It occurs to me that it is our place as antifeminists to start developing smart clean ways to discuss uncomfortable phenomena that for feminism is simple impossible to discuss, such as for example the phenomena of ''hypergamy'' tendency that women appear to have much more than men do.
And i think is proper for this role in our movement to be lead primarily by antifeminsit women themselves, to set the antifeminist golden standars on what is actually acceptable or just actual real misoginy.
So for example what do antifeminist women think about the phenomena of hypergamy, is it real, is it ok to discuss it, what is the explanation for it, what is its nuance in your view, and most importantly, what is the proper way to talk about it without you feeling attacked or offended as a woman?
Why do i think phenomena like this example are important to discuss in the first place?
Because this kind of phenomena can explain what happens in the real world, for example the supposedly ''wage gap'' falacy comes from the men collective as a whole earning (by merit) more sum of money than the women collective.
Hypergamy can explain this pointing to the higher pressure men are under to perform and earn more money to be succesfull at attracting women, is a very strong incentive that men have to put more effort into making money, therefore the men collective ends up earning a bigger sum of money as a whole.
Feminism would never be able to reach a conclusion like this because is impossible for it to even discuss the phenomena or anything that can remotly in any way correctly or wrongly be associated with anything negative about women, and therfore ends up always concluding that everything must inevitably be mens fault across the board.