Carl hte ccuk approves.

It's standard issue of the "left" or to put it in a more precise les esoteric term progressives, We deal with theoretical, what ifs?; This leads to a lack of concrete, shared goal where as conservatives already have something in existence. Conservatives don't have as much multilateralism to contend with. This is kind of good as not all change is positive.

Though not everything should stay as it is, particularly since our environment doesn't stay the same. This leads to traditional policies that conservatives cling to that no longer fit the functions they were designed for.

As far as actual progress, I'm getting the impression that even "intelligent" people are too stupid. We are so self-centered to the point that we often get stuck into these win-lose mentalities when we've gotten to the point that, that isn't how society has to work. We are caught up in this nasty negative feedback loop.

Concentration of wealth, expansion of federal/globalist powers, Monopoly/trusts by plutocrats. Feminism is certainly a convenient excuse. They seek to subordinate and disempower normal men, claiming to protect women and various other groups; When in the end it's the sum of various individuals and groups attempting to deepen their personal pockets regardless of external costs.

Illuminati conspiracy theories are frighteningly accurate, though the difficulty is that it isn't just one or even a few groups that are pulling puppet strings, so much as humans inability to deal with the issues of a necessary evil; hierarchy. We are not omniscient nor omnipotent, therefore we all have to chose priorities and outcomes depend on the sum of the skillsets involved.

Yet the issue is the other side of the coin, People are not always truthful about why nor what they are doing. People who climb chains of hierarchies tend to be the most skilled types of people that you least want to be in charge. Directly wanting power for powers sake is an indication that you are not the one who deserves it, however your also the type of person to most likely gain power. Though it isn't exactly a given so the probabilities depend on the question asked. Most will who try will fail and be unsuccessful, however they will make up the majority of the minority that are successful.

Feminism in and of itself is so vague and as a social group is self-selective that it effectively means little in and of itself outside of the actions done in the name of the group; However feminism while a part of the problem is more of a "problematic" factor in something that likely has thousands, if not millions, perhaps even more then that, factors to be contended with. This can lead to a misunderstanding of the severity of, what is ~1% of the problem, when your dealing with a thousand factors, that's 10X the amount evenly spread probabilities.

We too often fight fire with fire, using the excuse of the fire we used is someone else problem tomorrow. Then our fire is fought with another fire, and we respond with a fire, little thought is given to how we often perpetuate our own miseries in our existences.