So I wrote a comment on a feminist page saying that feminism is stupid and this happens (of course she blocked me)

Reddit View
August 18, 2019

Post Information
Title So I wrote a comment on a feminist page saying that feminism is stupid and this happens (of course she blocked me)
Author UselessDavide
Upvotes 202
Comments 30
Date 18 August 2019 09:04 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Original Link
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:

[–]Merlinfrost25 points26 points  (0 children) | Copy

Oh god said she male species. It’s come full circle.

[–]Tacticus_Anguis44 points45 points  (1 child) | Copy

Women have it 100x better than men do in nearly every aspect: Home, work, social, etc, yet the complain about inequality.

Feminism has no place in the world.

[–]Fried-Penguin1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

They are blinded from the truth by all the SJW screaming about male privilege.

[–]DragoniZilan8 points9 points  (7 children) | Copy

Can you send me the sbubby? I need it

[–]UselessDavide6 points7 points  (6 children) | Copy

The what sorry? Idk what a sbubby is

[–]DragoniZilan5 points6 points  (5 children) | Copy

The "your opinions are shit" thing at the top

[–]UselessDavide4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Oh ok I'm gonna do it now

[–]UselessDavide5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

Yeah I just realized I have no fucking idea how

[–]maybeathrowaway892 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Save it on instagram and upload it to imgur i guess

[–]UselessDavide2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

How about you tell me your ig and I dm it to you

[–]DragoniZilan0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy


[–]marcus-bolt6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

With that view of the world and men, I guess the closest this girl can get to getting a connection with a man is to get dicked then tossed away like a rag becuase no one can keep that much insanity around for too long. Miserable hag.

[–]YeastBeast335 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy


[–]generallazer73 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

I solute you

[–]Akumu012 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Don't degrade them with bad language. It's rude and only fuels the movement. Stay calm. Stay polite

[–]UselessDavide1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I tried. Thats what happened. She actually blocked me after she sent the second message and I also said to myself why not have some fun in the process

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (14 children) | Copy

She asserted that his opinion was Modus Tollens:

P -> Q


Therefore, ¬Q

However, when asked to elucidate further, She defended her assertion by using Ad Hominem:

¬P -> Q because person X is Y

This is a misuse of logic.

[–]UselessDavide0 points1 point  (13 children) | Copy

Yeah that's too intelligent to me, I just know she can't make an argument when asked to do so

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (12 children) | Copy

Basically, she said his opinion was wrong. When asked why his opinion was wrong, she resorted to name calling.

It's called Ad Hominem; which means attacking a person instead of a persons argument.

It's like saying "You're opinion is wrong because you are a twat", instead of saying "You're opinion is wrong because the basis of your opinion is not based on fact".

You will find that in general most, if not all, feminists opinions on men are ad hominem.

[–]UselessDavide1 point2 points  (11 children) | Copy

Yeah I noticed that, but I didn't know it had a name. Good to know

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (10 children) | Copy

It's always useful to have a few logic devices memorized (and understand them) when debating with feminists, as they usually lack these mental tools, and so their argument is easily refuted if you know how to translate their arguments into propositional logic eg:

MODUS PONENS (when the argument is sound).
P -> Q
Therefore, Q

MODUS TOLLENS (When the argument is unsound):
P -> Q
Not P
Therefore, not Q

AD HOMINEM (attacking the person, instead of the persons argument):
Q is unsound because person X is Y

DILEMMA (either one of the other):
P or Q
Not P
Therefore, Q

A -> B -> C
Therefore, A -> C

Birds lay eggs -> An eagle is a bird -> Therefore, Eagles are birds.

There's plenty more. I would suggest researching propositional logic (I've read 3 books on the subject).

[–]UselessDavide1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy

Damn ok. I'll happily take your advice. No wonder you are using all those technical terms

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (8 children) | Copy

Most happy to have introduced another brother to logic.

Quite simply: it ends the argument with most feminists, as facts do not care about feelings, and the same goes for logic.

The only consequence is that when you provide a feminist with logic that proves their argument false, they usually respond with calling you any number of names eg:

i) Sexist.
ii) Misogynist.
iii) Racist.
iv) Rapist.
v) Rape apologist.

And the ever popular weapon in every feminists arsenal:

vi) Nazi.

I've been called all of the above, in various combinations, by feminists when i've proven their argument invalid. If I may give a particular tip: when anything female related comes up, such as abortion, most feminists will simply respond with "no uterus, no opinion". I usually respond by pointing out that the presence of a bodily organ does not make an argument valid, it's valid due to the antecedent and consequent eg:

P -> Q
Therefore, Q

By stating "no uterus, no opinion" they are implying that the logic would be:

P -> Q only IF person X has organ Y

This is a misuse of logic... and at this point you'll be called any one of the above names.

They are exceedingly predictable in their thinking.

[–]UselessDavide2 points3 points  (7 children) | Copy

Yeah tell me about it. Also apparently when provided with facts logics and statistics, they deny everything and tell us the "correct" statement, mainly based on feelings and some stupid thinking

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy

You are spot on. They are now claiming that Mathematics is sexist.

Not the culture around Mathematics, or Universities teaching Mathematics, or books on Mathematics, or the historical impact of Mathematics on civilisation.

No, they are claiming that Mathematics ITSELF is sexist for example: 1 + 1 = 2.

Yes, 1 + 1 = 2 is now sexist.

Completely devoid of logic.

[–]UselessDavide1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy

Oh my God come on this can't be fucking true. Where is society going to end up

[–]Fried-Penguin2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

Male privelege be like

1: A woman has the legal power to steal a man's sperm and sue him for child support.

2: or rape a man or underaged man and sue him for child support.

3: can abort a fetus or give a child up for adoption without telling the father.

4: can say that any man is the legal father and forcing him to to legal responsibility for them.

5: can sue a sperm donor for child support.

6: having the power to opt out of parenthood.

7: actually having reproductive rights.

8: society believe that only women can be victims of domestic abuse despite evidence to the contrary.

9: having the access to abuse shelters even though women account for 40% of domestic abuse Other source

10: not having people to assume you did something to deserve it if you're a victim of domestic abuse

11: not being laughed at if being a victim of domestic violence

12: same with being a victim of rape.

13: 3x as likely of being a victim of homicide.

14: 75% of the homeless are men.

15: 80% of suicides

16: 5x more likely to be a victim of a hate crime if you are homosexual (Go to sexual orientation section)

17: 13 times more likely to die in work.

18: having the health issues that affect you getting disproportionately more funding for (e.g. Breast cancer got 2.3 times more funding than prostate cancer.)

19: its illegal for the female genitalia to be mutilated when you're a baby.

20: paying more income tax.

21: paying more for car insurance

22: having to sign saying you will go to war when asked, just to get car insurance or a house

23: being concidered disposable and being expected to be able to sacrifice yourself for the sake of somebody else because of their gender.

24: it's OK to hit a man, but not a woman, even if they hit the man first.

25: women can get men banned from college campuses just because of the way he looks.

26: a woman can ruin a man's life just by accusing him of rape, while getting away, free of charge.

27: not being ashamed by asking for help of any kind.

28: not having the kids get taken from you in a biased family court.

29: less likely to die from child maltreatment.

30: less likely to be a victim of infanticide.

31: more likely to get adopted.

32: it being socially unacceptable to fat shame you, but men can be ashamed for being short or bald.

33: having scholarships exclusive to your gender.

34: making a false rape accusation at Little risk you yourself.

35: more lenient sentences for equivalent crimes Another source Another source

36: having lower standards to live up to.

37: women who put themselves infront of their kids are empowered but men who do it are losers who can't support their family.

38: women get sympathy, men are told to "man up".

39: employment rate for men had been going down since 1956

40: men make up the majority of people laid off during economic downturns.

41: nobody cares when gender biased discrimination happens to men.

42: not being assumed as a pedophile if she work with kids.

43: not being expected to pay for anything when you go on a date.

44: less likely to suffer from mental disorders. Another source

45: Attempts to raise concerns for men's issues are concidered misygonistic. Any source even needed?

[–]UselessDavide1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

I see someone saw dr shaym's videos huh? Yeah I did too. This list will be handy in the future.

[–]Fried-Penguin2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

The text version. Couldn't find all the articles he shows so I found my own.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter