708,624 posts

I down vote dumb titles

Reddit View
June 12, 2019
303 upvotes
post image

Post Information
Title I down vote dumb titles
Author Epocalypse_Channel
Upvotes 303
Comments 9
Date 12 June 2019 06:49 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/708034
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/bzv23s/i_down_vote_dumb_titles/
Similar Posts
Comments

[–]marcus-bolt8 points9 points  (7 children) | Copy

Be an ally but do not talk, but your silence is complacency, but I am oppressed by your explaining or sitting, but you aren't doing enough, but quit your job and let me do it because I'm better than you, but I need to work from home and less hours and more salary, but women are held back in society, but I secretly hate all the women around me who is better or prettier than me, but society dictates beauty standards, but I hate it when a younger and more fit girl looks better than me and gets more notice, so I trash talk behind her back and sabbotage her.

But you see it's society and men holding them back I'm their ally defending them, so let me be the CEO because I'm oppressed, but I don't work in garbage collection or dangerous jobs because I'm a girl, but there is gender pay gap, but somehow we women can milk cash out of men or government that 80% of all purchase decisions are made by us, even though we claim we don't make a much as men, and everyone believes us, but we want equal rights where ever we want to con someone out of their cash, but we don't want equal responsibility, so we re-write justice and laws such that men are always condemned even with false accusations, but believe all women because we would nevvvar lie or trick anyone we promise okey?

[–]Epocalypse_Channel[S] 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy

I'm sorry you feel offended by this(also sorry for my bad spelling)I do believe in both genders having equal rights but both genders have to deal witb problems, girls have the pay thing like you said but guys are always judged too, many feminist say that all guys are trash, but also say that people should be treated equally

Both genders should have equal rights but we all have to deal with struggles. I know not all feminist say that all men are trash but lots do, guys don't get to live their life 100% perfect either. Both are judged by their looks which is dumb either by height, weight, or private size. Once again I do strongly believe in equal rights(in both race in gender just to be clear) Everyone is put to a stanard which I agree is dumb. Also many of the pay gaps have ended and most of the ones that are left is sports which is a sexist problem but is starting to be worked on being solved.

By the way I do agree with what feminism originally stude for. Equal rights and fair pay, but todays feminism focusses on things like the way a guy sits or the air conditioning in an office or work place. Also I do agree that not all women do this, in fact the majority of women I've met don't. Thanks for reading and I hope you have a good day.(Also again sorry if i offended you)

[–]Username16420 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

With sports, biologically men are more athletic due to [see reply]. This means they perform better, and so get more coverage and sponsorship. This means they generate more revenue and earn more money, and therefore are payed more. While the extent of this is more significant than it should be, a degree of this will always exist, and there isn't really anything (reasonable) anyone can do about it.

Also, I agree that feminism used to be good, but now it's derailed horribly. The idea of "manspreading" being a form of subconscious oppression is dumb. It's literally just the fact that guys have balls and girls don't. That's why it exists. Also, the air conditioning stuff is just stupid. Who would bother specifically setting the heating to a specific temperature where women were cold but not men. Especially seeing as employers care about money, not patriarchy. They will want their workers to work as well as possible. They won't reduce profits for the sake of enforcing a patriarchy.

[–]User-31f64a4e2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

due to higher testosterone levels.

Incorrect.

That is merely one of many, many factors.
Trained men can recruit almost 100% of a given muscle's fibres in a single movement; trained women, about 85%.
Male bones are heavier, thicker, and shaped differently (which is why, for example, men's shoulders are about a half head wider than those of women)
The male cerebellum is different; men have better motor capabilities.
Male visual processing is different; the parts of the brain that track movement, calculate parabolas (to throw things, or catch them, or duck them) are more developed
Male instinctive social skills differ, and are more suited both for team play, and to compete.
Female hips are shaped differently, which is why so few male Army recruits get hip stress fractures and so many female recruits do. This has profound effects on running, jumping, weight lifting, and just about everything else athletic except for arm wrestling.

You can't just give a woman shots of vitamin T and expect her to be the equal of a man in any sport.

Women aren't just "soft men"; they also aren't just men with different hormones.

[–]Username16420 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

I'm torn between saying "thank you" and "sorry".

[–]User-31f64a4e0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

No worries mate.

[–]Epocalypse_Channel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Glad we could agree and thanks for reading

[–]marcus-bolt-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well ok.

I'm not sure what you mean by offense. My angle of approach is using contrasting and hyperbolic tone to highlight internal inconsistencies of the ideology. The target is ideology, not women or feminists or men. This knee-jerk reaction to suddenly come "defend wahmen" is really unnecessary in my opinion. The urge to defend would only get triggered if a perception of threat is there. Which begs the question, why is there a perception of threat to criticising an ideology or inconsistencies of a belief?

No one is saying women don't have problems. But to suggest it as a way to move the topic to it means the argument is being diverted and moved away from actual topic, which I believe is wrong, as all forms of diversions from issues are wrong.

For the record, the topic isn't about looks or judging people by looks, it's about the fakeness of those who claim women are judged by looks, while they themselves venomously hate and judge other women. It's only their belief when they can get something for themselves, but in private, they are the opposite, and most judgy people. So topic is hypocrisy of those who claim they stand for equality or fighting oppression, not judging of looks, if you follow.

But anyway, thanks for the input. Discussion is always good and welcome.

[–]User-31f64a4e0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

When your attitude is "all about me", then any focus elsewhere is an attack.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter