Only men can be homeless

Reddit View
June 8, 2019

Post Information
Title Only men can be homeless
Author chairman-mao-43
Upvotes 228
Comments 16
Date 08 June 2019 12:25 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Original Link
Similar Posts

[–]SpellBlue30 points31 points  (4 children) | Copy

It's kinda of funny: imagine if 0% of the homeless were women, media would probably celebrate even if 70% of the male population is homeless, literally "Is it a boy? I don't care, let then eat shit."

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics18 points19 points  (0 children) | Copy

If zero homeless were women we'd never hear the word "homeless" again outside certain subreddits.

[–]AbsoluteSereniti6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy

It makes no sense. If 0% of homeless people are women then 100% of homeless are consequently men. That’s just how percentages work. Ignoring the whole LGBTQ shit with 500 genders. If we assume 2 genders. 40% of homeless people being women => 60% of homeless people are men?

[–]SpellBlue2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

That's the point of my comment, media wouldn't care if 100% of the homeless people were men.

[–]AbsoluteSereniti5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Double standards. Fuck SJWs and feminism.

[–]julianleung12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy

10% more to equality.

[–]6xxy9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

Lmao biggest whiteknighting I’ve ever seen. Trying to encourage people to help the homeless because “Good God! Some of them are women.

[–]marcus-bolt1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I legit read 'analysis' down the screen as 'anal ysis'

[–]Neighbor-of-the-Beas1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy


They don't want the rate of people who are homeless down, they want to make the women less homeless...

Seems ethical to me.

[–]Username16421 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

If it was 40% of women are homeless, then yes that would need to be dealt with. But 40% of homeless being women? The issue is that 60% are male, rather than 50%

[–]Neighbor-of-the-Beas0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

That was my point, you talk like we disagree, but we don't.

[–]Username16420 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

I did mean it as an agreement, sorry if it didn't seem like it. I just put it as a comment on what you said because I thought it kind of built on your comment

[–]Neighbor-of-the-Beas0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Reading it with that context allows me to see that it does.

[–]pablochocobarr10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

What was the discussion about?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I bet someone was offended by the stat

[–]Username16420 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Can we have a link to the video?

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter