.

This is why you don’t hear advocates of “Women’s Equality” demanding additional resources, say, for the 35,000 fewer boys who go to university in the UK, to address the growing disadvantage faced by boys in feminist education systems.

The necessary outcome of a rule set that preserves all women’s advantages and eliminates all their disadvantages is “Women’s Supremacy”, which is why the latter is a more accurate and better label.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

dude that's the entire sub

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy

[deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

understandable ig

[–]TheBadOof1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

They assume that’s what I’m here for; they also assume that I’m a dude for supporting men’s rights :/

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is what this subreddit is for. Read the description :) we are not against equal rights, we are against entitlement and supiriority of woman.

[–]kuruoshii0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I agree

[–]MAGA-TIME0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Women and men aren’t equal. They are inherently different but complement each other and need each other.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy

[deleted]



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter