Well done for leaving the feminst cult, and all your other achievements

Reddit View
July 15, 2020
post image

Post Information
Title Well done for leaving the feminst cult, and all your other achievements
Author mhandanna
Upvotes 843
Comments 90
Date 15 July 2020 01:36 AM UTC (10 months ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/713433
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/hrej7a/well_done_for_leaving_the_feminst_cult_and_all/
Similar Posts

[–][deleted]  (18 children) | Copy


[–]TSM_Cracker43 points44 points  (1 child) | Copy

“Left feminism and embraced femininity” love the way that’s put. Really sums up the way it should be

[–]Pro_Male_Vanguard3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Last time I've checked, Anita Sarkeesian was pretty feminine in her appearance and behaviour.

[–]tw1nm3t30r47 points48 points  (0 children) | Copy

Excellent! There is hope in the world after all 😊

[–]vicsj7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

I will say though that you don't need to be super feminine to be against feminism - your friendly neighborhood MRA tomboy lol

[–]mhandanna[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Oh absolutely, we should be free to be as we please... hence most of us here are anti feminists, feminism does not allow that

[–]Neveah_Hope_Dreams4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy


I'm glad shes changed her view of the world to a more optimistic way and is leading healthy habits. All part of leaving feminism.

[–]BupSpoi5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

NGL, the hedgehog look is kinda cute, though, I'm sure she would have hatred being called "cute" when that photo was taken.

[–]MingSushi3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy

I remember leaving feminism and focusing on my femininity, it was so relieving that I could finally be free of it. I’m a hopeless romantic and love the idea of being a housewife one day but feminists didn’t like that. Whenever I brought it up they’d treat me like a wounded puppy, a misguided little kid or I’d get the famous “What about your career?” question. Whenever I watched girl power tv shows, I always notice how they discouraged femininity in girls; they’d mock relationships, make the highly feminine character the villain, make fun of girls who liked to put effort into their appearance and mocked girly activities and would always make the heroes butch, very aggressive, cynical, rude or lesbians (Because in feminist land being a lesbian is the most “empowering” thing a woman can do and be).

[–]mhandanna[S] 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

Erin Pizzey, the pioneering woman who once was a feminist until she broke out of the cult said how viciously detested women who wanted to have chidlren were (not stay at home to look after kids, i mean HAVE children), how they viewed being with a man as sleeping with the enemy etc.


Given women and men the complete choice of wehther to pursue a career, stay at home, do what they want is fantastic... however that isn't feminism... feminism is literally forcing women into a role... they even devalue and make worthless careers such as teaching, healthcare etc and call it low value low status work, they call being a good human "emotional labour" and they have completely downgraded being a homemaker, a very highly skilled and pivitoal role.... its fucking unreal as well and dumb, they completely downgrade looking after kids, but at same time want men to do more childcare? Huhh?

The movement is just fucked. A cult idealogy

[–]MingSushi2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Or how Rockerfeller funded feminism to get women out of the house and into the workforce to get women to spend more money


[–]mhandanna[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah tonnes of examples of that, supporting ms magazine etc, feminists have been played like fools at times, and in others played people like fools. Cigarette companies using feminism to get more women to smoke, (failing) to use feminism to get women to buy diamonds for men, or for their other hand.

A lot of the support at the global level for feminism is to get women to pay more tax (e.g. women in UK pay 27% of the annual income tax), women to spend more money, increase work supply, depress wages etc

The sister of one of the most important feminist ever reveals all: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/hovc1c/the_sister_of_the_iconic_and_pioneering_feminst_k/

[–]wolfreturned17 points18 points  (66 children) | Copy

Can’t reverse your body count

[–]hatefulreason25 points26 points  (0 children) | Copy

also can't jump back over the wall :)

[–]sanrio-sugarplum10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy

Why is body count talked about so much in relation to frminism? I feel like a decent percentage of feminists are femcels. Even when I was a radical feminist I was never into hookup culture

[–]TiredExFeminist2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Because this dude can't get any at all so when a woman is more experienced than him he feels he needs to use bullshit to sound more intelligent than her to make up for his obvious deficiencies in the bedroom.

[–]eldredge_ape12 points13 points  (61 children) | Copy

So long as her body count (whatever number that may be) isn’t high enough to make pair bonding impossible for her, I think she’ll be alright. I just hope she’s not still hanging in or around the same circles that rooted her in her former tumblrina phase because she could change back in a heartbeat otherwise.

[–]bsutansalt1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

That number is far lower than most people think. just having two former sexual partners lowers women's long-term relationship chances of succeeding down to about 50%.

[–]TaunTaun_223 points4 points  (59 children) | Copy

How would a high body count make pairing with someone difficult at a different time?

[–]pinkeythehoboken223 points4 points  (8 children) | Copy

Because they're insecure. It doesn't make a difference if you don't give a shit And love each other. But if you're a man-baby it's different bc you want your "unsoiled virgin flower"

[–]eldredge_ape0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy

That’s an erroneous way of viewing the situation. Given the number of “Where Are All The Good Men”/“Why Can’t I Find a Man Worthy of Me” themed articles and talk show segments out there, I’d say it’s not men who are the insecure ones. Like it or not, a low body count matters to a lot of men when seeking a long-term romantic partner, primarily for evolutionary psychology reasons referenced above but also because of the simple fact that women can essentially have sex whenever they want to with little effort involved. Men have never and will never be able to get sex as easily as a woman can, so a woman with a low or nonexistent body count will of course be seen as more pure than one who’s been with double digit men. Shaming and name-calling are poor counters to logic.

[–]pinkeythehoboken220 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Lol, "logic." More like insecurity.

[–]pinkeythehoboken220 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy

The only one who gives a "body count" any value, is you. It's no one else's problem, because it doesn't matter.

[–]eldredge_ape1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy

I’m clearly not going to change your mind, nor am I going to get you to, for even the briefest of moments, re-examine your stance on things. Personally, I care more about whether or not one’s body count has affected her mentality, health, and ability to navigate monogamous relationships than I do about the number itself, but I understand why some might care and I advocate for those people against the ones who would rather throw labels, logical fallacies, and shame at them rather than listen to their concerns. Coming back with “Insecurity LOL”, regardless of how you feel about what I’ve said, is no more logically sound, and if a great deal of people weren’t already willing to write it off as such, you’d be no more able to convince others of your stance than I was able to convince you.

[–]pinkeythehoboken220 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

You're just performing mental gymnastics and being pedantic so you think you have a point. I'm telling you you don't.

So, we'll agree to disagree. I don't care about changing your mind, even though I used to think like you. That's why you won't change mine.

[–]eldredge_ape1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

I’m curious then, if you don’t mind me asking: What changed your mind?

[–]pinkeythehoboken221 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Realizing that the only person body count mattered to, was myself.

It's like words, that number only has power when you give it power. But if you meet someone who loves you for you, and makes your feel like the most important person to them, why does it matter how many partners they've had? Short answer, it doesn't. A person's "body count" doesn't define how their mental process works. Some people figure out love in different ways at different speeds, but what matter is the person, not how many people they've slept with.

Just because they've had more than one partner doesn't mean you're not the best they've had. Or that they're incapable of being in a monogamous relationship.

I nearly killed a relationship with a girl who loved me dearly, and treated me like the most important person to her, because I was immature and couldn't get over the fact that she had been with one more person than I had before we got together. But the fact of the matter was, those guys meant nothing to her because she had me now, and I was just too blinded by my own insecurity to see it.

The fact is, if she's with you, it's because you chose eachother, and it doesn't matter how many partners she's had, unless you let it matter.

Also, experience is a really great thing in the bedroom.

PS sorry I was being a dick, I thought you were being one of those "bEcKY FucKs ChAd & TYroNe" dudes.

[–]Mewster18189 points10 points  (48 children) | Copy

Studies show that particularly women who have had multiple sexual partners have a harder time feeling satisfied and happy in relationships. I wish I had a link to the study, but it did show reduced positive outcomes for women(the higher the "body count" the worse off the outcome in pair bonding usually.)

I don't really think it's surprising, biologically there is no good reason for a woman to be promiscuous, in fact the only reason it's common now is the feminist lie that "men and women are the same".

[–]TaunTaun_225 points6 points  (47 children) | Copy

Does this apply to men as well? Not asking for a "wHaT aBoUt MeN" way, more like curious about myself and others. I used to have a bit of fun in the early college days

[–]Mewster18182 points3 points  (45 children) | Copy

Nope. Men are biologically inclined to "spread their seed" as much as possible, while it's always been more advantageous for women to get commitment and a dedicated partner rather than lots of partners.

[–]seajayde-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy

Men who fuck women, get them pregnant and fuck off are perfectly fine. But how dare a woman have 1 or more partners before being in a long term relationship!

[–]Mewster18187 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

I'm just talking about the research that shows declining happiness in women who have a lot of sexual partners. Which from a biological standpoint makes sense as sex is a much riskier activity for women than it is for men. It makes sense that most women are less fulfilled with lots of sexual partners versus very committed partners.

I'm not condoning men who do what you said. I'm just pointing out the reality that the child is a burden for the mother, less so for the father, if they are not in a committed relationship. Men are not as naturally inclined to need commitment as a condition for their happiness and fulfillment.

[–]pinkeythehoboken22-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Right? What man children. Women like sex too, there's nothing wrong with that.

[–]pinkeythehoboken22-3 points-2 points  (41 children) | Copy

How convenient.

[–]Mewster18181 point2 points  (40 children) | Copy

I'm not sure I follow?

When we're talking about biology you have to remember that for the vast majority of human evolution and history birth control was not available, so there was no advantage for a woman to be promiscuous, meanwhile there is no real issue for men being promiscuous as they're not going to get pregnant and have a child that physically depends on them for years. It's not crazy to see how that would have affected men and women to have different sexual needs.

[–]pinkeythehoboken22-1 points0 points  (39 children) | Copy

Well for the last 100+ years birth control HAS been available. Shit changes.

[–]Mewster18182 points3 points  (38 children) | Copy

Yes, but human evolution takes longer than that to change. Which is the theory behind the declining mental health and happiness reported by women, especially among those with high numbers of sexual partners.

I'm not saying there aren't women who are 100% fine with it, but those people are the outliers. The majority of women are less happy when they have lot of sexual partners, whereas there is no impact in happiness for men.

Also you don't have to have a lot of partners to have a lot of sex, you only need one person. So I don't know why people equate this to "women don't like sex" arguments...

*also birth control pills weren't widely available til the mid-60s and birth control options before then were not great nor widely available/in-use( that's not 100+ years)

[–]renrubwej-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

See my reply above. From personal experience, I would say yes.

[–]renrubwej0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I’m a male with a high count. It took me a long time to bond with my wife. Better part of a year. And she’s a keeper by all measures. Beautiful, one partner before me, smart, submissive. It should have been very easy, but it wasn’t. Took a lot of prayers and time.

[–]baneyney074 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Maybe you can reverse your wack reading comprehension? Nowhere did it mention a body count

[–]UltimaterializerX2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

If the pic on the left had long hair, that would have been the cuter one. Not even gonna front.

That said, these leftist ideologies are all aligned with destructive behavior. She did well to leave the cult.

[–][deleted]  (5 children) | Copy


[–]qemist57 points58 points  (3 children) | Copy

Could be same person?

[–]Veivampire198 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

Hmm I wonder XD

[–]El_Maltos_Username0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I thought they get replaced.

[–]Earth_is_dirt0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

There is no mistaking that head shape.

[–]baneyney076 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

You don't say....

[–]Whippyice1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

GG WP welcome back.

[–]EarthDustGaming0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Great job!

[–]CoolGuySauron0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I though it was Elsa Jean.

[–]FauzanZaenuri0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy


[–]Inevitable-10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

It sounds to me like they traded one cult (feminism) for another (christianity). Weak minds often waffle from one bad influence to another.

[–]TiredExFeminist0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

When someone kicks you in the teeth for being like this I truly hope it's recorded.

[–]HrCx130 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

There are so many women who are against feminism. Feminism may have been necessary in the suffragette era but now it’s just hateful and divisive. Good on her for waking up to the bullshit.

[–]ONEFRYBOI20 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Is her before picture better or is it just me

[–]RedTheCat11 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

not a fan of her Dolph Lundgren haircut

[–]X___III___X-5 points-4 points  (4 children) | Copy

Ain't falling into the bullshit of these fake converts.

This is a standard operating procedure for feminishits / SJW scum / modern independent wahmen - she did all the crazy shit, screwed her body with drugs, fucked numbers of chads & tylers, got the 1000 cock stare and eventually realized she had hit the wall; and then after all this shit, she found her dumb beta cuck to leech on to.

[–]pinkeythehoboken220 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

So, no girlfriend, huh?

[–]EpicKiwi2250 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Bruh, who hurt you

[–]X___III___X0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

lol, I didn't knew antifeminists were this level of naive.

[–]empatheticapathetic0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

It’s a non religious version of a ‘born again virgin’

[–]Pro_Male_Vanguard-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Unless she starts speaking on the issues men face and spreading awareness, her "non-feminist" status doesn't concern me one bit. I am sick & tired of complacent people.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter