~ archived since 2018 ~

I think a lot of things said to be evolutionary in blackpill scenes, are in fact social engineering

November 6, 2022
4 upvotes

for example ''women liking violent or thuggish men''

i think this is false because for one, the whole ''thuglife'' thing was literally a cia psyop to make blacks more prone to crime and have a weaker community: https://lulz.com/cia-agent-admits-agency-created-gangster-rap-otpflktp-271836/

second, if this was natural, what purpose would it serve? a psychopathic or thuggish guy would probbaly be a danger to the female and her offsprings, evolution is about survival above all else.

you could say maybe, men more prone to violence would protect her from dangers, sure but i don't think that archetype is the thug/bad boy, it's the strong looking hardworking worker male type.

and there are also studies suggesting exposure to something could make you ''like'' or ''get'' desentisized to that thing more, exposure, media and social engineering altering perspections is also a thing that has evolutionary reason.

in short, people like whatever media tells them is the cool thing, both men and women.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/AllPillDebate.

/r/AllPillDebate archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title I think a lot of things said to be evolutionary in blackpill scenes, are in fact social engineering
Author kokorwqac
Upvotes 4
Comments 22
Date November 6, 2022 10:44 AM UTC (3 weeks ago)
Subreddit /r/AllPillDebate
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/AllPillDebate/i-think-a-lot-of-things-said-to-be-evolutionary-in.1139481
https://theredarchive.com/post/1139481
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/AllPillDebate/comments/ynms82/i_think_a_lot_of_things_said_to_be_evolutionary/
Red Pill terms in post
Comments

[–]SmarmyPapsmears 2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't really take blackpill to see that dark triad traits make men sexually successful

[–]kokorwqac[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

and i'm saying dark triad is socially engineerd trend, rather than an organic one, doesn't change my point

[–]SmarmyPapsmears 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

"Nice guys finish last" I've heard my entire life. This isn't a trend my dude lol

[–]kokorwqac[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Your life is a short time period, im talking about it being socially engineered since urbamization.

[–]no_bling_just_dingWhitePill (self aware MSTOW) 1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

second, if this was natural, what purpose would it serve? a psychopathic or thuggish guy would probbaly be a danger to the female and her offsprings, evolution is about survival above all else.

the same reason some people might like to own nukes even though said nuke would be a danger to everyone including its owner. it's "exciting", and if (in her own fantasy) she 'domesticates' the thug then she really feels powerful. from another perspective, those personages tend to thrive in environments where everyone is more or less expecting to die young no matter what. like, say, a lawless city.

[–]kokorwqac[S] 1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

and i'm saying this is a socially engineered preference to be widespread, did you read my link where it tells gangster rap and hip-hop were literally invented by CIA?

[–]no_bling_just_dingWhitePill (self aware MSTOW) -1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

yes

though heres my question: how do you explain that serial killers and other people who are unambiguously condemned by society have female fans

[–]kokorwqac[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

A vocal minority + society still promotes bad boy behaviour+ feminism made a lot of the ''good guy'' ones beta.

[–]no_bling_just_dingWhitePill (self aware MSTOW) -1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

so how come the beta guys arent socially engineered to be desirable

[–]Best_Illustrator_137 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I think it ties into both biological and societal..biologically females might look for a guy they view as someone who can handle other men if the situation arises, they pick it either consciously or subconsciously..second is definitely societal because the “thug” type has been glorified in media and especially in the black community other things like a straight laced dude is considered “square” “corny” or “boring.” They’ve been glorified as money makers and some women have the “I can fix him” mentality that was sold to them at some point in some media somewhere. It’s a multi layered issue that takes many forms including the media conglomerates using media to influence things and the public.

[–]kokorwqac[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed.

[–]FastBananaViral 0 points1 point  (17 children) | Copy Link

It serves an evolutionary advantage because it would be better for a female to comply with an asshole than resist.

Females do like dark triad traits otherwise governments wouldn’t spend billions of dollars combatting domestic violence. If females didn’t like assholes that money could be spent on something more worthwhile

[–]kokorwqac[S] 0 points1 point  (16 children) | Copy Link

And i'm saying that preference is socially engineered.

[–]FastBananaViral 0 points1 point  (15 children) | Copy Link

I disagree, I think it’s inherent in females

[–]kokorwqac[S] 0 points1 point  (13 children) | Copy Link

You say this but literally cia invented gangster rap: https://lulz.com/cia-agent-admits-agency-created-gangster-rap-otpflktp-271836/

Do you have any proof this isn't a recent invention made in urbanization times? And inherent, i'm waitibg for an argument.

[–]FastBananaViral 0 points1 point  (12 children) | Copy Link

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273809664_The_Dark_Triad_personality_Attractiveness_to_women

Evolutionary psychology may be able to explain this phenomenon. Women evolved to be dependent and choosy due to their greater parental investment. This caused men to evolve to be taller and stronger in an evolutionary arms race competing for mating opportunities. In response to this, women are thought to have evolved to choose the strongest and most dominant man available to be protected from men attempting to coerce them into sex, male violence in general (bodyguard hypothesis; Wilson & Mesnick, 1997) and to get access to high-quality foods and resources (Geary 2004). This aspect of human sexuality can be traced back to some of our oldest ancestor species, e.g. lizards, in which female animals submit themselves to dominant males (Irenäus Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1989). Dark traits such as low empathy and cruelty may have proven useful in male intrasexual competition (Kruger & Fitzgerald 2011), so these traits and women's attraction to them might have co-evolved as a socially parasitic reproductive strategy (Gervais 2018).

[–]KirthWGersen 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

That link about the CIA and gangster rap looks so plausible.

[–]De_Carabas_of_Below 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Jeez KK, you still pushing this nonsense?

[–]kokorwqac[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

muh biology

is CIA pushing something being proven not at least somewhat suspicious to you?

[–]De_Carabas_of_Below 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

LOL.

Girl finds random [dubious] fact and thinks it applies to the whole of history and is somehow connected to evolutionary psychology.

It doesn't. It isn't.

Do some research. Look at the Marquis de Sade. Don Juan, Cassanova, Errol Flynn, etc etc. I've referred to beatlemania before too. The dark triad is attractive to women, because it indicates a man who is going to be able to look after them.

Women are genetically programmed to find that attractive.

[–]kokorwqac[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Womanizer=/=dark triad

[–]caption291 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

second, if this was natural, what purpose would it serve? a psychopathic or thuggish guy would probbaly be a danger to the female and her offsprings, evolution is about survival above all else.

Evolution is about survival...but it's not about our survival. It's about the survival of our genes. I think a good example of why it's definitely not about our survival would be the many species where an animal willingly dies in order to reproduce or improve the chances that it's offspring will reproduce.

Anyways, let's cover the many reasons why a woman could benefit from a relationship with a violent man.

  1. if a woman can control a violent man, she has similar benefits to what the man has for being violent trough controlling him.(i.e she can use him to intimidate others to get her way, or maybe if he steals something he will share it with her etc...)

2.Making a violent man angry is obviously dangerous so, there's an incentive for women to want to comply with what violent men want.

3.(and this is the most important one). Whatever benefit violent men get for themselves, are potential benefits for her kids if they inherit those traits.

Very late reply because I'm clearing out tabs I hadn't closed.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2022. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter