We've all heard it. The rationalization hamster running a full speed to keep any feminine responsibility at bay while attaining all the benefits. Many of us have even heard this from our mothers and grandmothers (even from the traditional era now long past). No woman will admit that she "needs her man" for anything, but they will all shout to the heavens that they desire a man and "won't settle for less because they know their worth". But what does this actually mean and why do women behave this way?

To understand, we must look at what women get in a relationship with a man in this day and age. What are they seeking and how are men responding to them.

Please review "The Weakened Signal by our brother, u/Aldabruzzo.

In essence, women are not sending marriage-minded signals to men. They aren't requiring men to be good husbands and so men are responding by being good fuckbuddies.

Since women can get jobs, vote and do basically anything men can do, they think that they are already their own husband. They realistically don't NEED a man and their dating profiles (or capitulating FDS 'wedding ring' threads) reveal that they are perfectly happy doing their own thing and it would just be nice if that perfect man entered their lives because they shared like-minded goals.

However, the big problem with all of this is that by not "needing" a man, those men are not triggered to protecting and providing for them. And by avoiding this masculine role in the men they seek, they are also losing the traits in a man that keeps him locked-and-loved to the hilt over her. Eventually both partners get bored because the woman is "[independent](/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen/comments/kk6sea/where_is_that_high_level_man_for_this_independent/" and can just up and leave the relationship when tingles start flowing in another direction. The mans 'services' are no longer needed and she seeks someone else or initiates sex less and less, not out of lack of qualifications or that he isn't a good man all women say they all want, but because there is no necessity arising out of the relationship for her to compromise and suck a mean dick. She wants to be taken care of, but does not want to reciprocate that cost and effort she requires from men.

Since women are the sexual selectors and the gatekeepers of sex, then they need to provide sex in order for men to provide commitment. But if they truly don't need commitment (because socialism and the welfare state), then they are free to provide whatever value they want in the relationship and that is constantly in flux with the feelings she has or reciprocating benefit she realizes. This is the primary reason why women chase tingles and have sex with hot, attractive bad boys. They are attempting to exchange their sex for commitment but men aren't being signaled to be good candidates for those roles and those slutty women can't maintain their own role well enough as they get bored or disinterested in providing quality sex to stable, boring good man anyways. There are also no repercussions to her denying her added-value in the relationship so there is no incentive for her to fulfill traditional roles and there is no incentive for men to cherish and take care of a woman when there are plenty of bangable sluts at their disposal thanks to the normalization of promiscuity and sexual immorality.

So believe all women when they say, "I don't need a man". They really mean it! They really want it to be that way, to only want partner like a man does. But they aren't men and they aren't fulfilling male roles, so there is no sense in mimicking male benefits. By not needing a man, they remove most of the desire a man has to protect and provide for them, which then begs the question "If they don't need a man, then why do they still require men to protect and provide for them?" and that's a post for another day.

Thanks for reading and God bless!