~ archived since 2018 ~

When it comes to casual flings, women are attracted to men who take risks. (Another reason why casual sex is VERY bad for men.)

RatDontPanic
January 18, 2023
4 upvotes
/r/AllPillDebate
https://www.bustle.com/articles/159136-why-women-are-attracted-to-risk-takers-for-casual-flings

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/AllPillDebate.

/r/AllPillDebate archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title When it comes to casual flings, women are attracted to men who take risks. (Another reason why casual sex is VERY bad for men.)
Author RatDontPanic
Upvotes 4
Comments 22
Date January 18, 2023 4:48 AM UTC (2 months ago)
Subreddit /r/AllPillDebate
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/AllPillDebate/when-it-comes-to-casual-flings-women-are-attracted.1148718
https://theredarchive.com/post/1148718
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/AllPillDebate/comments/10eyczu/when_it_comes_to_casual_flings_women_are/
Top posts by RatDontPanic

Boys can be all these things, too

1871 upvotes
September 10, 2022
/r/MensRights

How much you wanna bet they thought this was hilarious as fuck... until the kid got hurt, too.

459 upvotes
March 3, 2023
/r/PussyPassDenied

Proof that there is no depth to feminist reading comprehension deficiency, paranoia and insanity

380 upvotes
November 11, 2022
/r/MensRights

There is an ongoing thread about women not being able to be charged with rape in the UK

196 upvotes
March 10, 2023
/r/MensRights

Woman collecting child support doesn't want to get a job but she can. Judge says (Unreal Tournament voice) "DENIED!" And wait'll you hear the end part...

119 upvotes
February 26, 2023
/r/PussyPassDenied

Don't just look at the misandry - look at the sheer number of women who upvote it.

78 upvotes
August 16, 2022
/r/EverydayMisandry

Another unhinged feminist subreddit on here is currently implying that this is misogyny.

77 upvotes
November 20, 2022
/r/EverydayMisandry

Women openly and intentionally antagonize men about their height on TikTok, then accuse men of being insecure when they get defensive.

66 upvotes
December 7, 2022
/r/EverydayMisandry
Comments

[–]inkvollien432 9 points10 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

*attracted to chads who take risks

[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump[S] 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Regardless, risks get men unnecessarily killed, thrown in jail, etc.

All that for some sex?

If a woman doesn't like a man who lives his life avoiding unnecessary risks then she's too toxic to be around. Pussy ain't worth all that.

[–]NotARussianBot1984 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Then she has that kind of man's kid from casual sex.

Thus continues the cycle of poverty. Unemployable men get to reproduce, leading to more uncivil men and an over stuffed prison system. Yay modern society!

[–]NotARussianBot1984 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Then she has that kind of man's kid from casual sex.

Thus continues the cycle of poverty. Unemployable men get to reproduce, leading to more uncivil men and an over stuffed prison system. Yay modern society!

[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

No lies detected!

[–]IHateFernales 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Being risky doesn’t mean anything when you get zero matches, the primary way of casual flings now

[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Risk-taking men usually get women in real life, assuming they aren't culled from the herd by their stupidity first.

[–]IHateFernales 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ugly risk taking men end up in prison

[–]hutavan 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Tabloid referencing another tabloid. I can't say I'm convinced. Like the other commenter said: women are attracted to chads who take risks. But I'll add they are also attracted to chads who are responsible/avoid risks. Women have varying tastes, you see, they like all kinds of chads.

[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

You made a really bad argument. Said "tabloid" studies are founded by non-tabloid sources for certain types of risks (but not others).

whereas hunter-gatherer risks were rated as especially attractive when performed by males. Discussion focuses on cultural and evolutionary explanations for the link between risk and attractiveness.

But in the end whether it's unattractive risks like driving without seat belts or hunter-gatherer style risks, it's all a VERY bad deal for men. Pussy is still not worth engaging in that stuff.

[–]hutavan 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Then why didn't you just link the study instead? The tabloid article and the study aren't even talking about the same thing, it's only vaguely related. Is smoking and drinking supposed to be one of the so called "hunter-gatherer risks"? Shouldn't it fall under the other category of "modern" risks (e.g. driving with no seat belt)? Same thing for jumping out of a plane. Is that something hunter-gatherers did? It's not, but the tabloid still argues it's the attractive type of risk.

I didn't actually buy the study lol so maybe you can shed some light on this. Did they actually define drinking, smoking and jumping out of a plane, etc. as hunter-gatherer-type risks? Because that makes no sense to me.

[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Then why didn't you just link the study instead?

Because I didn't need to. You just launched your criticism without realizing the study was legit.

I didn't actually buy the study lol so maybe you can shed some light on this. Did they actually define drinking, smoking and jumping out of a plane, etc. as hunter-gatherer-type risks? Because that makes no sense to me.

Probably not. But it does point to the fact that women like men who are protectors and will risk their lives to be so. It would explain the fetish for cops, first responders, etc., and why cubicle dwelling workers are among the least sexiest class of men for the average woman.

[–]carpetfoodie 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Life is so easy when you replace the word men with chad when women talk about dating.

I want a kind and caring man = i want a kind and caring Chad. Not a sub5 who is kind and caring

[–]hutavan 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Good observation.

I was thinking of calling this phenomenon "Chad of the gaps" (like "god of the gaps" for christcucks)

Whenever there's a gap in women's reasoning, just insert Chad instead of "man" and the statement will start to make sense 99% of the time.

Example:

"I like shy and dorky men"

-doesn't make sense. Let's apply "COG" and see if it makes sense

"I like shy and dorky Chads"

-suddenly this statement makes a lot of sense

[–]carpetfoodie 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup, it made so much stuff clear

[–]no_bling_just_dingself-aware MSTOW / i like my pill the way i like my coffee 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

this explains my convos with some of the women i find online

[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Muh soggy kneez! You will be burned at the stake for this heresy! :P

[–]puririnpa 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

it feels like america's problem is they reward animalistic, primitive men for fucking middle to high class women instead of having some sense of classism.

[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Classism is real, the problem is men like Donald Trump can have 3 wives in a row while working class men struggle to find even one.

[–]Latterfootstone1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

It's morally and spiritually bad for both. Only the most ruthless, manipulative, and sexually volatile win the casual dating game.

Also, what's with the preview icon being a BMWF relationship?

[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You know, I didn't see that BMWF icon. I'm not sure where that fits into the story.

[–]puririnpa 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

i tell everyone that black men are privileged in the west here, but i'm the only high iq user here, non-black ethnics here will rather suck off bbc than to realize the reason they are cucked is because of high amount of bmwf.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter