~ archived since 2018 ~

Women in twox finally admitted that short men are discriminated

March 14, 2023
post image

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/AllPillDebate.

/r/AllPillDebate archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Women in twox finally admitted that short men are discriminated
Author lv-_-lv
Upvotes 14
Comments 24
Date March 14, 2023 6:25 PM UTC (2 weeks ago)
Subreddit /r/AllPillDebate
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/AllPillDebate/women-in-twox-finally-admitted-that-short-men-are.1176850
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/AllPillDebate/comments/11re3yc/women_in_twox_finally_admitted_that_short_men_are/

[–]FortniteAbobusWhitePill 13 points14 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

Slowly soyciety accepts blackpill.

[–]TelephonicRugPeddler 7 points8 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

Most people are open to the conversation, it’s only Le Reddit Simps automatically go into soymode when you bring up empirical data around men’s height

[–]Last-Post2085BlackPill 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

it’s only Le Reddit Simps automatically go into soymode when you bring up empirical data around men’s height

And then bring up some stupid anecdotal evidence


Like shut up man and stop bringing up stupid things that happen 1/100000

[–]MiamiSunrise12 0 points1 point  (13 children) | Copy Link

Height is a factor, but let not pretend that short guys never get laid either. If they didn’t short men would not exist

[–]TelephonicRugPeddler 0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

1) the shortest ones often don’t “get laid”, they are lucky to ever get married/find a single LTR in their life which I wouldn’t consider “getting laid”, ultimately they end up settling

2) there’s never been a time like currently where birth rates are at ATL and hypergamy an ATH. In the next 40 years we are going to see an explosion of short(er) men not reproducing

So yes, I will say short men do not “get laid”, although a non-insignificant % can eventually find a single woman to settle down with long term. Getting laid means you have a decent stream of relationships and sexual encounters throughout your life time, not that you find 1 woman when you’re 32 and marry her.

[–]MiamiSunrise12 0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

  1. So you’re going to tell me that unless a man is above average height that they can’t have casual sex?

  2. Not unless those short men have something else to offer. If a man is short, but has nice smile and a great job he can still get married. There are plenty of short men with status (Kevin Hart) who are drowning in ladies.

Also, it might be worth considering that it’s beneficial for the human race in the long run if short men didn’t reproduce. If chads went around fucking more girls the average attractiveness of the population would increase substantially

[–]TelephonicRugPeddler 0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

  1. No. Average men height can get it, but they’ll always have to try 50x harder for 10% of the results of a tall guy, even with a better face/body. Also, yes, for actually short men, they can’t have casual sex.

  2. Yes, he can get married, eventually, and that marriage will likely be his only relationship in life. Short men are denied the ability to “test the waters” or match for compatibility - they have to jump at the first woman who shows them attention.

Not really. If the average height increases then the old average just becomes short and the old tall just becomes average. Women are hypergamous and select based off of men’s status relative to other men.

For some reason “just be a multi-millionaire comedian and A-list celebrity” isn’t solid advice for short guys, sorry, so your example means nothing to 99.9% of short men. Also, you have no proof that Kevin Hart “gets laid”.

[–]MiamiSunrise12 0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

  1. Women don’t know the difference between 5’11 or 6” there is no data to supposed that they do. So long as she can wear heals and the guy is taller than her, everything is fine. If a 5’3” girl wears 3 inch heals she’s 5’6”. Meanwhile the averse guy is 5’9” so there’s no problem. If a guy is shorter, than he he just has to go after women slightly shorter.

  2. See point #1, men below average height can have causal sex in tinder or one night stands in bars. Obviously I used Kevin hart as an example, but that doesn’t mean that other men below average height can’t get laid. I recently went to a swingers club and a guy whose 5’6” or 5’7” participated in a couple swap.

  3. Men can definitely be too tall for women. Most women would rather date someone 5’11” than 6’4”. Sure the average height might increase over time, but again most women only want men 6-7 inches taller. So the more tall men that reproduce the more tall men there will be since women in average end up being shorter…even if they have a tall dad.

[–]TelephonicRugPeddler 0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

  1. That’s ideal but not true, 85% or something crazy of women exclude guys who are 5’6 and below. Something like 70% exclude the average height, 5’9. Also, this does nothing for short guys, who we are talking about, who are often shorter than 50% of women and excluded by 99%+ of them.

  2. No, a short guy gets heightmogged at a club and destroyed on Tinder. If you’re saying “but it’s possible” then sure, it’s also possible I win the lottery tomorrow. That doesn’t mean anything for 99.99% of encounters.

  3. Actually most women want men at a specific height they can quantify, just about 5’10+, minimum. The other women simply aren’t able to lock down these taller men (since they account for 10-15% of men) and so settle for shorter men eventually. But it’s just that, settling. Additionally, if the average height of men goes up so does the average height of women, very likely proportionately, so again the old average becomes short and the old short becomes average.

[–]MiamiSunrise12 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

  1. The average height for a guy is 5’9”. The same logic applies if he’s 5’8”, 5’7”…5’5”….etc. 5’5” is already like bottom 10% for male height. Also source that 70% of women reject men who are 5’9”? The human race Luke reproduce if they did.

  2. You just conveniently ignored the real life example of the short dude at a swingers club I saw participate in a couple swap and get laid. I’m not saying that shorter men don’t have a tougher time time dating, but it’s probably because they’re going after girls that are too tall for them. Ex: a 5’7” should prioritize a 5’2”. Girl rather than someone 5’5”. The problem here is that there are less short girls just like there are less short men so it’s harder for them to find their match.

  3. True, but like I said the average height for women will go up much more slowly then for men. So it still ends up being beneficially. Also too tall is a thing, just because short men don’t reproduce doesn’t mean that all the super men should. If chads between 6’ and 6’3” started having multiple women but the 6’4” men don’t then you can control the average height

[–]TelephonicRugPeddler 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

  1. Got the numbers wrong - 65% of women will “accept” a man that is 5’9, average height. 25% will “accept” a 5’6 man. 10% will “accept” a 5’4 man.

We get into short territory at 5’6, and 75% of women will exclude them at that height, 90% 2 inches shorter. And that’s self-reported so includes their standard virtue signaling.

Regardless, I said a short guy can find someone, eventually, but they won’t have the option of choice and will have to try to lock down the first woman who gives them attention.

  1. I don’t care for the behaviors of a swinger dude…that’s peak degeneracy and says nothing about normal society or people who aren’t involved in that stuff. Also, short women still exclude short men in general let alone for casual sex.

  2. There’s no basis to assume that men’s height will increase faster. And if women’s height are increasing as well then “too tall” also goes up. There will always be variations in the human body size and so there will always be discrimination against men who aren’t as tall as other men, it is always relative.

[–]l00ks-p1lled 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes but talking about height is not enough because it's a numerical measurable quantity. We need to talk about facial features more

[–]Rammspieler 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Society has always spoken and tacitly accpeted the blackpill. It's just that when an inkwell says it that it is totally bogus.

[–]crypto_druid 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Girl on Reddit said, must be true

[–]zastale 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Must be Opposite Day.

[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh shit, Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Trust no one, especially your neighbors!

[–]red__hulkcerified male advisor 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Even a broken clock... well you know the saying

[–]Eyesofmalice 0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

Height is not an isolated factor, height is also tied to certain nationalities and backgrounds. If that study accounted for race, chances are they’d find taller whites make the most money.

[–]kurumon24 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

by nationality, indian-americans or other asian-americans make the most money: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_groups_in_the_United_States_by_household_income

height is dependant more on diet than race,you can say that kids whose parents are well off are taller on average, china and korea had the most drmaatic avg height increase by far this decade because their economy rapidly increased.

[–]Eyesofmalice 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

On average, sure. The ideal however is heavily westernized. Diet is hugely tied to income. Which is influenced by social factors historically determined such as race .

[–]kurumon24 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

in either case, i'm just correcting that it's asian-americans who make the most money on average.

it might not be westernized in a few gens, asian countries are sprouting up while european/america is wither stagnating or getting shorter on average.

[–]Eyesofmalice 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link


You forgot to factor in the conditions under which people migrate to the us, and the migratory system. People don’t just show up in the us.

[–]kurumon24 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

highly educated migrants are choosen, which explains why they make more money than whites on average.

[–]Eyesofmalice 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You might be into something

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter