706,399 posts

STUDY: Feminists more willing to ‘sacrifice’ men

Reddit View
July 6, 2019
44 upvotes
https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=10984


Post Information
Title STUDY: Feminists more willing to ‘sacrifice’ men
Author 5th_Law_of_Robotics
Upvotes 44
Comments 11
Date 06 July 2019 11:54 AM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/707958
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/c9sse3/study_feminists_more_willing_to_sacrifice_men/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
feminist
Comments

[–]marcus-bolt13 points14 points  (7 children) | Copy

The sacrifice of men isn't unique to feminism. In whole history, women were perfectly happy and comfortable with men going to war and getting slaughtered for their enjoyment of peace and civilization at home.

Majority of things attributed to patriarchy (for example glass ceiling, or online bullying) is also entirely women doing to other women, sabotaging each other to get ahead like a bucket of crabs, but then 'sacrificing' men in the sense of throwing blame and accusing them of doing what most women are doing.

[–]PixieChief-5 points-4 points  (6 children) | Copy

In whole history, men have been perfectly comfortable with impregnating women, many of whom died (many more than those who died in war) or permanently maimed or disabled. Through periods of history, women were put to death for getting pregnant, locked in asylums or mother and baby homes.

If you view history with an unbiased perspective, you will find that we are all expendable, just in different ways.

[–]marcus-bolt2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

You must be of a young mind to say these things.

Average life expectancy in history was equal for both men and women. In Greece, it was about 25 years. If our knowledge of medicine and midwifery was not as advanced to keep more pregnant women alive until about 17 century, you want to be angry at evolution and nature, not at men who impregnate women, like any other fucking dual-sex species. Are you actually complaining about reproduction as some form of oppression done by men to women in our human species? You must be fun at parties.

[–]PixieChief-5 points-4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Tremendous crack altogether actually.

You’re saying women were perfectly fine with sending men off to war to die (not sure all of them were but that’s by the by), I’m simply saying that men seem to have been perfectly comfortable to send women to the birthing room to die. Where’s the difference?

As for ‘advances in medicine’ keeping more women alive, it should be noted that when exclusively male doctors took over midwifery, they killed women in their thousands because they could not be convinced to wash their hands.

Today, if a man rapes a woman who becomes pregnant and later dies in childbirth, is he prosecuted for manslaughter? No because women dying in childbirth is just something that happens to them.

I’m saying that women are just as expendable as men in different ‘socially acceptable ‘ ways.

[–]Lucidique0-3 points-2 points  (2 children) | Copy

My God, I cannot stand whiny little cucks like you.

Men are more disposable in every single species with the exception of maybe two or three out of millions. That's just the way biology works. Cry a fucking river about it.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Other species don't worry much about consent. Sure you want to use this argument?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Take a look at post history. It's a bunch of one sentence gotcha/checkmate men! Don't expect anything. This redditor is literally the fucking epitome of cancer. Can stand whiny little fucks? Fuck off.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AdviceAnimals/comments/c9thhh/i_dont_want_people_looking_at_my_rear_end_i_just/et7rosq/?context=3

Let me get this straight this insufferable man hating piece of shit is actively looking for trouble? Much warrior! Fuck off.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter