678,119 posts

Let me get this straight, 'simp' is an attack on women now?

Reddit View
June 29, 2020
433 upvotes
post image

Post Information
Title Let me get this straight, 'simp' is an attack on women now?
Author baneyney07
Upvotes 433
Comments 91
Date 29 June 2020 01:25 PM UTC (1 month ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/709757
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/hhzspq/let_me_get_this_straight_simp_is_an_attack_on/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
simpdark triad
Comments

[–]akihonj98 points99 points  (10 children) | Copy

Wow they will never stop with the mental gymnastics will they.

[–]blondehairedangel42 points43 points  (5 children) | Copy

I dont understand how theyre so flexible!

[–]baneyney07[S] 34 points35 points  (3 children) | Copy

Plot twist: they aren't

[–]moria018 points19 points  (2 children) | Copy

They feel everything is open to interpretations of their own.

"I have the right to feel this way"

[–]baneyney07[S] 14 points15 points  (1 child) | Copy

"Just because you have the right to feel this way doesn't make you correct" that's a concept all feminists should get behind

[–]Dean_Clean6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

LOL. Not going to happen.

[–]ilikeblackbooties1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

If they were more flexible in bed they could probably keep a man lol

[–]baneyney07[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

They are in a competition of their own

[–]QS264 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

More like irrational gymnastics

[–]seeyounexttuesdaybru4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

[–]akihonj10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well of course it is because nobody loves sexism more than a feminist if she benefits from it. If she does then she empowered if she doesn't she marginalized and othered and a victim, for feminists then sexism is a win win, who then wouldn't want to try to change the narrative to suit their agenda.

[–]Chopanero7738 points39 points  (10 children) | Copy

They may have a point that it's used wrongly most of the time but claiming it's toxic masculinity is fucking retarded.

[–]baneyney07[S] 18 points19 points  (9 children) | Copy

I agree to some extent but literally, this explanation twisted the narrative to the point where it is the WOMEN who are at the receiving end of this. Like hey! Not everything is about women. And literally no one (not many) thinks normalizing treating women like shit is okay. This post was reaching

[–]Chopanero777 points8 points  (4 children) | Copy

Yeah that was the weirdest thing. Also, I'm pretty sure that's not what simp means. If anything, it would be SWIMP.

[–]baneyney07[S] 4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy

Hmmm I've never heard of a SWIMP. Explain it a little please?

[–]Chopanero776 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy

No, I mean, the image says "Someone who idolized mediocre pussy". That would be swimp, instead of simp.

[–]baneyney07[S] 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

Haha Oooh sorry that flew over my head 😂

[–]Chopanero773 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

np

[–]Dean_Clean5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy

This post is in direct contradiction to the other argument about simping that has recently hit the feminist related boards. That argument that men only label men as Simps because it is a way to shame the men who would otherwise be HVM (High Value Male) that strive to be giving to women.

[–]baneyney07[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Now you're thinking! 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

[–]Mytriptorussia20181 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

HVI man in reproduction, provision, protection and service?

[–]Dean_Clean0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

If you're asking for the definition of what an HVM is, it seems that there is no clear definition. I would say that all of your terms do apply here insofar as: if a man's behavior is providing anything a female needs (actually wants.and feels entitled to) then he is high value. Equality in giving both directions doesn't seem to qualify. Rather, as long as the male is providing the majority or maximal amount of provisioning (emotional, financial, etc...) then he is a "High Value Male". I'm only describing the context in which it seems to be used in certain feminist circles like FDS.

[–]baneyney07[S] 24 points25 points  (4 children) | Copy

My friend posted this on her Instagram stories and honestly, such an ignorant thing to post

[–]bluejburgers2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Your friend is a tard if you don’t mind me saying

[–]baneyney07[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Ehhh...... I will neither agree nor disagree with you

[–]Xsailrx1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

I would just mute their stories if people post dumbass things on their stories

[–]baneyney07[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I could but I happen to find feminists very entertaining. It's fun to see them flail around trying to be woke and create nonsensical ideologies for themselves

[–]QS2618 points19 points  (9 children) | Copy

Only a simp would believe this. Simps are people who literally lose they’re dignity by kissing women’s asses in the hopes of getting some. The reason women like simps is because simps always stick up for feminists even when they are wrong, cater to feminists’ delusional ideologies and sometimes they do it just to get a girl’s phone number, and most of all simps are the easiest people for feminist women to take advantage of.

[–]baneyney07[S] 8 points9 points  (5 children) | Copy

Agreed. And having simps still doesn't satisfy feminists as they assume (like this post) that the word simp is insulting women. Like how everything insults and triggers them.

[–]QS263 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy

FACTS

[–]Dean_Clean2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

I think that we can boil this post down to one simple thing: if a word exists and it relates to sexism, it will eventually be defined as something that harms women. I'd like to call this Dean's Law. LOL

[–]QS264 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

But it’s not related to sexism though. They try to relate to sexism and people fall for it.

[–]Dean_Clean2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

They're trying to relate it from the looks of it. It seems as though they're collecting keywords to apply specific (altered) definitions to in order to increase the number of words that can be used as weapons. Alot of this fight is taking place in print and online so words are used as weapons. So far I have seen new terms added to their lexicon or they take existing words and expand the definitions.

[–]QS262 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

That’s one of their main strategies expanding definitions of words.

[–]Mr_Volkstaat2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

Simps are people who literally lose they’re dignity by kissing women’s asses in the hopes of getting some.

As somebody with a kink for tossing salad this offends me. Don't lump me in with those sad rejects, they'd never even be able to do it right!

[–]QS264 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

Was that supposed to be a joke? Cause it was very bad.

[–]Mr_Volkstaat2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Couldn't help myself, mate. On a serious note, though, you do have a point: Nobody likes a white knight.

[–]KlutzySole9-112 points13 points  (5 children) | Copy

I thought that simp was used to insult someone who spends thousands of dollars donating to twitch thots when they are 3 months behind on bills

[–]baneyney07[S] 8 points9 points  (4 children) | Copy

You are correct sir. But apparently according to feminists, simps are someone who is remotely decent to them because they think men are the spawns of Satan released onto the earth to torture women. So calling them simps is normalizing abuse to women....apparently

[–]KlutzySole9-14 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy

I guess I'm a simp then because I treat my girlfriend nicely

[–]baneyney07[S] 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

Oooh I bet you take her out on dates and cuddle her. What a simp thing to do. Lol kidding. I think it's great you treat her nicely and I hope she does as well.

[–]KlutzySole9-12 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

I took her out on one date. It is difficult to find time to hang out with her due to the COVID lockdown and all that

[–]baneyney07[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Hey man, I'm sure your relationship will stand the test of distance and time. Don't worry, you two can pull through this pandemic. Stay healthy most of all so you have more future dates to look forward to.

[–]moria05 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

It is incredible to me how much stupidity rules our lives. Let's put a stop to it.

[–]baneyney07[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

We live in sad times

[–]Jabronskyi5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy

Wrongly used? Yes Toxic masculinity? No Way José!

[–]baneyney07[S] 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

Shhhhhh don't say José that's sexist! Why not Josefa? 😂😂

[–]Jabronskyi2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Oh, yeah! You're right. No Way Josefa

[–]bluejburgers5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

“2009 nice guy phenomenon”

Okay retard

[–]heyyoutake3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is hilarious

[–]TheZestyMan3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

It means “simpleton” too so that’s false information.

[–]baneyney07[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Right? They couldn't even get that right!

[–]Slyslothh4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

why are feminists against masculinity all of a sudden?

[–]baneyney07[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Because to them, men = bad

[–]kiaeej3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Everything is about them. EVERYTHING.

[–]Ssimpel4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

I hate my username

[–]baneyney07[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Oh you poor thing 😂😂😂 can you change it?

[–]Ssimpel1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

No an I use it for all my accounts so I always get called a simp haha

[–]SlavNotDead4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

Let me stop you right there

SIMP aint “someone”

SIMP is SPECIFICALLY a “Sucker”

SUCKER

IDOLIZING

MEDIOCRE

PUSSY

It even makes sense grammatically without all their (gymnastics)

I don’t expect feminists to get things right, but holy fuck, this shit ain’t rocket science

ALSO, since fucking when is donating your entire lifesavings to some twitch-thot “treating women like shit”?!

[–]baneyney07[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Exactly. But at this point, I don't expect good things from feminists. "Look at me! I'm the victim here! Pay attention to my feelings!"

[–]_sharpiesniffer_2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Something a simp would say

[–]baneyney07[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

You're not wrong

[–]hawknose332 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Dont using simping it hurts women. Using simping at the end of telling people not to use simping. Ok?

[–]Doctor-Jager2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

They will always take shit from memers seriously

[–]baneyney07[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Which is why rational people will never take them seriously

[–]PinBot11381 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Tdlr: Too didn’t long read

[–]baneyney07[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I love this 😂 feminists can't even get their own posts right

[–]DevilComeKnockin1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Narrator: nobody should ever use the term SIMP, and furthermore, all those goddamn SIMPS should go to Hell.

[–]MuttafukRen1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

The funny thing the nice guy comment in that last part is the “nice guy phenomenon” was also treated like an internet meme back then.

[–]baneyney07[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Haven't you heard? Comedy and humor and memes are cancelled, by the decree of every triggered SJW and feminist out there

[–]carryoncoveting1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy

Simp is an attack on both women and men. Men because it reinforces the expectation that men who are nice to women are weak and less masculine. Women because it conveys the idea that real men shouldn't respect or be nice to them.

[–]baneyney07[S] 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

But a simp isn't someone who treats women nice and is decent to them. That's called being a nice person. A simp is someone who is subservient to women, and literally worships whatever a woman does whether it's right or wrong.

[–]dobeye0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Most men who respect women are called simps. A good example is any man who agrees with a woman who expresses an opinion on twitter, or men donating money to female streamers on twitch. Replace female with male and none of these people are simps

[–]moria00 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

It is just a concept to be aware of, like knowing to not touch an electric fence.

[–]baneyney07[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Yeah that's reasonable. That post was still nonsense though

[–]moria01 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

It totally was

[–]Rozycka1230 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

A simp is a guy who goes out of his way to get a girl who doesn’t even know him to notice him, not a guy who’s nice to girls

[–]MingSushi0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I love how simps “Treat women like humans” when they only give her money just do they can get sex out of her 😂

[–]virtualwar123450 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Dafuq

[–]sanrio-sugarplum0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Ugh. No. Incel is for misogynists. Simp is for white knights.

[–]KingBobOmber0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I always thought it was spelled symp as in sympathetic

[–]doo-doo_dee-dee0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Reddit really only uses "simp" satirically, so the feminist who made this must be completely brain dead

[–]japanese-bo10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

the funny part is that the "simps" only treat them like humans only for sex.

non simps treat them like humans because they're humans.

[–]SnowySupreme0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Its suckaz idolizing mediocre pussy

[–]luridiestdruser-2 points-1 points  (6 children) | Copy

They are referring to how it affects men. Calling men effeminate for not treating others poorly is wrong, and toxic. Toxic masculinity affects men as much if not more than women. Ever been called a faggot before? Yeah, that person was toxic. These feminists are trying to stand up for you guys, and you aren't using your brains. It shows that y'all are just mad and don't care if anything changes. Read For The Love of Men.

EDIT: OK re reading the picture does prove that the person who made that graphic is mentally retarded; however, my point still stands. Toxic masculinity affects men as much if not more than women, therefore, calling another man a simp is toxic.

[–]baneyney07[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy

Wasn't denying that calling a man a simp is toxic. But the reason I called this post out was how the person literally took an issue that was suppose to be about how this term is toxic to men and turned it into a victim party for women. No, not everything is about women. Believe it or not, men being called simps aren't an attack on women. And literally no one (extremely few) in this time thinks its right to normalize abuse on women. This graphic was reaching and that's why I called it out. Because inevitably, the feminists will twist the narrative onto themselves and play victim while completely forsaking (and even blaming) their male counterpart who is more affected in the issue

[–]luridiestdruser-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy

Right! And when I went back and read the picture posted it became painfully obvious that what you were saying is the truth. I find it dangerous to label all feminists this way, though I agree it is very tempting. So called "feminists" often support toxic behavior in women that does nothing but perpetuate more toxicity and anger. But over the last few years I've met many wonderful women, men, and folks in between that self identify as feminists that truly want to help EVERYONE under the patriarchy. It is after all, a stream we all swim in that affects us all. Those twisting the narrative in such a way are only victimizing themselves. Really, it's just sad.

[–]baneyney07[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

You sound like a lovely and very understanding person. I mean that sincerely. But I think you might be misinformed about certain things. I'll explain if you would allow me to. I'll say first off that feminism, if defined by the movement to obtain equal rights for both male and female, shouldn't exist. Because if it is equality that everyone wants, it would be called equality. I'm sure there are lovely people who identify as feminists but they are misunderstood about the cause they are fighting and manipulated by the third wave feminists.

Secondly, there is no such thing as a patriarchy oppressing every woman that exists. If a patriarchy like that existed, no women would be in high positions, no women would be able to get rich and famous. But yet you see so many women CEOs, pop stars, actresses, business women, judges, astronauts. Where is the overreaching hand of the patriarchy when women like these exist in this modern time?

[–]luridiestdruser1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Well thank you! It's not every day you can disagree with someone one the internet and not have a flame war lol.

I agree with you. The terms they use are not perfect. Language is powerful, and the words have not been chosen with men in mind at all. Im of the opinion certain terms need to be reworked to be more accessable to EVERYONE. Toxic masculinity is a big problem, but so is toxic behavior from women. I think it just needs to be called toxicity.

What I will say about the patriarchy is that there are plenty of powerful (and everyday) women involved too, who both allow toxicity to continue and perpetuate it themselves. Men AND women are both oppressed by this. Men aren't allowed to be anything but a stoic, masc, straight, emotionless individual without social repercussions, but the reality is that masculinity comes in many beautiful shapes and sizes and personalities. Just like how feminists point out that it's wrong for women to be expected to be blonde stick thin and submissive. Id put forth that there are plenty of men AND women who hold the norms in place and dont give others room to express themselves how they see fit. Hope that makes a little sense!

[–]baneyney07[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

I agree with you now that you have clarified your points. You explained your point very eloquently. Thank you for taking the time to write this out. Hopefully society and its stereotypes and norms can change for the better. It's so needed. I enjoyed this discussion and I'm glad we discussed it calmly and in a civil manner 😊

Have a great day and stay safe ❤️

[–]luridiestdruser1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

You too, really enjoyed having a productive conversation with you! Love and light, and be careful out there☺❤



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter