714,030 posts

Feminism is filled with Psychopaths

Reddit View
July 16, 2019
90 upvotes

Their behavior is often self evidently psychopathic.

But we men often over look or ignore this truth.

But, psychopaths have well known and established defenses, which you can easily recognise in feminists you will deal with. Here are examples;

They will brigade sub's like this, but complain if their space is exposed. They have a superiority complex.

They project their faults. Projection is a standard psychopathic trait.

They argue excessively - they are trying to intimidate you

They gaslight - they will provoke you IRL to react in order to create a set of legitimate appearing grievances so they have power over you.

Like the mythical vampire, they have actual vulnerabilities, which are as follows;

Facts

Their own behavior is not of a morally superior nature but rather proves the opposite


Post Information
Title Feminism is filled with Psychopaths
Author Smooth_Imagination
Upvotes 90
Comments 19
Date 16 July 2019 10:53 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/707922
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/ce4f3e/feminism_is_filled_with_psychopaths/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
feministfeminismgaslighting
Comments

[–]HermanGould5 points6 points  (9 children) | Copy

Psychopaths lured by an authoritarism movement ?

That's gotta be a new thing. It is really sad we are commiting the same mistakes that in the past. Not only it is full by them, but their conduct is shown as normal making others to follow or not to control themselves.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Ironically it's created the perfect environment for facism to thrive. Feminism is the left that facism is building itself off of, this time.

[–]Smooth_Imagination1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy

yeah, there are psychopaths in both genders. But, we tend to overlook when they are women. But I see them on that side causing great mischief just as they do amongst men.

Without them perhaps we would get along. In the end, men and women are not that different but we are both easily manipulated.

[–]Username1642-1 points0 points  (6 children) | Copy

causing great mischief just as they do amongst men

I've never heard the actions of Hitler or Stalin described as "great mischief"

[–]Smooth_Imagination0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy

that's classic 'whataboutery'.

If all the 20th century leaders were women how do you know some would not have started a war? Margeret Thatcher was extremely gung ho over the Falkland Islands.

There are pyschopaths in both genders, which both cause problems in every day life. Yep, Hitler is extreme example and no, I have yet to see a female psychopath cause that much damage.

And obviously, one wishes that Hitler was never born. Male psychopaths are huge problem, because they are psychopaths. I'm just as against them.

[–]Username1642-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy

I literally just pointed out that you understated what Hitler and Stalin did, because that was what the original comment that you responded to was referring to. I think you may have responded to the wrong comment.

[–]Smooth_Imagination0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

oh sorry, my mistake!

[–]Smooth_Imagination0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

It's a fair point, there are a concentration of psychopaths at the top and they tend to be male. But I'm not a psychopath and the only power I have is to express my arguments, don't be silent, and make the best choices I can with limited data at the election.

When Britain was contemplating invasion of Syria MP's voted against it after a lot of popular complaint. Fortunately, a conflict was averted.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy

[deleted]

[–]Smooth_Imagination0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

well, you were also making the point that I understated what Hitler and Stalin did, right? and I was responding to that. Its true that the top of the power pyramid is full of psychopaths and that's a bigger problem, but it doesn't mean they should be ignored in lesser organisations. So anyway, point is still valid.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (7 children) | Copy

In 2015 there were 90k rapes reported to police. They say 80% go unreported so going along with that then we have 450,925 rape victims in 2015. Assuming each rape was done by a different man and no serial rapists then 450,925 men out of 162.5million men commit rape every year or 0.27% of the male population. But yes, all men deserve to be treated as the rapist gender.

In 2015, 3,292 women were murdered. Around 4x more men were murdered. But men are afraid of being humiliated while women are afraid of being murdered. So yes, all men deserve to be treated like the 0.002% of men who will murder someone in a year even when men are 4x more likely to be murdered.

Men commit suicide at 3.5x the rate of women but lol at male tears and male fragility over being demonized as nothing but rapists and murderers.

130,000 cases of domestic abuse reported in 2015. 60% goes unreported allegedly. So worst case scenario; 217k cases. Assuming thats all men then 0.13% of the male population are comitting domestic abuse every year but all males must be treated as the domestic abusing gender.

Meanwhile, women (the gentle, empathic, sensible gender that is constantly sucummbing to the societal pressure to make themselves as small a burden as possible even to the point of failing at suicide more often because they are so concerned about the person who will have to clean up their dead body) killed 638,169 of their own babies in the womb.

Something like 1 in 4 women get abortions (kill their baby.) Feminists particularly venerate abortion while hating men. I think its clear that feminism's original good goals have been achieved and now modern feminism is a perverted cause hijacked by downright evil women who are insecure about the fact that they are baby killers who will be unworthy of love and belonging from a gallant man.

Can you blame them? What good man would want a baby killer for a wife? Think about a socieity where 25% of the female population is unworthy of a good man. They must demonize the whole gender of men in order to feel worthy of the love of a man because they know in their heart that they are baby killers unworthy of the love of a good man.

[–]Username16421 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy

Something like 1 in 4 women get abortions (kill their baby.)

So I'm guessing your on the more extreme pro-life side of the spectrum

Aside from that, I agree with what's been said. Just bear in mind most of the women who have abortions will already be married, and so will already have a good man, or as close to it as they're able to achieve anyway.

BTW, do you know where the statistics for unreported crimes come from? This isn't me accusing you of inaccuracy, I just don't know how people work that stuff out. Do they do surveys to see what proportion of people would report it, and combine it with the amount of reports? Or do they do something I haven't thought of?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy

According to the CDC unmarried women accounted for 86% of abortions. Its not extreme to be honest about the fact that its a child growing in the womb and abortion is when you use a pair of sharp teethed bbq tongs to rip the baby out piece by piece. The statistics for unreported crimes were found on google but I have no idea where they get them from I was just being generous in including them.

[–]Username16420 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

According to the CDC unmarried women accounted for 86% of abortions

Fair enough. I did not realise that. I just assumed that the vast majority of women in that position would already be married. Thank you for correcting me.

Its not extreme to be honest about the fact that its a child growing in the womb and abortion is when you use a pair of sharp teethed bbq tongs to rip the baby out piece by piece

It depends on the point at which the abortion happens. In some cases it's a matter of taking a pill with some hormones which stop the body from allowing the embryo to continue growing. Besides, at what point does it count as being alive? After that point, then an abortion is essentially murder. Before then, though, it's stopping a life from forming, just like not having sex in the first place.

The statistics for unreported crimes were found on google but I have no idea where they get them from I was just being generous in including them.

Fair enough. I was just curious.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Its created by living cells coming together to form a zygote not dead cells that magically come alive so its always alive. I just gave you a very specific definition of abortion so I don't know why you're bringing up irrelevant things like the morning after pill.

[–]Username16420 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Its created by living cells coming together to form a zygote

That's the same level of life as a bacteria colony. It's not yet a full human life. The morning after pill deals with things on the level of a zygote, or a blastocyst. Is that murdering babies?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Human cells that are alive so its human life and its in the process of growing into a child. Its idiotic and anti-science to say that its not human life but all this is irrelevant because I told you the definition of abortion as pulling a baby apart.

[–]Do0ozy-2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy

They had us in the first half..

[–]Smooth_Imagination1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

this might be overly sweeping, some of it (feminism) makes sense.

But it is hard to stand behind that, since feminists do not allow men to contribute to their literature and make decisions in any of their communities. It is a supposed equality movement in which one gender is totally excluded from any involvement in its direction, only in blind support.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter