Cool skeleton says men's rights

Personally, I heard three arguments that condemn such abortions:

1. Women potentially pretending to be suicidal due to their pregnancy, in order to get permission for abortion from a psychiatrist, which would allow them to end their child's life.

2. There could be misdiagnoses, which would result in killing the unborn child when both them and the mother could have been saved.

3. If a mother agrees to have sex, she agrees to risk dying in childbirth or because of complications with her potential pregnancy.

They, however, can be debunked:

1. In cases where women claim to need an abortion due to suicidal thoughts caused by the pregnancy, they could be granted the abortion, however, once the child is killed, the mother would be obligated to undergo at least 3 months of treatment in a psychiatric ward for her mental health issues. That would prevent future abortions due to her mental condition, since they'd undergo treatment for it, while weeding out women that want to use a loophole to kill their child out of convenience.

2 and 3. If the mother dies, the unborn child will die with her. Therefore, it's "better" if, say, one misdiagnosed pregnancy is terminated and 101 children are sacrificed in order to save their mothers (if they choose to do so, of course. Nobody should ever be obligated to undergo an abortion), than if 100 children and 100 mothers (almost twice as many people) die suffering, and one mother and her child lives.