TheRedArchive needs help
With 700,000+ posts and 16,000,000+ comments archived, and new Red Pill content being added every week, keeping TheRedArchive alive and discoverable to everyone is starting to become very costly. As a 20-year-old student who just moved out and is living independently for the first time, keeping TheRedArchive alive is beginning to cost me much more than I thought.

Therefore, if you appreciate the website, have gained a lot of knowledge and insight from it, and want to show your appreciation, you can do so by donating any amount that you want via the options below. The money will be used on the expensive monthly host bill and any future maintenance of the website.
Thank you, and I wish you all a successful 2021 and a good luck with achieving your goals and dreams!

Best, /u/dream-hunter

I kinda dont...

Reddit View
May 11, 2020
post image

Post Information
Title I kinda dont...
Author robo_oof101
Upvotes 212
Comments 34
Date 11 May 2020 02:17 AM UTC (8 months ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Original Link
Similar Posts

[–]VestigialHead68 points69 points  (3 children) | Copy

Apart from these three men.

  • Ainan Celeste Cawley (IQ score: 263)
  • William James Sidis (IQ score: 250-300)
  • Terence Tao (IQ score: 225-230)
  • Marilyn Vos Savant (IQ score: 228)

[–]Heterodynist8 points9 points  (2 children) | Copy

And isn’t it ironic the way we tend to use the term “savant?” Ha!

[–]Verbalicedtea4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

Lol so it's not even a fact. Fems are making shit up every day

[–]Heterodynist0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

They really ARE!!!

[–]MyShitDoesStink30 points31 points  (2 children) | Copy

Looking at her Wikipedia page is doesn't seem like she's done much with her high level of intelligence.

[–]robo_oof101[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy

I know right.

[–]Heterodynist5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

She probably was one of the authors of a well-used IQ test, prior to scoring higher than anyone ever...(This is a joke, just to pre-empt those knee-jerk reaction downvoting trolls...I know I can read all about Marilyn Von Savant’s history. That wouldn’t support my joke though.)

[–]nopleasepleasedontn16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's literally not true.

[–]SirWeinmund9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

The thing there is “recorded” what about all those smarter but not recorded.

[–]nopleasepleasedontn9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

It is literally not true

[–]-Network_Reunited5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

She has accomplished nothing to prove that!

[–]dirgros0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Other than a column in “Parade.”

[–]magnusjaj5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

I hate that subreddit

[–]Heterodynist4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is also patently untrue. There is a ridiculous amount of debate and speculation about who has the highest IQ ever. I hate when some idiot has to chose the most extreme of all minorities (one individual) to try to prove a rule.

[–]vasekgamescz2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Lol everybody knows that Nikola Tesla is smarter. he had 250-310 IQ he never measured it but his IQ is definitely more than 240 Because he was the greatest inventor ever.

[–]Raygun200124 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

That subreddit gave me cancer

[–]SeizmicETC2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Alan S. Kaufman, a psychology professor and author of IQ tests, writes in IQ Testing 101 that "Miss Savant was given an old version of the Stanford-Binet (Terman & Merrill 1937), which did, indeed, use the antiquated formula of MA/CA × 100. But in the test manual's norms, the Binet does not permit IQs to rise above 170 at any age, child or adult. As the authors of the old Binet stated: 'Beyond fifteen the mental ages are entirely artificial and are to be thought of as simply numerical scores.' (Terman & Merrill 1937). ...the psychologist who came up with an IQ of 228 committed an extrapolation of a misconception, thereby violating almost every rule imaginable concerning the meaning of IQs."[12] Savant has commented on reports mentioning varying IQ scores she was said to have obtained.[13]


[–]DarkArcher__1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Even if it were true, why would it matter? You don't see us boasting about the actual highest registered IQ being a man

[–]Verbalicedtea1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Be that as it may, my question is what is the ratio of higher iq from men to women. The highest iq could be by a women but that's one not the entire gender so i don't understand why that is used as something to make a point 🤣. One women with high Iq means fokol

[–]Radikost1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

So what?

[–]iHaveAtinyWoody4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

"The fairer sex"

Until you see some drunk slag pissing in front of a downtown pizzeria.

[–]SeizmicETC0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy


[–]B4K3R2450 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

That sub is guaranteed to be filled with pink haired blobs who have never had a guy in their life

[–]KindPrecise0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

But what did she create, contribute or actually do for the greater good? Cure for anything... ? Helped liberate oppressed women in other places outside of university campuses?

[–]lenard-laurencin0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

On top of the fact this is wrong, you stated “recorded” I’m positive their are people from before iq tests that were geniuses

[–]ZenkaiLane0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

IQ tests are useless

[–]japanese-bo10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

IQ tests are misleading because they do not accurately reflect intelligence, according to a study which found that a minimum of three different exams are needed to measure someone's brainpower.

IQ test being only one.

For more than a century our intelligence quotient (IQ) has been used to measure how clever people are and Mensa, the society for the intellectual elite, has even used the test to weed out sub-par applicants.

But now the scale has been dismissed as a "myth" by scientists who found that our intelligence can only be predicted by combining results from at least three tests of our mental agility.

Different circuits within the brain are used for different thought processes, the researchers showed, meaning separate tests of short-term memory, reasoning and verbal skills are needed to measure someone's overall intelligence.

Their landmark study was based on the results of an online intelligence test which was launched by the Daily Telegraph and New Scientist two years ago, and attracted more than 110,000 responses.

Dr Roger Highfield, the Telegraph columnist and one of the authors of the paper, said: "When you come to the most complex known object, the human brain, the idea that there is only one measure of intelligence had to be wrong.

[–]C00ki3_Krom0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Still, there is nothing wrong if that is true

[–]GerinX-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

What else don’t you care about?

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter