~ archived since 2018 ~

Maybe women just aren't into romantic hetero relationships as much as before?

February 22, 2023
5 upvotes

I offer you the case of this woman's life (no brigading, please) as an example of what's going on out there.

It used to be that women needed men because relationships were their means of survival. Now that women can survive on their own economically, relationships are no longer as important to them. And it has laid bare an earth-shattering truth: marriage isn't all that important to women as the world deluded itself into thinking it was. Neither are romantic relationships.

Some guys want to fix this by stripping women of rights and making them dependent on men again. But this doesn't make women want men - it only makes women want the resources men would have that keep them from dying homeless. It's no wonder so many men got stripped of their resources in divorce court. Do we really want to go back to that?

We will have to accept the fact that women's rights means less women who want the romantic company of men. Because these kinds of women never wanted the romantic company of men in the first place.

I mean who wants to be with a woman who only loves you for the resources you can provide? Let them go and look for the unfortunately shrinking number of women who want romantic companionship. Better to live in acceptance of the truth than one day be burned by the lies, right?

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/AllPillDebate.

/r/AllPillDebate archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Maybe women just aren't into romantic hetero relationships as much as before?
Author RatDontPanic
Upvotes 5
Comments 14
Date February 22, 2023 4:54 AM UTC (1 month ago)
Subreddit /r/AllPillDebate
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/AllPillDebate/maybe-women-just-arent-into-romantic-hetero.1153796
https://theredarchive.com/post/1153796
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/AllPillDebate/comments/118pcci/maybe_women_just_arent_into_romantic_hetero/
Comments

[–]Opening_Pattern_301GloriousPill 4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

It never was in the past neither, only a few truly got the true love of a woman, yes they still depended economically from them but money wasnt the main reason they started relationship with those men, menawhile the others had to buy attraction and the most they got was a woman that couldnt stand them but had no choice than to stick with them, nowadays somewomen still start relationships out of convenience mostly out of ego and validation, but you as man should never leverage your economical position, status, material possesions and any other superficial trait to attract a woman, that aint true attraction at it never was, if you actually gonna do that then you re better off paying you already know who.

A woman who needs you because of your money or status doesnt loves you, she just finds you useful for a while, dont call that romantic companionship because that aint.

Anyways it should open your eyes that in the current era where women dont need men for their survival, of all of then men they flock towards is the so called bad boys, they cry over them and fight over them even though they dont need men, why? And dont get confused, what make those men attractive isnt that they are bad, so think about it, those women who only dated men because they needed them were never attracted to them in first place.

[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump[S] 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

but you as man should never leverage your economical position, status, material possesions and any other superficial trait to attract a woman, that aint true attraction at it never was, if you actually gonna do that then you re better off paying you already know who.

So true. More men need to understand this.

Anyways it should open your eyes that in the current era where women dont need men for their survival, of all of then men they flock towards is the so called bad boys, they cry over them and fight over them even though they dont need men, why?

Who knows, I avoid women like that. I'd rather be alone than put up with that.

[–]Opening_Pattern_301GloriousPill 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

the point is those never were romantic relationships, they were just convenience relationships.

[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

And no one in their right mind wants a convenience relationship.

[–]puririnpa 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

bad boys honestly seem a bit like cope, it's more ''high status'' they desire than bad or good

[–]Scooby-Doo14 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sounds legit

[–]Grapestheanswer 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

It's no wonder so many men got stripped of their resources in divorce court

It was like 4% divorce rate

[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Is this before or after divorce was legalized?

[–]Grapestheanswer 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Before no fault?

[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Get rid of no fault divorce, say hello to more dead bedrooms and cheating, or just dead bedrooms... there is no happy ending down that road.

[–]Grapestheanswer 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hookers and mistresses were all good for guys to avail of, keep the family unit intact.

[–]inkvell981 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

DNR what you wrote, but women definitely are into heterosexual relationships... with chads, that is.

Women have never actually TRULY been into heterosexual relationships with non chads/average Joe's though. Every "relationship" between a woman and a non chad average Joe in history can be accurately be described as nothing more than glorified prostitution. The women are not actually genuinely sexually/physically attracted to their husband's but are willing to fuck them in exchange for their financial stability/resources, because until a 100 years or so ago, women weren't really allowed into the workforce and therefore since there weren't enough rich high status chads to go around for every women, so they had to begrudgingly settle down for some average Joe with a stable income. Unless you can say for sure that all your ancestors were physically attractive, then know that you are descended from women who were never truly, genuinely, physically attracted to their husband's, but were wed to them by their families, and because of financial resources and stability, not actual physical attraction.

The most popular books for women are quite literally about them having a wild sexual relationship and taming a wild bad boy chad. Go look on audible and look up the top books women read. You'll see for yourself it's just books about women get with chads.

[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

The most popular books for women are quite literally about them having a wild sexual relationship and taming a wild bad boy chad. Go look on audible and look up the top books women read. You'll see for yourself it's just books about women get with chads.

LOL don't tell the truth about that too loud, the romance community will get triggered!

[–]no_bling_just_dingrip GD4761 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

women's romance books are an instant blackpill

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter