Hello, my first post. You have a good sub going here and I see a lot of red pill truths in the advice which is dispensed. As all red pill aware people know, the sexual marketplace has changed a lot in recent years. We know there are many factors which have contributed to this; internet dating, third wave feminism, family court rulings and a very "progressive" main stream media. This leaves the traditional model of a loving, secure and healthy relationship a very difficult thing for either sex to achieve. For men it is difficult to find an attractive, nurturing, good girl with a low n-count, for women it is difficult to find an attractive, high status leader. Everyone has different priorities but for me, in order of importance, I will list what makes me think a woman is suitable for an exclusive LTR. Excuse the length, I am verbose and I try to be thorough.

  1. Appearance. This is a red pill sub so we accept the truth. Men are overwhelmingly visual and appearance ALWAYS comes first. Unless you have close to maxxed out your appearance, you are doing yourself a disservice. Men will definitely date down, in fact I would say that a man who does not date down is setting himself up for failure. Hypergamy is a natural evolutionary trait which prevents species from producing weak and inferior offspring. Women have a much easier time of dating up than men do. So it is very possible that you can secure an 8 or a 9 if you are a 7, however to us, your SMV is almost entirely down to your appearance. Once we get to know you, we can then add or subtract points from your SMV to determine your RMV. Different people look for different things but I think the list I will put down is pretty solid for the majority of men.
  2. N-count. This is probably the most important thing for a man when looking for an SO. For us this is as primal and genetic as hypergamy is for a woman. A high n-count is very unattractive and kind of repulsive. I know this is not fair, nature is not fair. It is based on evo-psych principles. We do not want to be cucked, we do not (at a subconscious genetic level) want to commit resources and emotional investment into someone who may cheat and end up raising another man's DNA. So if you do not have a high n-count, good girl, you are wise and virtuous. If you do, well you have been lied to by society, but you have to be realistic and understand this lowers you RMV. Be honest when you assess your RMV, you get to add a point or two for your partner, we do not so be realistic. Lying too much (we all lie a bit) about your n-count is a perilous road. Deep down we know, we can tell, so do not say 5 if it 15).
  3. Nurturing. SJWs and unattractive angry wimmin would have you believe that any guy who loves to be fussed over and nurtured is looking for a mother and wants a domestic slave. Utter horseshit. Maybe it is Freudian and we want someone who treats us the way our mothers did (or should have). Who cares, it is a fact that most men like someone else to do the domestic duties. In second and third world cultures no one even questions this. It is accepted as normal, in Sudan women mock any man who tries to cook as unmasculine, they even sing songs about how he will be so incompetent that he will burn his cock in the cooking fire. When my girl keeps a clean house, is loving and attentive to the children, is demure and feminine in her general conduct and interactions with others, when she does little things for me like get up and grab drinks or seconds for me, I love her more than ever and feel that I am with the right person. While I am slaving away making the best income I can, and doing the dirty and heavy work, I love to know that those other domestic duties which I loathe, are being well taken care of. Studies in feminist cuck countries like Iceland and Norway have already shown that the more shared domestic duties are, the higher the chance of dead bedroom, unhappiness and divorce. Being nurturing, domestically skilled and feminine appeals to our ego, our laziness, our desire for order, and our need for a warm and loving mother for our offspring.
  4. Femininty. As the great Pook said. Masculinity is attracted to femininty. It is as natural and primal as the weather. Wikipedia (which has been doctored and rigged to support "progressive" agendas) lists the following traits as traditionally feminine: gentleness, empathy, sensitivity, caring, sweetness, compassion, tolerance, nurturance and deferance as being feminine traits. We like our SO to be a natural with these things. We all want a caring, supportive, nurturing and and sweet partner. You want a stoic, strong, bold, protective provider. This is nature's way and it is only the red pill subs who tell the truth about these issues in western countires. Trashy click bait all over the internet talks about "strong independent wimmin", they show ridiculous characters in movies who are basically women playing men's roles (has anybody seen the latest star wars movies, give me a break). Men do not want women who act like men, they want women to be themselves. Why can't hollywood celebrate feminine women like a loving grandmother who is the beloved matriarch of her family, a mother who puts her children's needs first, a nurse whose tenderness and empathy brings peace to those who are suffering. I feel very sorry for western women, they are force fed lies from the moment they are born. Be strong, have a career, enjoy the bad boys before you settle down, be independent, they are basically indoctrinated into becoming cogs in the system and learning to behave like a man. These instructions are all venomous lies. Women are the primary victims of this degenerate unnatural agenda and it is a terrible thing to behold.

So there is my view. I realise this is old news to the more experienced subscribers here, but I have tried to spell it out from a man's point of view.

TL:DR - Alpha men are most drawn to women who are: attractive, have a low n-count, and who are nurturing and feminine.