699,178 posts

This "mansplainer" argues for the abuse of men

Reddit View
January 23, 2020
82 upvotes

Legal Eagle argues for the abuse of men.

24 points1 commentsubmitted by Razorbladekandyfan to r/antifeminist

Post Information
Title This "mansplainer" argues for the abuse of men
Author Pro_Male_Vanguard
Upvotes 82
Comments 10
Date 23 January 2020 09:26 AM UTC (8 months ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/710197
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/esqprf/this_mansplainer_argues_for_the_abuse_of_men/
Similar Posts
Comments

[–]RegumRegis9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy

I've watched this guy sometimes, but wtf.

[–]gendalf3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

cucked and blue pilled

[–]willyj196 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

I don't think it's smashing the patriarchy if a cosmic powered Karen is going against a average Joe over "you should smile more".

[–]Axleonder4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

The patriarchy is a conspiracy theory, made up so she can dish out "justified" violence.

[–]AngelFire_3_141563 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy

In my opinion, this type of analysis is what happens when you overthink a fantasy scenario.

Maybe it's just me, but first, the guy had no business getting in her space. Second, it seems to me that Captain Marvel really overreacted. But that's the problem with feminism - they can't distinguish between being strong verses being a shrew, and in this scene Captain Marvel is acting more like the latter. The entire scene is set up so she can act like a shrew.

Also, this fantasy scenario is highly contrived. I haven't seen the movie (I really have better things to do with my time), but what kind of a superhero would use a paper map in the 21st century? She looks more like a mental health case. Put a phone or similar device in her hand and the entire scene becomes more irrelevant than it already is.

[–]cowyeti-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

He acknowledged that she may have overreacted and he said that there was a discussion to be had there, but that’s not what the video was about. It was an example of how law students have to really analyze cases to determine if a crime was committed.

[–]muckin-forons-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

The movie takes place in the 90s. So 20th century.

[–]Pz51 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

He seems to be a nobody. Only 810 views in 6 months.

[–]cowyeti0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I mean his video is pretty shit so I don’t expect him to become popular anytime soon

[–]muckin-forons0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Lol that’s this idiots response video.

The actual video is here

https://youtu.be/kIoWt2jPiK0



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter