Study of n=738 psychiatric hospital outpatients, finds those high in Cluster-B personality traits(i.e Borderline, Narcissism, Antisocial personality disorders) report 3.5x more sexual partners and 39% more offspring then those low in such traits. (Gutiérrez et al. 2013)

Was the study also implying females judging the same way?

Yeah the abstract was worded using male pronouns, due to the age of the study.

They found:

The correlation between liking of the date and evaluation of the date's physical attractiveness is .78 for male subjects and .69 for female subjects.

Others variables recorded like self-esteem, popularity, nervousness and academic success weren't found to be significantly correlated with the female date's liking of the men.

Also 1966 is a very old study. I would if the measures would be similar today.

Would indeed be interesting to see a more recent follow up study using a similar methodology, as opposed to the usual speed-dating format used for these studies.

The taller, buffer men of a social circle group will have first access to potential mating choices with females due to dominance physically and socially. That is contextual in a bar type of setting.

Likely, but such studies also suffer from a potential selection bias where particularly sexually unsuccessful males may be less inclined to participate due to fears of negative judgement or self-consciousness, and they do rely on self-reports of sexual partner count (which more dominant males possibly are more likely to inflate.)

So the argument is that these traits, through the brain chemistry article I gave, allow these men to have greater activity levels and less inhibition. You can then argue that they have more sexual partners due to the sheer effort they put in. They meet more women with little to no remorse, regardless of any literal or theoretical shit-test.

Yep, the dark triad or anti-social traits doesn't necessarily have to be directly be sexually attractive to women for it to result in a greater number of sexual partners. There are trait rating studies where women do admit to being attracted to such personality profiles in men, however.

It could also be that the opposite traits exhibited (higher empathy, higher inhibition) are also unattractive to many women (the whole 'nice guy' argument), possibly because they are seen as effeminate.

My argument then relates to social dominance where women don't judge based of looks but more the contextual alpha male.

Yes, there is plenty of evidence that men with higher levels of contextual status also have more sexual partners. This isn't necessarily completely separate from effects of looks however, looks have also found to be significantly correlated with other assessed male peer status.

Being the top guy in a gang is a good example of social dominance.

This doesn't only apply in poorer societies though, a study conducted in the U.S found that gang members had higher numbers of sexual partners than comparable age males that weren't gang members, with the gang leaders by far reporting the most partners.

Two gang leaders […] reported 11 and 10 partners, respectively, [within the last 90 days] […]