Man, this book seemed like an oscillation between hardcore fundamental red pill philosophy and uncharacteristic "beta" advice.

Now, all in all, I thought this book was fantastic. Seems to be geared more towards LTR advice, and as college student in his early 20s, I feel like much of this is not applicable in my life. I enjoyed the theme of masculine and feminine energy and found it very eye opening. However many lines in the book seem a bit out of place.

Praise specific things you love about your woman 5 to 10 times a day.

How many women you have sex with is your business. Before you consider more than one, however, it is best to prove your capacity with one. If you can't handle one-if deep communion, rejuvenating passion, and spiritual happiness are not the main features of your present intimacy-then you have not passed the test, and it is best to discipline your desire for other partners, since nobody is likely to be served.

When she does not feel full of love, she seeks to fill herself with ice cream, chocolate, or conversation, rather than empty her stress through TV or ejaculation, as men often do.

There are entire chapters dedicated to never ejaculating, because you rob your woman of a completely spiritual, amazing sexual experience. He also seems to completely ignore the notion that women tend to cheat.

Now, I think 90% of this book is gold, and am glad to have it read it, and will probably read it again one day. However I am interested in peoples opinions about it on here, and how much of it can be thrown out in today's world, as it was written over 20 years ago.