In this post I'd like to open up discussion about a flaw I've noticed in Red Pill theory.
It is a well accepted truth that, in the current marketplace, 80% of sex goes to the top 20% of men. This trend is an insult to men as a whole, and in the interest of solidarity, we need to find and promote a system that benefits all men instead of just a few. I'd like to stress that it's mathematically impossible for all men to be in the top 20%.
Red Pill doesn't accomplish this yet. Despite being marketed as a philosophy for the masses, it still forces men to compete within the confines of the injust Pareto principle.
A society that practices marriage corrects these injustices by providing a one-to-one mate for every man and woman. But this comes with several well known downsides, and it's unlikely marriage will make a comeback in the West.
So Reddit, are most men really doomed to sexual frustration, OR are there any systems around which the common man can rally to correct this one-sided marketplace?
[–]Never-quitting2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Red-Jester-[S] -2 points-1 points0 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Never-quitting3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Red-Jester-[S] -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Never-quitting2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Red-Jester-[S] -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]blackedoutfast1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Red-Jester-[S] -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]blackedoutfast4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Red-Jester-[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Red-Jester-[S] -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SmoothBeliever0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link