TheRedArchive needs help
With 700,000+ posts and 16,000,000+ comments archived, and new Red Pill content being added every week, keeping TheRedArchive alive and discoverable to everyone is starting to become very costly. As a 20-year-old student who just moved out and is living independently for the first time, keeping TheRedArchive alive is beginning to cost me much more than I thought.

Therefore, if you appreciate the website, have gained a lot of knowledge and insight from it, and want to show your appreciation, you can do so by donating any amount that you want via the options below. The money will be used on the expensive monthly host bill and any future maintenance of the website.
Thank you, and I wish you all a successful 2021 and a good luck with achieving your goals and dreams!

Best, /u/dream-hunter

Source of income : unknown

Reddit View
August 19, 2019
47 upvotes
post image

Post Information
Title Source of income : unknown
Author iamaryankhan009
Upvotes 47
Comments 6
Date 19 August 2019 09:44 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/707807
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/csnwyv/source_of_income_unknown/
Similar Posts
Comments

[–]Samsonite3141 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy

Her worth is actually 36 billion and is the third richest woman. And compared to other stories she's much more deserving. They basically started Amazon together. She was the first accountant for Amazon and one of the first employees in general, who secured much of their initial infrastructure and helped with the initial business plan. So no, source of income is not quite divorce.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

She got paid for her input and contributions a wage which was considered generous, and which she accepted as her earnings.

The 36 billion that she got in the divorce was not money she earned, it was money her husband earned.

[–]Wheream_I0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Not how working at a tech startup works.

If you work at a tech startup as an early employee you are compensated in stock. That’s how tech startups attract top talent.

Since she was like employee #3 she should have been compensated in stock from day one.

[–]gendalf2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Remove the marriage part - can you seriously, with a straight face, say "she's earned 36 billion $"? (I'm not even questioning if she has been (or not) a valuable employee or partner here)

If the source of income wasn't divorce, then she would've had this money either way, just like any other manager/employee in her position regardless of gender - with or without the marriage - by just working for the company, then marriage would've not been an argument here; it's bs.

[–]Wheream_I0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

She was like the fourth employee at Amazon. Normally early employees at tech companies are rewarded with stock, she wasn’t because she happened to be married to the founder.

The are billionaires that were like the #3 or #4 employees at Facebook who aren’t Zuck.

That’s normal when you work for a tech company as a startup and they make it huge.

[–]boop-oop-a-doop-bop0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Shit blud that’s true innit.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter